Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Wrong!. One day he fully sticks up for them.

Posted By: Next day they are gone. -embarrassing mess.nm on 2009-02-06
In Reply to: Best friends? - sm

nm


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

I fully understand that. However, when...
confronted about voting against it the first time, he said he would have voted for it if a bill ever came before him worded like the federal bill is now, which passed overwhelmingly. Well, it turns out, the NRL asked for the second bill that he also voted against and the wording is nearly identical, and is in fact identical in the areas he expressed concern about. So, he lied. He knew he had voted against it the second time with that very wording, he just hoped no one would check. All information about this has been removed from his website. The reason he did it is clear...anything that might remotely give creedence to overturning Roe vs. Wade he was willing to vote against...even if that meant children born alive being left to die. He has said, and there are videos on You Tube that support this, that there should be no restrictions.

So, even if he voted against the first bill for wording, he can't use the same excuse on the second. Which makes me believe he voted against both for the same reason and the only reason he lied was to appear more moderate and therefore more electable,and when caught in a lie is now doing...what did the other poster call it...keeping a low profile. You don't win the endorsement of the most radical left wing proabortion folks by being moderate. Look at the totality of his voting on the subject. It can't ALL be because of wording. That's all I'm saying. I don't know why people can't just be honest and say what they really believe and feel and let us elect them on their true merits. Yeah, I know, dream on.
Fully agree
x
lol....I like how she sticks her tongue out at the end.
.
It has been explained fully many times
in this post and you are obviously unwilling to accept anything we say. 
I fully support our soldiers -
As I have said before, I have a son who just graduated basic training last week, I was a soldier's wife for 20 years (one who served in the Gulf War during our marriage and is currently in Iraq now), and my father served in the Korean war, but I still think that the Iraq war is pointless and we do not need to be there. I don't think we should ever have been there, but definitely should be home now.

Even the Iraqi people don't want us to get out and come home and let them handle their own country.

Hating the war does not mean hating the soldiers - it means wanting the ones that are left to be home and alive and in one piece!
I fully agree with you - see message
Three months is definitely enough time for a mother to decide whether or not to have the baby. After that I say no way. After that time there is always a practice called adoption.

What I take offense to is someone who claims they know what God's intentions are, and then claims that someone who mows down a person in cold blood is a messenger of god and doing his work and this is what god wants, blah, blah, blah.

I think people should think before they write. When someone professes to know exactly what god wants (and considers killing someone in cold blood an act of god) then its time for some serious medication.

I say if you agree or don't agree that's one thing, but to get on and say "oh yeah, that's what god wanted" (for someone to be mowed down in front of family and friends).

Opinions like that just tend to irritate me a bit.
Sticks and stones......and you are capable...
only of petty, small insults and attacking in packs. Certainly something to be proud of. You should add it to your resume.
Sticks and stones ladies......
Your petty name calling doesn't touch us.


**Sticks and stones?** How bizarre.

You were called a **US citizen.**  Such audacity!


So which was hurled at you?  A stick or a stone?


No, dear, I understand fully what reality is.

Reality is truth.  I don't expect you to understand anything concerning the truth, though.  People who see reality for what it is are simply just sick and tired of being lied to, whether it's by Dumbya or by those of your ilk.  Thank God you don't represent the majority of Americans or we'd be in worse trouble than what we're in now.


Trying to communicate with you is impossible, so I choose not to participate in that endeavor any longer.


You have a nice evening now.


There's a big difference between killing a fully developed,
is at that point only a bunch of tissue that will EVENTUALLY be a human being, but is not, and is a long way out from being one. The OP, by the way, was NOT talking about abortion rights, or the pro-life religious movement, etc. Why you people have to infuse this argument into everything is beyond me. The OP was talking about WOLVES. And the fact that SP was not against what appears to amount to aerial target-practice. Please take your pro-life sentiments to another thread (and preferably, another forum.)
I've followed some of the cases that ACLU sticks their nose in and to know that they are somehow sm
linked to the Democratic Party scares me.  I do not see how they could defend NAMBLA if they are exploiting children.  It's a disgrace to say the least.
Sticks and stones....hope it empowers you to...
berate me. And your respect...thanks but no thanks. Don't want it, don't need it. Your assessment of my posts means less than nothing. So keep swattin'. I am not going away.
The sticks and stones were the smart-A (aleck, not a$$)....
remarks at the end of the post...ending in...chief. No need for that. And it does not matter how many times these folks (same folks who would DIE before claiming Bush as THEIR President...LOL) tell me Barry from Chicago is MY President...in my mind and heart he is not, and they are preaching to the choir. But if that makes their day....yippee. Maybe they can meet MSNBC Chris and they can sing Obama's praises and get those tingles up their legs...lol.
Oh, please, give me a break....that man sticks his foot
nm
*Sticks and Stones*. YOU LOST. AMERICA WON.

Stop the name calling, the crying, the ranting and GET BEHIND OUR PRESIDENT AND OUR COUNTRY!  Don't be a traitor!  You don't like it--Leave!! 


I can understand fully why you don't want to play the blame game...
considering where the blame falls. If those were all Republicans in the dam*ing video, would you be on this board saying stop the blame game? I think NOT. Where is accountability? You should be fighting mad about this...and demanding accountability from your party members who brought this down on us. I do not understand that. You want to hang Bush out to dry for every little wrong, and here we face the biggest financial crisis in decades, and the evidence is irrefutable Democrats on the hill are responsible..yet you give THEM a pass. WHY is that?
Biden sticks his foot in his mouth all the time...(sm)

But there's a difference between gaffes and a lack of knowledge, much less a willingness to pass FAIR legislation.


Biden sponsored the violence against women act and has had to fight republicans to extend the life of that bill every time it comes up.  He is a very strong advocate for women.  Check out his voting record.


Sticks and stones, my friend. Didn't vote for the man...
he is not MY President. I honor the office, not the man in it. Not Bush, and certainly NOT the great and powerful 0. Last time I looked this was a free country, although Barry from Chicago may change that before he is finished. I don't have to claim him because you folks elected him. I don't have to sig heil. I certainly don't have to respect him. I used to respect the office of the presidency and I might again if an independent nonpuppet with a mind of his freakin own (or HER own) ever gets elected. If McCain had been elected, would he be YOUR president? Would Palin have been YOUR vice-president? Come onnnnnn.

Sorry about that....chief.
Not only do I have a thicker skin - I also have a FULLY DEVELOPED brain-what a concept!!

Sure starting to look like she wasn't fully vetted and chosen last minute as a token female...nm
1
wrong, full of wrong statements, see my upper post...nm
nm
Wrong Woman - Wrong Message
http://www.truthout.org/article/palin-wrong-woman-wrong-message
Wrong, wrong, wrong, clueless Lu.
Horse hockey
Sorry about that...wrong board, wrong name
nm
You're right. Something is definitely wrong

Not with the priests who do the molesting.


Not with the Senator who absolves the priests of blame and instead blames the Liberals.


No.  Instead something is definitely wrong with ME for my outrage that a Republican Senator can make such an outlandish, IRRESPONSIBLE statement, instead of trying to SAVE these children and condemning what the priests are doing.  Unfortunately, this is typical of the Republican party these days.  Typical of the "We are perfect and make no mistakes" mentality that's prevalent in this country.  They couldn't be honest if their lives depended on it.


 


Well, tell us what's wo wrong about what he says?
  You can't, because he just pegged the lot of you like he always does which is why he has the top rated radio show in the country 
You got it wrong....
Many of us liberals do not have delicate thoughts about terrorists.  But get it through your brain, if you can, that many of us feel that invading Iraq for oil and power WAS NOT THE WAY TO attack or deal with the terrorists.  Apparently they're mostly in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan and what are we doing?  Messing around in Iraq.  We are LESS safe and I think time will prove that. 
WRONG. You know what is

Not everyone is a liar.  Only the ones who have done it on this board before and don't deserve to be trusted or believed again.


It's quite simple. If you want to be believed, stop lying.


Then that was wrong
absolutely wrong, and the teacher and school administration were clearly in the wrong.   Shouldn't have happened, period.
Wrong.

What posts are you talking about?  Either I wasn't here then or you're wrong.  I've read through most of the posts but don't remember seeing that.  Prove it.


WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU??!

You called her an elitist pig, claiming to mean it in a good way.


She replied with Yup, elistist pig here..Yeehhaaww~~


And now you’re claiming she said she speaks for God.


WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU??!


So was I wrong? And if not...
...what are you getting so huffy about? Just for the fun of it? There's no arrogance in assuming you aren't one of the 1% of the richest people in the country. It's a natural assumption considering you spend so much time here, and why would you bother if you could be off doing whatever pleased you with money being no object? I'm certainly not one of the 1% and you bet I'd be doing something rather than putting up with your petty indignation if I had a virtually limitless income. So I didn't assume a thing about you that you were not free to assume about me in return. What's the big deal -? Are you ashamed anyone might think you're not in the top 1% of wealthiest Americans? Mighty fragile ego, that. Better face reality and get a grip - that's a pretty exclusive club.
What is WRONG with you? sm
Seriously what IS wrong with you?  This has nothing to do with anything in this thread.  Except yet one more occasion to use the word LIAR.
WRONG!

I corrected myself.  I admitted to my mistakes.  I always admit to my mistakes, and believe me, I make a lot of them.  I'm even harsher on me than the neocons are.


If the neocons could just admit to theirs, the dialogue might be more productive.


and *what if* you are wrong?

We both could be wrong.  I find debating what if's a waste of time. 


The simple answer to any what if question is:


If you're right then I'm wrong.  However, I find dealing in knowns a better way to logistically deal with any scenario.  You can what if yourself all day long and never get anywhere.


 


Wrong. nm
  Richard Cohen was right.  Sad.
You are all three wrong. TI

Despite the UN ruling that Israel completed its withdrawal from southern Lebanon (UN, June 18, 2000), Hizballah and the Lebanese government insist that Israel still holds Lebanese territory in eastern Mount Dov, a 100-square-mile, largely uninhabited patch called Shebaa Farms. This claim provides Hizballah with a pretext to continue its activities against Israel. Thus, after kidnapping three Israeli soldiers in that area, it announced that they were captured on Lebanese soil.  Israel, which has built a series of observation posts on strategic hilltops in the area, maintains that the land was captured from Syria; nevertheless, the Syrians have supported Hizballah's claim. According to the Washington Post, the controversy benefits each of the Arab parties. For Syria, it means Hizballah can still be used to keep the Israelis off balance; for Lebanon, it provides a way to apply pressure over issues, like the return of Lebanese prisoners still held in Israeli jails. For Hezbollah, it is a reason to keep its militia armed and active, providing a ready new goal for a resistance movement that otherwise had nothing left to resist. In January 2005, the UN Security Council adopted a resolution condemning violence along the Israel-Lebanon border and reasserted that the Lebanese claim to the Shebaa farms area is not compatible with Security Council resolutions.



Wrong. I did not.

I never said this person was sent to SHUT DOWN down the board, as I was accused of saying by the rude, rabid person you're defending.


I said this person was sent to crash the board (as in INVADE the board, as in someone who would CRASH A PARTY). 


Yes, I made the mistake of posting on the other board twice before I read further and realized the nature of these boards.  I haven't repeated that mistake since.


I suppose I can expect 3,869 more posts from you to make us even for my two posts.


After reading some posts by you on your board (such as Prophecy certainly is being fulfilled.  So much of the world has turned their back on Israel.), I can totally understand your blind, unquestioning loyalty to Israel.  You obviously believe the end times are near, and if you don't support Israel, you won't get to spend eternity with people like Ann Coulter.  People like you scare me because I believe you will do anything it takes to self-fulfill that prophecy.  That is yet another reason why religion and politics don't mix; I can't help but wonder if God told Bush to bring the end times about, which he seems to be intent on doing with his bomb first, ask questions later tactics.  After all, God told Bush to go to war with Iraq, and Bush obeyed that order.


I was wrong....sm
He said Fox was off his meds or *acting.* {{same thing}}

Enjoy your show! (and all its *cough* facts).
You are wrong. sm
Noam Chomsky and Ward Chamberlain both made comments that we got what we deserved on 9/11. 
you got this one wrong.
I have been to the boards in the last 2 or 3 weeks once. I did not post whatever you are referring to and when I do post I always use my name. I have yet to come up with a reason to hide behind another. It was not me.
Wrong again...
I don't know what other liberals are doing or if they are mad about TV coverage. Secondly, I am reacting to a 1-hour broadcast, nothing more, nothing less. Maybe the new War Czar will see the necessity of administration presence at soldier's funerals. I agree with Democrat that this convocation was quite a bit more pomp and circumstance than Katrina where he showed up in shirtsleeves, made promises and left. I am not mad because liberal causes are not on TV...this has not a thing to do with liberal causes or TV coverage. It was my response to an event.
Wrong AGAIN....
President Bush declared a national day of remembrance for the Katrina victims and there was a great bit of pomp and circumstance as I remember it. I have never seen any administration order half-staff for a natural disaster, no matter who was in power.
you are just wrong
your facts and thoughts are so twisted and convoluted that further discussion with you is futile.  Step aside.  Next.
Okay, that's just wrong, wrong, wrong!
I'd say that is right up there with Hillary attacking Obama's kindergarten essay. What's wrong with these people and their campaign? Isn't anyone telling them when they have stepped off the deep end into the abyss of bull....
when I'm wrong I'm wrong
Everyone is wrong at one time or another...gotta suck it up and admit it. That's what makes us human. My MIL...she will never admit that she's wrong - infurates DH. When he tries to tell her the truth about certain things if she doesn't want to hear it, mysteriously something will be on the stove burning and she'll have to hang up immediately. Then she doesh't have the decency to call back. LOL
I'm sorry....but you are wrong.

Clinton was impeached on two counts, grand jury perjury and obstruction of justice, with the votes split along party lines. The Senate Republicans, however, were unable to gather enough support to achieve the two-thirds majority required for his conviction. On Feb. 12, 1999, the Senate acquitted President Clinton on both counts. The perjury charge failed by a vote of 55–45, with 10 Republicans voting against impeachment along with all 45 Democrats. The obstruction of justice vote was 50–50, with 5 Republicans breaking ranks to vote against impeachment. 


 


So....even though he was not convicted and not told to step down from office....he was still impeached.  Only one president has been impeached and told to step down and that was President Andrew Johnson...I do believe.  President Nixon chose to resign rather than be impeached.


wrong, wrong
True "feminists" are going to vote for Obama, issues over politician. Any true Hillary followers who followed her for issues will follow her to Obama instead of McCain. Only those few who followed her solely because she was a woman and no other reason will vote for McCain now. Fortunately they will be cancelled out by what one journalist called the "caveman" vote, in this case voting against McCain or just not voting at all because he has a woman on the ticket and no other reason. Oh yeah, they're still out there.
Wrong again, Sam.

It is not that the Soup Nazi didn't have any soup, it is just that he was free to deny soup to anyone he felt was not deserving of it.  The same goes for us.  We are not obligated to respond to your demands for documentation if we feel you are not deserving of it.  Therefore, no soup for you!



 


 


You are so wrong!
They're trying to do it in Alaska!!!