I will say it slower so maybe you will get it.

Posted By: sam on 2008-10-31
In Reply to: I am placing who where? - lets go there

I....said....I hoped that you..... would never be put in the position aborted babies are put in......that someone ..... would have total control..... over whether to allow you to live or to kill you. Because....I think you have a right to live....just....like...I think....babies have...a right...to live.

Got it?

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

For the record - - Amanda
- Well said. That is the bottom line. I have already voted....sm - christian
  - You don't think you might hear the cries of aborted babies.... - sam
    - If I hear that (sm) - Just the big bad
      - I would expect that kind of answer from you.... - sam
        So you just pretty much sent me to ... - Just the big bad
        I didn't send you anywhere. Can't send you anywhere that... - sam
        Forgive me for not being clear enough for you (sm) - Just the big bad
        Well....the name big bad atheist.... - sam
        No, actually I'm not begging for discussion.. - Just the big bad
        I think you pretty much did that all by yourself. nm - m
    - hallucinations - lets go there
      - One hopes that no one has absolute power one day... - sam
        are you threatening me? - lets go there
        ROFLMAO -- that struck me as funny - all4me
        Geez. No. Get a grip. I was sincerely hoping... - sam
        I am placing who where? - lets go there
        I will say it slower so maybe you will get it. - sam
        I bet you step on bugs - lets go there
        Hmmm....I pose your question back to you.... - sam
        sober bug relocator - lets go there
- It just seems to me to be wrong on a basic moral level.... - sam
  - Sam, to be honest, I don't think about it much at all either - - Amanda
    - Why should any human being have the right to decide... - sam
- I could agree with your logic if - all4me
  - For those who haven't read FOCA w/o a republican twist... - Just the big bad

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database

Maybe you'd better speak slower
It's okay for you to talk down to me and insult my intelligence, but it bothers you if I come back with a similar response. I didn't take kindly to your smart-aleck reply. If you want to disagree fine, but don't insult someone else and not expect the same treatment back in return.

You misunderstood - I'll speak slower
I never said, 'What's in it for me?'

My point was that you can't single out a section of the economic participants and think it will be perceived as equitable.

You can't say, 'let's help home owners' without disenfranchising non-home owners. You can't take cash from one group (taxpayers who rent) and throw it at another group (taxpayers who own houses) and pretend that it's fair.

Across-the-board or nothing at all. Surely even you can grasp that simple concept, no?

I'll type slower so you can understand
Durbin's proposal simply RE-STATED EXISTING LAW. Let me rephrase that: Durbin's proposal simply RE-STATED EXISTING LAW. It said nothing about "opening our American media up to foreign countries." What are your sources? Here are mine:

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/senate-tunes-out-fairness-doctrine-2009-02-26.html

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=1&vote=00071

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/02/26/senate-votes-to-kill-fairness-doctrine-but-gop-concerns-remain/

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=1&vote=00070

You really ought to peel your mind away from Fox News and the rest of those jokers some time. Communist China running my local TV station? Geez Louise, you're the one who needs to get a clue.