He said he "bummed" a cigarette occasionally -

Posted By: Amanda on 2008-12-08
In Reply to: Obama smoking - Just me

I think anyone trying to quit smoking at the same time running a presidential campaign would be entitled to a slip up every once in a while...

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

BC fanatics, the broken record. - nm
- Wanting the whole truth is fanatical? - Disagree.nm
  - You have all the truth there is. Needing proof - over and over again....fanatic. sm
    - Fanaticism............sm - m
      - First of all, Obama did not seal his records....sm - geek
      - There is no credibility in any single part of this story - sm
        Maybe no one answered the two previous posts...sm - ms
        Don't think so. The fanatics have not been - the least bit shy...sm
        How do you know Obama has nothing to hide? sm - ms
        O has already provided valid evidence and - the courts should not allow.....sm
        The courts aren't allowing it - the - sm
        The pathology of the conspiracy theorist's mind - will not allow...sm
        The pathology of the liberal mindset allows no dissention...ever...nm - nm
        That would explain why the libs were single-handedly - responsible for....sm
        Seems to me that Obama the lib is inviting/appointing - all sorts of.....sm
        Clarification...do not allow dissention to their point of view...nm - nm
        Reply posted above this by accident. - nm
        OMG I got it - gourdpainter
        Obama smoking - Just me
        He said he "bummed" a cigarette occasionally - - Amanda
        I totally understand - - Just me
        Twas not me that called you a liar - - Amanda
        GP, I do appreciate your use of a moniker, - but at the same time.....sm
        Speak of Sam, what happened to her? nm - Amanda
        How I wish that sneaking a smoke was all Obama was hiding...lol....sm - ms
        A search warrant under FISA prior to 9/11 - required evidence of direct terrorist connections.

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database

You don't know who I am. I only breeze by here very occasionally.
x

If the cigarette tax would completely fund...
the 6 billion in revenue expanding this program is going to cost,that would be one thing. It won't. You say you wouldn't mind "having your taxes raised a little." Isn't 35-40% off the top of your gross now enough? I think it is. I think they need to proritize the spending, that is all I am saying. It seems the consensus here is that health insurance for children is the most important. Then that program should be funded first. Then decide what is the next most important issue, and fund that, and on down the line. We cannot keep adding programs, adding taxes, adding programs, adding taxes. At some point it has to stop, or those paying the taxes are going to need help from a program to eat while they are working for taxes for programs. And as more and more people opt for programs and not working and paying into the system...the situation will only get worse. You do realize that realistically this cannot continue forever....right?