Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

regarding dates

Posted By: Carla on 2008-11-20
In Reply to:

Subject: regarding dates

If you have a date that reads something like -"LAD test 11/20/08 with the finding of etc" Should there be a comma after the date or is that just when they are spelled out like "november 20, 2008,"  Can't seem to find this in the BOS. Maybe just missing it somewhere.  


Thanks




Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

dates
Subject: dates

either is correct - but remember if you put May 10, 2007 - put a comma after the 2007 every time - a comma goes there - like this on May 10, 2007, the.......
dates
Subject: dates

My company has us type out 06/07/2008 as an example, because it is an account specific.
I have been told to type the dates out
Subject: I have been told to type the dates out

but I think each hospital/client has a preference. I am going to be doing a different account where I work and now they want the dates as 6/30/2006. Go figure. They are trying to make us all crazy.

Are you working on your own or for a company? I would find out what the preference is if it is a company.
Sounds like herpes "syn" rash. Not skin, cause later dates no cutaneous component. sm
Subject: Sounds like herpes "syn" rash. Not skin, cause later dates no cutaneous component. sm

The nature of her chest wall spasms is not clear. The first thing that comes to mind is herpes, but this would have to be herpes syn rash. There does not appear to be a cutaneous component to it, and postherpetic neuralgia is less likely but still remains the most likely diagnosis.