I am questioning that 75%

Posted By: dnh on 2008-11-29
In Reply to: let it die - vinnie

Where did you get that from? I think he only won the vote by a 5% margin.

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

let it die - vinnie
- Dangerous............ sm - m
- I don't agree - gourdpainter
  - but GP - vinnie
    - The problem is s/m - gourdpainter
      - One way to make the topic go away - GhostMom
      - "Regular readers have read and hopefully examined all offered verification for themselves.." - m
        Please be advised - gourdpainter
        Whatever, GP, ...... sm - m
        Again whatever - gourdpainter
        But they are "credible" as you stated above. sm - m
        I'd love to continue to argue with you - gourdpainter
        Starting at the community level......... sm - m
- I am questioning that 75% - dnh
  - Make that 6.8%. - nm
    - Certainly not a "landslide" - see message
      - Who do you think you are kidding? - This stupidity has been "out there"....sm
        So, if he is outright lying about the BC, that is okay - ? What else could he be covering up?nm
        The bottom line is that he's not lying about it. It's just - your desperate wishful thinking. nm
        you do know the electoral vote has not occurred?? - dnh
        Has anyone ever in history won by this - sm
        You need to brush up on your civics/history.......... sm - m
        You are the one woh needs a brush up. - sm
        Margin or no......... sm - m
        There is nothing up in the air - sm
    - still a far cry from 75%....nm - dnh
      - 75% accounts for the former McC supports - sm
  - There are also those more level-headed Obama opponents - who genuinely embraced....sm
    - The "level-headed" people here voted for McCain. - .nm
      - Many still not embracing Obama because he - seems to be hiding something.nm
    - Let's have some "credible" source...... sm - m
      - What are you trying to say here? - You seroiusly think that....sm
        No............. sm - m
        Not changing the subject. - Just asking the same of you. sm
        Well, let's see s/m - gourdpainter
        Most folks will say that.......... sm - m

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database

The ad is questioning his judgment
not whether he was exonerated.

Questioning is one thing

going on and on and on and on and on is ridiculous. There is nothing that is going to convince some of these people that Obama is going to be the next president.

I think we are in quite enough trouble in this country without adding to the division and that is exactly what is going on. Anyone with eyeballs in their head can see the b/c is authentic.

I don't have peace with Bush, Obama can have peace with him if he wants to. He has run this country down the tubes. I don't trust him or his sleasy VP. Remembers WMD????

They aren't saying questioning
Obama because if things fail, they will still blame Bush. That is their plan. If they totally screw this country up worse than it already is, they will say that this was all unavoidable because of the stupid stuff Bush did. They will not take responsibility for anything. That is why we still have crooks like Nancy Pelosi in office and Chris Dodd, Barney Frank, etc. We have crooks like Geithner running the IRS now. Obama's own aunt is here illegally. There are different sets of rules for politicians obviously and even more so when it comes to dems and pubs. The dems ridicule Bush and turn around and so something ignorant and still blame it on Bush.

That questioning thing goes both ways, ya know.

Who is "ranting"? People are questioning. They
nm

not questioning your ideas or beliefs -
I am just wondering how is that? Are you and your husband both American? I am just being nosy and I guess you don't have to answer me if you don't want to... just curious how that happened or how it works and if it was something you chose.

Since when does questioning a stance on a single issue
"changing his mind?" In fact, it is media's JOB to exercise both sides of an argument (in the same way that debaters are required to argue both sides of a premise). The mere fact that a reporter is doing just that during a broadcast does not necessarily say anything whatsoever about his personal beliefs.

That's not "grilling" it's called questioning what is wrong
Do you get it? There is so much wrong going on. You think we are suppose to just sit back and watch our country be destroyed? I had to turn the freakin news off because every day it got worse and worse and instead of blowing a gasket I turned it off.

If you agree with JTBB then yes, you might think her posts are "insightful and intelligent", but I've seen many of them that were not and were just trying to start fights and keep everyone divided. It's this elitist attitude that is not very becoming.

We are not "grilling Obama for anything and everything", what people are doing is when something is wrong and should not be done they are finally standing up and saying "hold on a minute, you just can't do whatever you want and think there will be no consequences" (or maybe he does think that). Either way he (and congress) needs to be held responsible for the mistakes they are making and the sleezy behind closed door deals they are making. And last thing I knew it is in the Constitution that it is our right to do just that. You might want to read the constitution sometime.

P.S. - You sure had your hay day when Bush was in office and you thought that was okay to grill him about every single little thing. So as the saying goes "What's good for the goose is good for the gander"