Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

You should use "was" as the 50 cc is a considered...sm

Posted By: Correction on 2008-05-16
In Reply to: I would say 'were' infused, as 50 cc is plural - EvaEv

Subject: You should use "was" as the 50 cc is a considered...sm

a single unit.


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

Usually it would be carried out, but sometimes they might say "was done."
Subject: Usually it would be carried out, but sometimes they might say "was done."

nm
The size...was small, so "was." NM
Subject: The size...was small, so "was." NM

x
"was" by my training and references...sm
Subject: "was" by my training and references...sm

all amounts are to be transcribed as singular when abbreviated, so it does not matter if "approximately" is used it is always 10 cc of fluid was aspirated (and/or injected).

Obviously if it is dictated "a total of 10 cc..." it is WAS because "total" is the subject. Also, even if the dictation was "10 cc of fluidS..." it would still be was because the unit of measurement is the subject of the sentence and is abbreviated.
also, could it be "was performed on the RIGHT" (not 'on the side') ?? nm
Subject: also, could it be "was performed on the RIGHT" (not 'on the side') ?? nm


Found this "cute" example for "was laid down" -- sm
Subject: Found this "cute" example for "was laid down" -- sm

Couldn't resist posting the following found on a grammar Q&A site. (If I read below correctly -- after I quit laughing!!! -- then in your example the patient is the direct object.)


by gradyplayer on 1/20/07
I am always wondering about the past participle tense of the vulgar form, have I been lain?

by Larabees on 1/20/07
I'm pretty sure that you would have been laid. You would have been the direct object. That is, someone did it to you (i.e., laid you). Going back to the example given in the podcast: "It's pretty easy, you lay something down, people lie down by themselves..." So, someone laid you, you didn't lay yourself (I think).
:-)

really just a WAG. Could you be hearing "was sick througout"
Subject: really just a WAG. Could you be hearing "was sick througout"


Thought that should be it. It threw me, because of the "was created" part of it. Thanks!
Subject: Thought that should be it. It threw me, because of the "was created" part of it. Thanks!


Because AP, lateral and oblique are singular then it is "was", if it was laterals and obliques
Subject: Because AP, lateral and oblique are singular then it is "was", if it was laterals and obliques (plural) then it would be "were"...

With words that indicate portions—percent, fraction, part, majority, some, all, none, remainder, and so forth —look at the noun in your of phrase (object of the preposition) to determine whether to use a singular or plural verb. If the object of the preposition is singular, use a singular verb. If the object of the preposition is plural, use a plural verb.

Examples: Fifty percent of the pie has disappeared.
Pie is the object of the preposition of.
Fifty percent of the pies have disappeared.
Pies is the object of the preposition.
One-third of the city is unemployed.
One-third of the people are unemployed.

NOTE: Hyphenate all spelled-out fractions.

All of the pie is gone.
All of the pies are gone.
Some of the pie is missing.
Some of the pies are missing.
None of the garbage was picked up.
None of the sentences were punctuated correctly.
Of all her books, none have sold as well as the first one.

I considered that...but I don't think that is what he is saying.
Subject: I considered that...but I don't think that is what he is saying.

I also considered impregnation, but I think the word is something that begins with dos or dose, but I just can't quite grasp it.
It would be considered a lab.
Subject: It would be considered a lab.

x
Per BOS, IU is considered a "dangerous"
Subject: Per BOS, IU is considered a "dangerous"

abbreviation and should be written units.
q is considered a dangerous
Subject: q is considered a dangerous

abbreviation when standing alone. Unless client wants you to use it, replace with "every."
This is now considered to be a dangerous abbrev. Unless...sm
Subject: This is now considered to be a dangerous abbrev. Unless...sm

otherwise stated by the client, use at bedtime or at hour of sleep.
What is considered term pregnancy?
Subject: What is considered term pregnancy?

I have a dictator that said, "The child was born at term.  Mom was 24 weeks' gestation."  I always thought term was somewhere around 36+ weeks.  He went on to say the birth weight was 6 pounds 13 ounces.  Just from experience, I would think a 24-week gestation infant would not weigh that much.


Anyone in OB care to comment?


DC is considered a dangerous abbreviation
Subject: DC is considered a dangerous abbreviation

per BOS2 and should NOT be used. You use it in the context, not hard to determine if it means discontinue/d or discharge/d.
cc is considered a dangerous abbreviation
Subject: cc is considered a dangerous abbreviation

per BOS, however, if the facility/MTSO, etc. wishes to use cc they trump BOS.
Actually I had considered "adhesion" - but sent a draft - nm
Subject: Actually I had considered "adhesion" - but sent a draft - nm


cc is considered a "dangerous abbreviation"
Subject: cc is considered a "dangerous abbreviation"

x
i would think upper 7's without hearing it. anything 10 and under is considered anemic. nm
Subject: i would think upper 7's without hearing it. anything 10 and under is considered anemic. nm

`
where I work cc is considered a "dangerous" abbreviation.
Subject: where I work cc is considered a "dangerous" abbreviation.

We are required to use mL for that instead. It also satisfied HIPAA, JACHO, and all the other health-care alphabets. LOL
No, I actually considered promethazine, but I definitely here what sound like "tri." Thanks.
Subject: No, I actually considered promethazine, but I definitely here what sound like "tri." Thanks.


Are "bicarb" and "prep" considered slang? Do you
nm
Aspirin is considered generic, unless coupled with
Subject: Aspirin is considered generic, unless coupled with

brand name, like Bayer Aspirin.
Unless it is considered gravida 2, para 2, "live births" 2?
Subject: Unless it is considered gravida 2, para 2, "live births" 2?


a knee aspirate would be considered a procedure, at least from my experience.
Subject: a knee aspirate would be considered a procedure, at least from my experience.


It's considered an acceptable sloppy "docism" to use tendinitis now. Read something
Subject: It's considered an acceptable sloppy "docism" to use tendinitis now. Read something

s
I say "feels" because nursing is considered a single unit in this context. nm
Subject: I say "feels" because nursing is considered a single unit in this context. nm

x