Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

I have a question about numerals in a report (sm)

Posted By: quietmoods on 2006-06-30
In Reply to:

Subject: I have a question about numerals in a report (sm)

I have an old copy of AAMT BOS (copyright 1995) and QA sent me something like the below.  "He is to follow up with me for post hospitalization follow up within "1 to 2 weeks" after discharge."  I had originally transcribed it as "one to two weeks."  He goes on to state "Per AAMT BOS, use numerals almost exclusively, rather than spelling out the numbers."  Did that change in the new newer book?  TIA


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

use numerals only, not to be spelled out
Subject: use numerals only, not to be spelled out

according to BOS2..........
BOS now says numerals preferred, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc. nm
Subject: BOS now says numerals preferred, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc. nm

.
Have always seen it as Roman numerals. nm
Subject: Have always seen it as Roman numerals. nm


Used to be roman numerals, now it is 2/6.
Subject: Used to be roman numerals, now it is 2/6.

NP does not know transcription rules.
Arabic numerals.
Subject: Arabic numerals.

x
Roman numerals not used much today...nm
Subject: Roman numerals not used much today...nm

x
as I know it all stages are in roman numerals
Subject: as I know it all stages are in roman numerals


It's because they want to pay less. Numerals are shorter than writing out.
Subject: It's because they want to pay less. Numerals are shorter than writing out.


You're right. BOS says numerals with the exceptions sm
Subject: You're right. BOS says numerals with the exceptions sm

you mentioned plus when two numbers come together, such as

"The patient will take two 2-mg tablets per day."

You wouldn't transcribe it as "2 2-mg tablets."

I've always used Roman Numerals.
Subject: I've always used Roman Numerals.

A good example are Salter-Harris fracture values which are always Roman Numerals.


I believe the type is in Roman numerals II nm
Subject: I believe the type is in Roman numerals II nm

nm
For chondromalacia, what numerals are you referring to? Thanks
Subject: For chondromalacia, what numerals are you referring to? Thanks


it is probably 2, usually Arabic numerals w/grades, but that is JMO NM
Subject: it is probably 2, usually Arabic numerals w/grades, but that is JMO NM


Through Wheeless it would be Roman numerals.
Subject: Through Wheeless it would be Roman numerals.


When I started, it was Roman Numerals
Subject: When I started, it was Roman Numerals

That was 30 years ago. Now they prefer Arabic numerals. I was rather disappointed; it was one of the few times you could trot out Roman numerals!

Roman numerals for stages are used
Subject: Roman numerals for stages are used

only for cancer the majority of the time. There are some exceptions, but the majority of the time it is roman numerals. For example, kidney disease is arabic, fractures are arabic. If it is not associated with cancer then it is more than likely arabic. You can always look it up and tell which is which, which is BOS2 suggests.
Certain conditions, etc. still use roman numerals
Subject: Certain conditions, etc. still use roman numerals

x
Use arabic numerals for all numbers.
Subject: Use arabic numerals for all numbers.

The current standard in transcription is to use arabic numerals (1, 2, 3...)for all numbers, even under the number 10, because they stand out on the page and are less likely to be overlooked or misinterpreted.
(BOS 3rd)
Factors are written in roman numerals
Subject: Factors are written in roman numerals

I found this on google and in Vera Pyle's Current Medical Terminology. This is a great book. I have found a lot in here.
grades are numerals, stages always Roman
Subject: grades are numerals, stages always Roman

stage II-A but I don't know anything about that little *y* you left there - so I'd give them a blank there.........


stages are always roman numerals and grades are always numbers


stage IV, grade 4


Hope this helps somewhat - I've been doing oncology for 20 years..........next year....but MT'g for much longer  *lol*


Schatzker II fracture (Roman numerals for this)
Subject: Schatzker II fracture (Roman numerals for this)

x
TIMI III (roman numerals) flow.......nm
Subject: TIMI III (roman numerals) flow.......nm

xx
Cranial nerves are roman numerals II-XII. (nm)
Subject: Cranial nerves are roman numerals II-XII. (nm)

x
I'm finding the regions and planes use numerals and
Subject: I'm finding the regions and planes use numerals and

s
aren't leads in Roman numerals?
Subject: aren't leads in Roman numerals?

x
Stedman's says Roman numerals, such as Gravida I
Subject: Stedman's says Roman numerals, such as Gravida I


Not all stages are roman numerals, depends.
Subject: Not all stages are roman numerals, depends.

x
heart murmur with roman numerals?
Subject: heart murmur with roman numerals?

I have always typed heart murmur (ex: 2/6 ejection murmur).  However, I have a new NP who states it using roman numerals (II/VI ejection murmur).  Which is correct?  Thanks!
Not sure, but cranial nerves are Roman numerals.
Subject: Not sure, but cranial nerves are Roman numerals.

x
grade 2 to 3 (grades are roman numerals).
Subject: grade 2 to 3 (grades are roman numerals).

Beaking is correct. I usually use a hyphen for in-between.
grade 2 to 3 (grades are roman numerals).
Subject: grade 2 to 3 (grades are roman numerals).

Beaking is correct. I usually use a hyphen for in-between.
grades = numbers; stages = Roman numerals....
Subject: grades = numbers; stages = Roman numerals....


leads = Roman numerals if I remember correctly
Subject: leads = Roman numerals if I remember correctly


Wrong. Not all stages are roman numerals anymore.
Subject: Wrong. Not all stages are roman numerals anymore.

x
jGrade is arabic such as grade 1, and stages are Roman numerals.
Subject: jGrade is arabic such as grade 1, and stages are Roman numerals.


Standard leads are typically denoted by roman numerals.
Subject: Standard leads are typically denoted by roman numerals.


III (stages and classes are Roman numerals, grades are Arabic) nm
Subject: III (stages and classes are Roman numerals, grades are Arabic) nm


A search of several web sites shows staging with numbers, not Roman numerals. nm
Subject: A search of several web sites shows staging with numbers, not Roman numerals. nm

s
Grades are arabic numbers and classes and stages are roman numerals.
Subject: Grades are arabic numbers and classes and stages are roman numerals.


I was always taught that types & grades are arabic and classes & stages are Roman numerals. nm
Subject: I was always taught that types & grades are arabic and classes & stages are Roman numerals. nm


FIGO staging is typed using roman numerals, such as FIGO I, II, etc., see inside.
Subject: FIGO staging is typed using roman numerals, such as FIGO I, II, etc., see inside.

Table 2: Carcinoma of the Vulva – Stage grouping
FIGO UICC
Stage T N M
0 Tis N0 M0
IA T1A N0 M0
IB T1B N0 M0
II T2 N0 M0
III T1 N1 M0
T2 N1 M0
T3 N1 M0
IVA T1 N2 M0
T2 N2 M0
T3 N2 M0
T4 Any N M0
IVB Any T Any N M1
1.1.2.3 Histopathologic types.
Squamous cell carcinoma is the most frequent form of cancer of the
vulva. Malignant melanoma is the second most common tumour and
should be reported separately. Other histopathologic types are:
– adenocarcinoma underlying Paget’s disease of vulva, verrucous
carcinoma, Bartholin gland carcinoma, adenocarcinoma not otherwise
specified (NOS), basal cell carcinoma.
• Histopathologic grades (G).
• Gx – Grade cannot be assessed;
• Gl – Well-differentiated;
• G2 – Moderately differentiated;
• G3 – Poorly or undifferentiated.

www.figo.org/docs/staging_booklet.pdf
All data that I can find on ECT leads (not EKG leads) are in arabic numerals.
Subject: All data that I can find on ECT leads (not EKG leads) are in arabic numerals.


Roman numerals, but "lead" would be "Lead"
Subject: Roman numerals, but "lead" would be "Lead"

x
EKG report
Subject: EKG report

"No weeshnoblomotion abnormalities are identified." What is that word?
thanks everyone. One more report and then I am going to bed.
Subject: thanks everyone. One more report and then I am going to bed.


nothing more to add about the report unless
Subject: nothing more to add about the report unless

the patient had an implanted pacemaker which is not eluded to here.  Just a note, adenosine is not capitalized except to start a sentence.


Maybe you will hear something back.


d~


Sorry, same report...
Subject: Sorry, same report...

"CPK and _______ were negative"  s/l intraconals??


 


Still on the pulmonologist's report...


EEG report
Subject: EEG report

Anyone ever heard of an EEG performed on a Nikon Codon machine?  Thanks.
just sent the report on.........nm
Subject: just sent the report on.........nm

x
op report sm
Subject: op report sm

What kind of surgery is it? If he used "lap" laparotomy pads may be the second one. They usually say sponge, needle and instrument counts. Will keep thinking on this one. Type of surgery would help.


You don't say where in the report -- sm
Subject: You don't say where in the report -- sm

this is given, or any other context, so I have to wonder if this isn't a problem list perhaps giving more than one diagnosis/problem here (as in (1) portosystemic shunt and (2) nephrolithiasis)...

Just a thought