Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Yah, but I wasn't sure the original questioner did, sorry if I made you mad :)

Posted By: Cathy on 2006-06-19
In Reply to: I know - Tam

Subject: Yah, but I wasn't sure the original questioner did, sorry if I made you mad :)




Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

I appreciate your help. It wasn't in my drug book and wasn't sure if I was even hearing it ri
Subject: I appreciate your help. It wasn't in my drug book and wasn't sure if I was even hearing it right.


No, it wasn't, but I wasn't responding to "the OP"
Subject: No, it wasn't, but I wasn't responding to "the OP"

get a hobby
Original Poster
Subject: Original Poster

She is saying sPAP.
see original message
Subject: see original message


I would do it the way you have it in your original post.
Subject: I would do it the way you have it in your original post.

Madhan's suggestion isn't a chart. If he specifically requests a chart I would type it that way. It doesn't matter what you think looks better. It matters what the doctor thinks looks better.
Thanks Derm MT - not original poster, but /sm
Subject: Thanks Derm MT - not original poster, but /sm

I wrote this one down -- cross-referencing in both "c" and "s"

Browsing this morning, I read original post and thought I had had "servant" as "cervatte" or something before -- looked up a couple different spellings, and could not find, so figured I must have been wrong and moved on. However, this one would have bugged me enough I would have spent more time searching later...

Glad you posted the correct answer.
KCL as you have it in your original post stands for
Subject: KCL as you have it in your original post stands for

potassium chloride.

It would be 20 mEq of potassium chloride.

20 mEq of KCL
original poster figured it out all on her/his own...nm
Subject: original poster figured it out all on her/his own...nm


original pack sm written OP
Subject: original pack sm written OP

http://www.ppa.org.uk/education/endorsing_fp10_dispensed.htm

found it here
I am the original poster for the dosing
Subject: I am the original poster for the dosing

question. So you would not type the word dispense out? I sent my report in with a blank so I will let my QA person make that decision.

Thanks.
maybe the original skin cancer,
Subject: maybe the original skin cancer,

if this is a recurrence.


Misspelled in original e-mail
Subject: Misspelled in original e-mail

This word should be colpoproctogram.
I refer to original Tessier book. Does the new one still have sm
Subject: I refer to original Tessier book. Does the new one still have sm

Buckwalter retractor and Buchwalter retractor (rather than the correct Bookwalter?). There were several others, but I can't recall them now. I gave my book away about 15 years ago, and strictly use Stedman's Med/Surg Equipment words, Stedman's Surgery words, and Vera Pyle's latest. I think what you're seeing is an entry before Hasson was verified. The same thing happened with Steffee/Steffe and Veress/Verress. If there were two spellings for Hasson/Hassan, I would think Vera's book would clarify. Time will tell, though. Ya never know in this business.
I checked wtih the original chart
Subject: I checked wtih the original chart

that I typed where the doctor stated that he was going to do an FNA and it was on the thyroid. I had already sent my charts, but I copied and pasted another with the work spelled colloid and an explanation and then sent that. Thanks so much.
I'm sorry, see message in side original post.nm
Subject: I'm sorry, see message in side original post.nm

xx
Yes, In the original post she asked about the doc numbering each
Subject: Yes, In the original post she asked about the doc numbering each

.
um, original poster absolutely makes no reference to 110
Subject: um, original poster absolutely makes no reference to 110

nm
Did you try shutting down and rebooting to get back to your original settings?
Subject: Did you try shutting down and rebooting to get back to your original settings?


you said chronic IBS, original poster heard long E disease.
Subject: you said chronic IBS, original poster heard long E disease.

therefore chronic IBS disease.


You said it.... NOT me.


to answer the original question, initials mean "BIpolar CircumActive Probe" nm
Subject: to answer the original question, initials mean "BIpolar CircumActive Probe" nm


hm...sorry i wasn't able to help! nm
Subject: hm...sorry i wasn't able to help! nm


wasn't the cap - was the E in......nm
Subject: wasn't the cap - was the E in......nm


thanks wasn't quite sure :)
Subject: thanks wasn't quite sure :)


Thank you-wasn't sure
Subject: Thank you-wasn't sure

nm
Oh well, I wasn't much help....sorry - nm
Subject: Oh well, I wasn't much help....sorry - nm

XXX
no that wasn't it.
Subject: no that wasn't it.


Sorry I wasn't more help...
Subject: Sorry I wasn't more help...


Thanks! I wasn't sure about the
Subject: Thanks! I wasn't sure about the


I did see your *lol* and I wasn't angry *LOL*...sm
Subject: I did see your *lol* and I wasn't angry *LOL*...sm

Really, I'm in a good mood!  *lol*  Have a GREAT day!!!
No, it wasn't positive (sm)
Subject: No, it wasn't positive (sm)

And I just meant I hadn't ever heard "plus" in front of S1, S2 before.  That was what I was questioning.  Thanks for taking the time to reply!


 


It's labral; doc probably wasn't sure which one to use. nm
Subject: It's labral; doc probably wasn't sure which one to use. nm

nm
That wasn't the OPs question, now, was it? nm
Subject: That wasn't the OPs question, now, was it? nm

zzz
Thanks! It wasn't an op note...
Subject: Thanks! It wasn't an op note...

Just someone reviewing the history and there was no elaboration other than that.  This particular dictator is killing me tonight...they sound like they are recanting a dream while still out of it themselves...words are trickling out their mouth oh every 15-30 seconds or so and sentences are all malformed, they are yawning, so a 10 minute report is only yielding like 30 lines and I'm falling asleep myself...very frustrating! 
If it wasn't a typo:
Subject: If it wasn't a typo:

"bronchial dialator or inhalation therapy"

dilator, not dialator.
nice to see I wasn't the only one who...sm
Subject: nice to see I wasn't the only one who...sm

who misunderstood OP's query...*LOL* - WELCOME TO THE CLUB!!! 
Nope, it sure wasn't and...
Subject: Nope, it sure wasn't and...

we actually had to work with some live stuff in training, was always thinking I had the symptoms of everthing we worked with!
Great help, wasn't it!
Subject: Great help, wasn't it!

Tried searching every which way on that one!  Have to say I hang out here a lot, usually not of much help to anyone myself, but sure a lot of useful info and links from others!  Thanks to everyone who helps here, including you, Hayseed.  You rock and really enjoy your posts! 
I came across that term thanks wasn't quite sure :)
Subject: I came across that term thanks wasn't quite sure :)


I just wasn't sure if there was a "right" way..
Subject: I just wasn't sure if there was a "right" way..

nm
You're welcome, wish I wasn't! :-(
Subject: You're welcome, wish I wasn't! :-(


That's how I looked at it, too, but just wasn't sure. nm
Subject: That's how I looked at it, too, but just wasn't sure. nm

nm
Oops, I'm sorry, you said it definitely wasn't that!!!!
Subject: Oops, I'm sorry, you said it definitely wasn't that!!!!

:o)
wasn't trying to just guess sm
Subject: wasn't trying to just guess sm

I wasn't sure if it was something more popular I should know but didn't
I'm sorry I wasn't more clear on that.
Subject: I'm sorry I wasn't more clear on that.


thanks, but that wasn't the question?!
Subject: thanks, but that wasn't the question?!

xx
it helped to know I wasn't crazy!
Subject: it helped to know I wasn't crazy!


That's what I thought, but QA said it wasn't correct.
Subject: That's what I thought, but QA said it wasn't correct.

That's what I thought, but QA said it wasn't correct. But I can't find any documentation either way.
wasn't trying to be rude, just the suggestions--sm
Subject: wasn't trying to be rude, just the suggestions--sm

given had absolutely nothing to do with the low back, which she specifically mentioned in her post. Not all MTs are way off in what they are asking about or looking for and some of these suggestions that have nothing to do with their requests can be very misleading, as well. JMO and again, not meant to be rude.
No wasn't Lamisil. I flagged it. Thanks though. nm
Subject: No wasn't Lamisil. I flagged it. Thanks though. nm

nm
wasn't being nasty as you put it - I merely asked
Subject: wasn't being nasty as you put it - I merely asked

how you can interpret a simple question being *nasty* is beyond belief....I asked because she never posted before 3/1 and there are a slew of questions - and is the ONLY reason I asked if she was testing.  I showed and had no attitude in my question BUT YOU SURE DID !!!


around these here parts, I guess one is dam*ed if you do and  dam*ed if you don't. 


Thanks, I sent for QA. Wasn't Charcot, maybe Kidner.
Subject: Thanks, I sent for QA. Wasn't Charcot, maybe Kidner.