Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Your Jehovah has to frown upon the tone and content sm

Posted By: me on 2008-11-06
In Reply to: he is a socialist - Judy

of your original post.  Why are you not relying on your faith that your Jehovah will take care of you and why not pray for peace and safety for us throughout this transition, if your Jehovah is your president and leader?  From your original post you have no faith much less religion besides being led and guided by the devil.  Really and truly how can you say the words you said in your original post and then speak of your Jehovah.  Such a sad day and time, you sound as if you hate President-Elect Obama.


My God tells me that I will be okay because he will surely take care of me, regardless of who is President.




Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

Jehovah's Witnesses Don't Either
Nothing suggestive here. A lot of relgions don't believe in commercialism. There's nothing UN-American here, find another bone to chew on.
You set the tone.

I responded likewise.  And I agree it's not necessary.  Why do you do it?


There is no racism in my tone......
I am just sick of nuts like him standing up there and making absolutely insane remarks, such as the "messiah" thing. And what is even worse, he has weak followers if they don't see this man for what he is. HE is a RACIST man. I have no problem calling him out on that one. He is racist, his comments are racist, and he loves to divide the races. If you don't like it, too bad. The facts aren't prety are they?


Ummm. Fox is changing its tone and now
"a problem with semantics," trying to slither out from under its legendary erroneous biased reporting.
There is racisim in your tone, not Obama's.

McCain is going to be the same. We need change; true change.  We definitely do not need our healthcare taxed.  What's next?  No tax break for what we pay in interest on our mortgages?  I'm quite frankly sick of hearing about what a hero John McCain is when in actuality he is was cheating on his wife.  All of the women out there need to think about that one!  Then, he marries into money (still doesn't come home) and his wife becomes a pill addict.  Don't even get me started on Palin's wonderful family that get people fired (scorn SIL) and has a teenager who is pregnant right under her nose!  It all starts at home.


I think people are afraid of Obama, but I think he may bring the change we need, but of course, there will always be nay sayers (especially the rich ones).  Too bad I wasn't born with a silver spoon in my mouth so that I can be a McCain fan and say "it's okay to cheat on your wife" or a Palin fan "it's only your daughter does not practice abstinence even though we're very religious."  Cough gag!!!!


I have a tendency to reflect the tone used in
x
Republicans taking a different tone on Iraq...sm
Republican lawmakers losing positive tone on course of war

Jonathan Weisman, Anushka Asthana, Washington Post

(07-22) 04:00 PDT Washington -- Faced with almost daily reports of sectarian carnage, Republicans are shifting their message on the war in Iraq from optimistic talk of progress to acknowledging serious problems and pointing up mistakes in planning and execution.

Rep. Gil Gutknecht, R-Minn., once a strong supporter of the war, returned from Iraq this week declaring that conditions in Baghdad were far worse than we'd been led to believe, and urging that troop withdrawals begin immediately.

Other Republican lawmakers acknowledge that it is no longer tenable to say the news media is ignoring the good news in Iraq and painting an unfair picture of the war. About 4,338 Iraqi civilians died violent deaths during the first six months of 2006, according to a new report by the U.N. Assistance Mission for Iraq. Last month alone, 3,149 civilians were killed -- an average of more than 100 a day.

It's like after (Hurricane) Katrina, when the secretary of Homeland Security was saying all those people weren't really stranded (at the New Orleans civic center) when we were all watching it on TV, said Rep. Patrick McHenry, R-N.C. I still hear about that. We can't look like we won't face reality.

Essentially, what the White House is saying is, 'Stay the course, stay the course,' Gutknecht said. I don't think that course is politically sustainable.

Rep. Jim Gerlach of Pennsylvania, a swing-district Republican facing a tough re-election race, has introduced legislation to create clear measurements of progress in Iraq, from territory under the control of Iraqi forces to government stability.

Congress needs to be more proactive and aggressive in evaluating what is the progress in Iraq, he said. The Iraqi government shouldn't feel like it's got a blank check on American lives and American dollars.

Rep. Christopher Shays, R-Conn., meanwhile, is using his House Government Reform subcommittee on national security to vent criticism of the White House's war strategy and new estimates of the monetary cost of war.

On Tuesday, Shays joined U.S. Comptroller General David Walker in criticizing unreliable cost estimates of a war that is nearly 3 1/2 years old.

Even Democrats say they see a change in tone on the other side of the aisle.

I think there is a lot less arrogance about the war in Iraq than there once was -- and people are much more sober in their assessment, said Rep. Chris VanHollen, D-Md.

The evolving Republican message on the war contrasts with the strong rhetoric used by House and Senate Republicans recently in opposing a deadline for withdrawal from Iraq. Last week, House Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, issued a statement hailing the turnover of Iraq's Muthanna province to Iraqi security forces under the headline, Progress in Iraq ... Despite Doomsday Democrats.

During a debate last month, Gutknecht intoned, Members, now is not the time to go wobbly. This week, he conceded I guess I didn't understand the situation, saying that a partial troop withdrawal now would send a clear message to the Iraqis that the next step is up to you.

Republicans, especially those in swing districts, had no choice but to shift the emphasis of their war talk, lawmakers said.

The Iraq issue is the lens through which people are looking at the federal government, said Rep. Charles Dent of Pennsylvania, another swing-district Republican. That is the issue to most people. There's no question about that.
and this changes the content how?
nm
Obviously you do not read my posts for content.
I said pull out the military. How does that translate to pulling out all together? Abandonment was never uttered.

Where is it written that the US military is the only one who can provide protection?

I bet that if it were proposed to the UN and some of our friends in the nether regions of the intention to pull the military out of Iraq to concentrate on the rebuild, we would probably get more protective support than we are getting now.

I don't believe it would be painful to the Iraqi people to have running water, clean food, and less bomb attacks do you?
What content? All I see is more Repub vs. Dem bashing.

Source discredits content.
One clear signal voters are sending this time around is that they no longer buy into NeoCon extremist viewpoints. The republican party is also trying desperately to distance itself from the right fringe of its own party via "diva," "rogue," and "whack job" perjoratives used to describe the VP pick and McCain's poor judgment. Repubots unite and flame away...will not change a thing.
Let's not. Divert, bas, name-call to ur heart's content.
Seems like you are the only one who is allowed to dominate this board. This is what democracy looks like. Deal.
Still slamming instead of addressing post content.
nm
I thought lewd pornographic content is not allowed here...nm

Logic and common sense tell me the content of this message
Our government agencies tend to err on the side of caution in these circumstances. I do agree that votes will not and should not be swayed one way or the other. I just found this to be a fascinating piece of news.
Investigate credit cards donations to your heart's content.
Hamas information?