flag it as it is a DEFINITE discrepancy...nm
Posted By: no message on 2007-02-01
In Reply to: Doc says blood type O positive negative, can this be? (nm) - quietmoods
Subject: flag it as it is a DEFINITE discrepancy...nm
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
it is a true *discrepancy* so FLAG IT....
Subject: it is a true *discrepancy* so FLAG IT....
discrepancy
Subject: discrepancy
While Stedman's Equipment words has it as MediPort, that spelling does not go through Stedman's Medical Spellchecker. It only accepts it as Mediport. That is the spelling I have always used and I've never been corrected. MediPort with that spelling is a company that makes medical imaging display devices.
Discrepancy Marker
Subject: Discrepancy Marker
I would put in a discrepancy marker at the "second" mouthwash part of the sentence and send it to be reviewed.
it's a true discrepancy because MD spelled it...
Subject: it's a true discrepancy because MD spelled it...
QA marker, reason being *discrepancy* and then in the QA/QC comment box you need to type what the discrepancy is (keeping it as short as possible)..."MD spells Zelexia, I think he means Celexal, hence true discrepancy"
Perhaps Galeazzi sign, limb length discrepancy
Subject: Perhaps Galeazzi sign, limb length discrepancy
probably a typo but not limp length
There was a definite "M" sound
Subject: There was a definite "M" sound
I had to send it in with 2 blanks. Maybe it was one of the "made up words." 
There's a definite s/l "VICTION" in there... Thanks to you as well.
Subject: There's a definite s/l "VICTION" in there... Thanks to you as well.
That's a definite possibility
Subject: That's a definite possibility
I'm thinking that too. He might be saying something to the effect that the pt needs to step up, get going, finally agree to have this test performed. Thanks for the help
Definite r sound
Subject: Definite r sound
Nope I don't hear "lymphs" at all. There is a definite "r" sound at the start of the word. Sounds like "run" or "ran", but that doesn't make sense.
wait - maybe I'm wrong.......sorry...not definite!...nm.
Subject: wait - maybe I'm wrong.......sorry...not definite!...nm.
Thanks but I listened again -there's a definite "s" at the beginning
Subject: Thanks but I listened again -there's a definite "s" at the beginning
S/L Sin frame or sinfrim retractor was appropriately positined as necessary.
I thought of that, but there is a definite "K" sound there. Thanks :)
Subject: I thought of that, but there is a definite "K" sound there. Thanks :)
Hmm...perhaps. She even says it a second time in exactly the same way. TRI-SKAVY. Definite "E&
Subject: Hmm...perhaps. She even says it a second time in exactly the same way. TRI-SKAVY. Definite "E" sound a the end. :^(
Not cock or cockup, definite "l" sound in there. SM
Subject: Not cock or cockup, definite "l" sound in there. SM
This is a very clear dictator. It's either clock or clack, like that. Any idea? Thanks!
No, definite Z or S sound in the middle of word
Subject: No, definite Z or S sound in the middle of word
that definitely makes sense, but it is a definite R sound
Subject: that definitely makes sense, but it is a definite R sound
Omni-Vent is a definite...I told you
Subject: Omni-Vent is a definite...I told you
I was not sure about Nasonex. Since I have no work until 9 AM and I get up early, I try to help people with only the terminology I know. Otherwise I do not post. I'm sorry I could not answer your question of Nasonex, but like I said, that is the only thing that comes to mind. I looked in my drug books and found nothing other than that. I looked in my ENT book as it has drugs listed and again nothing. I have done a lot of research for you, be a little more appreciative. Sounds like I got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning. Good luck with your search. Perhaps someone else can help you and that is your best bet when people start getting on.
skin is slightly s/l hyperemic? but no definite rash
Subject: skin is slightly s/l hyperemic? but no definite rash
is seen
Thanks, great one for reference. Definite keeper to Favorites.
Subject: Thanks, great one for reference. Definite keeper to Favorites.
Thanks but no. Has a definite hard T sound. Lantium or Lentium.
Subject: Thanks but no. Has a definite hard T sound. Lantium or Lentium.
Patient is to use s/l mycolog cream. Not finding anything definite on google or rxlist. thanks
Subject: Patient is to use s/l mycolog cream. Not finding anything definite on google or rxlist. thanks
Having a discrepancy, it is basal cisterns or basilar cisterns in the brain?
Subject: Having a discrepancy, it is basal cisterns or basilar cisterns in the brain?
PET scan wiht cortex with prominent anterior s/l *singulet* hypometabolism. Definite T at end. sm
Subject: PET scan wiht cortex with prominent anterior s/l *singulet* hypometabolism. Definite T at end. sm
The FDG-PET scan is classic textbook for frontotemporal dementia and confirms this clinical diagnosis with a high degree of diagnostic certainty. The patient has severe bilaterally symmetric frontal hypometabolism. This includes both lateral and mesial portions of the cortex with prominent anterior *singulet* hypometabolism. There are lesser degrees of anterior temporal hypometabolism but by far frontal lobes are more affected. There is also slight decrease in left parietal cortex with relative sparing of primary motor sensory cortex.
I'd flag it. You don't know which one
Subject: I'd flag it. You don't know which one
FLAG IT.............................nm
Subject: FLAG IT.............................nm
.
thanks for trying. I'm just going to flag it. nm
Subject: thanks for trying. I'm just going to flag it. nm
x
maybe- might just have to flag this one thank you
Subject: maybe- might just have to flag this one thank you
:-)
I'm just not sure. I'm going to flag. Thanks for your help.
Subject: I'm just not sure. I'm going to flag. Thanks for your help.
what I would do - I'd either flag it or....
Subject: what I would do - I'd either flag it or....
Thank you, I did flag it (NM)
Subject: Thank you, I did flag it (NM)
-
I'm going to flag it...
Subject: I'm going to flag it...
I have a name that I can't understand in the document anyway (person's last name) and I can't find it to verify spelling - so it's got to go to QA anyway, I come back here and post if/when QA gets it in case someoen else ever has it. TY for those that tried looking also.
I'd flag it
Subject: I'd flag it
Doc may have meant take 2 tablets in the morning and said the q just as a habit. I would certainly question having to take Lexapro at 2 a.m. In my opinion, don't guess - flag it.
Thanks. I will have to flag it.
Subject: Thanks. I will have to flag it.
ss
thanks, that might be what he is trying to say but I had to flag it :( nm
Subject: thanks, that might be what he is trying to say but I had to flag it :( nm
Thanks, but I sent it in with a QA flag.
Subject: Thanks, but I sent it in with a QA flag.
It wasn't locked. Sounded like lap or lapped. Doctor was running words together and even made up a few of his own! Gotta love it !
@>--^-- Thanks again!!
If it were me, I would flag it
Subject: If it were me, I would flag it
Seems obvious he meant ACL.
I have a doc who says stuff like that all the time...give a list of "this is normal, that is normal" only he says the same thing both times. I don't change it, I just flag it.
I would say if you are not sure, flag it.
Subject: I would say if you are not sure, flag it.
I'm going to flag it, ty anyway! nm
Subject: I'm going to flag it, ty anyway! nm
x
Thx for trying! I am just going to have to flag this one. THx again!
Subject: Thx for trying! I am just going to have to flag this one. THx again!
Thanks for any help.....I will flag
Subject: Thanks for any help.....I will flag
If you are not sure, flag it.
Subject: If you are not sure, flag it.
will flag it for QC. thanks! n/m
Subject: will flag it for QC. thanks! n/m
xx
Thank you, had to flag it because he only said cod. thanks again. nm
Subject: Thank you, had to flag it because he only said cod. thanks again. nm
x
Should I flag this
Subject: Should I flag this
During CBC doctor says "counts of 7.7" Later in the sentence he says white count of 11,900. Would he be referring to RBC and should this be flagged for clarity????? It's unclear to me but then everything he says is. Thanks for your help.
sounds like you'd better flag it to me.
x
Used to flag it and then at the bottom SM
Subject: Used to flag it and then at the bottom SM
of report said something like this:
*doc said "Ureteka" maybe meant Uritex....
Thanks, I'll flag
Subject: Thanks, I'll flag
Thanks. I couldn't find it either and since it is a medication, better safe than sorry and I will flag it. Thanks so much for your time
I agree... flag it
Subject: I agree... flag it
/
I'd flag, especially since allegies. nm
Subject: I'd flag, especially since allegies. nm
Absolutely flag it for QA....
Subject: Absolutely flag it for QA....
nm
Thanks...I will flag it just in case
Subject: Thanks...I will flag it just in case
When I got to the exam, she only weighs 111 lbs, so that makes me even more concerned that he just got lazy and just said "5" because he definitely didn't say 0.5 or even .5, it was just 5. I hesitate on questioning things that could be borderline, I always worry about them getting huffy if I dare to suggest they might have said something wrong, especially if what they said was what they meant, but then I think, I work at home in another state and wouldn't know him from a hole in the ground, what's he going to do, come to my house?!?!?
|
