Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Guess what?! At 17, you should not

Posted By: francie on 2008-09-01
In Reply to: Guess what? Birth control doesn't always work! - Even the pill. You are all making assumptions. sm

be having sex!  Duh!  My mother started working outside the home when I was 12.  She gave me VALUES of responsibility, of self-respect, and the consequences of my actions.  I never had to be told not to have premarital sex.  Unreal!  If this stuff was coming out about Chelsey Clinton, you all would be all over it!  What a meltdown!


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

Good don't guess. It's my guess though.nm
x
My guess would be

THREE!



guess what
Now you know how it feels, don't you?
That's anybody's guess. sm
But I think it is an educated guess to think most democratic voters in this election were against the war and most republican voters were for the war. Just my guess.
I guess your'e in the 39%
Bush approval rating dips to 39 percent - poll

Wed Oct 12, 9:47 PM ET

President George W. Bush's job approval rating has fallen to a new low of 39 percent in an NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll released on Wednesday.

Bush's approval rating dipped in the poll below a mid-September ranking of 40 percent. The survey also found only 28 percent of respondents believed the country was headed in the right direction, NBC reported.

Bush's political challenges have been piling up in recent weeks, from criticism over his handling of Hurricane Katrina, to growing unease over rising gas prices to conservative discord over the nomination of Harriet Miers to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Many conservatives are outraged that Bush picked the White House insider with no judicial experience instead of a judge with clear-cut conservative credentials who could be counted on to move the high court firmly to the right.

Twenty-nine percent of people surveyed said Miers was qualified to serve on the highest court in the United States, while 24 percent thought she was not qualified and 46 percent said they did not know enough about her, NBC said.

The poll also found that strong majorities did not believe that recent charges against former House Republican leader Tom DeLay of Texas or a federal investigation of Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, a Tennessee Republican, were politically motivated, NBC said.

DeLay has been indicted in Texas on money-laundering and conspiracy charges linked to campaign financing. Frist is being investigated over a stock sale.

With the 2006 congressional elections a year away, 48 percent of respondents said they preferred a Democratic-controlled Congress, compared with 39 percent who said they preferred Republican leadership, NBC said.

The 9-point difference was the largest margin between the parties in the 11 years the NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll had been tracking the question, NBC said.

The poll of 807 adults was conducted from Saturday to Monday and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.4 percentage points
where are you? I guess some way
from Houston, too close to it myself! you are right about the crime wave, up just about everywhere. have your kids told you what Sugarland and Ft. Bend County are like now?

Anyway, nobody is going to hire a medical Transcriptionist with 143 days experience on her resume and I don't feel inclined to hire a president with that, either.

Immigration is not the problem; invasion is, lawbreakers are a problem. We just had a pastor on TV in Houston who has had 5 wrecks, all caused by uninsured motorists and that is the least of it. I personally have seen what is happening to our ER's, unfortunately, the media says little about it. I understand 87 hospitals in southern California have folded. No private hospital can withstand the onslaught of all this clinic business. But, of course, the actual clinics designed for this are only open during regular business hours. Well, just a few thoughts of mine.
To Guess Who?

Sam,


Here, here! Couldn't have said it better myself! We ALL have our own personal experiences with illegals.  Where is the mention of all the illegals that come here with drugs, and murder and rape our people?! Did I mention the pedophiles?! Just watch the news and it's all over the place! Just yesterday, they were talking about an illegal from Mexico in SanFrancisco that killed a father and his 2 boys, over a traffic incident!!!??? He was part of a gang! He previously was in trouble with the law before, and nothing was done! Now 3 people are dead, and a wife and 2 other children are forever torn apart by this low-life piece of sh*T that couldn't care LESS about life, liberty, and the pursuit!!!! Same story just a few months ago in LA.  Another gang member (illegal) shot a young teen and he is now dead! These are just 2 of the MANY stories out there! Even the people that are coming here "for a better life", I can understand that.  What I don't understand is them coming here and getting FREE medical, FREE housing, etc. etc. etc.... Why the hell are THEY entitled, but we, as natural-born citizens are not, because we may "make too much money?!" My dad is 62 years old, and probably will work till the day he dies, because he isn't "entitled" to any of this, he doesn't have savings or 401K to fall back on.  My husband busts his butt, and pays a LOT of $ every month so that we all have medical, why? so they can come here and drop a kid for free, at the expense of OUR tax dollars?! BS!!! You wanna come here, fine! Then WORK for your OWN medical, housing, food, etc. etc.! I agree with the above, as for the lawbreakers, molesters, murderers, gang-bangers, let them all rot on an island together! And don't come here and wave your Mexican flag, or any other flag for that matter! If you went to other countries with your American flag, you would most likely be shot!


So please, Guess Who, get a grip and a life!


To everyone else, have a lovely day!


You must be, I guess....nm
x
THough I guess they won't be able to use them...
if we have two women running next time...lol. Guess I can put a big red X through "him" and write on "her." lol.
Well, then I guess I have a very

simple view of politics.  I would think that if a bad bill is being put on the table, that enough politicians will see that it is bad and will vote against it, i.e. the bailout bill. 


I guess that's just too simple.  Agree to disagree.


I guess we will have to.............. sm
learn to say "Do you want fries with that?"

I'd say LOL if it weren't such a scary prospect.


Nothing to guess about. s/m
They'll be crying about their bottom line profit which they will pass down to consumers and they'll lay everyone off so they can send the jobs overseas.  No guess about it.  Then they'll cry some more when no one has any money to buy their overpriced stuff.
Well, guess I can guess! what it says.
We had several Cubans come over here back in the late 60's, all close friends, one a doctor who warned all of us then where medicine was going and he was right on the money. They fled Cuba for their lives at the time. I am watching my country unravel and there is not a dang thing I can do about it outside of this one vote.
My guess is...and only a guess....
because SS is in such pitiful shape now, this will take the place of it for those of us still working...while we continue to pay for those who are on social security NOW (with our payroll taxes) because in a congress in times past Democrats decided to "borrow" from social security and never paid it back. Liberal socialist ideas NEVER work. And people keep voting them in anyway and blaming it on Republicans. LOL. Like mice on a treadmill. Sigh.
Well, then, I guess we should

keep the 10 Commandments in church too.  Then we could just go around raping, killing, stealing, lying, whatever we felt like doing.  I believe 76 some odd percent of the U.S. describes their religion as Christianity.  We let Madeline O'Hair or whatever her name is take away prayer in schools, etc. etc.  I am sick to death of this p.c. stuff.  If someone wants to be an atheist or muslim or what the heckfire ever, let 'em be.  If they don't want to participate with the MAJORITY then I don't know of any law that makes them. 


Guess who said this

"we're set up, unlike other states in the union, where it's collectively Alaskans own the resources. So we share in the wealth when the development of these resources occurs."


The New Yorker Magazine


This is not an opinion, simply a quote.


My guess would be..............sm
just like the rest of the sheeple, they have been duped into believing this man will turn the economy around with his smoke-and-mirrors approach to healing the financial condition of this country, which in turn benefits them as the money is redistributed back up to the top. Who do you think will ultimately benefit from Obmama's plan. That's right..the rich...as the lower and middle class have more disposable income, the money will trickle right back up to the top.
my guess is a lot of them
x
I guess a lot of them
Question: I would like to know who "them" are?
Well, I guess you don't but
at least if you see it alive you know if it is sick.  I posted earlier about chickens.  I promise you if you ever saw the LIVE chickens loaded in the crates on the truck headed for the slaughter house you would NEVER EVER eat another chicken  And that's a pretty site compared to the inside of a 500 foot chicken house where hundreds of chickens are raised never seeing the sunlight and standing toe to toe in their own excrement.  Well.....get the picture?  But by the time they get to the grocery store all neatly packaged...........want me to tell you where they get the cut up chickens, breasts, thighs, legs, wings?  No?  I didn't think so.
I guess it's okay then............sm
especially in light of the fact they were serving coffee! LOL
guess not................sm
ms, but I guess we will all get a bowl of that ice cream now.
I think she did just guess also (sm)
I know she had been reading some articles in political magazines about him, not Muslim magazines.  So that part probably should not have even been mentioned in my post, as I think it had nothing to do with it.  She is not Muslim.  She is not religious at all I don't think.  She was a coworker I enjoyed talking with but since I went back home to work I haven't talked to her much so have not discussed it with her recently.  She and her husband consider themselves African-American although she is a mixed race.  So she may have been following his progress because of that, not sure.
Then I guess you can....... sm
take it up with God when you see Him. This kind of reasoning is so in line with the "me, me, me" greedy society that we have now. And as far as adopted children....I know quite a few who view their adoptive parents, the ones who loved them and provided for them, as their "real" parents rather than the biologic parent and have no desire whatsoever to meet the biologic parent. And I am sure they are thankful that the biologic parent didn't take the easy way out for herself and deny them the right to life.

My guess is that they don't like him because he is ...
BLACK!
Let me guess....(sm)

Since you call yourself FeFiFo, your last name must be Fum?  Or is it Pfffffft?  I know you use that as a sign off a lot.  Doesn't sound Jewish at all to me.  LOL.  First of all, *sm* is not a moniker; it simply means *see message.*  And so what if he/she doesn't use a moniker? 


Using a moniker isn't cowardly, it's protecting one's identity....that is unless you want to be considered cowardly as well since you do the same thing. 


Try sticking to the subject for a while.  *SM* (assuming it's the same person throughout this thread) has brought up some very interesting ideas concerning the situation, and yet the only response you have to these ideas (the other side) as well as mine (basically just backing up *SM*) is to call us ignorant.  I thought this was a board for discussion, not a board for the 4-year-old *it's mine -- no it's mine* tantrum you seem to want to throw.


I guess that's no better than
Those first exects that got the bailouts and went to the resorts and spent $$$$$$$ at the spas.

I loved the replies to the ad. I say no more bailouts for anyone. NONE, NADA, ZIP. After seeing what these "people" do with the bailout money makes me sick. And the fact that nobody in congress questions it or takes the money back makes me even sicker. Congress should find out what they spent on that ad and demand they return that money or else find themselves in a nice little 8x8 room (metal bars not optional).
You got it - I guess
I'm with you. I don't understand it. This is a guy, a man, a human being. He doesn't have any supernatural powers, unless you call hyptnotizing people into trances.

But it is all the celebrity status. Most people believe that if a celebrity movie start says he's great then they must be right. People worship celebrity stars so why wouldn't they worship obama.

It's just beyond me their reasoning, but at least I know I've got some sense because I don't follow their reasoning and think for myself.

It's just very hard to educate people now adays. Especially after they've been brainwashed so much.
Well....I guess it is our job to

research and find out who voted for what and wanted what speciality added to the stimulus and when we get the chance......VOTE THEM OUT OF OFFICE!  If we start holding them accountable and voting them out for their bad decisions, maybe these politicians will think twice before they screw their constituents up the rear.


This whole thing disgusts me.  Here we are talking about our economy and the need to stimulate it and all some in government care about is getting free stuff for them.  We want new furniture.  Hey...let's all set a good example for the environment and charge new hybrid vehicles for the government to the tax payers.  Correct me if I'm wrong.....don't they make enough money to buy their own hybrid cars if that is what they want?  


I'm seriously considering the whole trip to DC with my torch and pitchfork.  I'm getting VERY irritated with our government.  If this so called stimulus package passes, I will be taking a trip.  That is all I've got to say. 


My guess is that...(sm)

she couldn't answer O'Reilly's questions because he wouldn't shut up long enough for her to get it out.  That's how it always works on his show.  I really don't see the point of anyone going on his show.  He doesn't interview people, he just screams out his right wing crazy crap.  It's like watching Jerry Springer.


The no spin zone ---- Good for right wing books, screaming matches, and, of course, door mats.


Let me guess...(sm)

You're going with the back-peddling New York Post excuse that that's supposed to be Pelosi?  Give me a break!


If they, and you, are going to be racist, you should at least have the balls to admit it. --- Pitiful.


this is not a guess
Which thing is a fact?

a. That Iran has, at this moment, long-range missiles aimed at our heartland?
b. That Iran has some uranium that could be used, years and years from now, for nuclear weapons, if nobody ever bothered negotiating with them and everybody treated them like dangerous lunatics?

The facts point to one option (and in fact the NYT article covered some of this), but the slant and the propanda lead, as always, to the other one.

I don't have any rose-colored glasses. What I have is the knowledge that our government has lied over and over to get us into war, that newspapers and TV have accepted and regurgitated those lies, and that those lies have repercussions far beyond what the news is willing to report. At some point we've got to stop listening to people we know are dishonest, saying exactly the things we JUST HEARD A FEW YEARS AGO to send us to war with Iraq.

Of course, the next step will be a humanitarian crisis, as we discover the Iranian government is killing some people we never cared about before, but that now provide a convenient excuse for us to get even madder! (Kurds, could you move over a bit?)
Let me guess...(sm)

You also can't "grasp the idea" that there are people in this country who are starving, or people who are losing their homes because of medical bills, or younger people who are simply struggling for everything, or people who are paying through the nose to get their kids through college, and yes, actually have to put off for a few days buying some things.  You really need to open your eyes.  There are people in this country who cannot afford the finer things in life.  We have 2 jobs and work overtime but we can't afford vacations most the time, certainly cannot save 600 a month, etc.  Let me define "snooty" for you:  The act of looking down one's nose and condemning those who are not as fortunate (or lucky) as oneself.  I personally would have chosen a different word. 


I wouldn't stay in that glass house too long if I were you.  Someone might come by with a rock.


That's my guess too..nm
nm
So I guess
you would rather have the crack skanks giving birth?  Wow, how nice!   You're a loser, go away.
My guess is they were sm
screaming for someone to do something, talking about patriotism, etc. Problem is how soon they forget. Now this country is less protected, I think, than it has ever been. Wait til the next attack and see what the "left" screams about then! Obama doesn't have a clue how to protect this country
Then I guess you are not yet
one of the Borg.  But watch out.  I think even repeated short exposure has a cumulative effect. 
Let me guess...(sm)

You're in that group that thinks Jesus played polo on the back of a dinosaur.


"....


No one can guess
anyone's sexual preferences/behaviors in life unless they happen to be with their significant other or tell someone about them. Most people do not make derrogatory statements because we really don't care unless you are pushing this "lifestyle" on our children or grandchildren. I don't see that anyone on this board has used any derrogatory names except for those who happen to be "offended" by those people who do not approve of homosexuality. The shortening of the term "homosexual" to "homo" does not compare to the terms you have been spewing. You cannot expect a person to NOT be offended by something they view as immoral, distasteful and unhealthy. And you cannot expect all of us to change our opinions and beliefs just because the homosexual community thinks we should, even on the heels of perverted laws. Getting "married" and enacting laws will not change opinions and beliefs. That's what homosexuals need to accept.
I guess they are going after the

Dated January 26, 2009:   http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/leftwing.pdf


Leftwing Extremists Likely to Increase


Use of Cyber Attacks over the Coming Decade


Excerpts:


The potential for economic damage, the individually-initiated and


anonymous nature of cyber attacks, and the perception that cyber attacks are


nonviolent align well with the ideological beliefs, strategic objectives, and


tactics of many leftwing extremists.


The increasing reliance of commercial businesses and other


enterprises on cyber technologies, including interconnected networks and


remote access, creates new and expanding vulnerabilities that technically-savvy


leftwing extremists will exploit.


Lone wolves and small cells can conduct highly-effective cyber attacks


consistent with the strategy of leaderless resistance that many leftwing extremists


embrace.


I guess that would put her in the....(sm)

group of "commentators."  The problem here is that you are trying to compare Beck with Barbara Walters, an investigative journalist, who for years did not express her personal views, but does so now that she is on a talk show.  I repeat --- A TALK SHOW. 


Glenn Beck is, by his own admission, also a commentator.  However, he is "spewing" his junk on the news.  Did you notice his first answer to the question of whether or not he checked his facts?  That was a big NO from him. 


And why did they get on him?  How about making up lies for no apparent reason?  What was the point of doing that?  I personally think the guy has some serious issues.....mentally, that is.  He has all the classic signs....crying spells, simulating death by gas can, etc.......LOL.


 


I guess that would be me......... LOL... sm
BUT I never said that marriage was only for Christian heterosexuals. See, this is where you twist words to suit your own tastes and create all kinds of word wars.

Marriage has been traditionally secularly as well as biblically defined as uniting 1 man and 1 woman - not a man and a man or a woman and a woman and not a man with 20 wives, etc. The issue at hand is not that marriage should be for Christians only but that no marriage, Christian or otherwise, should include people of the same sex.

As far as your argument of whether certain benefits that come with marriage should also be stripped of anyone who does not have a civil union, well, that brings about yet another form of discrimination....which is exactly what I know you wanted me to say to prove your point. However, these things were given by the government or insurance companies or courts and are not God-given rights.

Nice attempt at a fruit salad, though.
Guess what.....(sm)
that mess was waiting for him 5 months ago.
Let me guess.....(sm)
Your favorite Melissa Etheridge song is "Come To My Window?"  
Well, then, I guess it would be a
real hoot for you if/when Obama is lynched by someone with a sense of humor like yours. 
Hey, guess what....(sm)

I wasn't giving Conyers a free ride.  I was saying that him letting his wife take the fall for this (as opposed to owning up to whatever dealings he had in the matter, which I'm sure is the case) is bad....just as bad, if not worse, than cheating on your wife. 


I'm not trying to distract from anything.  You just seem to want to start an argument.


I guess they're afraid of
kids being influenced and maybe going out and doing random acts of kindness.....
My guess is much higher.
I would say at least 100; 25 who can read, another 25 who can comprehend what they read; another 25 to articulate what the ones with reading comprehension can understand and try to express, and another 25 to type and proof, at least.
Science? Guess we don't need it any more....

Poll: Give Bible story of creation equal time


Laurie Goodstein,  New York Times
August 31, 2005 RELI0831











 





In a finding that is likely to intensify the debate over what to teach students about the origins of life, a poll released Tuesday found that nearly 66 percent of Americans say that creationism should be taught alongside evolution in public schools.


The poll found that 42 percent of respondents hold strict creationist views, agreeing that living things have existed in their present form since the beginning of time.


In contrast, 48 percent said they believed that humans had evolved over time; of those, 18 percent said that evolution was guided by a supreme being, and 26 percent said it occurred through natural selection.


In all, 64 percent said they were open to the idea of teaching creationism in addition to evolution, while 38 percent favored replacing evolution with creationism.


The poll was conducted July 7 to 17 by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life and the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. The questions about evolution were asked of 2,000 people; the margin of error is 2.5 percentage points.


The poll showed 41 percent of Americans want parents to have the primary say over how evolution is taught, compared with 28 percent who say teachers and scientists should decide and 21 percent who say school boards should.


Asked whether they believed creationism should be taught instead of evolution, 38 percent were in favor, and 49 percent were opposed. Those who believe in creationism said they were very certain of their views (63 percent), compared to those who believe in evolution (32 percent).


The poll also asked about religion and politics, among other things. Respondents agreed in nearly equal numbers that nonreligious liberals have too much control over the Democratic Party (44 percent agreed), and that religious conservatives have too much control over the Republican Party (45 percent agreed).


red or green. I guess everything is all right now.
Now that the election is over.
I would go with A, I guess, Democrat
Grow a backbone, take a firm stand on the issues, present REAL ideas that people can support, provide a good alternative. Is that possible though, given that in general politicians are politicians and they seem to forget they work for the people and not lobbyists and special interests? Very discouraging, but one can only hope.