Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Yeah, Obama also keeps changing his definition

Posted By: of "rich" 250 thous? 100 thous? .nm on 2008-10-28
In Reply to: Elizabeth Edwards - Kaydie

nm


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

Obama's definition of rich

Being so hateful and against Hillary all these months (and for Obama), after finding this article I now am rethinking my decision as to why I thought he was the better of the two.  


Obama's Scary Definition of "Rich"


I was a bit alarmed last night when during the debate Obama said that people who earned $97K a year are not part of the middle class and therefore should have their payroll taxes raised. Good grief, if this guy gets in the White House, hide your wallets.

If Obama thinks someone making $97K a year is in some way "rich" and not part of the middle class, I hesitate to think what tax hikes he has in store for people who make $250K or more.

I worry when I find myself agreeing with Hillary, but I found myself nodding when she responded by pointing out that in some states such a salary is definitely middle class, and that in New York school superindents, school principals, fire department chiefs, etc., etc. earn more than $97K and yet certainly can't be considered "rich."

Mike Griffith
------------------------------------------------------------
"Maintain peace, friendship, and benevolence with all the world. . . . I feel it to be my duty to add . . . a fixed resolution to consider a decent respect for Christianity among the best recommendations for the public
service. . . ." -- John Adams, Inaugural Address, March 4, 1797


OBAMA is a socialist! Go read the definition
nm
It isn't changing, it's in the details
Obama says if you are making under $250K you will not see your taxes go up a dime. If you are making under $200K you will see your taxes decrease. Basically if you are between $200K and $250K it's a no-change. He always gets this right, it's just that the wording on it seems similar so people get confused (or think he is).
Not changing the subject.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/11/13/poll-obama-facing-high-expectations/
Poll: Obama facing high expectations. Refer to the "overall approval rating" paragraph toward end of article.

http://www.gallup.com/video/111904/Most-Expect-Obama-Make-Effort-Republicans.aspx
Most Expect Obama to Make Effort With Republicans

Yet again changing the subject...(sm)

My original post merely pointed out that Olberman had a good question (which has yet to be recognized on this board).  Just as a refresher, the question was, why is Coulter trying to get on NBC to promote her book (in which she talks badly about NBC) when she has such a low opinion of the network.  This is not a battle of the networks, just a simple observation that anyone with half a brain can see.


I guess it's easier to change the subject than to actually answer a question or post an opinion on the subject matter.


Yet again changing the subject...(sm)

My original post merely pointed out that Olberman had a good question (which has yet to be recognized on this board).  Just as a refresher, the question was, why is Coulter trying to get on NBC to promote her book (in which she talks badly about NBC) when she has such a low opinion of the network.  This is not a battle of the networks, just a simple observation that anyone with half a brain can see.


I guess it's easier to change the subject than to actually answer a question or post an opinion on the subject matter.


Consider changing your moniker to IAlwaysGetTheLastWordNoMatterWhat. nm

Ummm. Fox is changing its tone and now
"a problem with semantics," trying to slither out from under its legendary erroneous biased reporting.
Man, what a sick reason for changing

Here is a blurb from an article I read..........changing a vote just IN CASE Obama becomes president........what a sell out.


Among the 21 converts was Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr., D-Illinois, his chief of staff, Kenneth Edmonds, said.


Edmonds said Jackson was changing his vote because "he received assurances from (Sen. Barack Obama) that, if elected, his administration will aggressively use authority in the bill to prevent foreclosures and stabilize the housing market."


Changing the subject to the tax rant
nm
Changing the subject does not change
I agree. Any undecided voter should read the entire fact check site AND both candidates issues platforms on their websites.
You're changing your tune
You make comments you want to make with no regards to anyone feelings and you call it being funny but someone else makes a comment you don't like and you call it racist and start yelling for the moderator. Maybe they thought their comment was funny.
I give up...I keep typing 7 and it keeps changing it.
xx
why do you insist on changing the subject
when Bush was in and we mentioned Clinton we'd be hemmed and hawed at that Clinton and Gore were gone and to get over it. Now that we say something about Mr. Messiah and we get Bush/Cheney comments.

Give it a rest. They are gone.
You seem to remember wrong, and why would I be changing races...sm
Find this and post it.
LoL! Must be changing of the guard in crasher-trasher land.

The solution is pretty simple.  If you don't like the liberal sermon, then don't attend the liberal church.


Other than that, I couldn't care less what you think.  Have a nice day.


Bush starts changing his tune/rhetoric.....
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061112/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_iraq
Kindly stop changing the subject. Still waiting for examples.
You made the charge, so back it up or admit that you can't. And if you don't even have that much integrity, then at least please stop saying things that you can't support.


yeah, and Obama isn't qualified to be in the top
nm
Yeah, that was on the news. Obama almost
nm
Yeah, I would NEVER trust Obama to be our
nm
Yeah, and they never seem to try to refute Obama's
nm
Yeah, how can you vote for Obama? How could you
nm
Yeah, Biden just knows that Obama needs
nm
Yeah, and the guy who just endorsed Obama...
that would be Colin Powell, believed that same "bad intelligence" and sold it to the world in the UN. But of course...since he is endorsing Obama...he is absolved of all wrongdoing? LOL, GP. Sorry.

WWJD? J wouldn't vote for a pro-abortion candidate, and I sure don't think J would be walking this earth telling people go ahead and have an abortion because the government shouldn't be in your personal life. Forget the government! Is being a Christian part of your life? If it is, then I don't know how you can vote for Obama or condone abortion in any way, shape, or form.

Killing babies is wrong, it doesn't matter WHO does it. If the mother decides to terminate it, fine. If a man sticks a knife in her belly and kills her and the baby, he is guilty of a double murder. And you can justify that in your mind...how? Simply that the mother has the right to kill it and the man didn't? What would J think of that?
Yeah, well, unfortunately, with Obama in office,
nm
Yeah, isn't Obama the great example for us to
nm
Yeah, but it was Obama who yammered
Wutta mutt.
Yeah, and Obama is so darn smart, yet does not
nm
Yeah, Obama's executive experience
nm
Yeah, I don't trust Obama's character
nm
Yeah, I don't care for Obama, but I am not "proud"
nm
Yeah, even scarier that you will vote for Obama
nm
Yeah, and Obama used to be ACORN's lawyer
nm
Yeah, and now put Obama in there to raise taxes
nm
Yeah, and the "honest" response from Obama
nm
Yeah, trying to hide Obama's answer, which is the
nm
Yeah, what's wrong with that - only stated what Obama
x
Yeah, well it would be nice if Obama could find an
nm
Yeah, think things are bad with Obama? Imagine
nm
Yeah, and maybe Obama will FIND his birth
nm
Yeah, that is how Obama got elected. ACORN

NM for you.


Yeah, yeah, yeah. You've said before that you're leaving, but you and your goons can't sta

Yeah, guess Obama supports refuse to look at all
nm
Yeah...good thing she isn't debating Obama...
nm
Yeah those nasty old rich. Well, after 4 years of Obama...
there certainly won't be those anymore...except those closest to him, and you won't be a bit better off than you are right now. And when the rich aren't there anymore, who is going to pay for your health care then? You might want to have a contingency plan, because if Obama doesn't have the rich to tax anymore, how is HE going to pay for your health care? Another thing to think about...they will all move to Europe before they allow him to bleed them dry. Survival of the fittest. Where do you think you will fall in that food chain?

Just asking.
Yeah, moochers love Obama, thinking they will get
nm
Yeah, agreed. Obama supporters refuse to see his
nm
Yeah, I am hoping Obama WONT be a disaster.
nm
Yeah, I am hoping Obama WONT be a disaster
See I too can keep repeating like you.
Yeah, and they're also all 30 something or younger...all Obama drones....