| I never liked the 'ist' because it feminizes the Posted By: sound of the job, which may have contributed -sm on 2008-06-26In Reply to: have always considered myself transcriptionist 'ist' is a specialist. nm - oh well
 
 to the job being considered on the very outer fringes of importance, and our pay going down, not up.
 
 And reason #2 is more practical:  I find it nearly impossible to fit the long word 'transcriptionist' into most spaces on forms, including tax forms, that ask for the type of work you do.  So I use the shorter "transcriber".
 
 And #3, I just never liked where the 'ist' word came from (AAMT), and that it came about at pretty much the same time as our wages, job satisfaction and respectability all took a nosedive.
 
 
 Complete Discussion Below:
  marks the location of current message within thread 
 
 The messages you are viewing 
are archived/old. To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select 
the boards given in left menu
 Other related messages found in our database
 
 have always considered myself transcriptionist 'ist' is a specialist. nm
 mm
 
 |