Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

I never liked the 'ist' because it feminizes the

Posted By: sound of the job, which may have contributed -sm on 2008-06-26
In Reply to: have always considered myself transcriptionist 'ist' is a specialist. nm - oh well

to the job being considered on the very outer fringes of importance, and our pay going down, not up.

And reason #2 is more practical: I find it nearly impossible to fit the long word 'transcriptionist' into most spaces on forms, including tax forms, that ask for the type of work you do. So I use the shorter "transcriber".

And #3, I just never liked where the 'ist' word came from (AAMT), and that it came about at pretty much the same time as our wages, job satisfaction and respectability all took a nosedive.


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

have always considered myself transcriptionist 'ist' is a specialist. nm
mm