Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Afraid to view it are you?

Posted By: Sam on 2008-08-22
In Reply to: Neverending trash. No one in their right - mind could take you seriously.

And it is the least of my worries what you consider trash...:)


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

and steal another 700 billion! Be afraid, be very afraid. nm
xx
Be afraid.........be veerrrry afraid. n/m LOL
x
Oh, I am afraid I do. And please tell me sm

how you know that I am a Christian?  You are ignorant beyond belief.  The Israelis are furious about the Gaza pull out and rightly so.  Hamas has already said it is only the beginning and Jerusalem will be next.  Do you read anything at all?   This is news right out of Jerusalem.  You are going on what you have been spoon-fed by the media. That's too bad. And by the way, politics has nothing to do what alignment with the Jews and their plight against Hamas.  You should have figured that out by now. 


FROM WND'S JERUSALEM BUREAU
Palestinian Authority
greenlights terror ops

'Resistance' against Israel discussed in meeting with Hamas, Jihad





Posted: August 25, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern



By Aaron Klein




© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com


TEL AVIV – Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Ahmed Qurei and members of various Palestinian terror groups this week decided at a meeting "resistance" against Israel would continue and would be coordinated at the national level until the Jewish state evacuates "all territories," WND has learned.

Earlier this week, it was reported Qurei held a private conference in Damascus with leaders of Hamas, Islamic Jihad and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. According to media reports, the parties reached an agreement under which the PA would not attempt to disarm the terror groups in spite of recent U.S. and Israeli calls for the groups to be dismantled after the Gaza evacuation.




But security sources close to the meeting told WND agreements reached at the conference went one step further – it was concluded the Palestinians would continue to use "resistance" against Israel until the Jewish state leaves "all occupied territories" – code for the destruction of Israel. The resistance, the sources said, is to be coordinated between the Palestinian groups and based on the foundations of Palestinian unity.

Qurei also allegedly discussed other ways of cooperating with the terror groups after Israel's Gaza evacuation is completed, and stressed that the focus of the Palestinian struggle must be turned to the West Bank and eastern Jerusalem

Said a security source, "Just the fact alone that the PA won't disarm the terrorists is already a green light to go ahead with attacks. But there is information the idea of future attacks were discussed and encouraged."

The revelations are significant. Since Mahmoud Abbas assumed control of the Palestinian government following the death last year of PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat, the P.A. has been careful not to publicly endorse terrorism.

Islamic Jihad Chairman Ramadan Shalah yesterday echoed the alleged conclusions of the Qurei meeting in an interview he gave in Arabic to Al-Jazeera.

"We reached an agreement regarding a common strategy based on the premise that the resistance was a strategic option which should not be interfered with and which had to continue on a foundation of Palestinian national unity," Shalah said.

Shalah stressed the PA had agreed not to disarm his group "as long as Palestinian land was occupied."

At a press conference held after the meeting, Musa Abu Marzuq, a member of Hamas' political office, stated, "The real battle with Israel was on the West Bank. ... We hope there will be no disagreement with the Palestinian Authority regarding the weapon of resistance, because as long as the occupation exists the weapon must exist."

The same day Hamas, Islamic Jihad and local terror groups including the Democratic Front and the Jerusalem Battalions held competing parades in which each claimed their violence drove Israel out of the Gaza Strip.


Several thousand Palestinians attended a Hamas rally in Gaza and a separate victory procession in Nablus in which Hamas flags and models of the Temple Mount were waved, and mock tanks, rockets and even houses of Jewish settlers were displayed.

Hundreds reportedly attended a rally in Khan Yunis led by the Democratic Front, and about one thousand Palestinians marched in a Jerusalem Battalions victory procession in Rafah.

Afterward, the Battalions held a press conference in which a spokesman stressed his group's determination to "do whatever it took" to liberate the "rest of our land," including kidnapping Israelis and committing "resistance attacks."


I'm afraid you won't get your wish
Conservatives will continue to defend the most defenseless including but not limited to unborn babies.
No, I am afraid I don't.

And they are afraid of a man who...
might make their lives a little easier!  Obama wants to stop giving tax breaks to companies who offshore and the majority of the MTs on this board are going to vote against him.  Vote against Obama and you vote against yourselves too.   Obama is against offshoring.  He wants to keep it in America.  Yet, all you anti-Obama's call him un-American.  Obviously we all have more time to sit on this board and talk politics than work.  That is because we have less and less work.  Where do you think our work is going?  We are a dying breed.  Wake-up and smell the coffee!
to be afraid of...?
C'est LA vie.
Would you say that McCain is charismatic?
Definitely not.
He is just the Republican candidate.
Kerry had the same problem, he was too rigid.

Be afraid. Be very afraid! nm
x
I guess they're afraid of
kids being influenced and maybe going out and doing random acts of kindness.....
Nope, afraid we can't

as long as libs wan't to dig up dirt we'll continue throwing the mud you throw from your huge pig stye right back at ya... 



Why are you so afraid of the truth? You should take...
this show on the road. They would love you in Berkeley.
Not afraid of change...
It's not the change that scares me, but the fact that my money will be going to pay for someone else to have something I can barely afford for my own family. Already too much of it goes for that - think foreigners that get Medicaid to pay for all of their doctor visits. And yes, lots of legitimate claims are being denied, but do you think that's going to change when the government has thier hands in it? That's what's really scary. I don't even trust the government with the money they already get from me - what's going to happen when they get more, and more power to boot? The insurance industry needs a complete overhaul, that I agree with, but as far as letting politicians take over? I'm thinking that's not really the best plan.
Too afraid to show up at RNC.
nm
No one is afraid of him because he is black....
it is a valid concern that he is a racist.

However, his far left socialism is more concerning to me than his racism.
nuttin to be afraid of.....
nm
I think that's what O lovers are afraid of....
Of course she doesn't have the power to single handedly divide the country. She says what she believes and she is either liked or not. Some agree, some do not. I couldnt' care less what she wears or all this other nit picky garbage the O lovers have resorted to out of desperation.

A true sign of desperation is pulling out such ridiculous notions and accusations and worrying about her wardrobe. Who cares? At least her money isn't coming from terrorist organizations to help her fund her wardrobe, campaign, or anything else for that matter.

Too bad O lovers don't care where his funds are coming from. They are afraid to find out because the truth "won't set them free".
Again, I am so afraid I can't type
I meant vote against Obama. You people have got to stop scaring me with these stories of Muslims taking over the world. How will I ever sleep at night?
Afraid? You bet. I do not want change that O wants.
He keeps changing his mind.  You want change?  Boy are you going to get change.  I am afraid a lot are going to regrete who they voted  for down the road when welfare will be spreading around, electricity rates skyrocket.  No more small businesses because people will be taxed over 250,000.  Oh wait.  It will be 200,000.  Oh wait.  It is 150,000 by Biden.  Oh wait.  Now it is 120,000.  Next it will be 42,000.  Gosh, cannot make up their mind.  I could go on and on.  The O says it is going to be difficult for us because he needs to "kill people's expecations" if he is president.  HE FREAKS ME OUT.  Been reading up on the GREAT DEPRESSION and about Hoover.  Also been hearing reports of O's plans and he will probably put us through the biggest Great Depression in history.  He will kill middle class first and then it will be welfare and the rich. 
I'm afraid it went down the toilet. nm
x
Someone is just jealous of Mrs. M I'm afraid
xxxx
I will admit that I am afraid, because
and what he states is no different than how the Arab leaders make their speeches.
I'm afraid O doesn't know exactly what he's doing.
He's trying to do too much - if he knew what he was doing, he'd do a little at a time and see what happened. It's like he's going by the principle that if you throw enough sh**, eventually some of it will stick. He needs to slow down and think about the repurcussions of what he's doing first - that was Bush's problem - he just jumped right in and didn't think about how it would affect anyone in the end.
Not afraid of looking foolish cuz...
Things are turning around in spite of people like you who prefer to sit and stew over the fact that the Democrats won.

Sorry, but the world is moving on with or without you.

Save your advice, you might need it.
I'm not afraid that Obama will.............sm
bring about peace in the ME because by my calculations, believers will be long gone before this is accomplished or shortly thereafter. What is concerning is that the "peace" you seem to think he is capable of achieving is not going to be peace at all but rather just the beginning of 7 of the worst years this planet can even imagine. Believers don't want others to have to go through that and that is why we try to tell others about it, but some just don't care to hear it.

And for what it's worth, my life isn't miserable in the least. Uncomfortable sometimes because of economic conditions, yes, but not miserable.
No one hates Bush, most are afraid of him.sm
I am definitely a moderate conservative and libertarian,but not Republican. Love my country, freedom, liberty. I am from Colorado Springs,and everyone I know is conservative, but they do not support Bush and the USA Patriot Act.
Democrats are afraid of Palin

Democrats are so afraid of S. Pain that they sent 30 lawyers, investigators and opposition researchers to Alaska to dig into her record and background.  What they can't find they will be making up.


Here are some facts:


- Palin did not cut funding for special needs education.


- She did not demand books be banned from the library.  That librarian also continued in her job through Palin's first term.


- She was never a member of the Alaskan Independence Party.


- She has not pushed for teaching creationlism in school.


Here's the link to the full article.  You just can't make up things that are not true (however the dems are doing just that and it's really going to come back at them).


http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/09/obamas-wasilla-airborne/


 


are you really that afraid of open debates you need to
reduce yourself to name-calling?

I am unsure who to vote for but one thing I know is it will be for whoever is going to make my life better.

Democrats might tax but the taxes go toward social programs, libraries, schools, afterschool programs, playgrounds, all of which are almost nonexistent where I live now since the last 8 years. Rich people walk around here like they are royalty, they pay no taxes and have no care or interest I helping those less fortunate, spare the very few who do.

the more I see on TV and the more I read on boards like these it seems to me republicans are afraid of democrats. when you see Bush sneering and snickering (many examples on youtube) he is not doing that towards democrats, he is laughing behind the backs of all the republicans who believe his lies. I think the joke is actually on the republicans more than democrats.

I have never seen such people be taken advantage of, and love it so much.

send your children off to war to die, give up all your social programs, take more out of your pocket, all so the rich people can slither around this country at their will with no responsibility toward it. that is left to the poor and the nonwhites.

I am starting to see the bigger picture here, I think Republicans do not believe in social programs because of greed, because no one should be able to make money unless you have the right skin color. Say, how many blacks in Alaska, anyway?

lets all lie down and just die for the rich republicans. here, take my money, my children, my hopes and dreams, my pride - just take it all and make sure to give me absolutely nothing back. Right on!
Obama not afraid to debate, that's all.
This is just another McCain gimmick, as in gas tax holiday.  Politizing everything is another thing JM enjoys.
I am not afraid of McCain and he actually sacrificed
nm
I am afraid he is going to let people down, already starting.

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/31/obama-lays-plans-kill-expectations-election-victory/


Obama plans to kill expectations.


Exactly, dynamic mentality, the one you need to be afraid of.nm
x
I'm afraid we will find out all too soon what "it" is.
I don't think "it" is what all his loyal supporters think "it" is.
I agree, but afraid the country
x
Maybe you're not afraid of your own shadow...
feel super threatend by a guy who gives hope to millions and millions of Americans. No one cares about what's in your glass but your empty rhetoric is getting to be a real drag. The reason you can't understand the worshiping is because it is a figment of your imagination, so no one else will be able to explain it to you either. The woman was not expecting a check, just relieved to see someone take office who will be representing the interests of all Americans, not just the greedy corporation CEOs and super-rich top 1%. We listen to all of his speeches and are delighted and refreshed to hear someone who shoots from the hip and tells it like it is. Hate to disappoint you, but Obama supporters are realists who recognize the mountain of poop W leaves in his wake that he will have to climb over before he can get down to the business of what he will do best....turning the country around, getting us back on track and headed into a better and brighter future. You can twist and turn his words around till the cows come home to suit whatever acidic spew you have in mind, but what you have not noticed, dear, is that you are just preaching to the choir. Nobody else is listening.
As a former cop, I'm afraid I have to disagree with your assessment.
If I had read this report as a cop, I would have concluded that someone at DHS had come unglued, and it would have been laughed out of the squad room. It is virtually useless in terms of offering any actionable intelligence and it labels people who have very legitimate, NONRADICAL, viewpoints as potential threats.

This should bother all of us.
I am afraid Sir Percy was on a roll and just had to get all that hate out! nm

He is afraid of Bill O'Reilly, it's as easy as that....
Obama can handle the butt kissing and egg shell walking of Olbermann and Matthews but when it comes down to it, Obama can't answer real questions that would be poised to him by Bill.
I am not afraid of a black man raised by whites. sm
Flame away, but.....What I AM afraid of is people who cannot see the forest for the trees, those who are so bamboozled by his smoke and mirrors and snake oil, how this "black man raised by whites" is going to pay for all the pie-in-the sky promises he is making. We all know socialized medicine does not work. Look at all the Canadians coming here for their medical procedures etc. How much money can he take from the "have's" to give to the "have not's?" So if I make over $250K, then I have to give money to somebody who doesn't work and will never work? And don't even get me started on his stand on the abortion issue. Conversely, McCain does not have all the answers either. I don't know who would or who does, but I do know this: It is not Obama.


Scare tactics!! Ohhh, be afraid, be very
afraid.  You rightwingers are such wimps!  Well, as Roosevelt once said and as Barack Hussein Obama repeats, "We have nothing to fear but fear itself."  The rightwingers have surely gotten to the skittish.  I, for one, am very afraid of McPalin.  Now there's reason to fear them. They have nothing to offer, just more of the same old politics and power-hungry greed.  Get away from me!  If you want to base your decisions on lies, then you all deserve whatever comes from McPalin, but the thing is that our country will be stuck in the mire for another four years.  So big deal, McCain was shot out of the sky...so were hundreds of others, others have given their lives for this country but McCain votes against any bill that will cost anything to help them....some leader he will make.  Makes me wanna puke!  Country First...doubt it!!
McCain is afraid to debate Obama.
First, McCain tries to lower peoples' expectations of his debating abilities as compared to Obama's (see link). Now, he finds a way to weasel out of the debate while trying to convince people that it is for a noble reason. Who does he think he is kidding?

http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/09/23/mccain-lowers-expectations/
Wrong. People are afraid to question O about
nm
I'm afraid my history lesson disqualifies your argument.
be a smartass and ask what has changed since his statement. I simply stated the obvious answer. What has changed is his MIND. If he didn't feel qualified, he would not have run. Evidently, 65,431,955 citizens agreed with this chane of heart. You cannot argue away the fact that GREAT presidents have held office with much less experience than Obama...and I look for him to be adding his name to that list of the BEST our country has to offer in short order.
You just don't have the capacity to understand I'm afraid... see ya, not responding anymore nm
to you
Perhaps he was afraid of being attacked for mixing politics and religion
I don't think it was anything to get uup in arms about - but of course people get up in arms about EVERYTHING this man does - even to having pizza in the White House.

People need to quit grasping at straws and focus on important issues!
Switzerland is nice and backward, try there? How can you be afraid of human rights?
nm
My view.
I really don't think the slander/libel has anything to do with how the public is perceiving this.   I do think it plays a part in how the women feel, as well it should.  I have been saying all along that we have free will to read or not read what we wish.   I agree with you totally on that.  However, I feel the handling of this incident is definitely along political lines and I also feel that what Ward Churchill said was a lot worse.  Ward says he does not regret what he said and he probably doesn't.  But his career has certainly been affected.   Thank you for addressing the issue and not making a personal attack. That's refreshing.
Sam we don't always have the same view but
you are welcome to post under mine at any time. We have debated a few issues without resorting to crude, name-calling and I have enjoyed that. I too am an independent, leaning more toward Dem., and I am glad you aren't going to lump all Dems together, because not all, and none I know, would do anything that you are seeing on TV or say even a tenth of the crap that is being said here.

So Sam, please debate away!
and what about JOY ON THE VIEW?
and Barbara is just about as bad.
My view............sm
based on my studies of Revelation over a period of time, are that there are 2 beasts referred to in Revelation 13. The first Beast who arises out of the sea (could be interpreted to mean a sea or mass of people or, in Obama's case, that hew was born on an island - Hawaii) and the Antichrist are one and the same. Why? Because the Beast will usher in a one-world religion that will demand he be worshiped, thereby making him the Antichrist. The 2nd beast will arise out of the earth. I believe this is likely the religious figure who will point to the first beast and build him up as one to be worshiped. Farrakhan has already said "the messiah has spoken" so could this be him? I don't know, but I do know that Obama has said that should the political winds blow in an ugly direction he would side with the Muslims and Farrakhan has very strong roots in the Islam faith.

All this remains to be seen, of course, and I'm certain that, if these conclusions are correct, it won't matter who we vote for because God will cause the events in Revelation to come to pass, whether now or at some point in the future.
God does not view us
as homosexual or heterosexual. He sees us as humans he created. We are not to be lukewarm or sit on the fence when it comes to sin. You need to either heat up the water or fall off the fence. Hopefully, it will be on the right side. ;-)
Another point of view...

Thinking About Iraq on King Day
By Star Parker
Monday, January 15, 2007


The characteristic of greatness - whether we are talking about a great man or great art - is that it transcends time and place. It dips into that which is universally and eternally true and applies those truths to a particular moment and a particular place.

Re-reading, after many reads, Dr. Martin Luther King's words of Aug. 28, 1963, the famous I Have a Dream speech, his greatness rings clearer than ever.

Because King did indeed touch the heavens on that day and pull down kernels of eternal truths about freedom and the condition of man, those words of 40-plus years ago have relevance to our struggles today. They can serve as guidance in these difficult times.

Am I saying that King's message from 1963 can guide us in today's conundrums _ about our embroilment in Iraq, about the Middle East, about America's role in the world? Yes, I am saying this.

The power of King's message, the unquestionable reason that the movement he led was successful, was his appeal to the truth of freedom and its universal applicability to all men.

By identifying and appealing to the freedom of man as a universal and eternal truth, and going on to make clear that this truth defined what this great country is about, then King's conclusion _ the intolerability of conditions that denied any American full participation in this freedom _ could not be denied.

Beyond this central message, King made other very important points in this speech.

One of key importance was that responsibility for solving a problem does not necessarily imply direct responsibility in having caused that problem.

Although the responsibility clearly was in the hands of those Americans with power, overwhelmingly white Americans, to fix the problems in the country that limited the availability of freedom to all, this did not mean that all those same Americans were racists or had caused the problem to begin with.

The responsibility for fixing these problems came, rather, with being the beneficiaries of a country whose destiny and identity was fundamentally linked with the enterprise of freedom.

In King's words, white Americans have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny and they have come to realize that their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom.

He appealed to blacks not to allow suffering to translate into bitterness nor into categorical hate of white Americans. Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred.

Instead, King exhorted black Americans to Continue to work with the faith that unearned suffering is redemptive.

So Dr. King accomplished a lot of business that August day in 1963.

He recognized the universal truth of human liberty. He recognized our country as a unique vessel of that truth. He appealed to Americans with power to assume their responsibilities as the beneficiaries of liberty to make this a better and freer country. And he appealed to black Americans to assume a different kind of responsibility _ to not allow themselves to be destroyed by unearned suffering but to be redeemed by it.

The prophet is a lonely man because he brings a message that people do not want to hear.

Dr. King's activism was not welcomed by most whites and a good many blacks.

There is natural appeal in the inertia of the status quo. Change and assumption of new responsibilities and challenges are welcomed by few.

Turmoil tells us that something is wrong and we have no choice but to open our eyes and ears and assume the responsibilities that are cast upon us.

I am, of course, not a military tactician and am in no position to speculate about how best to use American troops to midwife a portion of the world that clearly needs help in becoming more modern, more civil and freer.

However, I can say, that I am in complete sympathy with our president who senses that America has a unique and special role to play in this world. We cannot shirk responsibilities that are clearly ours.

I cannot help but think that it is not an accident that the United States stands so alone, despite many other nations that claim to have similar commitments to and stakes in civility and liberty. The way they act makes clear that they don't.

The truths that Dr. King articulated in so crystal clear a way in 1963 continue to resound today. Freedom is what this country is about. We have no choice. It is our heritage. We thrive and prosper from it. And we cannot avoid the responsibilities that come with it in our engagement with the rest of the world.