Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

How many did it take to write this note?

Posted By: we? on 2005-07-08
In Reply to: whatever.... - vs

Just wondering.


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

    The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
    To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


    Other related messages found in our database

    On a serious note...

    ....I thank you for your response.  While I agree boxes probably arent' the best idea sometimes they make complicated ideologies a little simpler to understand, I guess.


    Actually I would be very interested in learning all the posters on these boards beliefs/ideologies/hopes for the future.  I think we could do this without undermining each other or bashing.  Perhaps I'll post it at the top of the board some time as a new topic.


    and on that note...
    Who gained the most benefit from keeping it a secret, and/or keeping the rumor afloat that he is still out there somewhere?
    Note to sam
    Sam, just wondering if when you post a legitimate question on the board could you please change your name. It seems like anything you ask anymore people are bashing you. You put up some very good questions (sorry can't answer this one as I'm not knowlegable enough to know what the outcome would be -it's all too confusing), but it seems as though people are going to attack you for anything. Now if there is an argument you want to make that's one thing, but its not right that you put up a question and people are attacking you for that. - just a suggestion.
    One more note
    Was curious to see what people would say to my post. I expected the O supporters to bash me for my opinion. That's the way this board is run, but I was curious so came back. For all of you thinking this is one sided - I voted for Obama! I supported Obama! I donated money to his campaign. I fought tooth and nail on this board to defend Obama. I got into some rough ones with some of the republicans on this board. But as time has gone on I have researched and learned more about Obama and I do not like what I am finding out. I come to this board to hopefully get some insightful information and it IS mostly the democrats bashing and attacking posters who are for McCain. I would say 95% dems bashing republicans and 5% republicans defending themselves by coming back at the posters who originally bashed them. Facts are facts and its in black and white on this board. And they bash Palin without cause. I just say it like it is (sorry you don't like to admit it). Like the poster below said - guess only half the pixels on your monitor work.

    If you had any type of open mind you would read through every single post and you would see the Obama supporters bashing the McCain supporters more, calling them every name in the book while in the same breath saying its all them against you (and the posts below are proof of that). The posts below show you don't have open minds, you don't search out facts. You are blindly led around like a bunch of sheep.

    God help us if Obama gets in there. I for one don't want to live my life with the likes of Farrahan, Wright, Resko, and Ayers (to name a few) dictating how we should be living. Farrakan's the creepiest of all, and I cannot for the life of me figure out why you want to live like that.
    Please note....(sm)

    I think Phelps and his daughter were banned back in Feb.


    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/7898972.stm


    There are also a number of people on the list whose names have not been published.  I would love to see the entire list. 


    Note, what I said was
    You prepare for what an opponent might do, not what he appears to be doing at the moment.  Situations change in an instant, stuff happens, appearances may be misleading.  You don't encumber both hands when you could be attacked, especially if there's more than one.  Doesn't mean attack them first, but you stay ready for the possibility that they might attack you.  Military training and just plain common sense. 
    Please note....(sm)

    We are talking about Obama here, not Bush the war monger. 


    "There will always be a war that he needs them for and if there isn't one he will create one." 


    You do realize that Obama was one of the few senators who voted completely against the Iraq war?  What makes you think he wants to stay in a war when all he has done is talk about how we need to get out of it?  That is just completely irrational.


    "Why do you say the GOP is not funding the troops."


    Ummm....because the vast majority of pubs in the house just voted against a funding bill?


     


    Note to gt......off topic

    It's me - the one who's been posting under all the gt alias joke monikers.  I just had to blow off steam after the conservative board debacle last night.  Don't know why I get involved in it.  My fall equinox resolution will be to inform, not condemn.


    Thanks for tolerating my not-that-funny-ha-ha little joke.


    note: this was in no way gay-bashing, as i am gay too,
    but i just had to laugh at the mental image of a pitbull with lipstick, trying its best not to look like a 'klondyke'.
    On a side note..
    Where in the Mojave desert did you live? I grew up in a tiny town called Inyokern and went to high school in Lone Pine.
    just a note from factcheck.org

    A second false quote has Obama saying he would "stand with the Muslims," words that don't appear in his book. What he actually said is that he would stand with American immigrants from Pakistan or Arab countries should they be faced with something like the forced detention of Japanese-American families in World War II:


    http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/did_obama_write_that_he_would_stand.html


    On a lighter note.....sm
    Stuff I didn't know about.......




    Meet Obama's bodyman: The White House 'Chief of Stuff' who caters to the President's every whim





    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1127223/Meet-Obamas-bodyman-The-White-House-Chief-Stuff-caters-Presidents-whim.html


    Agree and just want to add to your note that
    that Bush WOULD NOT meet with those of the fallen.  He out-and-out dissed them.  So, even though none of this mess is Obama's making, he met with those who mourn and actually listened to their views.  He did so much more in that 45 minutes than Bush ever did. 
    Note to mythbuster...(sm)

    Off our meds, are we? - Mythbuster (Views: 33, 2009-03-10)


    You might want to clean up your own backyard before you start on someone else's.


    I think the thing to note here...(sm)

    is not so much that he had an affair.  People do that all the time.  I personally think it's nobody's business, and that's how I felt about Clinton as well.  However, what we have here is a guy who has been preaching "family values" as a campaign slogan for how many years? and then this comes out.  It's the blatant hipocrisy that I can't stand. 


    Also, this guy was supposedly a good candidate for VP next time around.  If something like this had been found out about Biden, the rght would have had a field day with it, just like they did with Clinton.


    More on that note....France, that non...
    judgmental open-minded country....their Prez says France cannot accept Burqas...this is just part of it....PARIS — President Nicolas Sarkozy said the Muslim burqa would not be welcome in France, calling the full-body religious gown a sign of the "debasement" of women.

    In the first presidential address to parliament in 136 years, Sarkozy faced critics who fear the burqa issue could stigmatize France's Muslims and said he supported banning the garment from being worn in public.

    "In our country, we cannot accept that women be prisoners behind a screen, cut off from all social life, deprived of all identity," Sarkozy said to extended applause at the Chateau of Versailles, southwest of Paris.

    "The burqa is not a religious sign, it's a sign of subservience, a sign of debasement — I want to say it solemnly," he said. "It will not be welcome on the territory of the French Republic."

    Hmmmm. Oh my. Muslims world wide (not to mention the 5 million that live in France) are going to LOVE that.

    And people say WE aren't open-minded? LOL. Where is the French version of the ACLU?? Hey...they can borrow ours. HEY, Sarkozy...take THEM ALL. :-) lol
    I know you didn't write it. sm
    Another obvious glaring error.  Bill Clinton.  Not on the list. 
    They need to write a better bill
    This is a mute point now, because the bill was vetoed by the Pres.and for good reason. Why do we have to accept bad bills? This was a poorly written bill, and that's the reason it was vetoed. Why all the vagueness? $83,000 per year is hardly poverty level. If this bill was truly going to help poor kids then write it that way. I don't understand why it has to be so vague. To me it reeks of dishonesty and pork.

    Write a good understandable bill...what's the problem with that?
    You need to write some more posts
    on this board because you really seem to know what you are talking about. Maybe you can explain the popular vote versus the electorial vote to some of the people in posts further up that don't believe thier votes count.
    Can't you still write in your vote for someone else?
    because they don't like either candidate. Actually, I'm in that boat right now. I don't like either one of them. OTOH, I want to vote because it's my one chance to be "heard," even though I largely agree that the media and politicians have already chosen a president for us (look at Ron Paul--he was able to garner such a large following online where the media couldn't control the people that I think they were actually worried he'd throw a kink in their plan so he was basically shut out in the media). If they weren't trying to control our vote, why else do they shut out any coverage on certain candidates and cover every word said by others? Why wouldn't they just cover all equally and fairly? I'm looking into whether I can still write in a candidate other than the 2 yahoos the current media has chosen for us. Wouldn't it be wild if everyone wrote in someone else and that person won out over both of them? LOL I know, it's a dream, but still, it'd be really cool if that happened and showed the media and politicans of this country that USA is still run BY THE PEOPLE!
    What possible write-in candidate has all the necessary
    exists, then why were they not nominated?
    Maybe he will just write a check... sm

    That's what my son used to tell me to do when I told him I didn't have any money.  "Just write a check, Mommy,"     

    Levity, people........... LEVITY!!!!


    Interestingly, you write:

    "Obama is flying on the premise that he is innocent until proven guilty..."


    That's what the Constitution you claim to support so much demands:  Innocent until proven guilty (and not a word about "flying on the premise" of same).


    I'm just curious.  Once this bogus b/c issue is "officially" revealed as such by the SC, you have promised to let this issue go.


    What's next on your list to pound this man into the ground about?  Because it's obvious that you're never going to give him an honest, fair chance to be a good president.  (He hasn't even been sworn in yet.)


    So what's the next bogus issue on the agenda that will be raised to continue to try to drag him (and the country) down?


    My last question:  Did you complain as vigorously about George W. Bush's blatant contempt for the Constitution that you claim to love so much?


    The one who is going to write a book
    for our country and how he kept our country safe for the last 7 years from terrorists. He could not state it while he was in office, but now he can write a whole book about him being in office. I felt much more secure with Bush than I will with O as he still scares me.
    I was just going to write that. No message
    x
    I did not the write the post, CNN did.
    I am glad Obama succeeded in a human life. Hopefully Obama will succeed in the 2 wars of many and the economy, etc. I am glad the Captain was rescued by the SEALs.
    If you do not like what I write, MOVE ON.
    Your own words. Stick to it and do as you preach.
    My goodness - you'd better write and tell someone
    Hardly quite that simple or people way smarter than you or I would have solved it. The studies on the effectiveness of preventive measures, incidentally, study people who DO participate in prevention - not those who don't.
    you can write to the network
    I did and let them know they should be embarrassed for pimping themselves out for this biased promotion instead of two-sided reporting on an issue and told them one less viewer would be looking to them for any attempt at fair reporting. There is a link on their website to contact them.
    Please note that American Woman is not AG

    Thanks Brunson for you objective views....it is refreshing.  You know how to respectfully post and carry on an adult conversation.


    The only reason I am posting here is to state this even though it's blatantly obvious American Woman is not me. 


    I read here, but I don't post here.  I might post my responses to posts here on the C board....but other than to clarify like I'm doing now I don't post here....I made a mistake on Friday posting here, but I got my boards mixed up.  Have a great day!


    Note to uptight liberals
    It was s-a-r-c-a-s-m.   Humor is lost on you all...
    OK, on that same note you answered your own question..sm
    You believe abortion is immoral and that it should be illegal. I think the same thing about this war. Yeah congress passed it, so for all intents and purposes on paper it is legal, but it should be illegal to preempt war against a dictator and his followers (because technically we are not at war against Iraq) that is not a eminent threat to us.
    Please note sources within this article...
    http://ourfuture.org/makingsense/factsheet/oil-drilling
    Here's a funny for you. Note the date.

    James I. Blakslee


    "Pledged to vote for Woodrow Wilson and support the reorganization of the Democratic Party"


    "Democrats in every county in Pennsylvania have been betrayed times without number and to-day trickery and deception walk hand in hand to again mislead them"


    "Canidates have been found, who, for a price, are willing to represent the twin-machine traitors."


    "Every alert, active Democrat will easily detect the tricksters, and on Saturday, April 13th, 1912, between the hours of 2 PM and 8 PM, will register his vote for the Purification of this Party."


    I get a kick out of that.


    A note about your socialism comment sm
    We do not have socialism except for that big bank bailout that was under Bush's leadership, (lack of leadership). All your sorry arguments of months ago are now moot points. Stop being a sore loser. Nobody cares about the birth certificate, about Ayers, about Rev Wright, about fake socialism, about your phoney crooked republican manipulations. Suck it up and be a real American and follow the new president.

    Relax, I didn't write it.
    It was simply for amusement and speculation, not of scientific value.
    The Democrats did not write this book.

    A man who calls himself a **Christian conservative** did. He was I believe the #2 man on the **faith-based initiative program.** His name is David Kuo. He is a Republican. I think he will be on 60 minutes tonight. I have seen a couple of recognizable names from the Christian right denounce the white house after hearing some of the things Kuo writes. I am anxious to hear what Kuo himself says.


    I am a Christian and I do not feel stiffled at all about voting.


    Exactly...well, they did manage to write and get passed...
    one piece of legislation...the "reform" bill that was supposed to straighten out Fannie/Freddie...instead was the straw that broke the camel's back...forced them to offer those floating rate mortgages to low and moderate income people and the creditworthiness of said people was not to be an issue. The floating rates went UP, and a bazillion people went into foreclosure, and if the Bush admin had not stepped in and taken over, the economy could very well have collapsed. The "reform" bill, plus the crooked Dems at the top of Fannie/Freddie, just about did us in this time. Other than that piece of legislation, they have not done a blessed thing in the year they have been in charge. That is why their approval rating is in the tank.
    Not voting for Obama either. Will write someone in instead. nm

    //


    Well, then explain to us how voting for a write-in
    Nobody ever agrees completely with ANY candidates full agenda. You pretty much have to look for the main ideas that matter to you most, at that particular point in history. Sometimes you have to vote for those, and let other principles ride for a while. Not easy, and I HATE letting anything slide in order to vote for what is a more pressing issue to me. But the 'perfect candidate' has not, does not, and never will exist. So we've gotta do the best we can with what we've got to work with.
    Boy, that never gets old. Never. You should write Osamabama's speeches.
    nm
    Don't worry, I'll still write. nm
    x
    I can't write too fast anymore, but here's what I did get

    1. Fiscal Stimulus Plan: Before or after inauguration (sp). Wants to get it moving quickly, but if he has to wait until January 20, so be it, but states he will try during these couple months to push one through now.


    2. Retooling assistance plan for automakers for fuel-effieicnt cars. He realizes that the auto industry employs thousands and other companies depend on the auto industry for their jobs. Wants this package done quickly.


    3. Review implementaion of plans and not rewarding management for housing problems that are caused.


    4. Grow middle class in the long term.


    Reporters asked questions but couldn't get them all.


    1. He wants to help the states financially.


    2. As to going to other countries for conferences: He is developing a team and weighing all his options. Iran's nuclear weapons are unacceptable along with the militants. This has to cease. It's not something he can do in a knee-jerk fashion and wants to be careful (not to p--s them off).


    3. Tax plan: 95% of WORKING Americans will get it. His first goal is tax relief for struggling families and to build the economy from the bottom up.


    That's all I could get.


    Hillary can write another book
    And her debt will be wiped clean or pretty near to it. She just is greedy and wants everyone to pay for her expenses. Her and Bill make enough money to wipe out their (or her) debt.

    This is ridiculous that the DNC is asking people to give for them. We're already going to be paying a ton for the bail outs they gave a few weeks ago.
    M, did u write the post Vie is referring to?

    just wondering


    i didn't write that - shows what you don't know
    x
    And as a side note...anyone who posts here has a right to speak...
    no matter how bad that chaps you. And the fact that it does chap you so much...is definitely food for thought.
    On the whole religion note, I just read yesterday
    about how McCain people are calling Jewish neighborhoods and making false statements about Obama. They start out saying they are polling or something, and then it gets into their religion - making false statements about Obama. The people that were called from McCain's people were very upset about this, that they would call and say these things. One woman even asked a question about it and the person on the other end of the phone said they wouldn't qualify for the poll if they weren't Jewish or they wouldn't have been called if they didn't live in a traditionally Jewish neighborhood. I think that is disgusting.
    It has NOT been proven his certificate is authentic - see note
    What he has provide is a computer generated copy - not the original type written certificate typed in a typewriter that was used in 1961 (there were no computers back then), and it is NOT authentic. What part of that don't you understand. The people who said it was authentic is the Annenberg foundation who is connected with Ayers and ACORN - hence, they are tied in and supporting Obama.

    This has not been verified otherwise the supreme court would not be issuing an order that it be presented. There is something fishy about the whole issue especially when Obama legally had the records sealed so nobody could see the certificate.

    The only ones who will not see this is the Obamabots. Open your eyes - you know, if it's found that he is inelligible to be President then Biden will become President (which is who I wanted for President in the first place and we'll see who he picks as VP).

    The issue needs to be resolved and at least now we have a supreme court justice wanting to see the original type written certificate and not a computer generated certificate created by a group who is supporting Obama.
    Question: When repubs. speak (or write), why is every
    .
    So tired of reading you write McClain....nm
    x