No need for that. His eligibility has already been certified
Posted By: repeatedly and so far.... on 2008-11-02
In Reply to: O went to "visit grandma" in HI. Yeah, right. He - went there to have the Gov. seal his BC!.nm
has been upheld in court challenges. Berg's case was not dismissed on BC evidence, making your outlandish claim about the seal rather ridiculous. It was dismissed because he could not prove standing and claims of harm. Why don't you try taking a stab at the other questino about just where the pub party is trying to take this? Biden as president? Supermajority still seated? New elections? What can they possibly gain from this folly?
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
More on Obama eligibility status from discussion
This argument validates the lawsuit, so it would seem to not be so frivolous. Can't argue about the facts.
************************************
It seems that Barack Obama is not qualified to be president after all for the following reason:
Barack Obama is not legally a U.S. natural-born citizen according to the law on the books at the time of his birth, which falls between " December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986? . Presidential office requires a natural-born citizen if the child was not born to two U.S. citizen parents, which of course is what exempts John McCain though he was born in the Panama Canal. US Law very clearly stipulates: ".If only one parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16." Barack Obama's father was not a U.S. citizen and Obama's mother was only 18 when Obama was born, which mea ns though she had been a U.S. citizen for 10 years, (or citizen perhaps because of Hawai'i being a territory) the mother fails the test for being so for at least 5 years **prior to** Barack Obama's birth, but *after* age 16 It doesn't matter *after*. In essence, she was not old enough to qualify her son for automatic U.S. citizenship. At most, there were only 2 years elapsed since his mother turned 16 at the time of Barack Obama's birth when she was 18 in Hawai'i. His mother would have needed to have been 16+5= 21 years old, at the time of Barack Obama's birth for him to have been a natural-born citizen. As aforementioned, she was a young college student at the time and was not. Barack Obama was already 3 years old at that time his mother would have needed to have waited to have him as the only U.S. Citizen parent.
Obama instead should have been naturalized, but even then, that would still disqualify him from holding the office.
*** Naturalized citizens are ineligible to hold the office of President *** Though Barack Obama was sent back to Hawaii at age 10, all the other info does not matter because his mother is the one who needed to have been a U.S. citizen for 10 years prior to his birth on August 4, 1961, with 5 of those years being after age 16. Further, Obama may have had to have remained in the country for some time to protect any citizenship he would have had, rather than living in Indonesia. Now you can see why Obama's aides stopped his speech about how we technically have more than 50 states, because it would have led to this discovery. This is very clear cut and a blaring violation of U.S. election law. I think the Gov. of California would be very interested in knowing this if Obama were elected President without being a natural-born U.S. citizen, and it would set precedence.
Eligibility case finds standing...
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=84966
Certified BC from HAWAII has been submitted.
Immigration hearings are no different than any other court proceedings. The lawsuit is dead in the water because he cannot prove anything one way or the other...unlike the DNC, who has proven their case over and over and over and over and over again. There is no issue here. Go dig up some more dirt.
If he has been certified already by the Secy of State
were not successful 74 days prior to the election (as spelled out clearly in the election code), his eligibility is upheld. Hence, the question about the timing of the challenges. Why did no one seem to care about the constitution in 1996, 1998, 2002, 2004 or the summer of 2008. There was plenty of time to challenge this guy. Berg's lawsuit surfaced on August 21, literally minutes after it became apparent that Barack was going to seize the nomination and that his candidate, HC, would not be the VP pick. He filed his lawsuit 75 days out from the election, making it impossible to get a result in time to have Obama removed from the ballot. Can you say sour grapes loser. Book deal. TV movie. Attorney megalomania?
The birth certificate has been submitted to the DNC, the Illinois Secretary of State x3, the US Secretary of state x2 and to the US Regional court....all of whom have so far upheld its legitimacy.
What part of he has alrady been certified
It happened before the nomination for PRESIDENT. Like I said, if Berg the Boob was really worried about that constitution, he had From February 10 2007 until Summer 2008 to act. I notice you are not addressing that fact.
The officials in Hawaii have already certified
that he's an American citizen & released his original birth certificate. The fact that you're still spouting this nonsense & have never heard the term 'office of the president elect' before now shows that you rely too much on forwarded emails and Fox "news" for your in-depth information. LOL.
Certified graduate of the *How to Insult like a kindergartener* school of insults. SM
|
