Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Will see him back in three months and check a s/l CPE?? TIA

Posted By: ak on 2008-06-18
In Reply to:

Subject: Will see him back in three months and check a s/l CPE?? TIA




Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

I'm here and I will check and get back to you!
Subject: I'm here and I will check and get back to you!


Check back, I will try to put a list of refs together for you. nm
Subject: Check back, I will try to put a list of refs together for you. nm


Quite all right. Meant to come back and check answer.
Subject: Quite all right. Meant to come back and check answer.


Necon®1/35. Check back for a link for this stuff. nm
Subject: Necon®1/35. Check back for a link for this stuff. nm

www.campnecon.com/ - 20k - Cached - Similar pages

NECON ®





Necon® is the most frequently dispensed monophasic norethindrone/ethinyl estradiol product 2 ... Necon®1/35 therapeutic equivalent to Ortho-Novum ®1/35 1 ...
www.oralcontraceptives.com/brand_necon.asp - 25k - Cached - Similar pages

My Stedman's spell check comes back with pro embolic (2 separate words). Pro is a word in itself
Subject: My Stedman's spell check comes back with pro embolic (2 separate words). Pro is a word in itself as is embolic. Hope this helps.


SHE'S BEEN AN MT FOR ONLY 6 MONTHS!! SM
Subject: SHE'S BEEN AN MT FOR ONLY 6 MONTHS!! SM

I think you're jealous because she is getting help. She did the actual transcription herself. I didn't listen to it. If you had read my posts, and obviously you did not, I referred her to some references that would help her. I prefer books rather than links for many, many reasons.

As far as breaches in confidentiality, I don't know who NewbieMT is, where she lives, even if she is a "she," or where her account is. There is no telling by the document she presented for help. She was careful to not even leave dates of admission or discharge. Her report was presented such that it was totally untraceable, unrecognizable as far as identifying an individual, and completely generic. I give her a lot of credit for that. She has a lot of sense.

BTW, your posts are atrocious in grammar, punctuation and syntax. Tacky, tacky Stapler. I think you should focus on your own back yard.

What her QA is or is not doing is none of your business, nor mine. You didn't read older posts, and are just speaking out of an orifice. Newbie asked for help, and she got it. I don't bother with (so-called) MTs who don't give a flying you-know-what. I don't even answer their posts when it's something they could easily look up. See for yourself. I wouldn't waste my precious free time on someone who didn't care, who was out only for the money. This gal is good, and deserves a hand under the elbow THAT WE ALL HAD WHEN WE WERE LEARNING. Have you forgotten, or did you malign the people who tried to help you when you were learning?

You're not going to win this argument, so back off. If this newbie, or any other newbie (or even a not-so-newbie) wants my help, they're going to get it.

BTW, You ARE flaming. I've read some of your posts on other boards, and you are trouble. Leave this newbie alone. She's doing great and obviously is working hard.

"one does for themselves?" Really, now.

s/l ar vay in two months
Subject: s/l ar vay in two months

This is a new account.  Under plan he say s/l "ar vay" in two months.  We will do a stress test.....
Months ?
Subject: Months ?

Followup in 3 and a half months with A1c prior. 


                             or


Followup in 3.5 months with A1c prior.


 


Which one is acceptable?  Unsure.


only about 3-4 months and I did not think I was doing that bad
Subject: only about 3-4 months and I did not think I was doing that bad

a
Thanks. I had this several months
Subject: Thanks. I had this several months

ago and our QA had no idea. I even posted it on this board then and apparently no one knew it then either. He is very clearly saying epical and was have tried all variations without success. Of course, if he gave a dosage it might help.
NewbieMT has only had 6 months on the job! Thanks!!!! nm
Subject: NewbieMT has only had 6 months on the job! Thanks!!!! nm

xx
Well, he'd be 4 months old unless those 30 days were
Subject: Well, he'd be 4 months old unless those 30 days were

hehe....
;D
Three months' time
Subject: Three months' time

One month's time. All other-two months' time, etc. As you would type one month and simply add an 's. All others already are pleural so you simply add the apostrophe after.
3 months' time.
Subject: 3 months' time.

x
back pain, given dura-back if needed for spasm. nm
Subject: back pain, given dura-back if needed for spasm. nm

s
probably means 13 years + 4 months old
Subject: probably means 13 years + 4 months old


Never heard it that way. There are 12 months in yr, menses every
Subject: Never heard it that way. There are 12 months in yr, menses every

xx
ƈ months' worth of samples' is right..nm
Subject: ƈ months' worth of samples' is right..nm

nm
How would you write the child was four years and eight months old
Subject: How would you write the child was four years and eight months old


I agree, probably means 13 years and 4 months. NM
Subject: I agree, probably means 13 years and 4 months. NM


Yeah, funky way of say 2 years, 8 months.
Subject: Yeah, funky way of say 2 years, 8 months.


3 months' time is the correct format
Subject: 3 months' time is the correct format


depends on account specifics, but I usually type 3-1/2 months NM
Subject: depends on account specifics, but I usually type 3-1/2 months NM


OB.. she returns for a string check?? or Estring check?? Thanks
Subject: OB.. she returns for a string check?? or Estring check?? Thanks


1 year's time and 3 months' duration. A single unit of something takes 's.
Subject: 1 year's time and 3 months' duration. A single unit of something takes 's.

s
Three month's time or three months' time? TIA!
Subject: Three month's time or three months' time? TIA!


you should always try to back it up
Subject: you should always try to back it up

:)


Thx for the help. I just keep going back and forth on it. Now I know. nm
Subject: Thx for the help. I just keep going back and forth on it. Now I know. nm


X-ray of back
Subject: X-ray of back


x-ray of back.....
Subject: x-ray of back.....

It sounds like it might be spondylolisthesis, which would be descriptive of the L5-S1 joint; where as anterolisthesis refers to a subluxation of one vertebral body upon another would be stated as "there is anterolisthesis of L5 on S1"
Going to go w ith take-back
Subject: Going to go w ith take-back

cannot figure out what else this could be. Says this very clear. Thanks for those who were looking.
Went back...
Subject: Went back...

and it is clear as day! Geez...guess I just needed to talk it out! Thanks! :)
That was it, Thank you - I think I need to go back to bed!!!
Subject: That was it, Thank you - I think I need to go back to bed!!!


I put 110 to 120. Never had it come back yet....nm
Subject: I put 110 to 120. Never had it come back yet....nm

x
Just got it back from QA -
Subject: Just got it back from QA -

She has a long habit of only drinking...........

 

Wow! Call me homer simpson.  d'oh!

Back strain

The doctor is giving instruction for a back strain.  The blank s/l leg umes or rig umes.  Thanks for any help!


The sentence is:  Rest, ice, _______ for pain not controlled with ibuprofen.


Just wanted to get back and thank you
Subject: Just wanted to get back and thank you


Yuk-he's back. Will probably post something,,,,
Subject: Yuk-he's back. Will probably post something,,,,

nm
I take back the palladium..
Subject: I take back the palladium..

I didn't think about gadolinium, but it is used with MRIs.


I am back again with another question
Subject: I am back again with another question

I have never had so many questions and this is the same doctor I have always worked for.  the patient has an actinic keratosis behind the ear along the hairline ove the "occioitent".  He is not saying occipital...is it possible he is making this up?
thanks..going back and checking it out
Subject: thanks..going back and checking it out


Just got QA back, just wanted you to know that you were right! Thank you
Subject: Just got QA back, just wanted you to know that you were right! Thank you

x
as I go back and listen
Subject: as I go back and listen

it sounds like "Dilaudid hepta" but I can't make out "hepta". This is an ESL.
Just coming back on
Subject: Just coming back on

to say DUH, tragal pit.
Not thinking clearly today.
Thanks for the help though!
Hello back atcha ................nm
Subject: Hello back atcha ................nm


CC: Back pain
Subject: CC: Back pain

Thanks for taking the time on this . . .

While the CC: is back pain, the subjective describes . . .

This is an 81-year-old female who, for the last month, has had some intermittent pain next to her right shoulder blade. She is right-handed, and she has been doing a lot of gardening and weed whacking. It does not bother her much during the day, but at night when she sits, and then when she is lying in bed at night, she feels what she describes as a muscle spasm with twinges. She also at times has some diffuse pain from her elbow radiating up to her neck when she “overdoes it”, but that has been going on for quite some time, and she does not feel like that has recently changed.
thanks, I thought of that and went back
Subject: thanks, I thought of that and went back

and listened again, but he is definitely saying AS or AZ-vair, or something like that. To complicate matters, I'm having problems with the tape not playing correctly in that spot..it keeps stopping and slowing down,etc. I think the tape is just bad.
no offense, but what do either of these have to do with the low back? nm
Subject: no offense, but what do either of these have to do with the low back? nm

nm
I take that back...it could also be "tack"...sm
Subject: I take that back...it could also be "tack"...sm

there apparently is a sling "Tack" procedure, but could also just be saying bladder tact which is not naming the specific procedure.
Thank you . . . I was just coming back
Subject: Thank you . . . I was just coming back

It is PMR.

Thanks to all for taking the time.
Well, I went back and relistened,
Subject: Well, I went back and relistened,

proud flesh and then changed to pride flesh . . . I had never heard this term, but was able to find proud flesh (still cannot locate pride flesh, but this is a verbatim account and he clearly changes from proud to pride, so I'll give him what he says)

Thanks all!