Correction... *un* classified document.
Posted By: Democrat on 2006-06-22
In Reply to: I do not understand why anyone would believe there were WMD....sm - Democrat
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
So instead of saying "that is classified information"
and press conferences about things that are not true? That makes no sense at all. The were presenting instances where they were trying to prove that their policies were justified. If it is classified, rather like--oh, I don't know--the identity of undercover CIA operatives--then why even present examples of success? Why not just stick with their tried and true "it's our business, not yours, go away now" policy?
Wow, how vitreolic you can get? It is all in de-classified information and has been .....sm
widely published, I am not going to put my little links in here for everyone to follow, why do the Bush supporters hate history and fact so much? Hey, I would have loved it if George had been a great President and had carried on the prosperity from the previous 8 years, and by the way, Iraq did not attack us, the radical fundamentalist Islamic Jihaad did under Bin Ladin, and we knew he was in Afghanistan......bait and switch is a time-worn trick of the previous administration, truth hurts, but not more than the mess we are in. I am not trying to kick down Gearge, but why do the pubs keep trying to put him back up on his tarnished pedastal and re-write history for him? He is a nice man but he was a GIANT LOSER of a president, and I would say that if he were Democratic, he has dragged this nation into the mud in more ways than one and we ALL should be angry and looking for solutions instead of finger pointing. Enough already, it is like dealing with little kids who want to root for their superhero.
Now here's the document and please take
http://www.obamacrimes.com/attachments/028_Obama,%20Motion%20for%20Leave%20and%20First%20Amended%20Complaint.pdf
I'm sick of having to find everything for you weak feeble O lovers who are led by the nose by your "leader" while he tells you how mindless you are and need him to take care of you. That really should be an insult but he knows when he's preying on the weak.
Now, I'm sure you're quite capable of reading the local docket which says no dismissal has been granted.
Please don't be lazy!
Then document what you are saying
we should take your word that it was yelled when the Secret Service says they cannot find 1 person who heard it. Now who is fueling the fire?
Here's the formal document
http://www.obamacrimes.com/attachments/028_Obama,%20Motion%20for%20Leave%20and%20First%20Amended%20Complaint.pdf
No, it is a static document.........
You confuse adding amendments and "interpreting" the constitution. Obama wants to interpret it always HIS way when he knows good and well what the founding fathers intended. It is and always was intended to be a static document. The founding fathers did not design the constitution with the intentions of "changing" the interpretation as O sees fit.
You don't believe in free speech? All you O lovers need to get a clue! As president, if you ain't got the backbone for criticism by the news media or the average American, you need to fold up your tent and move on!!!!
He constantly brings up these guys, which tells me he doesn't have thick skin; he is a guy who just wants to get even and that AIN'T the kind of guy I want running my country.
You need to pay a little more attention to our president and how many times he obsesses over these guys. He really needs to move on and do his job and stop spending his face time on TV talking about people I don't care to hear about.
Why don't you read the document
not for what someone else predisposed you to think it means.
It does have something to do with the document posted.
Rightwing radicals are basically being called racist because they don't like Obama and his his ideas.
You can't compare those of us who are concerned about this country to those who just want to go after Obama because he's black. It's like comparing apples to teddy bears - you can't do it.
That's right, ignore a court document....
denial, denial, denial. You care nothing about the truth. I don't even know if you recognize it anymore. Pathetic. Cannot let go of prejudice long enough to see the truth when it is in plain black and white, and resort to snide remarks when you cannot effectively debate. But there is no debate here...CBS on the one hand said she was covert, and filed a brief in court stating the opposite. They have a history of lying to suit their agenda. And you are right there with them. I know you are not ignorant...I know you know that a court document is not cooked. The only impression one can glean from that is that you know they are lying, but you don't care.
And how does that speak to character?
DONT OPEN the above document, it contains
Safest not to open ANY links on this board... things have gotten nasty enough on here to have been lowered to computer virus warfare.
Insane.
Why should he? The last time he produced a document
x
Senate document 06-570 supposedly
verifies this info, but I searched and couldn't find it. Maybe someone smart can find this.
Document NOT to be released to the public?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nT-BvWg3e1I&eurl
The document does not state that vets
I suspect, however, that you know that and are just attempting to stir the pot by posting ridiculous and intentional misinterpretations of what the document actually does say.
This started out as a three-page document....as of yesterday....sm
It was up to 103 pages long. The dems added everything but the kitchen sink, and we don't know the half of what they added, and tried to change around.
It is a sound document based in fact.
As we can see in the archives of this very board.
What exactly do you find alarming about it? What do you think is not truthful? Do you think that domestic terrorism does not exist? Do you think that nothing should be done to monitor potential threats to our safety within our own borders? Would you object so vocally if the report pertained to extremist liberals?
Or did you not read the actual document and simply read Malkin's piece?
Yeah, he thinks the constitution is a living document....
somehow I don't think the framers had that in mind. lol
WARNING - dont open the above poster's document -
and it was a real beeotch to get rid of. Spent all evening redoing work it erased, and returning PC to prior settings.
Nice. Real nice.
Provide a link to the document with that title. None of the official copies I've seen use the wor
nm
Correction!
I copied the wrong link. THIS is the link that includes the clip of him saying what he denied saying. Sorry!
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/11/10.html#a5796
correction, *believe OR think* and *put this out there for you to THINK about.* sm
Excuse my misspellings, I'm typing too fast.
Correction
Yet, he goes on business as usual Iraq speeches, guitar playing, and everything *under the sun in response to Katrina* and not until he is criticized that he shows up for photo ops. In my mind this is criminal as well.
Correction.
Re: #4 and #22. Commas where inserted where numbers should appear. Total = 54.
Correction: Don't come here looking for you.
nm
correction
George HW Bush IV is the global head of investment management for now-bankrupt Lehman Brothers, not ML. Got my bankrupt companies mixed up...
Correction to above
I did find the US Code on another site. I don't know why it won't pull up on the US Code search. However, the fact is that the whole issue in the original post was regarding Obama's appearance on "Meet the Press" September 7, 2008. He has not been on there in months and the supposed author of the article does not appear to be a real person, certainly not a writer for The Washington Post, or googling his name would have pulled up an abundance of articles he had written.
Correction.
I wrote previously that you responded to my response to GP. I see now that you responded to my response to Chele.
I'm still confused by "OP," though.
Correction.
I accidentally posted the wrong link above the Norwegian MD video. It should be as it appears below. I am posting the warning again in case anyone views this without having read my other post.
WARNING. These videos are extremely graphic and quite disturbing. If you are faint at heart, have just eaten or if there are children in the room, DO NOT VIEW THESE ACCOUNTS. However, if you are interested in an unsanitized report of this conflict as seen by everybody else outside the US, take a deep breath and a long, hard look at our tax dollars at work.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ev6ojm62qwA
Norweigian MD says he has only treated ONE Hamas military among the other hundreds of injured and dead.
Correction...(sm)
Here's what you said:
*Like it or not nations are formed through civil war. There are winners and there are losers. It's really very simple. The process has not changed for centuries and it will never change. The strong prevail. The righteous prevail. The minute we take a liberal viewpoint, that's the exact minute we become weak. *
So, the question I had was whether or not you thought Hitler was righteous, since he did prevail. (notice the lack of the word Jews in your statement above).
And yes, I did bring Hitler into the conversation. He systematically tied to wipe out a group of people, which is exactly what Israel is doing right now.
*there is a very fine line between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism, a line that was very clearly crossed when just the big bag posted her Hitler remark, a line many have crossed in this discussion by likening the Gaza Strip to a concentration camp. When you say these things you have become an anti-Semitic.*
And that should mean what to me? If Israel's actions right now are indicative of Jews in general, then please by all means, call me an anti-semitic.
However, to me this really has nothing to do with Jews in general. It has everything to do with a government (Israel's) that is simply in the wrong.
How many schools have they bombed now?
Correction...(sm)
Clinton tried to kill Osama and failed. He then passed all information on to Bush, who simply ignored it for 9 months.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3L2513JFJsY
Correction, I should have said
middle school.
Correction...(sm)
*do not have TVs* should have been -- do not have compatible TVs
Correction...
guy singing with his friends...and freecreditreport.com.
Correction.....(sm)
Technically, we are not in a war.
correction
it is not just republicans. there is hate on both sides.
Correction.....(sm)
It's not that we can't talk to Iranian leaders, it's that we haven't been able to talk to them in the past. You're right that the supreme leader pretty much controls everything; however, I think with what is going on right now, it's not just the president who is in jeopardy, but also the supreme leader. I don't know if you caught any interviews of Moosavi backers before the election, but they were saying what they wanted was to be more in tune with the rest of the world. They are tired of being cut off financially and socially from everyone else. If the people of Iran get their way with this election (which is iffy at best), then perhaps we could wind up with someone we could talk to.
The thing about the US getting involved is that it has to be because we were invited. If they ask for help, then I would help them. If they don't ask for help, then if we did butt in, it would again to them look like we are trying to control their govt, which is about the last thing we need right now.
correction: 90 %...................nm
nm
Correction, Roe, not *Rowe*
//
Correction - This..."If you are not with me, you are against me."
is Bush's motto.
Correction -- *College* (nm)
//
Correction...about 22 debates....nm
Correction, that should be Indonesian man by
Lolo Soetoro, M.A., an Indonesian citizen.
Slight correction
His exact words, "we can change the world." From where I sit the world could use a little improvement. It's amazing how changing 1 little word can change the whole meaning.
correction -- YOUR imagination.
nm
A correction to my post
Ok, now thinking about it I agree with Backwards typist and LA difference. I do believe in the death penalty for exactly the reasons they gave. When I first wrote I didn't believe in it I was thinking that I would not want an innocent person wrongly put to death. However, we do need the death penalty to deter others from doing heanous (sp?) crimes (even though it still is not enough of a deterrance for others. But I do agree that if someone takes the life, kidnap, rapes, or murders children and the innocent, those remnants of human debris do not deserve to live and sit in a jail, have a bed to sleep in, get to eat 3 meals a day, watch TV, lift weights, etc for the rest of their lives. I believe that if they are found guilty they should be brought to the back of a building, stand in front of a firing squad blindfolded and put an end to their miserable excuse of a life.
What got to me most about this post was your statement about gun control. Still does when I read it again. That actual audacity spoken about nobody needing more than a hunting rifle. As though you actually know what people need or don't need to protect themself. But then again, that is why I'm not a liberal. Not saying all liberals believe that way but most do, and most of them will be the first to enter your home and remove your guns if they had their way.
The constitution may be slowly being eroded away, but luckily nobody had taken away the second ammendment.
Correction. 2928.
Guess you still haven't thought over that obstacle the GOP has to overcome, lest they cancel themselves out of 2012.
Correction. 2928.
x
correction to my post
Tonight I heard on the news there were around 700,000 people who participated. Last night I heard it was around a million. Tonight I heard it was around 700,000.
But does not change that this was a huge grass roots movement and I hope to be seeing more peaceful protests like this one.
Correction - see message
I meant "not" based on color, size, sex, or religion.
and, I meant husband "can" see marriage should be allowed for all.
Correction, he is called DUBYA sm.
His nick name is "Dubya" not shrub. I saw a post on here the other day actually wishing him, "Happy Birthday, Mr. President". Do some of you people actually think Dubya as incompetent as he is, comes on this board to see your high school fantasies?
Correction: I posted it because I know what Rush said
Clarifying the subject line. It's been a long day.
|
