Sorry that would be 06/30/2006

Posted By: FT MT on 2006-06-30
In Reply to: I have been told to type the dates out - FT MT

Subject: Sorry that would be 06/30/2006

nm

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

I have a question about numerals in a report (sm) - quietmoods
- Thanks, that makes me think of another question (sm) - quietmoods
  - For your first question, yes, numbers are sm - nm
  - I have been told to type the dates out - FT MT
    - Sorry that would be 06/30/2006 - FT MT
      - I work for 2 nationalsm, one FT, one PT, and have 8 (sm) - quietmoods
- Yes, numbers not spelled out anymore - FT MT
  - things are changing sm - mmm
    - AAMT is not to blame here (for a change). sm - nm
    - Probably AAMT's benefit. - FT MT
      - Not only that but.... - Happy MT
- Sure did, along with using numbers for all ages now, not just 10 and over. nm - wanderer
  - It's because they want to pay less. Numerals are shorter than writing out. - NM

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database

my saunders, 2006, says
Subject: my saunders, 2006, says

Altocor changed to
Altoprev in 2004.

maybe even in February (or March) of 2006? nm
Subject: maybe even in February (or March) of 2006? nm

s

The Dupuytren's contracture, which was s/l 15 15 on April 7, 2006 now has....
Subject: The Dupuytren's contracture, which was s/l 15 15 on April 7, 2006 now has....

severely affected the right little finger. MP 44, PIP 71.

Just curious how I would write the "15 15" 15/15 15:15. Not too familiar with this.

Thanks guys!!!

Parcopa RapiTab -Saunders Pharmaceutical Word Bood 2006 (nm)
Subject: Parcopa RapiTab -Saunders Pharmaceutical Word Bood 2006 (nm)

x

Rhuli spray from Saunders Pharm word book 2006
Subject: Rhuli spray from Saunders Pharm word book 2006

.

The patient has had an abdominal CT scan in January 2006 which showed significant intra- and extra b
Subject: The patient has had an abdominal CT scan in January 2006 which showed significant intra- and extra b

The patient has had an abdominal CT scan in January 2006 which showed significant intra- and extra biliary tree dilatation, but this was unchanged from a previous scan of 2003.

I am specifically wondering about the hypen after intra. Thanks.

not in the 2006 Drake and Drake, either. Hmmm....nm
Subject: not in the 2006 Drake and Drake, either. Hmmm....nm

s

normal Pap smear in there anywhere? Normal Pap in 2006?nm
Subject: normal Pap smear in there anywhere? Normal Pap in 2006?nm