Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Go to the Rasmussen poll if you want a TRUE representation of polls...nm

Posted By: nm on 2009-02-09
In Reply to: New CNN poll results - O with 76% job approval rating.

//


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

My point is not to take a NEWS organizations poll as a true representation
of public opinon. I don't care if O has a good approval rating or not; news polls are skewed towards their base audience. Better to have an impartial poll rather than a left or right leaning poll. Relax and have a drink!
My point is not to take a NEWS organizations poll as a true representation
of public opinon. I don't care if O has a good approval rating or not; news polls are skewed towards their base audience. Better to have an impartial poll rather than a left or right leaning poll. Relax and have a drink!
Rasmussen poll results:

Sarah Palin has made a good first impression. Before being named as John McCain’s running mate, 67% of voters didn’t know enough about the Alaska governor to have an opinion. After her debut in Dayton and a rush of media coverage, a new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey finds that 53% now have a favorable opinion of Palin while just 26% offer a less flattering assessment.


Palin earns positive reviews from 78% of Republicans, 26% of Democrats and 63% of unaffiliated voters. Obviously, these numbers will be subject to change as voters learn more about her in the coming weeks. Among all voters, 29% have a Very Favorable opinion of Palin while 9% hold a Very Unfavorable view.


By way of comparison, on the day he was selected as Barack Obama’s running mate, Delaware Senator Joseph Biden was viewed favorably by 43% of voters.


In the new survey, 35% of voters say the selection of Palin makes them more likely to vote for McCain while 33% say they are less likely to do so. Most Republicans say they are more likely to vote for Palin and most Democrats say the opposite. As for voters not affiliated with either major party, 37% are more likely to vote for McCain and 28% less likely to do so. Those numbers are a bit more positive than initial reaction to Biden.


After McCain's announcement, Clinton issued a statement saying, "We should all be proud of Governor Sarah Palin's historic nomination, and I congratulate her and Senator McCain. While their policies would take America in the wrong direction, Governor Palin will add an important new voice to the debate." Palin is now viewed favorably by 48% of women. That figure includes 80% of Republican women, 23% of Democratic women, and 61% of women not affiliated with either major party.


Polls are what they are and change like people change socks.  However, these are good preliminary numbers.  Time will tell how it all plays out. 


The polls poll mostly democrats...go figure...

Not true. This is the latest poll, figures submitted just today. nm
.
If you believe in polls good for you - The King of Polls said
So the polls only poll a few small areas with certain demographics. You trust that. Sure maybe they only poll Hollyweird and the other liberal cities. They also reflect all the phone voter registrations, so maybe to your cat and cartoon characters it matters that Obama is ahead. Me - I'll wait for election day to find out the truth about who is ahead in the race. I've said it before and I'll say it again (and glad to know Mr. Rassmusin backs me up on this one) - polls do not matter and do not reflect a real vision of who is ahead in the race.
The polls that supply that electoral map are just that....polls...sm
Polls mean less than nothing to me. Polls intimidate and mislead the voters, in my opinion. Thanks for asking.



Not according to Rasmussen....
according to Rasmussen McCain is up 51% to 44%. Win Ohio, win the election.
Rasmussen said
I was listening to Rasmussen interviewed and he said that by having all these fraudulent registrations it shows up in the polls (you know, the same polls that change hour to hour and don't mean anything). Like you said, maybe they register but what happens when it comes to the actual voting. The only thing (to me) that bogus registrations do is boost the polls up.

He also said that if "everyone" was for Barack Obama and he was so great and nobody wanted McCain or a republican in this next term Obama should be way way head in the polls like by 20 or 30%. But because the polls are showing McCain and Obama pretty much 50/50 give or take 4 or 5 points that goes to show you how close they really are.

Goes to show me (coming from Mr. Pollster himself) that polls don't mean anything and will not affect the way I and most people vote.
Current Rasmussen Reports
Poll shows Obama leading 260 electoral votes to McCain 167 votes. If you take the "likely states" the votes change to Obama 300, McCain 174.

Rasmussen has lots of interesting polls on its site, for what they are worth, but it is interesting to watch them change week-to-week and some of them even day-to-day.

www.rasmussenreports.com
Sorry - the Approval Index is by Rasmussen
+30 the day after his inauguration...down...down...down...a few blips up...but mostly DOWN. Not hard to see why, of course - it's called buyer's remorse. Unfortunately, there's no Lemon Law when it comes to kissing a political toad and learning to our sorrow that it really is just a toad - and was never anything else. In 2012, we'll try a different toad.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
Excuse me. I gave the AI exactly as reported by Rasmussen.
Misrepresent my eye.

And only 37% think the country is going in the right direction - I didn't even mention that little number.

The fact that this is a daily poll makes absolutely no difference because the +30 number he started off with was a daily number as well, so it's comparing apples to apples. All you have to do is look at the trend to see it's going DOWN DOWN DOWN DOWN DOWN with - exactly AS I SAID - a few blips up.

Galls ya, doesn't it?

Nice try, but no cigar and/or kewpie doll for yew today!
Geez, check rasmussen. Love these drive by potshots. lol. nm
nm
I took the poll...sm
Sounds like Lewis needs to stay in the house unless the owner is with him. That should solve the problem.
Poll
It is
50 for Obama
43 for McCain
how about the AP poll...
Which shows the two candidates dead even? and if the polls are accurate, how come every one of them has different numbers? And furthermore, they only show the people who responded; I know I got several calls and I don't tell any stranger on the phone who I am voting for. This is my business and only mine. so don't be naive enough to think the polls are the be-all and end-all. look at how many times the polls have shown one candidate as a clear frontrunner who then went on to lose the election.
there was a poll on here
not too long ago and if I remember correctly, at least at the time I saw it, the majority on here seemed to be with McCain; of course I don't take polls too seriously either. TATA... Enjoy your week!!! :)
How about a poll?
Some of us who choose Obama have posted our reasons for doing so.  How about you pubs posting your REAL reasons for voting for McCain.  What do you think (or hope) McCain will do for you and all of us?
poll
You asked for whom we were voting for. I didn't realize my choice wasn't sincere since I didn't give an explanation in the post. I've stated my reasons enough on this board. Also, I'm not Republican, rather Independent.

I'm not being snippy in this post. I just wanted to state why I didn't post my reason under my vote. :)

I'm voting for McCain, but I think Obama is going to win in all honestly.
The man at the poll said
I just wore jeans, orange top with lighter orange sweater. The guy helping at the poll had to pull the top part of my ballot off before I stuck it in the machine. He said: "Now I've just got to rip your top off ... I mean the top of your ballot." :)

Gorgeous here today!! Low 70s, I think. (Michigan)

Sorry - that was not my poll -
I did not post a poll before that I remember. And in case you have not been reading my posts for the last months, I voted for Obama the first day my county would allow me to vote...
Particularly a CNN poll.
x
That's true - and Barack Obama is a true Patriot too.
Again we can agree to disagree. How John McCain has voted goes against everything I want as a President, but there are an equal number of people to me who feel opposite. That's the way it goes.

Your last comment brought to mind how true that is. Being a true patriot is not harmful in a candidate. John McCain is a patriot. So is Barack Obama.
This poll truly makes me ill....sm
85% Of Troops In Iraq Think Saddam Was Involved In 9/11, 77% Think Supported Al-Qaeda.

You can't blame them either. I cannot imagine what it be like to know what they are doing over there is all connected to nothing but BS. The cognitive dissonance would be unbearable.

Re: Poll/Survey sm
There are a lot of concerns and issues facing the nation at this time and for some reason my gut tells me substance will be the major factor in the next election, at least I hope so. Thus far the two candidates that have caught my attention are Obama and Romney, but the election is quite a ways off and I need to do more research. Anyway I hope that religion/hairstyles/past lovers, etc., take a back seat to substance/ability/issues in the next election.
depends on what poll you are looking at
I've seen recent polls that put both Clinton and Obama about even with McCain when matched up together and others that show both of them come out ahead of McCain 5-10 points. Others then show McCain ahead. Polls are so subjective that you have to take them with a grain of salt. The most telling thing to me is that Democratic vote turnout has been twice that of Republican turnout in some areas, so no matter what people are saying in the polls, getting them to the voting booths in November is a different matter. The Democrats are energized and enthusiastic, flocking to the polls. The Republicans overall are leukwarm on McCain (and the party in general) and it's showing in unenthusiastic turnouts. This will play very well for whomever the Democratic candidate is in November.
You might want to check your poll
.
USA Today poll

9/5 - 9/7


McCain 54


Obama 44


 


Actually....this is the actual poll...
While Republicans and Democrats predictably favor their party’s candidate by overwhelming margins, the experience gap among voters unaffiliated with either party is even narrower than the national totals. Forty-two percent (42%) say Obama has better experience to be president, but 37% say Palin does.

These are unaffiliated voters....37% of which say she has more experience to be President. That is just a 5% difference...not 61%.

Ahem.
Every poll is a sample of what is to come...this is no different...sm
from the polls out there now. I would guess the ones that didn't contribute are physically incapacitated in some way due to the effects of fighting the WRONG war. We went after the WRONG people just to try and make a war hero out of a president who ran his companies down to the ground and now he did the same with our country and his best friend McSame will do the same. He can't even decide which mantra to go by for his campaign...first it was experience, then country first and now change...he's trying to copy Obama because he knows Obama is right.
A simple poll, sm
Who Would You Hire

You are The Boss... which team would you hire?





With America facing historic debt, multiple war fronts, stumbling health care, a weakened dollar, all-time high prison population, skyrocketing Federal spending, mortgage crises, bank foreclosures, etc. etc., this is an ***unusually critical*** election year.





Let's look at the educational background of your two options:




McCain:


United States Naval Academy - Class rank 894 of 899





& Palin:



Hawaii Pacific University - 1 semester



North Idaho College - 2 semesters - general study



University of Idaho - 2 semesters - journalism



Matanuska-Susitna College - 1 semester



University of Idaho - 3 semesters - B.A. in journalism 



(verified through Anchorage Daily News adn.com  1981-1987.  5 schools in 6 years! 



 vs.


Obama:



Occidental College - Two years.



Columbia University - B.A. political science with a specialization in international relations.



Harvard - Juris Doctor (J.D.) Magna Cum Laude



 & Biden:



University of Delaware - B.A. in history and B.A. in political science.



Syracuse University College of Law - Juris Doctor (J.D.)



Now, which team are you going to "hire" ? 


On which poll? They all vary. (sm)
x
depends in which poll you look at....
and all within the margin of error.
Internet poll...
Firstly of all, it is the result of an Internet poll.
Secondly TAKE IT EASY.
Cut out the RAGE.
Add your vote to the poll down below
nm
POLL TIME!
What did all you political activists wear to the polls today?  

This WHITE-haired old gal made her own personal, albeit subtle, political statement by wearind a RED sweater with my BLUE jeans. 
New CNN poll results
Not to shabby after his week from he!!.
Gallup Poll
Approval of Congress Hits 4-year High, Fueled by Dems

 

by Jeffrey M. Jones


PRINCETON, NJ -- Americans' job approval rating of Congress is up an additional 8 points this month, after a 12-point increase last month, and now stands at 39% -- the most positive assessment of Congress since February 2005.


0ht92lp5mko26m1teo2spw


Americans who identify themselves as Democrats are mostly responsible for the improved ratings of Congress measured in the March 5-8 Gallup Poll. After showing a 25-point increase in their approval of Congress from January to February and a further 14-point increase in March, a majority of Democrats (57%) now approve of the job the Democratically-controlled Congress is doing. Independents also show improved ratings of Congress, but not nearly to the extent that Democrats do. Republicans' evaluations of Congress have changed very little this year.


ppzjbmzq3kojg7bmohawxw


Quick Turnaround


Even though Congress' job approval rating is still low on an absolute basis, the recent ratings represent a quick turnaround from the historically low ratings of 2008. Last year, on average, only 19% of Americans approved of the job Congress was doing -- one of the three lowest yearly congressional approval averages in Gallup records dating back to 1974, along with 1979 (19%) and 1992 (18%).


In January of this year, Congress' job approval rating among remained low at 19%, before jumping to 31% in February after the change in presidential administrations from Republican George W. Bush to Democrat Barack Obama. But this month brings an even more positive evaluation of Congress, with 39% of Americans now approving.


The latest increase suggests the reason for the improved ratings of Congress in 2009 may go beyond simply the change from split control to one-party control of the federal government, to include an assessment of the work Congress has been doing with the new president on the economy and other issues.


Such an explanation seems plausible given that a majority of Democrats now approve of the job Congress is doing, and that the gap between Democratic and Republican approval of Congress is growing, as Congress passes and President Obama signs laws to deal with the economy and other issues that largely follow a Democratic philosophy of governing.


Even though the Democratic Party had majority control of both houses of Congress in 2007-2008, it was able to achieve little of its legislative agenda while Republican Bush remained in the White House. This lack of results may have soured Democrats' opinions of Congress. During this time, rank-and-file Democrats' approval ratings of Congress sank to as low as 11% in July 2008, after starting out near 40% shortly after the party took control of Congress in early 2007.


z8zawoaajuqcaodtozho0a


Now that the strengthened Democratic-controlled Congress is able to pass most of what it wants with little or no help from Republicans, and can count on the president to sign it into law, rank-and-file Democrats hold Congress in much greater esteem. The 57% approval rating for Congress among Democrats is the best the party has given the institution since March 2002, when Congress' job approval scores were at historical highs in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.


Survey Methods


Results are based on telephone interviews with 1,012 national adults, aged 18 and older, conducted March 5-8, 2009. For results based on the total sample of national adults, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±3 percentage points.


Interviews are conducted with respondents on land-line telephones (for respondents with a land-line telephone) and cellular phones (for respondents who are cell-phone only).


In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.


This is such a stupid poll
About half say yes and half say no, I bet if you polled atheists, college students, teachers, doctors, construction workers, etc etc, you'd get about the same result.

JTBB, I used to quite enjoy our talks, but now I'm starting to feel like you just like to attack Christians. Personally I find it really hurtful.
A poll of a sort........... sm

What, in your opinion, originally defined right behavior from wrong behavior? 


This not only applies to the discussion below but also any wrong behavior such as stealing, murder, rape, or any one of the other blights on the face of mankind.  Please explain your answer citing whatever source of information supports your argument. 


Take a look at these polls.sm
Just to give you an idea, take Denver's Rocky Mountain News poll (the state is very conservative) below, and look at the results. Almost every poll I have seen shows large percentages of Americans think the same way as the theorists.

http://blogs.rockymountainnews.com/denver/rockytalklive/archives/2006/08/the_government_and_911_2.html#more

Here is another one from Ed Schultz at Air America with a 50/50 split.

http://www.wegoted.com/index.asp
Polls
Make that alter-ego. Changing names according to post content = literary license. I'm sure you've heard of it before, being so intimately acquainted with the literary world and all. Makes things a bit more intriguing. Enables one to dial back rabid mad-dog rhetoric.

Case in point. You don't launch into your "5-paragraph volleys" unless you think you are talking to GT. As BW, I enjoy the luxury of not having to drag out an entire arsenal of put-downs just to make myself understood, since you can’t quite figure out who you are talking to. Usually I am pretty good about revealing the aliases eventually, but not always. That is another prerogative of free speech.

BTW, when you lift content and ideas from somebody else's post, it's customary to use quotes. Disciple? Shades of the gospel according to Saint Hannity. Another suggestion would be that when you plagiarize thought or content, at least be careful not to put it into responses addressed to the original author.

Yes, Congress has a lower rating than Bush. He wields a powerful weapon that empowers him to obstruct, stall and reverse any sort of viable legislative initiatives. It's called the veto pen. In this last session, he has used it 8 times but Congress has managed to override him on 4 of those vetoes. They at have at least shown more ability than Bush to cross the aisle and engage themselves in effective bipartisan initiatives and convince them to vote against their fearless leader.

You and the pubs make no excuses for being too inept at reaching consensus (a decidedly American concept). Obstruction, stalling and reversals are akin to dodges, deceive and deflections. They are the strategies used by petty dictators and their parties in a setting of “might makes right,” that divide and conquer approach, rather than taking the high road and exerting the effort or harboring the desire to create a representative government body. Bipartisanship has never been his forte anyway. No surprise there.

Polls are interesting, but not terribly reliable, given the problems that arise when you start to consider the source, sift through bias, skewing and the like. More than likely, the polls offer the most reliable reflection of public opinion would be the approval ratings of the candidates, not that status quo that is destined to be decimated come November. Most dems are just about as frustrated with the whole mess as you are. On that we can agree. But my take on approval ratings, at least in terms the current state of affairs in Congress and the executive branch, is that the low numbers reflect a much more deep-seated frustration and anger toward being lied to about the war and the incalculable costs in terms of human life as well as tax dollars, the state of the economy and the perception that nobody anywhere is doing anything, typical of a lame duck in a campaign year. The nation as a whole is in a really bad mood, to be sure. They simply don't approve of anything, at the moment.

More than likely, this will play itself with a major overhaul on both sides of the aisle. Who comes out on top in Congress in terms of numbers is anybody’s guess.

Polls are even at 42%
per a CBS poll taken on Wednesday, so this does not include Palin's speech or McCain's acceptance speech. 
Polls & More

Remember, this is the party that prides itself on being "tolerant."  Yeah, sure.  How tolerant have they been of anything a conservative has to say?  This why they lie in wait here, so the few times I even bother to take the time (more like waste it) to post something, I try to make the subject line not stand out as a "right-winger" view.


This board is no better than DailyKos, HuffingtonPost, etc.  Go to those sites and see how well the libs behave. I look at this forum very seldom now after seeing what the bulk of my industry thinks and how totally nasty they behave.  They make having a cat fight look like a tea party.


While polls mean almost nothing to me, Rasmussen is a very reputable one.  Below is from Media Resarch Center (excellent; Bret Bozell, Libertarian).  Included in the article are links for a great deal of info for anyone interested.  Nasty posts, etc. mean nothing to me, so do as you please.  I've made my pitstop here for the day (or week), and see that each time I look here it's only gotten more nasty.


**********************************************************************************************
A new Rasmussen poll of 1,000 likely voters shows that by a
stunning five-to-one margin, Americans believe the media
are actively trying to help Barack Obama win the Presidential
Election.

The new poll comes on the heels of last week's survey that
discovered by a margin of 10 to 1, the public believes the
media are trying to hurt Republican Vice Presidential
nominee Sarah Palin.

Shockingly, Democrats and "unaffiliated" voters both believe
that journalists are attempting to help Obama.

For the complete CyberAlert report:

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10831&RID=16855646


Much has been made of Barack Obama's "lipstick on a pig" remark,
but few, if any worked harder to run cover for Democrat
Presidential hopeful more than MSNBC’s Chris Matthews, who
questioned if the comment "insults...everyone's intelligence?"

But did Matthews insult his viewers' intelligence on Monday,
when he accused Palin and Rudy Guiliani of using coded racist
language when they referred to Obama’s experience as a
"community organizer?"

For the full CyberAlert report:

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10832&RID=16855646

Is CNN the talking parrot on the shoulder of the Democrat Party?

A closer look reveals the "best political team on television"
parroting the Democrats dismal view of the economy by mimicking
the claim that the Republicans are shying away from the issue.
In fact, in true parrot form, CNN repeated the charge at least
12 times during its September 4 coverage.

For the complete Business & Media Institute report:

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10833&RID=16855646


Haven't yet signed up for The Business & Media Institute's Balance
Sheet? It’s a free, weekly e-mail newsletter auditing media coverage
of business and economic issues. Packed with analysis of the top
issues in the news from a free-market perspective, it is essential
reading for everyone who wants to know what the media aren't
telling you.

The Balance Sheet also delivers expert commentary and links to
valuable resources. Click here to sign up:

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10834&RID=16855646

P.S: MRC's exclusive, special report "Obama's Margin of Victory:
The Media" is shipping. If you haven't yet reserved your copy
of this 60 page booklet that shines the white-hot light on the
media's overt role in Obama's meteoric rise to prominence do so
now by clicking here:

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10835&CID=500&RID=16855646


********
MRC News Report
09/11/08
********

***Brent Bozell's Syndicated Columns

MSNBC's Doomed 'Experiment'

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10836&RID=16855646

Toxic Beverly Hills

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10837&RID=16855646


***CNSNews.com

Passage of Year Makes Petraeus Look Good, Congressional Critics Look Bad

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10838&RID=16855646

Moms Say Palin Is Role Model for All Women

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10839&RID=16855646

Chavez Hails End of ‘Yankee Hegemony’ As Russian Bombers Arrive

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10840&RID=16855646

Palin Stars at Virginia Rally, Then Heads Home

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10841&RID=16855646

Biden's Bishop Seeks Prayers to Help Biden Become Pro-Life

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10842&RID=16855646

Democrat Leader Raises Specter of Government Shutdown over Oil Drilling

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10843&RID=16855646


***MRC.org

By 5-to-1 Public Thinks Most Journalists Trying to Elect Obama

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10844&RID=16855646

Matthews: Obama's 'Pig' Not Sexist, 'Community Organizer' Racist

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10845&RID=16855646

CNN Labels Palin's Environmental Stances 'Outside the Mainstream'

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10846&RID=16855646

'Non-Partisan' Liberal Group's Critique of Palin Cited by CNN

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10847&RID=16855646

ABC's Brian Ross Highlights Angry Librarians Opposed to Palin

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10848&RID=16855646

MSNBC Hosts Mock and Distort Prayer Request by Sarah Palin

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10849&RID=16855646

CBS Highlights Dem's Anti-Palin Plea: 'We've Got to Go After Her'

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10850&RID=16855646

NYT's Herbert: "Arch-Conservative" Clarence Thomas' "Self-Hatred"

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10851&RID=16855646

Couric Uses sex Scandal to Show Bush Admin 'Close' to Big Oil

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10852&RID=16855646


***Culture and Media Institute

Newsweek's Female Columnists Pile on Palin

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10853&RID=16855646

The Cost of Killing Palinzilla

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10854&RID=16855646

Palin Heat Threatens Planet

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10855&RID=16855646

Crude MTV Award Host Mocks Palin, Purity

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10856&RID=16855646

Stop the Presses! Palin's Church Holds to Bible's Teaching on
Homosexuality!

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10857&RID=16855646


***TimesWatch.org

Public Editor Says Palin Coverage Fair, Parenting Angle "Legitimate"

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10858&RID=16855646

Obama's Terrorist Colleague Bill Ayers Makes Cameo in Story on Education

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10859&RID=16855646

Rev. Jeremiah Wright Compares Obama to Virgin Mary -- Times Doesn't Blink

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10860&RID=16855646

Seelye Shrugs Off Dem. Ed Rendell's "Big Lie" Smear of McCain

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10861&RID=16855646

Bob Herbert Unleashed: "Arch-Conservative" Clarence Thomas's "Self-Hatred"

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10862&RID=16855646


***Business and Media Institute - businessandmedia.org

CNN Parrots Dems on Republicans and Economy

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10863&RID=16855646

Greenspan: Recession Still ཮ Percent or More' Likely

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10864&RID=16855646

Media Error Causes Steep Loss for United Airlines

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10865&RID=16855646

ABC: Manmade Global Warming Causing Worse Allergies

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10866&RID=16855646

CEO: Fannie/Freddie Bailout Makes America 'More Communist than China'

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10867&RID=16855646


***NewsBusters.org

Covering for Dems: NYT Reporter Certain Obama's 'Pig' Wasn't Palin

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10868&RID=16855646

WaPo Religion Blogger Attacks Sarah Palin's Religion

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10869&RID=16855646

MRC's Bozell Discusses 'Lipstick' Smear, MSNBC Meltdown on 'Fox & Friends'

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10870&RID=16855646

Mitchell: Obama 'Clearly' Wasn't Talking About Palin

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10871&RID=16855646

Joe Klein: 'Obama is the precise opposite of Mountain Man Todd Palin'

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10872&RID=16855646

Former Time Columnist Unveils New Obama Spokesman: Buckwheat

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10873&RID=16855646


***Worst of The Week

The Trashing of Sarah Palin

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10874&RID=16855646

*** NewsBusted

For a Lighter Look at the News:  Watch the Latest Episode of NewsBusted!

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10875&RID=16855646

***Eyeblast.tv

For the best in video, check out Eyeblast.tv!

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10876&RID=16855646

+   +  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +  +  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +
(Note: Please do not reply directly to this e-mail message. This
e-mail address is not designed to receive your personal messages.
To contact the Media Research Center with comments, questions or
to change your status, see the link at the end of this e-mail.)
+   +  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +  +  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +

+ + Comments? Questions?

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10877&RID=16855646

+ + + + +

The Media Research Center is a research and education organization
operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Contributions are tax-deductible for income tax purposes.


How much do you believe polls?
Yahoo had some info on the Rasumussen Polls and I went to their website to check it out: www.rasmussenreports.com

They have an electoral college page that shows the current "vote" at 248-163 in favor of Obama. I'm going to have to do some research and see how accurate polls were in previous presidential elections. They have it broken down by state and it is pretty interesting, if numbers are your thing!

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/election_2008_electoral_college_update
For all who believe in polls

I don't believe in polls but a lot of posters like to use them to try to make some sort of point....


Today's Gallup poll (one of the most trusted) - Obama 49, McCain 47 -


Like I say....way to close to predict a winner.  I also heard some students after last nights debate that said they were still undecided said if they had to vote right now they'd choose McCain.  Goes to show not every single person/young person voting Obama.


polls
Thanks, it is

49.5 for Obama
42.7 for McCain.

Obama is 6.8 points ahead.
Should be noted that this is not a scientific poll
It's one those click here to vote deals.  Not credible in the least.
CNN poll from September of 2006

Asked whether former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein was personally involved in the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, 52 percent said he was not, but 43 percent said they believe he was. The White House has denied Hussein's 9/11 involvement -- most recently in a news conference August 21, when President Bush said Hussein had nothing to do with the attacks.


To answer your poll - I think it will hurt him...sm
Just the mere fact that it is the topic of several different discussions could hurt him.

Or could it have the opposite effect?

(my thoughts is that it hurts him)
Here is an article about the poll workers. sm
It is from the Boston Globe. They only give a brief description. There was more discussion on it in one of the grassroots forums.

Apparently,the poll workers did have permission to be there, and the NH GOP told them to stand their ground.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/politics/primarysource/2008/01/obama_and_paul.html