Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

LOL. Thanks! And may your decimals all be

Posted By: in the right places. (nm) Michael Bolton on 2006-02-11
In Reply to: Now here is a answer with proper research! - Milton's Red Stapler

Subject: LOL. Thanks! And may your decimals all be

:)


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

DECIMALS
Subject: DECIMALS

Hi, I have been doing this forever and have always used decimals when doing weights. I used to be an RN and that is the way I was taught. In an ancient text I have it says that is accepted practice to use this. I have seen it both ways and have found it easier to type 175.5 pounds than 175 1/2 pounds. In another less ancient, but still ancient text I found that if you type 175-1/2 pounds you insert an hyphen before the fraction. So, since I am lazy unless they beat it out of me, I will continue to type it 175.5 pounds. It is for decimal system, but 0.5 is still the same as one-half. Right? It is easier to read too. What I want to know is why do they have to try to fix things that are not broken all the time? Some of the things they have changed for the better don't look so good to me. Maybe it is time to retire? What would I do if I couldn't type? Sigh. Sleep, go on trips, go to the movies, sew something, surf the internet, play with grandchildren, bake cookies?
decimals for metric so the 1.25 way
Subject: decimals for metric so the 1.25 way

x
Call me crazy, but I thought decimals were only for
Subject: Call me crazy, but I thought decimals were only for

the metric system, which pounds are not.  So, it would be 175-1/2 pounds.  I can't find it in BOS either and I've looked up everything I can think of to support my theory. 
i use decimals for metric numbers: 0.25 kg but 1/4 pound NM
Subject: i use decimals for metric numbers: 0.25 kg but 1/4 pound NM

nm
I thought you used decimals for metric and fractions for standard...
Subject: I thought you used decimals for metric and fractions for standard...

and I think you need another decimal place

0.0038-inch-diameter
or
1/38,000-inch-diameter (but this = 0.0000263)

and now I really have a headache!