Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Stedman's has it Homans. sm

Posted By: MT-IC25 on 2007-08-12
In Reply to: Homans (according to my MTSO) - (nm)

Subject: Stedman's has it Homans. sm


Homans sign
Homans test



Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

Stedman's Medical has Homans'
Subject: Stedman's Medical has Homans'

nm
Could it be masses sign? And Homans has no apostrophe according to Stedman's ortho word book
Subject: Could it be masses sign? And Homans has no apostrophe according to Stedman's ortho word book


cores might be cords, holmes may be Homans (as in Homans sign), moses may be masses? sm
Subject: cores might be cords, holmes may be Homans (as in Homans sign), moses may be masses? sm

x
Homans, Homan's or Homans'
Subject: Homans, Homan's or Homans'

I'm getting way too confused on this as I find all three when I look them up.  I have a transcription work book that says "Homans."  Can someone please post which is correct or the most correct?


Thank you so very much!


Homans or Homans' sign?
Subject: Homans or Homans' sign?

I was taught Homans' but QA just corrected it to Homans.
homans? nm
Subject: homans? nm


so is Homans..
Subject: so is Homans..

/
Homans sign
Subject: Homans sign

for DVT
Homans (according to my MTSO)
Subject: Homans (according to my MTSO)


Homans. No apostrophe because...sm
Subject: Homans. No apostrophe because...sm

...First, it's named after Dr. Homans (as the previous poster mentioned). Secondly, it is no longer proper in medical transcription to use the possessive forms of eponyms. That's why it is now "Alzheimer disease," "Kawasaki disease," "non-Hodgkin lymphoma," etc. The resources where you are finding it with an apostrophe are out of date. If I recall correctly, this new standard is only a few years old. (Why can't they just quit changing this stuff on us?!?!?!)
because it is doctor name HOMANS
Subject: because it is doctor name HOMANS

can check out some things on---   whonamedit.com
Homans sign, :) nm
Subject: Homans sign, :) nm


Homans? *no apostrophe* per BOS 2nd edition
Subject: Homans? *no apostrophe* per BOS 2nd edition


named after John Homans.....
Subject: named after John Homans.....

Biography:
John Homans worked on experimental hypophysectomy with Harvey Williams Cushing (1869-1939) at Johns Hopkins. Homans, Cushing and Samuel James Crowe (1883-1955) in 1910 presented the first evidence of the relationship between the pituitary and the reproductive system. Homans later became interested in peripheral vascular disease.

His wife was Helen Perkins Homans. Their daughter Helen Homans died of pneumonia on November 22, 1916, while serving as a nurse with the Red Cross in France. Homans' three sons all graduated from Harvard.

from whonamedit.com
Homans sign - no apostrophe s
Subject: Homans sign - no apostrophe s


whonamedit says it should be Homans' as it's attributed to
Subject: whonamedit says it should be Homans' as it's attributed to

s
Homans and McMurray's sign maybe?
Subject: Homans and McMurray's sign maybe?

x
says homans' and she/l Marcie's ? sign are negative
Subject: says homans' and she/l Marcie's ? sign are negative


Homans sign if neurology report?
Subject: Homans sign if neurology report?

/
Baby homans were inserted? see note.
Subject: Baby homans were inserted? see note.

Blunt dissection was taken down to the lateral wall of the calcaneus.  S/L Baby Homans were inserted superior and inferiorly along the area of the osteotomy. 
I have Stedman medical & surgical equipment and words and find that out of my Stedman books (have 4
Subject: I have Stedman medical & surgical equipment and words and find that out of my Stedman books (have 4 others) this is the one I use the most. Just my preference.


Hi, Tracy, Stedman's had "postinflammatory", but I have seen it without, I go with Stedman!
Subject: Hi, Tracy, Stedman's had "postinflammatory", but I have seen it without, I go with Stedman! NM

nm
Homans sign, Hohmann retractor (not Homan's retractor). nm
Subject: Homans sign, Hohmann retractor (not Homan's retractor). nm

x
don't have a Stedman's, but thanks anyway. :(
Subject: don't have a Stedman's, but thanks anyway. :(

x
Per Stedman's Ob-Gyn
Subject: Per Stedman's Ob-Gyn

Tucker-McLane forceps.


It's in Stedman's
Subject: It's in Stedman's

Omni flush
according to Stedman's...
Subject: according to Stedman's...

mucous cyst: A retention cyst resulting from obstruction in the duct of a mucous gland.


Syn: mucocele: A retention cyst of the salivary gland, lacrimal sac, paranasal sinuses, appendix, gallbladder, or other site.

According to Stedman's
Subject: According to Stedman's

nephrolithiasis (nefr-li-th-sis)

Presence of renal calculi.


Not the calculus itself - the presence of renal calculi.


Well, now I see it in my Stedman's
Subject: Well, now I see it in my Stedman's

and it is Kantor-Berci video laryngoscope.  Never heard of it before.
stedman's
Subject: stedman's

Physic - A medicine; often a lay term for a cathartic.


Catharsis - purgation


purgation - Evacuation of the bowels with the aid of a purgative or cathartic


Used Stedman's
Subject: Used Stedman's

I'd really recommend getting a Stedman's. I started doing Ophthalmology about a year ago and it was a life saver for me! I bought a used copy on eBay. Just took a quick peek there and saw one for under $5. Totally worth it! Good luck!!
RSR according to Stedman's . .
Subject: RSR according to Stedman's . .

cardiology, but have also seen rSR in other places.
According to Stedman's
Subject: According to Stedman's

There is a Sims position.  No Dutch though....
Neither, my Stedman's ..
Subject: Neither, my Stedman's ..

Equipment Book says MediPort.
Per Stedman's, m/sec or m/s (nm).
Subject: Per Stedman's, m/sec or m/s (nm).

xx
Per Stedman's - either way.
Subject: Per Stedman's - either way.

x
According to Stedman's...
Subject: According to Stedman's...

Mental retardation is a valid medical term, according to Stedman's. Could you please tell me exactly what medical reference you have used to determine that it is no longer acceptable? By the way, we are not political transcriptionists, we are medical transcriptionists!
Per my Stedman's, MU...sm
Subject: Per my Stedman's, MU...sm

but my Quick Look Drug Book spells out *million units* when describing penicillin dosing (mg, g for other drug).  Not sure if there is a preference. 
It's in Stedman's.
Subject: It's in Stedman's.


Per Stedman's there is a
Subject: Per Stedman's there is a

Thumper 1007 CPR system. Don't know if this fits or not.
i don't have stedman's but... sm
Subject: i don't have stedman's but... sm

i believe it's an "e"...styloideum (not to be confused with stylidium)
Per Stedman's GI
Subject: Per Stedman's GI

they have "caput medusae." Please not it is the plural medusae, not singular medusa. It is when dilated veins are seen on the abdomen (simple explanation). HTH!
Per Stedman's
Subject: Per Stedman's

M:E ratio
Stedman's.
Subject: Stedman's.

x
Thank you very much!!! My Stedman's GU is too old I guess. nm
x
stedman's abbrev
Subject: stedman's abbrev

capitalizes the IU part,
Thanks so much. That is not even in stedman's and I indeed was far off in the spelling!
Subject: Thanks so much. That is not even in stedman's and I indeed was far off in the spelling!


epilolic stedman GI//GU 2nd nm
Subject: epilolic stedman GI//GU 2nd nm


not in MY spellcheck, it isn't, and it is Stedman's.
Subject: not in MY spellcheck, it isn't, and it is Stedman's.

I will not use it either. I do not think it is professional looking and if I was still going through training, it would not be acceptable to the school either. but my Stedman's spellcheck will not accept it, either.
not to be rude but Stedman's has been....sm
Subject: not to be rude but Stedman's has been....sm

Not to be rude - it IS coffee grounds that one can vomit and when used as a noun, but when it's used as an adjective, it is coffee-ground emesis....I suppose it could be an either-or so I'm not giving anyone an argument.  Just have seen Stedman's be wrong on many occasions and I don't use Stedmans as a result.


To each his/her own....


additional info:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emesis


http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/505474_print


coffee-ground emesis is old blood in the vomitus, coffee-ground vomitus.



 


In my Stedman's GI & GU book.....
Subject: In my Stedman's GI & GU book.....

they are both listed side by side, so I think it is the same procedure but just two different ways of writing it out. Either way looks correct.