Home Contact Us

Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

not in MY spellcheck, it isn't, and it is Stedman's.

Posted By: no name on 2006-09-27
In Reply to: "wise" is actually a suffix and perfectly...sm - casey

Subject: not in MY spellcheck, it isn't, and it is Stedman's.

I will not use it either. I do not think it is professional looking and if I was still going through training, it would not be acceptable to the school either. but my Stedman's spellcheck will not accept it, either.

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

how do you transcribe this?? - mac
- "wise" is actually a suffix and perfectly...sm - casey
  - In my spellcheck it is written as cardiac wise -- two words; no hypen. - most recent Stedman's downloadable version
    - I would not do that either...sm - nn
    - Wow!! that is different. I would not do that. nm - mac
  - not in MY spellcheck, it isn't, and it is Stedman's. - no name
    - Interesting...it is in mine but mine is older..can't argue with Webster though...nm - casey
      - nope...don't want to either...again, just a matter of preference.nm - NN
- see message - no name
  - "In regards to" is not correct grammar. SM - Nona
    - You forgot to point out "alot" isn't, either, LOL. (nm) - Me
      - and in my reports...I put....sm - no name
  - depends on whether or not it's a verbatim acct - client preference-verbatim account?...nm
    - no,not verbatim. if it were, i would type it verbatim. nm - mac
  - so would you put... - mac
    - see message - no name
      - sounds good....thanks (nm) - mac

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database

which Stedman's..?? spellcheck likes either
Subject: which Stedman's..?? spellcheck likes either

Stedman's spellcheck was updated in 2002 by
Subject: Stedman's spellcheck was updated in 2002 by

Barb G and if Barb says it is effect it IS effect! The 2002 and 2003 Stedman spellcheck is more accurate than any of their printed or electronic dictionary versions.
d~

Spellcheck
Subject: Spellcheck

If you are using a medical spellchecker program, I don't know why you would use MS word to spell check anything. the spellchecker program runs in the background and underlines everything in red that is misspelled. so much easier than having to do a spell check on every document! just a suggestion.

Both spellcheck, but - sm
Subject: Both spellcheck, but - sm

Nonobstructing spell checks but I always hyphenate it as I think it looks better and is clearer. Just my opinion.

*always - also spellcheck is not always right.
Subject: *always - also spellcheck is not always right.

x

I actually noticed when my spellcheck got it..
Subject: I actually noticed when my spellcheck got it..

Caught that w/ spellcheck afterwards ;) Thanks though.
Subject: Caught that w/ spellcheck afterwards ;) Thanks though.

use spellcheck to your advantage
Subject: use spellcheck to your advantage

If your spellcheck checks for capitalization (like Word), you can just type the med in lower case, and it will mark it as wrong if it needs to be capitalized. You can then put the ones that need to be capitalized into autocorrect so you don't have to memorize brand names.

Thanks. Just checked by spellcheck
Subject: Thanks. Just checked by spellcheck

and fiducials came up.

TY. Spellcheck didn't like it.
Subject: TY. Spellcheck didn't like it.

.

My med spellcheck did not like this word
Subject: My med spellcheck did not like this word

thanks, found the extra "n" once I did spellcheck...nm
Subject: thanks, found the extra "n" once I did spellcheck...nm

word's spellcheck/grammar is not always right...
Subject: word's spellcheck/grammar is not always right...

i have come across that many, many times even with stedmans.

when all else fails with stedmans/word, grab webster.

My spellcheck says Thiersch-Duplay
Subject: My spellcheck says Thiersch-Duplay

and did find Thiersch in surgical word book. See cannot always go by the docs spelling.

my spellcheck comes up with carbo Taxol
Subject: my spellcheck comes up with carbo Taxol

yes, carboplatin is not trade. Then my Pharmaceutical Drug Book has it as Carbo-Tax. Go figure.
I think I will make it the carbo Taxol as in my spellcheck.

Thanks to both of you.

That's what I thought - then I ran a spellcheck, but I'm sure that's what I'm hearing.
Subject: That's what I thought - then I ran a spellcheck, but I'm sure that's what I'm hearing.

nm

Dorland's spellcheck shows it ceruminotic nm
Subject: Dorland's spellcheck shows it ceruminotic nm

x

Question regarding Microsoft Word Spellcheck sm
Subject: Question regarding Microsoft Word Spellcheck sm

After completing the typing in a Microsoft Word document, I do a spell check. When the spell check is complete, and I have to hit okay, it makes a really, really loud DING, and because I am using ExpressScribe and have to have the volume up on my headphones, it is really causing me problems with how loud the DING is, as it either scares the heck out of me or I also believe it is giving me a headache. So, I have to take my headphones off while doing the spellcheck, so I'm not deaf by the end of the day. I was wondering if anyone knew how to turn off the DING. I would be so appreciative!

my medical spellcheck has mica, not mico
Subject: my medical spellcheck has mica, not mico

Before spellcheck and expanders, we LEARNED the difference!
Subject: Before spellcheck and expanders, we LEARNED the difference!

x

I did find it with Google, but spellcheck doesn't recognize.
Subject: I did find it with Google, but spellcheck doesn't recognize.

I have Stedman medical & surgical equipment and words and find that out of my Stedman books (have 4
Subject: I have Stedman medical & surgical equipment and words and find that out of my Stedman books (have 4 others) this is the one I use the most. Just my preference.

In my spellcheck it is written as cardiac wise -- two words; no hypen.
Subject: In my spellcheck it is written as cardiac wise -- two words; no hypen.

Hi, Tracy, Stedman's had "postinflammatory", but I have seen it without, I go with Stedman!
Subject: Hi, Tracy, Stedman's had "postinflammatory", but I have seen it without, I go with Stedman! NM

nm

Thanks, I came close in my guesses but not close enough for spellcheck to offer a suggestion!
Subject: Thanks, I came close in my guesses but not close enough for spellcheck to offer a suggestion!

don't have a Stedman's, but thanks anyway. :(
Subject: don't have a Stedman's, but thanks anyway. :(

x

Per Stedman's Ob-Gyn
Subject: Per Stedman's Ob-Gyn

Tucker-McLane forceps.

It's in Stedman's
Subject: It's in Stedman's

Omni flush

according to Stedman's...
Subject: according to Stedman's...

mucous cyst: A retention cyst resulting from obstruction in the duct of a mucous gland.

Syn: mucocele: A retention cyst of the salivary gland, lacrimal sac, paranasal sinuses, appendix, gallbladder, or other site.

According to Stedman's
Subject: According to Stedman's

nephrolithiasis (nefr-li-th-sis)

Presence of renal calculi.

Not the calculus itself - the presence of renal calculi.

Well, now I see it in my Stedman's
Subject: Well, now I see it in my Stedman's

and it is Kantor-Berci video laryngoscope. Never heard of it before.

stedman's
Subject: stedman's

Physic - A medicine; often a lay term for a cathartic.

Catharsis - purgation

purgation - Evacuation of the bowels with the aid of a purgative or cathartic

Used Stedman's
Subject: Used Stedman's

I'd really recommend getting a Stedman's. I started doing Ophthalmology about a year ago and it was a life saver for me! I bought a used copy on eBay. Just took a quick peek there and saw one for under $5. Totally worth it! Good luck!!

RSR according to Stedman's . .
Subject: RSR according to Stedman's . .

cardiology, but have also seen rSR in other places.

According to Stedman's
Subject: According to Stedman's

There is a Sims position. No Dutch though....

Neither, my Stedman's ..
Subject: Neither, my Stedman's ..

Equipment Book says MediPort.

Per Stedman's, m/sec or m/s (nm).
Subject: Per Stedman's, m/sec or m/s (nm).

xx

Per Stedman's - either way.
Subject: Per Stedman's - either way.

x

According to Stedman's...
Subject: According to Stedman's...

Mental retardation is a valid medical term, according to Stedman's. Could you please tell me exactly what medical reference you have used to determine that it is no longer acceptable? By the way, we are not political transcriptionists, we are medical transcriptionists!

Per my Stedman's, MU...sm
Subject: Per my Stedman's, MU...sm

but my Quick Look Drug Book spells out *million units* when describing penicillin dosing (mg, g for other drug). Not sure if there is a preference.

It's in Stedman's.
Subject: It's in Stedman's.

Per Stedman's there is a
Subject: Per Stedman's there is a

Thumper 1007 CPR system. Don't know if this fits or not.

i don't have stedman's but... sm
Subject: i don't have stedman's but... sm

i believe it's an "e"...styloideum (not to be confused with stylidium)

Per Stedman's GI
Subject: Per Stedman's GI

they have "caput medusae." Please not it is the plural medusae, not singular medusa. It is when dilated veins are seen on the abdomen (simple explanation). HTH!

Per Stedman's
Subject: Per Stedman's

M:E ratio

Stedman's.
Subject: Stedman's.

x

Thank you very much!!! My Stedman's GU is too old I guess. nm
x

stedman's abbrev
Subject: stedman's abbrev

capitalizes the IU part,

Thanks so much. That is not even in stedman's and I indeed was far off in the spelling!
Subject: Thanks so much. That is not even in stedman's and I indeed was far off in the spelling!

epilolic stedman GI//GU 2nd nm
Subject: epilolic stedman GI//GU 2nd nm

not to be rude but Stedman's has been....sm
Subject: not to be rude but Stedman's has been....sm

Not to be rude - it IS coffee grounds that one can vomit and when used as a noun, but when it's used as an adjective, it is coffee-ground emesis....I suppose it could be an either-or so I'm not giving anyone an argument. Just have seen Stedman's be wrong on many occasions and I don't use Stedmans as a result.

To each his/her own....

additional info:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emesis

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/505474_print

coffee-ground emesis is old blood in the vomitus, coffee-ground vomitus.