Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

It's a 'per the facility' issue as both are acceptable. Just use what QA says to keep them

Posted By: wanderer on 2006-05-23
In Reply to: when referring to the spine is it disk or disc? Also is it 3 mm or 3mm - Kat

Subject: It's a 'per the facility' issue as both are acceptable. Just use what QA says to keep them happy. nm

s


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

I would not unless there is a name to the facility such as Jones Hospital Urgent Care Facility but g
Subject: I would not unless there is a name to the facility such as Jones Hospital Urgent Care Facility but go by the client profile if you can for that report.


I would type 5-pack/year smoking history..slash stands for 'per'..nm
Subject: I would type 5-pack/year smoking history..slash stands for 'per'..nm

nm
This is not a BOS issue ...
Subject: This is not a BOS issue ...

... where there are mistakes, but an English grammar issue. Since most companies use the BOS as a guide, though, if QA says to do it with "was" unless you want to get points off, use "was."

In English, if you have a plural (5 mL) expressing measurement, quantity, etc., that plural subject is considered a single unit, not 5 separate mL.

The grammar link you provided was a different thing entirely. It was talking about "each" I believe. I really didn't get how that applied, but maybe I missed something.

Just trying to help out.
alm is right, skilled nursing facility, as in a short stay in a skilled nursing facility
Subject: alm is right, skilled nursing facility, as in a short stay in a skilled nursing facility


It's a "preference" issue (sm)
Subject: It's a "preference" issue (sm)

In Dorland's, "venostasis" gives you "venous stasis" as a definition. It refers you to another term, rather than just giving you the definition right there, which is an indication that Dorland's finds venous stasis preferable to venostasis, although it allows that they mean the same thing.

Stedman's entry for venostasis simply gives you a synonym, which is "phlebostasis." Upon looking that up, you find two definitions. First, slow motion of blood in veins, as you were using it. Second, treatment of CHF by compressing proximal veins of the extremities with tourniquets. And, it says that venostasis is a synonym for phlebostasis.

Checking phlebostasis in Dorland's, we find those same two definitions, but no mention of venostasis as a synonym.

What does this mean? You and your QA person are both correct, but probably, she just thinks venostasis looks odd, because it kind of does look odd. Usually, you see it written as venous stasis and most people say it as venous stasis.

Venostasis isn't wrong, by far, but the fact that Dorland's tells you it's venous stasis communicates that venous stasis is the more expected form.

If you show her the dictionary entries, she'll kind of have to accept that you're correct, but that still won't make "venostasis" look any better. My concern would be that clients will think it is incorrect, causing them to focus on it unnecessarily. It's often best to go with a neutral choice that won't cause excitement.

My preference would be to use venous stasis for the abnormally slow movement of blood in veins.
current not an issue?
Subject: current not an issue?


ahh, it is a personal issue - then take it private!
Subject: ahh, it is a personal issue - then take it private!

XX
agree with you, but for a different reason on the ST issue
Subject: agree with you, but for a different reason on the ST issue

crashing. On the other hand, BOS says non is a word that in most cases does not need a hypen, so it does vary in many instances. Non can be combined with the word being used. Noncommental is an example, but there is no hyphenated statement following it.
Possible risk management issue
Subject: Possible risk management issue

I think the proper form would be to type it verbatim and then flag the report for possible risk management.
aaah, meant currently not an issue
Subject: aaah, meant currently not an issue


AAMT follows AMA's style guide on this issue
Subject: AAMT follows AMA's style guide on this issue

x
using mg for "Zofran 4 mg" isn't an issue, I just question it's dictated as
Subject: using mg for "Zofran 4 mg" isn't an issue, I just question it's dictated as

"4 mg of Zofran"
is this a shoulder issue? Could be "ends" as in tendon ends..sm
Subject: is this a shoulder issue? Could be "ends" as in tendon ends..sm

for example, as in a labral tear of the shoulder.
She has lost some weight, but she has been reading up on s/l “pekos”, and understands the issue with
Subject: She has lost some weight, but she has been reading up on s/l “pekos”, and understands the issue with


.........insulin resistance and problems with obesity and hyperlipidemia, as well as her elevated blood pressure and so she would like to go over issues with her diet today.


The patient has a diagnosis of polycystic ovarian syndrome with glucose intolerance.  Under the plan the doc again says, reviewed "pekos" in detail......


TIA!!!


It has been that way every facility I have
Subject: It has been that way every facility I have


Go by what YOUR QA says. They should know what the facility wants. (nm)
Subject: Go by what YOUR QA says. They should know what the facility wants. (nm)

x
Only if it is associated with the name of the facility, i.e.
Subject: Only if it is associated with the name of the facility, i.e.

Example Hospital Anesthesia Department, otherwise it should be in small letters.
Every facility is different in this. I have one
Subject: Every facility is different in this. I have one

who wants all caps, one who wants the heading then normal case, and one who wants it on a separate line, top of report, no matter were dictated. Need to check with specific client.
the facility or community as there....sm
Subject: the facility or community as there....sm

There is no such diet or anything so I tend to think this may be a nutritionist or dietician/dietitian in and around the facility or area where the dictator works from/around.  Just a wild guess actually.
Sure this is not the name of the facility performed at?
Subject: Sure this is not the name of the facility performed at?

MRI at Open Imaging of Redwood?
Inside or outside facility...
Subject: Inside or outside facility...

Senior Care Center

There are Specialty Care Centers.

Surgical Care Center.
You definitely do for a JCAHO facility.
Subject: You definitely do for a JCAHO facility.

Some accounts will not tell you but cc is a big no no on the Joint Commission "Do Not Use List" See site below.  Account I type for now, MTSO was/is not even aware.  They dictate cc but I change to ml and have not had a report come back yet.
STEL facility?
Subject: STEL facility?

Sentence: Nursing home placement was secured in a 's/l STEL' OR stell' facility.

Anybody know if this is an acronym and what it may stand for?
Could he be saying SNIF facility?
Subject: Could he be saying SNIF facility?

Skilled Nursing Inpatient Facility (Unit)...
If your facility follows BOS, or your MTSO
Subject: If your facility follows BOS, or your MTSO

follows BOS, it is followup. Why not contact your QA/supervisor for clarification to be sure on your end. One facility I work for wants followup, the other follow-up. Verify to be sure for your sake.
We ust Thromboguard at our facility,
Subject: We ust Thromboguard at our facility,

compression boots/stockings for DVT prophylaxis.
That is probably a facility preference. The
Subject: That is probably a facility preference. The

abbreviations you gave examples of are standard abbreviations still in use.
That is probably a facility preference. The
Subject: That is probably a facility preference. The

abbreviations you gave examples of are standard abbreviations still in use.
If the facility does not want it expanded,
Subject: If the facility does not want it expanded,

then you don't. Could be a specific rule of a particular client. If you are told not to, then don't.
It's probably facility specific
Subject: It's probably facility specific

It's possible this is the name of a facility or something that is specific to the account you're typing. You might see if the hospital has a web page and go there and look under services/programs, and see if there is a TLC listed there.

It really could be anything. My first thought was transitional long-term care, but given that they're on pressors, that's usually not the kind of drug they send you to a SNF with.
It is probably SNF (skilled nursing facility).
Subject: It is probably SNF (skilled nursing facility).

nm
it may depend on a facility rule
Subject: it may depend on a facility rule

our facility requires a hyphen for any statement of __ to__ so for us it would "x4-5" days.
Check with your TL on the specifics of the facility.
Subject: Check with your TL on the specifics of the facility.

Most hospitals I have worked with prefer cm2. 


It's probably something specific to that hospital/facility. Ask your QA or Google the
Subject: It's probably something specific to that hospital/facility. Ask your QA or Google the

s
Need more info. What's located on the 4th floor of the facility? nm
Subject: Need more info. What's located on the 4th floor of the facility? nm

s
The facility may have it's own stock or normal regimen that they
Subject: The facility may have it's own stock or normal regimen that they

s
should urgent care facility be capitalized
Subject: should urgent care facility be capitalized


A thought, wonder if it's the name of the unit, like facility slang
Subject: A thought, wonder if it's the name of the unit, like facility slang

just a thought
maybe normal values/ranges for this facility? nm
Subject: maybe normal values/ranges for this facility? nm

nm
Seems to be a facility, what state or town is the report in?
Subject: Seems to be a facility, what state or town is the report in?


googled acox tuberculosis facility,
Subject: googled acox tuberculosis facility,

On a Cox regression model, distance from home to treatment centre (hazard .... in the TB clinics of the respective health facilities provided treatment, ...

Sorry, but either is acceptable
nm
either way is acceptable ....
Subject: either way is acceptable ....

AAMT prefers not making name possessive but a possessive form is acceptable if dictated or prefered by doctor. If it sounds better I would use 'S.
Yes, it is acceptable.
Subject: Yes, it is acceptable.

x
Both are acceptable and..
Subject: Both are acceptable and..

this account wants the "k". Thx
perhaps both are acceptable--sm
Subject: perhaps both are acceptable--sm

Caesarean section
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Caesarian section)
Jump to: navigation, search
A caesarean section (AE cesarean section), or c-section, is a form of childbirth in which a surgical incision is made through a mother's abdomen (laparotomy) and uterus (hysterotomy) to deliver one or more babies. It is usually performed when a vaginal delivery would put the baby's or mother's life at risk, although in the last decade it has been performed upon request.


q.a.c. is acceptable.....
Subject: q.a.c. is acceptable.....


acceptable
Subject: acceptable


I would think 3 in 1 or 3-in-1 are both acceptable
Subject: I would think 3 in 1 or 3-in-1 are both acceptable


Per BOS, this is acceptable but not
Subject: Per BOS, this is acceptable but not

preferred unless specifically indicated by the client.  If not specified on account specifics, I would adhere to the BOS recommendations.
Either way is acceptable...
Subject: Either way is acceptable...

Use whatever your account prefers.