Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

If you believe in polls good for you - The King of Polls said

Posted By: they don't reflect all of America on 2008-10-15
In Reply to: McCain drops further in polls Monday. - Sarah & Todd said to be partly to blame.

So the polls only poll a few small areas with certain demographics. You trust that. Sure maybe they only poll Hollyweird and the other liberal cities. They also reflect all the phone voter registrations, so maybe to your cat and cartoon characters it matters that Obama is ahead. Me - I'll wait for election day to find out the truth about who is ahead in the race. I've said it before and I'll say it again (and glad to know Mr. Rassmusin backs me up on this one) - polls do not matter and do not reflect a real vision of who is ahead in the race.


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

The polls that supply that electoral map are just that....polls...sm
Polls mean less than nothing to me. Polls intimidate and mislead the voters, in my opinion. Thanks for asking.



A good explanation of the polls and margins...sm
Pollsters Struggle to Handicap Presidential Race

Barack Obama's leading in virtually every national poll, but his margin fluctuates wildly -- suggesting that in some cases, the numbers do in fact lie.


Barack Obama's been leading John McCain in almost every national poll since late September, and it may seem like he's got the election all sewn up.

But the Democratic presidential nominee's margin has fluctuated wildly, anywhere from 1 to 13 points in the past two weeks alone. And a few recent polls are even within the margin of error, suggesting McCain could actually be leading among certain sets of voters.

This doesn't mean the surveys are masking a widespread McCain advantage -- he's still trailing in most major battlegrounds needed to secure the election. But survey disparities are so great this year as to suggest that the numbers, contrary to the old adage, sometimes do lie.

Part of the problem? The sheer amount of polls being conducted across the country.

FOX News political analyst Karl Rove said by his count, there have been 177 national polls conducted as of Oct. 24, compared with 55 at the same time in 2004.

"The proliferation of polls, particularly polls run by universities that may not have the skill and capability that a professional polling outfit has, are really not helpful to the process, in my opinion," Rove said.

But some of the inconsistencies in the polls this year can also be traced to the method used by the pollsters.

The "expanded" Gallup poll, unlike the "traditional" one, includes those citizens who call themselves likely voters but who've never actually voted before.

"This year, I think all pollsters are concerned about how they're defining 'likely' voters, and trying to understand turnout," FOX News polling director Dana Blanton said. "There's been so much attention placed on new registration and enthusiasm among the electorate, and it's just -- it's extremely hard to figure out that, that piece of the puzzle."

Obama held a 10-point lead Monday in Gallup's expanded poll, but only a 5-point lead in their traditional poll.

Karlyn Bowman, who studies public opinion for the American Enterprise Institute, urged voters to examine the wording and sequencing of a poll's questions, to be wary of sudden spikes -- and to shop around.

"If you see a huge change in let's say the McCain-Obama margin overall, you might want to think about whether or not there has been something that's happened that would produce that kind of extraordinary change," she said. "But I think it's important to look at one poll, and then to compare that poll to other polls, and that's the way you can be an educated consumer."

A survey of the polling landscape shows the latest CBS News/New York Times poll to be the outlier, placing Obama up by 13 points.

A FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll last week had Obama up by 9 points.

Investor's Business Daily, which came closest to nailing the race between President Bush and John Kerry in 2004 (within four-tenths of a point), has the current presidential race within the margin of error. And The Associated Press recently reported a virtual tie.

With polls still fluctuating but mostly showing Obama in the lead, the Illinois senator says he's taking nothing for granted.

"Don't believe for a second this election is over. Don't think for a minute that power concedes," Obama said Monday in Canton, Ohio. "We have to work like our future depends on it in this last week, because it does depend on it in this last week."

McCain, meanwhile, is pledging to stun the pundits on Election Day.

"Let me give you the state of the race today. There's eight days to go. We're a few points down. The pundits have written us off, just like they've done before," McCain said Monday in Ohio. "Senator Obama's measuring the drapes ... You know I guess I'm old fashioned about these things. I prefer to let the voters weigh in before predicting the outcome."

Both Blanton and Bowman said there appears to be no evidence of a so-called "bandwagon effect" in American elections -- the idea that widespread dissemination of polling data trending a certain way will cause voters to in turn move in that direction. Such an effect might have led to a Hillary Clinton-Rudy Giuliani pairing, once the favorites in their respective races.

Experts say the "bandwagon" effect might be more common in places like Israel or Great Britain, where election cycles are much shorter.

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/27/dont-like-polls-wait-minutes/
Take a look at these polls.sm
Just to give you an idea, take Denver's Rocky Mountain News poll (the state is very conservative) below, and look at the results. Almost every poll I have seen shows large percentages of Americans think the same way as the theorists.

http://blogs.rockymountainnews.com/denver/rockytalklive/archives/2006/08/the_government_and_911_2.html#more

Here is another one from Ed Schultz at Air America with a 50/50 split.

http://www.wegoted.com/index.asp
Polls
Make that alter-ego. Changing names according to post content = literary license. I'm sure you've heard of it before, being so intimately acquainted with the literary world and all. Makes things a bit more intriguing. Enables one to dial back rabid mad-dog rhetoric.

Case in point. You don't launch into your "5-paragraph volleys" unless you think you are talking to GT. As BW, I enjoy the luxury of not having to drag out an entire arsenal of put-downs just to make myself understood, since you can’t quite figure out who you are talking to. Usually I am pretty good about revealing the aliases eventually, but not always. That is another prerogative of free speech.

BTW, when you lift content and ideas from somebody else's post, it's customary to use quotes. Disciple? Shades of the gospel according to Saint Hannity. Another suggestion would be that when you plagiarize thought or content, at least be careful not to put it into responses addressed to the original author.

Yes, Congress has a lower rating than Bush. He wields a powerful weapon that empowers him to obstruct, stall and reverse any sort of viable legislative initiatives. It's called the veto pen. In this last session, he has used it 8 times but Congress has managed to override him on 4 of those vetoes. They at have at least shown more ability than Bush to cross the aisle and engage themselves in effective bipartisan initiatives and convince them to vote against their fearless leader.

You and the pubs make no excuses for being too inept at reaching consensus (a decidedly American concept). Obstruction, stalling and reversals are akin to dodges, deceive and deflections. They are the strategies used by petty dictators and their parties in a setting of “might makes right,” that divide and conquer approach, rather than taking the high road and exerting the effort or harboring the desire to create a representative government body. Bipartisanship has never been his forte anyway. No surprise there.

Polls are interesting, but not terribly reliable, given the problems that arise when you start to consider the source, sift through bias, skewing and the like. More than likely, the polls offer the most reliable reflection of public opinion would be the approval ratings of the candidates, not that status quo that is destined to be decimated come November. Most dems are just about as frustrated with the whole mess as you are. On that we can agree. But my take on approval ratings, at least in terms the current state of affairs in Congress and the executive branch, is that the low numbers reflect a much more deep-seated frustration and anger toward being lied to about the war and the incalculable costs in terms of human life as well as tax dollars, the state of the economy and the perception that nobody anywhere is doing anything, typical of a lame duck in a campaign year. The nation as a whole is in a really bad mood, to be sure. They simply don't approve of anything, at the moment.

More than likely, this will play itself with a major overhaul on both sides of the aisle. Who comes out on top in Congress in terms of numbers is anybody’s guess.

Polls are even at 42%
per a CBS poll taken on Wednesday, so this does not include Palin's speech or McCain's acceptance speech. 
Polls & More

Remember, this is the party that prides itself on being "tolerant."  Yeah, sure.  How tolerant have they been of anything a conservative has to say?  This why they lie in wait here, so the few times I even bother to take the time (more like waste it) to post something, I try to make the subject line not stand out as a "right-winger" view.


This board is no better than DailyKos, HuffingtonPost, etc.  Go to those sites and see how well the libs behave. I look at this forum very seldom now after seeing what the bulk of my industry thinks and how totally nasty they behave.  They make having a cat fight look like a tea party.


While polls mean almost nothing to me, Rasmussen is a very reputable one.  Below is from Media Resarch Center (excellent; Bret Bozell, Libertarian).  Included in the article are links for a great deal of info for anyone interested.  Nasty posts, etc. mean nothing to me, so do as you please.  I've made my pitstop here for the day (or week), and see that each time I look here it's only gotten more nasty.


**********************************************************************************************
A new Rasmussen poll of 1,000 likely voters shows that by a
stunning five-to-one margin, Americans believe the media
are actively trying to help Barack Obama win the Presidential
Election.

The new poll comes on the heels of last week's survey that
discovered by a margin of 10 to 1, the public believes the
media are trying to hurt Republican Vice Presidential
nominee Sarah Palin.

Shockingly, Democrats and "unaffiliated" voters both believe
that journalists are attempting to help Obama.

For the complete CyberAlert report:

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10831&RID=16855646


Much has been made of Barack Obama's "lipstick on a pig" remark,
but few, if any worked harder to run cover for Democrat
Presidential hopeful more than MSNBC’s Chris Matthews, who
questioned if the comment "insults...everyone's intelligence?"

But did Matthews insult his viewers' intelligence on Monday,
when he accused Palin and Rudy Guiliani of using coded racist
language when they referred to Obama’s experience as a
"community organizer?"

For the full CyberAlert report:

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10832&RID=16855646

Is CNN the talking parrot on the shoulder of the Democrat Party?

A closer look reveals the "best political team on television"
parroting the Democrats dismal view of the economy by mimicking
the claim that the Republicans are shying away from the issue.
In fact, in true parrot form, CNN repeated the charge at least
12 times during its September 4 coverage.

For the complete Business & Media Institute report:

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10833&RID=16855646


Haven't yet signed up for The Business & Media Institute's Balance
Sheet? It’s a free, weekly e-mail newsletter auditing media coverage
of business and economic issues. Packed with analysis of the top
issues in the news from a free-market perspective, it is essential
reading for everyone who wants to know what the media aren't
telling you.

The Balance Sheet also delivers expert commentary and links to
valuable resources. Click here to sign up:

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10834&RID=16855646

P.S: MRC's exclusive, special report "Obama's Margin of Victory:
The Media" is shipping. If you haven't yet reserved your copy
of this 60 page booklet that shines the white-hot light on the
media's overt role in Obama's meteoric rise to prominence do so
now by clicking here:

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10835&CID=500&RID=16855646


********
MRC News Report
09/11/08
********

***Brent Bozell's Syndicated Columns

MSNBC's Doomed 'Experiment'

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10836&RID=16855646

Toxic Beverly Hills

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10837&RID=16855646


***CNSNews.com

Passage of Year Makes Petraeus Look Good, Congressional Critics Look Bad

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10838&RID=16855646

Moms Say Palin Is Role Model for All Women

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10839&RID=16855646

Chavez Hails End of ‘Yankee Hegemony’ As Russian Bombers Arrive

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10840&RID=16855646

Palin Stars at Virginia Rally, Then Heads Home

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10841&RID=16855646

Biden's Bishop Seeks Prayers to Help Biden Become Pro-Life

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10842&RID=16855646

Democrat Leader Raises Specter of Government Shutdown over Oil Drilling

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10843&RID=16855646


***MRC.org

By 5-to-1 Public Thinks Most Journalists Trying to Elect Obama

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10844&RID=16855646

Matthews: Obama's 'Pig' Not Sexist, 'Community Organizer' Racist

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10845&RID=16855646

CNN Labels Palin's Environmental Stances 'Outside the Mainstream'

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10846&RID=16855646

'Non-Partisan' Liberal Group's Critique of Palin Cited by CNN

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10847&RID=16855646

ABC's Brian Ross Highlights Angry Librarians Opposed to Palin

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10848&RID=16855646

MSNBC Hosts Mock and Distort Prayer Request by Sarah Palin

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10849&RID=16855646

CBS Highlights Dem's Anti-Palin Plea: 'We've Got to Go After Her'

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10850&RID=16855646

NYT's Herbert: "Arch-Conservative" Clarence Thomas' "Self-Hatred"

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10851&RID=16855646

Couric Uses sex Scandal to Show Bush Admin 'Close' to Big Oil

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10852&RID=16855646


***Culture and Media Institute

Newsweek's Female Columnists Pile on Palin

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10853&RID=16855646

The Cost of Killing Palinzilla

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10854&RID=16855646

Palin Heat Threatens Planet

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10855&RID=16855646

Crude MTV Award Host Mocks Palin, Purity

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10856&RID=16855646

Stop the Presses! Palin's Church Holds to Bible's Teaching on
Homosexuality!

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10857&RID=16855646


***TimesWatch.org

Public Editor Says Palin Coverage Fair, Parenting Angle "Legitimate"

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10858&RID=16855646

Obama's Terrorist Colleague Bill Ayers Makes Cameo in Story on Education

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10859&RID=16855646

Rev. Jeremiah Wright Compares Obama to Virgin Mary -- Times Doesn't Blink

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10860&RID=16855646

Seelye Shrugs Off Dem. Ed Rendell's "Big Lie" Smear of McCain

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10861&RID=16855646

Bob Herbert Unleashed: "Arch-Conservative" Clarence Thomas's "Self-Hatred"

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10862&RID=16855646


***Business and Media Institute - businessandmedia.org

CNN Parrots Dems on Republicans and Economy

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10863&RID=16855646

Greenspan: Recession Still ཮ Percent or More' Likely

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10864&RID=16855646

Media Error Causes Steep Loss for United Airlines

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10865&RID=16855646

ABC: Manmade Global Warming Causing Worse Allergies

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10866&RID=16855646

CEO: Fannie/Freddie Bailout Makes America 'More Communist than China'

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10867&RID=16855646


***NewsBusters.org

Covering for Dems: NYT Reporter Certain Obama's 'Pig' Wasn't Palin

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10868&RID=16855646

WaPo Religion Blogger Attacks Sarah Palin's Religion

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10869&RID=16855646

MRC's Bozell Discusses 'Lipstick' Smear, MSNBC Meltdown on 'Fox & Friends'

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10870&RID=16855646

Mitchell: Obama 'Clearly' Wasn't Talking About Palin

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10871&RID=16855646

Joe Klein: 'Obama is the precise opposite of Mountain Man Todd Palin'

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10872&RID=16855646

Former Time Columnist Unveils New Obama Spokesman: Buckwheat

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10873&RID=16855646


***Worst of The Week

The Trashing of Sarah Palin

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10874&RID=16855646

*** NewsBusted

For a Lighter Look at the News:  Watch the Latest Episode of NewsBusted!

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10875&RID=16855646

***Eyeblast.tv

For the best in video, check out Eyeblast.tv!

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10876&RID=16855646

+   +  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +  +  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +
(Note: Please do not reply directly to this e-mail message. This
e-mail address is not designed to receive your personal messages.
To contact the Media Research Center with comments, questions or
to change your status, see the link at the end of this e-mail.)
+   +  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +  +  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +

+ + Comments? Questions?

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10877&RID=16855646

+ + + + +

The Media Research Center is a research and education organization
operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Contributions are tax-deductible for income tax purposes.


How much do you believe polls?
Yahoo had some info on the Rasumussen Polls and I went to their website to check it out: www.rasmussenreports.com

They have an electoral college page that shows the current "vote" at 248-163 in favor of Obama. I'm going to have to do some research and see how accurate polls were in previous presidential elections. They have it broken down by state and it is pretty interesting, if numbers are your thing!

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/election_2008_electoral_college_update
For all who believe in polls

I don't believe in polls but a lot of posters like to use them to try to make some sort of point....


Today's Gallup poll (one of the most trusted) - Obama 49, McCain 47 -


Like I say....way to close to predict a winner.  I also heard some students after last nights debate that said they were still undecided said if they had to vote right now they'd choose McCain.  Goes to show not every single person/young person voting Obama.


polls
Thanks, it is

49.5 for Obama
42.7 for McCain.

Obama is 6.8 points ahead.
Well, actually there are polls to confirm this
I don't believe the word "sick" was part of the poll but it comes pretty darn close to the majority of America's current view of this administration and this war.
These polls are so fickle.

Up and down, up and down. 


I just don't know if he can stand the heat.  I have so far not been impressed with Obama.  Right now it seems that people are using him against a Hillary vote and not necessarily for anything he says or stands for.  Is it just me, or does the man lack conviction or passion of any kind?  He doesn't ever really say anything of substance and not very good at defending what positions he has taken a stand on.  I'm not sure if I want someone of so little experience as President. 


This is how I would like to see it play out:  HIllary elected and breaks some of the ice by implanting some changes followed up by either Edwards or Obama at the next election to implement more changes.  I say this because I believe people inherently don't like change and they especially don't like fast change.  So if Obama or Edwards were to beat out Hillary and try to implement such sweeping changes, I don't think those changes could sustain themselves.  Obama doesn't strike me as being very forceful and may buckle, and Edwards comes across as too forceful and I think would have trouble during their administrations amongst their peers.


I don't put much stock in polls....
however, McCain is the first to break the 50% mark. And I trust Gallup and rasmussen more than I trust Fox polls, CNN polls or other media outlet polls. Although CBS did show McCain with a lead too. Still, it is encouraging, and a pretty big whoop...lol
If polls are samples of what is to come...
that is very good for McCain. Still ahead in the popular vote and making big gains in swing states. So...great. If polls are a sample of what is to come...it is good news for McCain.
Polls as of today....
Gallup:
Gallup Daily: McCain 47%, Obama 45%

McCain retains a three-point advantage for the third straight day, 50% to 47% (see recent daily results).

Real Clear Politics
RCP Average 09/05 - 09/13 -- McCain 47.5 Obama 45.2 McCain +2.3

McCain has also diminished Obama's lead in many of the "swing states" and is even within 2 points in Pennsylvania, which is unheard of. Pennsylvania nearly always goes democratic. McCain leads in Ohio. He has gone into the lead in New Mexico and Nevada. That has been steady for several days now.

All that being said...the polls said Kerry should have won many states handily...but he didn't. Polls can be very misleading. We won't know until election night...although this is the first time in how long that a Republican was leading in the polls at this point?

It is a very interesting campaign, that's for darned sure.
Polls are usually wrong. I don't put much
<>
latest polls

SP sinking . . . losing her "oh look at the shiny new object" diversionary value.  Obama on the upswing . . . and these were before the latest financial fiasco which McCain and Gramm had a hand in by deregulating financial institutions.


 


latest polls
Obama up in swing states FL and PA due to financial crisis. 
Polls don't mean didly
Unless you only keep track of them when your candidate is up. However, don't know where you got this poll, because the one I saw today said FL is very tight with McCain leading by 4%. They also added not to get to comfortable with that because polls change on an hourly basis. But in all the polls they put up there McCain was ahead by at least 4 points or more in most of the states. But like I say, polls are polls and they don't mean diddly.
If your going to go by polls then use more than just the ones that favors
As of today - Taken from polling websites and CNN

Gallup -
Obama 47, McCain 44

Rassmussen -
Obama 38, McCain 58

Battleground Tracking - Obama 46, McCain 48

American Research Group - Obama 41, McCain 53

In Ohio CNN poll gives McCain a 3 point lead (48-45)

In NC McCain has a 10-point lead

In Indiana McCain has a 6 point lead

Wisconsin has voted for dems in the last four elections, this time Obama only has a 3 point lead

My point is whether McCain or Obama is ahead it doesn't mean diddly and by posting only the polls which favor your candidate while ruling out the others is just another spread of propaganda and does not validate your claims.
Polls mean nothing. Don't trust them. - sm
Polls have always been used by the media to sway people to vote one way or the other. I have no idea how they can even count them as reputible. The real poll is when people vote and I have never heard anyone say that they are voting a certain way because of the polls. What we are hearing on the news is made up to fit whichever news station you ware watching and from what I see and read on the internet the polls change hourly.
I'll believe polls when
I see how many illegals are in them.
I too do not put much faith in polls.
Did these polls have John Kerry ahead at this time during the last election.  They also showed the Nixon was ahead of Kennedy.  We will find out when we find out.  Just go vote for who you think is best and hope for the best.
The polls are not accurate...
slanted for obama like everything else the liberal media tells you. People (myself included) tend to believe what they want to believe
Yeah? I saw polls where they were only

2 points away from each other. I've seen polls where they were 5 points away all in the same day.


Don't count on the polls for the decision and I don't think you should be so smug about it. He may still lose. Then what are you going to say?


does anyone know anything about registering at the polls?
I just got a call from my daughter who lives in Arizona. She went to vote this morning and was told she was not registered, even though she has voted there before! So they went and had her register on site but then told her she could fill out a "provisional ballot" but that her vote would not count! What??? Does anyone know anything about provisional ballots or the whole "registering at the polls situation? Please, reliable info only. No bashing! I would appreciate it. Thanks in advance.
Well, when you look at the national polls
and see that 37% of Americans are in favor of the bill, I guess you can say that *most* people don't want this stimulus!
i dont believe those polls
How do u know those polls, any of them can be trusted?  You don't. 
again, I really dont believe ANY of those polls.
It's kinda like how they were saying our economy is fine but we all could feel that it wasn't. 
Well, you're right but the polls tell the story even better.sm
He's obviously losing some of his republican base because his poll numbers are at an all time low, so I think this article has some weight.

I don't connect with either of the country club wings either, obviously as a working woman I wouldn't fit in anyway except maybe waiting tables...LOL-(Joke!)
This predictable when News is doing polls
They can manipulate the demographic as they want. It was stated today that most of this week's polls were made up of more democrats than
Republicans. Well, of course that will bode against the president.

Look at what the polls were saying on election night in 2004. According to the news polls Kerry was winning. However, when the results were in that wasn't happening, but I'm sure you will come back with the argument that the election was fixed....and if you do then there's no debating, because that has never been proven to be true. In fact, investigations completed recently showed that Democrats were registering dead and mentally/medically incompetent people in Michigan.

Believe in polls all you want, but personally they are very easily manipulated to show what a particular organization wants them to show.
Do you live your life according to polls? sm
Reminds me of something my mother used to say to me many years ago.  If everyone jumped off a bridge, would you. 
Rs and Ds will choose which polls to hear...
You cannot overlook 13% undecided which gives neither candidate a bounce over the 50 mark, no matter how hard you try to make it fly. You can have your 3-day whoop, no problem. Convention bounce has a tendency to fade quickly in the face of unaddressed issues.
That's why polls deserve little to no attention
nm
Amen! Did you see today that the polls...sm
are showing that more men say they are voting for McCain-Palin than women by about a 10% margin?
Polls promising for both candidates
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/26627956#26627956
nice try. I don't pay attention to the polls....nm

today's polls bloomberg

and all others show obama steadily rising due to mcCain's inept performance this week with crisis and temper tantrum he threw over NYT.


 


Last week McCain was up. Polls go up and down....
we won't know until election night. But in the mean time, toast your polls. :)
I thought you didn't believe in polls?
nm
According to the polls...Biden Won Debate! (nm)
:p
Interesting article regarding polls
I have never been one to trust polls. I think a lot of people want to be "PC" and will tell you they will vote for Barack, but when it comes down to it when people actually vote it does not always line up with what they tell you. I think this election is way too close for anyone to be claiming victory or defeat at this point. Only on November 4th or 5th will we really know who the winner is. Here's the article.

http://news.aol.com/elections/article/could-the-bradley-effect-hurt-obama/210605?icid=100214839x1211583779x1200708670


By the way, I haven't been called by any of the polls....sm
This was on another blog I saw, but fits me perfectly, as well as a lot of my friends and family. By the way, we haven't been called by any of the polls either...you know, the ones that say Obama is ahead!!




How do we know the real Obama


If you question anything - you are suspect.
If you ask about his past - you’re a racist.
If you ask abut his associates - you’re a racist.

The media buries any negative reports about Obama.
I did not buy the media hype from Day ONE!!!
The media is biased and is totally against the truth.

I am voting MCCain - I can find out what I want
without retribution.

By the way, I haven’t been called by any of the polls.

the polls to be open in my area
x
Michelle Obama said don't believe the polls.
She said its too close to call right now.

Also there are over 11% who are still undecided.
Funny thing about polls
This year for the first time, I have been polled probably EVERY WEEK for the last 4-6 weeks. Other years, nothing. So, if I am any kind of example, there is little wonder the polls change so little. They poll the same people every time!

I hope the polls are wrong, believe me- sm
I remember thinking that Kerry had it in the bag too.
Then don't call them "her" polls. THAT was my point. nm
nm
Steady polls, electoral map, environment,
nm
McCain drops further in polls Monday.
n/m
All depends on what news you watch, polls
are all over the place
The polls poll mostly democrats...go figure...