Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Dont even bother responding to her posts -

Posted By: smsg on 2009-06-20
In Reply to: I will not get in a war with you - Backwards typist

() is most definitely NOT playing with a full deck.


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

I don't think I was responding to those posts

I was responding to gt's, and no, I was not around when those other posts were made, and that's why I didn't comment on them.


I was responding to the "drunk" comment that gt made which was totally off par and shows what that gt is here for only one reason and that is to incite fighting, because calling someone a drunk without knowing them at all is definitely fighting words.


I don't know how you can render me a phoney, because I have told you nothing of my self.  That is again, a baseless judgement.  GT was typing nonsenical stuff right after telling someone their posting habits sounded like those of a drunk.  If posting habits are evidence of drunkeness then gt needs to look at his or her posting style.


Dont bother with () - she's NUTS.
nm
And I think you have to read all of my posts, I am responding to arrogant inflammatory remarks, whic
Substantiation, no real substance, and yet these people are CHOOSING to start devisive threads with divisive remarks on this board, even making statements that historically are 100% inaccurate. Yes, I pray for unity, compassion, wisdom, etc., but the rabid Republicans on this board (and I do not mean all Rep., just a few loud ones), want to harshy judge and condemnn the new administration without giving things a chance, what would you call that? What about the "hit and run" posts by right wingers who continue to stir the pot with incorrect, slanted, and inflammatory remarks here? Fair is fair, I try to back up each statement I make with historical facts, I try to see both points of view (wow, I have actually agreed with Republicans on certain subjects!), but this board is not about me, or you, it is about all of us trying to hash out all the many struggles this nation now has, and with restraint, intelligence, and care look at each problem and try to help fix it. America comes first. Period.
Not gonna bother. your posts are way too
X
Dont pay attention to those posts
They are obviously from people slithering over here from the con board as no democrat/liberal is going to bad mouth this way, not after what we have been through for 7 long years.  This is just observer and the others posting under different handles.  I have seen this before on this board.  Just wish they would go back and let us discuss the exciting wonderful times to come with a democrat in the WH..YIPPEE!!
I dont ready your posts cause

they are usually wrong.  Sorry.


 


LOL, your posts are getting sillier, time to rest it, dont ya think?
If you are not with me, you are against me, LOL?  A liberal statement?  Do you have Alzheimer's?  That is bush's statement from a State of the Union Address.  OMG, you guys are truly silly.  Satanist?  This is really getting inflammatory, dont ya think?  You posted previously that you were xtian, that is where I got that from.  Satanist?  I dont even know what that is.  For you to bring something like that up, that is so..**out there**, I really truly question your sanity, questioning a poster if they are satanist.  Whew.  I think if you want to discuss religion, you need to go to the religion board, ya know?  And leave the jewish situation alone on this board, cause you truly do not know what you are talking about.  Satanist, LOL...**BOO**
Dear Miss Thang. If you dont like it, dont watch.
nm
rational to one is irrational to another..dont like it, dont read it
Rational posts?  Well, maybe you would think that, however, I disagree..but, what the heck, from your continual posts attacking me over the past few months, it is obvious that we dont agree on anything.  Gotta tell ya, no one chases a person from a chat board..that is a lame excuse for someone who obviously was not able to hold his/her own with the smart liberals who post on this  liberal board.  So gt chased her/him away.  On please!  If a poster is getting to you, you just ignore their posts..dont click on them..Viola!  It is that easy!  Or dont come on the liberal board if you do not like liberal ideology!  Viola!  It is that easy!  So, Im here all the time am I?  Well, punkin, I see your handle always on both this board and the dinosaur board..er..I mean conservative board.  Is this what your debating has gotten down to?  Lets count and see who is here more often?  How ridiculous, how childish, how so....republican.  **BIG HUG**
I dont hate Obama. I just dont see him as qualified
nm
You dont get it. Most dont want O to fail, they feel
nm
Posts were removed due to the nastiness. Play nice and posts won't get deleted.

I saw the posts for myself, no one "ran" to me. Note that all boards were reviewed for inappropriate posts.


Thanks for responding.

1) Agree with the point about Afghanistan.  If our troops weren't burdened with fighting an unnecessary war in Iraq, we might be able to have a stronger presence in Afghanistan, as well as protect ourselves at home in case of a disaster (terroristic or natural).  Our troops are spread too thin, and the military keeps raising the age limit and lowering physical standards for enlistment as a reseult.


2) I agree with this.


3) Bush has recently admitted that Iraq had no WMDs and also had nothing to do with 9/11.  Do you think he is lying?


4) Tony Snow has made some really stupid statements, including blaming 9/11 on Bush 41.


5) Bush was the only leader who held out so the war could continue longer when the rest of the world pleaded for it to end.


Regarding your last sentence, whether I agree or not doesn't matter.  You have your opinion.  I have mine.  I don't feel you wasted your breath or your time.  Thank you for responding.


I believe she was responding to the
the exclamation point abuser, and not referring to teabaggers in general.
If you'd stop responding, so will the OP.
The more you carry on with posters like this, the more they will continue.

Moderator

No, I was responding to the past above yours, sorry,
did I get it wrong? yikes - I meant that for the 'first of all' post...
Huh? No. I was responding to the post
above that stated man and woman were created with the purpose of producing offspring. It had nothing to do with homosexuality.

I don't understand where you got the idea I meant anything else.
Do you think you've been responding to
just 1 person all day - LOL.
I dont WANT war. Dont judge me!
nm
enclosed the post I was responding to

 


Below is the post I was responding to:


*But can a parent sacrifice their child to the military


 that was the question...


and No most of the country doesn't agree with the self-proclaimed martyr, Sheehan.*


Maybe you should actually read the post before responding.

Bush is claiming they are working on nuclear weapons. 


Iran has always claimed they are working on nuclear energy.


Who's lying?  Which country has the track record for lying when it comes to reasons for declaring war on a country that didn't attack it first??


Agree and I do not plan on responding to them either
I have better things to do than squander any more of my time responding to the troublemakers posting on this board.  When someone here has something worth responding to, I will. There is no point in explaining, defending, or arguing with the people who are only here because they can't find any intelligent discussions on their own board.
You're the one who keeps responding. Just quit your...sm
harassment.

I was speaking to you, no matter how you try to twist the converation, and say I can't follow the thread. Period.


My apologies... I thought you were responding to
I usually don't read her posts, so by the time I checked to see if you were responding to her or me, it was too late. Sorry about the hasty reply, but I what I wrote still stands, just in case anyone DOES mis-quote me.

Anyway, a great big OOOPS!
:-/
Just tired of responding to hatred....nm
x
Responding to you is a waste of my time.
I do not waste my time responding to your political posts, and I will not waste my time arguing semantics with you. I would not associate with you in my personal life, and you are not worth my time and energy on this forum. I am afraid you will have to find someone else to listen to your nonsense.
I am responding to the above post with my opinion
and am not interested in over-aggressive fights about such silliness. It is my opinion in answer to the question above.
Wasn't responding to your post.... but the sow's ear
--
Did I stop anyone from responding to your post?
you haven't answered mine.
the problem with responding too fast
...is that you end up leaving out important phrases!

The $72 an hour figure quoted in the article, I should have said, isn't made of *just* the wages and benefits of current employees--it's also including those paid to retired workers, the ones who paid into the retirement fund their whole lives, and are now living off those benefits.

In other words, you take the wages/benefits paid to the current 180,000 or so autoworkers, PLUS those paid to the 400,000 or so retirees and the 120,000 spouses of dead retirees, then divide that by the 180,000 current workers, then say, LOOK HOW MUCH THOSE GUYS GET PAID! It's an incredibly artifically inflated number.

And noooo one in the media ever seems to question it.


You did not follow who I was responding to!!!! YOU READ IT
dip
Also I was responding to the person who wrote that

say the opposite. BT stated it correctly.


Now nuff said.


I agree, I was responding to some of the ugly remarks made below nm
x
You just don't have the capacity to understand I'm afraid... see ya, not responding anymore nm
to you
I am responding to all the posters who have made a living on this board denegrating everything that
new President does, even though he has just taken office, give me a break. George had 8 years, and each year was worse than the one before it.....I am not "whining" about Bush, the past is the past and I am trying very hard to focus on change, on a new future, on how we can all help, etc., not waving the Democratic flag, but the AMERICAN flag, I am just referring to history, nonpartison history.
I heard today Palin is responding to Levi's charges
by throwing the dirt back at him. I say that is how every woman her age should behave, right? Tit for tat.
Don't bother

I won't be back to read it.


I hope you will see what is truly going on in your viewing this morning.  I hope you will also see all the good Americans who are walking around the astrodome giving out water and supplies.  I hope you see that the Southern Baptists and Samaritan's Purse and other groups  are setting up kitchens, mobile showers, and counseling stations.  I hope that you see how the gangs, rapists and murders are making this difficult on everyone.  I hope you can get your index finger out of the pointing position and roll up your sleeves with the rest of good Americans are doing and do what you can do.  There will be time to dissect this all later as far as whole failed who etc., but that is after all these people are taking care of.  I agree that government has been slow in acting for reasons I'm yet to understand, but I also know that we don't need the government to take care of these people.  If we all pitch in and sacrifice these people will get the leg up they need to start putting their lives together.


Why bother?
I used to enjoy these boards and the differing viewpoints, but I think people are starting to show their true colors. Enjoy yourselves. However, I hope those that read here do their own research using unbiased sources and make up their own minds and don't just take anything here as fact without doing so.
oh don't bother....
...I'll just answer my own question. It's because you're one of the dems on this board....*sigh*

Let me also just save you the trouble and call myself a couple dozen names in the process.

&*()&*(WE&R)*D&*()&)&*(#&&*()#$&%

There. Now you feel better, don't you?


why bother?

Sam, surely you know that these libs have nothing but empty emotion in their replies.  They're mad that Hillary wasn't chosen (but so are we!), mad this, mad that, just bitter people who do exactly as the drive-bys do. 


They won't debate you openly and fairly because they can't.  If they bring forth something worth discussing I'll reply.  These people aren't acting like adults.


While I applaud your initial efforts, I have to wonder why you continue the abuse.  They don't absorb what you say.  All they do is just hurl something back at you.  And why?  Because Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder.


 


Why stoop to that level?


Does this not bother anyone?
I mean if this wasn't talking about a presidential candidate, would this bother you who support Obama? I want an honest answer, not "oh this is just a scare tactic" "they are mingling his words" tell me the truth - do you feel that what they were doing in Illinois was okay? And do you think Obama was right in what he said?

This isn't a presidential issue, this is a humanity issue. If anyone besides Obama said that, what would you think of them?


You know what Sam? Don't bother
They are so blinded by the light that shines from Obama that they are willing to follow anything he says. There's no reasoning. Next he'll be saying "lets kill any of the disfigured or mentally disabled people in this nation so we don't have to care for them" and they'll all say "WE UNDERSTAND!"

Understanding the killing of infants, my God what has this nation become?
You seem to know everything, why should I bother...
you really don't care what I think anyway.
I won't even bother to ask why you see those to
#
I'm not going to bother
doing the research but didn't Barrack Obama and John McCain actually work together on some bill or other?
Wow, it really DOES bother you!
nm
Please don't bother....
.
Again, this just really doesn't bother me.
Having lived all over the world, I consider myself lucky to be here.  I don't see this as a big deal.  But then, that's me. 
I agree. I try not to let it bother me,
I live in a town with a military base, and sending my friends and neighbors to Iraq unequipped and unprepared is THAT BAD.  He has blood on his hands, and Hilary voted for the war too, so no, I am NOT voting for her either.  Blood for oil is un-Christian, un-American, and unacceptable!!!
Does this bother you about Palin?
The first time she applied for a passport was in 2007.

yeah, don't bother
Anyone who doesn't agree with your beliefs is blinded, cult-like, blah, blah, blah.