Fried? sm

Posted By: sm on 2005-09-18
In Reply to: How long a truce? - gt

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

Today is a new day. - Libby
- So much for who can't stay away from our board. - Libby
  - Award - Reality check
    - OMG - gt
      - No I have not - Reality check
        far leftist? - gt
  - And that 's not the total number either because it keeps rising. They just can't stay away. - Libby
    - LOL - gt
- To anyone who bet the neoCONS couldn't stay off this board for FIVE MINUTES - Libby
  - This is no contest. We called a truce last night. - sm
    - Your post below about the truce says you can't - Libby
    - How long a truce? - gt
      - Fried? sm - sm
        FRY - gt
        I'm terrified beyond the capacity for rational thought. sm - sm
        Well, then.... that explains your lack thereof. - Reader
        Then again, no one likes to be threatened, do they? SM - MT
        Threatened? Who was threatened? - Reader
        Sounds like a threat to me. And hey, I am being nice here. SM - MT
        Threat? - Opinion
        Please describe the actual physical threat that you allege was made on this internet chat board. - Reader
        She already did. nm - sm
        So give me details. How is she going to be fried? - Reader
        I prefer Olive Oil myself. Anyone? NM - MT
        So much for the threat. SM - Reader
        Where's gt anyway? - hmmmm
        Banned..not me - gt
        Maybe you finally hounded her off the board, too. - Reader
        We've been having nice debates over there this week - hmmm
        Who's been having *nice debates* here this week? - Libby
        I said *over there* meaning the C board - hmmm
        Just peeked in on the Conservative board, looking for some *nice debates* - Libby
        Gee, it's funny how you guys can go to page 11 to prove a point or hurl accusations. - -
        Oh, yeah. I see now why you've got such a *feel good* attitude. - Libby
        Lurker, to me, took things personally. You can't do that in debate. - -
        She took it personally because she was attacked personally. Plain and simple. - Libby
        She most absolutely was not attacked. - -
        If it's so great there, why don't you STAY there instead of attacking posters on this board - Libby
        GT is here - gt
    - get off SM - gt
      - I am not attacking you, therefore I can post here. In other words, make me. :) nm - sm
        LOLOLOLOL - gt
- agree! - gt

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database

So give me details. How is she going to be fried?

With or without salt?

Crisco or Mazola oil?

Deep fried or pan fried?

Breaded? If so, plain bread crumbs or Italian style?

And how does one actually go about doing this on an internet message board? Does she pour oil all over her monitor and light a match?

See how ridiculous you are? You're drawing at straws because you hate this particular poster with every fiber of your being, and you're so hell bent on pounding her into the ground that you will invent negative things to say about her, which is typical of you and which is why nobody wants to engage in a conversation with you on this board. Accusing this poster of *threats* only means that you refuse to acknowledge when a message is posted with figurative phrases by someone you don't like. If someone of YOUR ilk did the very same thing, you'd be defending it up one side and down the other.

There was no real threat intended, and if the intense hatred that fills your heart didn't prevent your objectivity, you'd see that.

I'm much more concerned about the poster who called her *an elist pig* and claimed to mean it in a *good way*.

What possible *good way* could that be?

Like ribs, fried chicken and watermelon
Ever hear of double entendre? If you do not want to appear racist, maybe you should try not to use them.