Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Sadly, there are plenty of wimpy miserable little

Posted By: people who agree with her...... nm on 2009-05-27
In Reply to: As for having knowledge of the constitution - Trigger Happy

--


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

not voting is wimpy and will make absolutely
x
The top result on google for miserable.

First it was 'Failure', and now it's 'Miserable' search google for it.


http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=miserable&btnG=Google+Search


IN ADDITION, just log off, you are such miserable LOSERS
WE WON AND WHAT DO YOU WANT FROM US ??????
Your outlook is the disappointment....sorry you are so miserable....nm
x
miserable little wretch - not nasty...
get it right. I wouldn't consider Darwin, Einstein or Newton an insult, but......you went on a rampage on the wrong Mr. Dean....miserable as in unhappy.....and "talks through the mouth of a horse?" WTH does that mean? Don't bother answering.
What a miserable and pathetic comment from you
I quote:

'Loosen up a bit. Dang. I think you need to take a Xanax and chill out a bit. Sheesh.

Regardless of my joking, which you obviously didn't get, I have no sympathy for people who want us dead.'


Loosen up a bit?
We are talking about torturing prisoners. Dang!
This is no 'joking' and '
laughing matter'!
You meant every word you said and if you were joking it is even worse.

If you want to make some jokes, go to the 'Comedy Board', that's a better fit for you.

I cannot believe what I am reading here!

Wow, you sound pretty miserable. I am not arguing about anything...

simply stating my opinion. It seems like many here on this board have some bug up their behinds, are bitter and angry (most tend to be O supporters, go figure) and can't have adult conversation without resorting to name calling.


To Woofer: These are just sad, miserable, angry people who...

...don't want to see America succeed. 


Personally, I'm thinking maybe it's best to just ignore them because each time I respond to a negative post, all I do is feed it, and I'm tired of doing that.


Unfortunately, this board is becoming downright toxic because of all the anger, hatred, whining and complaining from the very sore losers. 


The good news is that 78% of the country wants to see America succeed, so I have great hope for a much brighter future for my daughter and grandchildren.


Tsk tsk tsk - nasty or miserable - still is the same thing and an insult
No matter how much you want to sugar coat it, its all nasty. No need to be that way on this board.
Sadly, no.
xxx
Sadly....

to some Americans, we will never be "color blind" and the race card will still fly frequently by some people.


Also, it is sad that even though some of us see that Obama is inexperienced and how that has hurt us, etc......there are many that still love the fool.  I guess it will take, God forbid, another terrorist attack on US soil or our economy to totally collapse before people get a clue.  Although I'm sure they will still give Obama the thumbs up because....hey.....this is ALL Bush's fault....remember?  Can someone please pass the kool-aid around?


Sadly, the first thing...
 I thought when I heard **foiled terror plot**  was Wag the Dog.  I do not believe that  this is a hoax in any way, but it is certainly distressing when the first entity you suspect in any cover up or any **make up stuff** is your own government. The timing was what made me think that. With W's popularity in the toilet, over half of Americans wanting out of the war and Lamont winning in Connecticut, without something to distract us, the Lamont win and what it means could have taken over the news for some time to come.  Can't have that. Now we are not thinking about Iraq, Lebanon, Hezbollah, Israel or changing the face of our House and Senate in November.  We are all focused on the terrorists again. Same thing with BP. Very much like Enron, all of a sudden they have to close down the oil pipe and CA gets hit the hardest. BP makes tons of money, we all begin to think drilling anywhere is okay.  The administration is happy. The oil companies are happy.  I did hear that BP is going to try to keep the pipe open now while they do repairs. There was SOOOOO much criticism about the timing and the fact that they have known for years that the pipe is corroded that they have been forced to do something different.  Anyway, I believe that the deal at Heathrow was the real thing, not a ploy in any way. I trust the British and Scotland yard much more than I do this administration and the CIA/FBI.  It is just disturbing that it has come to this. I take everything I hear with a grain of salt until it is proven to me to be true. I used to trust my government but I fear them now.  I  just hope we are all still here in November 2008.
Sadly this is so true
Like I said, this is a high school class president campaign, not a USA presidential campaign. What he promises he cannot deliver.
Are there any adjectives besides sad and sadly? n/m

Sweet! Sadly, I think you are right. I need a better job. LOL nm
x
Sadly, some of the senators, if not all,

think we DO want this. Doesn't matter how many calls they get. They think we just love mortgaging ourselves, our children, and our grandchildren.


There are a few that are fighting against the bill as it stands but....and I know a certain person will blast me for this but Schumer, Dodd, and Kerry absolutely screamed today that this package is what HAS to pass. Schumer stated right out that it's what the people want. Kerry stated there was no reason to cut anything from it. Dodd stated that the TARP package has money in it to help with the mortgage debaucle so why they want amendments to the tune of $9B in this one was beyond him.


So, if there is money in TARP for the homeowners, why aren't the homeowners being helped? No rocket science in that. The banks and Wall Street are keeping it.


They just don't get it.


 


Sadly, most don't have a clue and
don't really care what got us in this mess. Banks and mortgage companies were forced to give subprime loans because the democrats wanted EVERYBODY to have house, whether they could afford it or not, giving everyone the belief they were somehow entitled to a home, money or no money. The law was pushed by the democratic party (for those who bother to read it) and it became law that the banks HAD to make these loans AND the law put in place these institutions making money on these worthless pieces of paper. They were forced to do the business with those who had no business in there in the first place getting a loan. And for those who knew they were living beyond their means and even lying about the income, they should have to bear the burden of their stupidity. I do not feel the least bit responsible for keeping them in their home. We live well below what a bank told us we could afford and we have......better safe than sorry!

For all those that think free handouts somehow will make a better country for us and hitting companies that employ with MORE taxes and treating those who are fortunate enough to be rich as if rich is a bad word and going after their income, do those same people EVER stop to ask themselves who the heck pays their assistance!!! It's those who have more money.....duh!! If you didn't have them, you wouldn't have your free money in the first place but lets certainly not discuss that, Heaven forbid!

I'm glad you see the writing on the wall but I'm afraid for those who voted for Obama who are now changing their tune are realizing all too late they have been screwed.
Sadly the blame game is what we

get to hear the most instead of actual plans and solutions to this that won't end up screwing us in the end. 


I've learned more about the economy than I ever have in the past couple of days.  Makes me wish I'd have listened in economics in high school.  Hind sight is 20/20.  LOL!


Have a great day! 


Sadly enough there are those that live in the same make
@@
I sadly enough agree with you Gourdpainter
I think the ugliness has barely begun.  Truth will out in the end, it always does.
Sadly, this is reality in my state, also......nm
nm
Exactly! Sadly, Americans cant seem to wake up.
nm
You're right. Sadly enough you've wasted your
--
It is disgusting, huh? Sadly, I have lost faith
nm
I think sadly you are right, I always thought that if I would vote Republican, it would be for McCai
and believe he really wants to do good for this country; my own thought was that he was advised, after seeing all the disillusioned Hillary supporters who were not completely sold on Barack yet, that he should pick a female running mate, scoop up all the disappointed Hillary supporters who would want a female in the White House, and it all blew up, Ms. Palin was just not an intelligent choice as running mate, she brought him down, and I think it all snowballed so quickly that all Mr. McCain could do was watch as the snowball hit bottom and disintegrated. But I believe he is a very good Senator.
Sadly, common sense and good behavior...........sm
are seldom rewarded but highly expected and those who practice sound financial habits are often not given the breaks that those who do not are given. It just seems harsh to say "screw them" when one may not know the circumstances and when there may be children involved who would be homeless through no fault of their own. Guess I'm just a little tender-hearted about that.
Sadly, the haters started to hate him way before he even took office....sm
I have mixed views here, but I found it amazing, as I read this board around election time, and then shortly thereafter, that all the Bushwackers and Right Wingers were already condemning and DOOMING the Obama administration....way before the man even took the oath of office! Now George had 8+ years to do good for this country, to help the economy, the reach out to the poor, to upgrade the educational system, and what did his administration do? Let's see, instead of getting Bin Ladin, we spend billions and billions, and thousands of precious lives, on a war with Iraq for those infamous invisible WMDs which no one could find, and which was reported to the President ahead of time. We have made most of the world hate us for our arrogance and stupidity. He let Wall Street run amok and watched the country go down in ashes....stop bashing Obama, no he is not God, he is not perfect, he has faults, he will make mistakes inevitably (and I am not fond of several things in the stimulus bill), but by God give him a chance, he has barely been in office a MONTH versus 8 excruciating, embarrassing years with the Bush gang, support him as our American President, and stop DOOMING his administration before he even gets a chance. Sorry, off my worn-out soap box now!
Oh, I have said plenty here.
You just don't read it.
Oh, I appreciate them plenty! sm
I was raised on them. Had a big ol' pot of beans with cornbread and homemade bread and butter pickles yesterday for dinner. Sho 'nuff wuz good, too!

You can have my portion of possum, though. Gives me indigestion. ;o)
Well, there has been plenty of that...lol (sm)
And I'm sure there will be more.  The reality of the situation is yes, she was thrown under the bus.  She also made the DECISION to put herself in the limelight, knowing (just like everyone else in that spot) that she would be scrutinized.  It was a JOKE!  Lighten up....besides, I told you not to look.
Ah, but that's not all. She has plenty more
::
LOL! No, there's plenty.

In fact, there's a new "crow," it seems, every day!!


Thanks for the good wishes, GP. 


Well, so far there's been plenty with O to keep you
nm
There are plenty of us who get
TechSupport.  Just because you lack the intelligence or refuse to stop drinking kool-aid...doesn't mean the rest of us are like you.  If you don't like TechSupport....don't read his posts.  If you can't reply without being petty, don't bother replying.  The childishness is getting old here. 
Yup, he's got plenty of constituents who'd like him out.
Nothing like earning respect like this:

http://philly.metro.us/metro/local/article/Who_wants_to_be_Santorum/3165.html
Again, there will still be plenty who will carry her. sm
She isn't going to change and she shouldn't.  She is no more outrageous than Molly Ivins and some of the far left pundits.  She will always have a following.
Wrong...there were plenty (sm)

who were telling her to get out.  Like I said earlier, I do not support any of the current candidates.  Based on the length of your posts, it seems that you spend way too much time focused on something you have no control over, but that's just my opinion.


Here is some...you can research for more yourself...there is plenty
on the net.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-08-24-Biden-son_N.htm

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/politics/5965332.htm

More on MBNA connection to Biden:
http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=ZDU4OTdhMTFhN2YwZTY3MmMzNGFhYzc3ODdhOTA0ZjQ

More on lobbyists...they all have them on staff:
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/lobbyists-on-obamas-08-payroll-2007-12-20.html

http://www.newsweek.com/id/138519
There is plenty of blame to go around...
However, Bill Clinton is not trying to rewrite history and take credit for keeping the United States safe since 9/11.
He has to do this so he will have plenty of people
nm
We have had plenty of terrorist
AND after 9/11.

- USS Cole.
- 2000 New Year attack attempt at Los Angeles Airport, but stopped at Port Angeles, WA ferry terminal during Clinton.
- New York Bomb Subway in 1997 with Clinton in office.

My gosh, there is a whole list of terrorist attack attempts.
I am sure there are plenty of them who use prostitutes sm
in the District of Criminals, left and right. They only out them when they become a problem - i.e. Eliot Spitzer blowing the whistle on Wall Street before the election.
Wrong - there are plenty
You go ahead and think there are no people who can "hold a candle to him". C'mon you really need to stop drinking the kool-aid. Do you know every single politician in this country? I don't think so. There are a lot of unknown politicians out there who are much better than what is in there and also a lot of well known politicians more qualified. Right now we just have a continuation of the Bush Admin.

At the rate he's going he'll be lucky if he isn't impeached for bringing the country down.

So unless you know every single candidate (republican and independent because we could be seeing the first Independent President in history in 2012) it would be wise to keep these uneducated statements to yourself.

As Ben Franklin once said -

"It is better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt".
And, unfortunately, you have plenty of "inane"
xx
There are plenty of misspeaks to be found
from ALL the candidates from both parties. That doesn't make it right but arguing over whose misspeak is the worse doesn't get us anywhere.

So don't bother to duck. I'm not gonna throw anything.
Yes, i have plenty to keep me busy. Your attitude

just makes you seem somewhat sexist and I really was just curious? 


No problem. Plenty of time for that.
xoxoxox
Yeah, and plenty of them are on this board. sm
I don't relate to them, or SP, whatsoever. I do relate to the women commenting on that blog, and I believe others who visit this board will too, which is why I gave the url. Enjoy.
i've seen plenty of comments
regarding religion... obama and mccain.... seen it a bit more with obama with good reason, when you hear what his pastor of 20 years has said.
I know plenty of kids in our schools who would
@
I have said plenty of things against Mccain
And if it wouldn't be just a wasted vote I would write in another candidate. But the bottom line is Obama is way to liberal. If there was a democratic candidate who was more middle of the road and upheld Christian values I would most certainly vote for him or her. I could care less about republican or democratic parties. Heck this is my first year voting! I think the voting age should be 21 because most 18 year olds are not intelligent enough to go out and really learn about the candidates. They just want to vote for the rock star who promises change. Forget what the change is. He's just so COOL.

Last time I checked COOL wasn't on the lists of requirements for presidential candidate.