If the doctor dictates it, you transcribe it, in quotes, as this

• QA Help: Earlier I transcribed a report where - Dazey
  • If the doctor dictates it, you transcribe it, in quotes, as this - ja
  • Transcribe what the dictator says... - QA2
  • As stated below, transcribe what is dictated - sm -
  • If it is in quotes, you had better leave it... - blubird
  • uncomfortable with phrasing/quoting - anne c.
    • Thank you, Anne. n/m - Dazey
  • You sound as if you are better than doctor - Tiredoleme
    • To Tired: Get some rest! I knew there had to - Dazey
      • You need thicker skin. nm - Don't ask for advice if you can't take it.
  • Not your call. Transcribe in quotes SM - QA
  • Agree it's the dictator's report and the dictator's call. NM - MissIndigo
  • It's not our job to determine relevance of anything dictated. They say it, I type it. nm - R
  • ONE MORE POINT OF VIEW AND QUESTION - Lillybelle
    • Patient may ammend - USMT
      • It's HIPAA, not HIPPA. People in the business really should know that. nm - deb
  • Another point of view...sm - ks
  • I'm sick of seeing those words - prude and proud of it
    • Misplaced pride. The physician is documenting something, Or trying to. NM - MsIndigo
    • The physician put his comment in - winnie
      • Actually BOS says NOT to transcribe curse - Dazey
        • The BOS can cram it. That's C-R-A-M and don't put it in quotes. nm. - Sick of BOS
    • Thanks, proud prude, for another point of view on this.... - Dazey
      • As Thumper said, If ya can't say something nice - Malki Reed
  • I was told if it is in quotes transcribe it even if curse word... - blondie
    • Thanks for your reply! Yes, that sounds logical. n/m - Dazey

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

If it is in quotes, you had better leave it... esp in regard to the legal aspect, but also the integrity of the document.

That said, usually the client has a preference regarding these things.

I typed:  CHIEF COMPLAINT:  "I was hallucinating."

I was corrected as:  CHIEF COMPLAINT:  "I was hallucinating".

Am I wrong here?

Administrator, these quotes below are what we are referring to.  Her attitude and language are indefensible.  Please ban her from this board.

From MQLOVER: 

"1.  ….is utterly ridiculous that you find a negative thing to say about everything you read you nasty, nasty lady. "

"2.  Maybe you better wonder about what is for dinner tonight, I am sure you are thinking about that."

"3. Yeah, you make a lot of sense! Stupid.  I find it funny that you think people who enjoy their jobs are immature and have multiple personality disorders. So wake up ugly and go find a shrink."

"4.  You really are stupid.  What I have to say is the only loser here is you, so lose about 50 pounds and come back later."

There are many more examples on record.  Thank you,

The professional MTs who really want to use this site.

Do you have a supervisor/liaison/QA person to ask? 

I agree ... not really professional.  Of course, I still cringe when I have to type "belly" instead of stomach.  

CHF or expand into congestive heart failure; and for any other shortened word, do you expand.  The guidelines for my company state type what is dictated and only expand things in the diagnosis section.  Well, someone I know who works for the company said that they just always expand regardless.  That doesn't seem right to me.  I was just curious as to what anyone else does.

Thanks!

"Note to transcriptionist...thank you for your time, thank you for your service, and have a great day."

WOW, that doesn't happen often, and when it does, it sure feels nice to know we are considered colleagues and not just a typewriter on the other end of the telephone line!

I'm half tempted to type it just that way....Would you?

"She has a known history of uterine leio, leiomy, ly, leio, leiom, la...ugh...uterine, um, fibroids."

*mask* things once (and ONLY once).  What a crock!  It's like trying to transcribe an auctioneer.  I always wondered how the accuracy couldn't suffer with this method.  (I guess I was right, considering the government is now using it.)  They make less money because there isn't much skill involved in doing it that way.  Legitimate court reporters go to school for quite some time and have to learn what's basically another form of shorthand.  (It's been years, and I might be wrong, but I believe, for example, the letters PB=N (or something like that.  LOL). 

I was around when the court reporters in my area went from straight dictation to *the computer.*  In fact, I did editing/scoping work for one court reporter who bought the new system, way back when the technology first became available.  (She also bought my computer for me to do her work and anything else I wanted to do on it, and part of her *offer* was that after two years, I would own the computer outright!)  It's a whole different world than transcribing.  I didn't like it then, and I don't like it now.  It's easier for the court reporter, who can pull his or her notes right up on the screen when something doesn't make sense and see where the *typo* was and figure out what it actually should have been.  So in order to be an Editor for a court reporter today, you basically not only have to know how to read their notes, but knowing how to read their TYPOS is the important thing.  This particular court reporter had the wisdom to know when her notes weren't that good, and rather than give me a very sloppy transcript to edit, she'd dictate it instead.  She was a great person, and I miss her a lot.

Scoping/editing for a court reporter is a great field to get into if that's your cup of tea.  If you're a typist, it's real difficult to get the "rhythm" that you can get when transcribing, and that's what I don't like about it.  (Very same thing with VR in medical transcription today.)  However, after doing this kind of work for 20 years, I might wake up tomorrow with carpal tunnel and might be forced to pursue it.

One thing about court reporters, from my own personal experience in my area:  They are the most generous, easy-going, NICEST people I've ever encountered, considering the enormous amount of stress they're always exposed to.  Back in the 1980s, I remember reading stats on suicide rates, and court reporters and DENTISTS were right at the top of the list!!

Is there a way to transcribe a church audio lecture from CD?  It is a .cda file.  I have "associated" the .cda with Start/Stop and ExpressScribe, but I still have no control with my foot pedal.  any suggestions? 

Thanks, Debbie

a minimum of 2000 lines per day x5 days a week for 8 hours a day, making 9 cpl which equals out to $180 per day. That comes out to $900 per week or $46,800 per year. That is just at 2000 lines per day. This is w/o shift differential and line differential added in. We get a bonus for going over a certain number of lines per pay period and we get a shift differential for working 2nd and 3rd shifts, which then works out to over 10 cpl. Transcribing 2000 lines per day works out to 250 lines per hour. W/o using an expander, I probably type about 100 words per minute and with my Expander it is a lot more. My pay stub shows how many lines per hour I average each paycheck. This week it was over 300 lph. I use my expander to its fullest. I have macros for everything and anything you can think of. I do radiology, oncology, and ER transcription - lots of phrases said over and over. I do not cherrypick. I cannot see what report or doctor I am going to get, the chart just pops up and I type it. Some days are all good docs, lots of days they are horrible but in this profession you take the good with the bad.

Everybody's work habit is different. Focus on what you can do instead of what person A or person B can do. When I first started I set goals for myself. I wanted to be typing 1000 lines by so and so date in 8 hours. When I reached that goal I made the goal higher by 100, 250 and then 500 lines. To me, it's all in the attitude you have for work. I look forward to work each day because every day there is something new to be learned.