Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Republicans, my butt!

Posted By: Concerned Voter on 2008-10-19
In Reply to: Do you not realize that republicans come in all kinds of flavors? - Arnold is California flavor, Powell a moderate cen

That's what we call a RINO.  I endorse neither of them.  Both of their wives are mega-libs, & they're no different.  Genuine Republicans don't want them in our party, either. 


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

    The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
    To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


    Other related messages found in our database

    or how to kiss butt really well
    ++
    Working your butt off
    Is never having a day off because during the week you MT part time and take classes AND teach youth group and then you have a second account on the weekend.

    I'd love to have kids but I'm not going to right now BECAUSE I CAN'T AFFORD IT and I don't expect anyone else to pay for them! It's called being RESPONSIBLE.

    Think before you speak.
    If she had tightened her butt up any more, she
    @
    He only did this to save his own butt.
    nm
    Mixed butt? ...(sm)

    That was just pitiful.


    O'Reilly is a SELF-PROCLAIMED traditionalist, not an independent.  Look it up.


    Yea, right....transparency my butt!!

    WH refuses to hand over the visitor list.....  after all, didn't he say he was going to be MORE transparent than other administrations?  Bull!! That man told so many lies on his campaign trail....   


    Considering I pay for that big 'ol house he lives in, and he preached transparency, then why not hand over the visitor list.  Actually, the U.S. citizens are supposed to have it given to us without asking.  And for those of you who will once again find excuses for this man.... NO, he does not have a reason not to, except as usual he has been seeing people he shouldn't be around and people that no doubt would expose him for what he is...  


    Yup. The Old Dude got his butt kicked.
    maybe he was looking around for someone to rescue him.
    The eye-rolling was a little much, as well. Somehow I can't see that affect going over real well when talking to heads of state worldwide.
    if you don't want to answer my question, would you please BUTT OFF
    nm
    slap my butt and call me
    x
    I work my butt off and don't want handouts -
    Voting for Obama does not mean I want anyone to give me anything. I have never asked for anything and don't intend to start taking anything.
    You can quit kissing butt now
    we get the point.

    Geez.
    Oh yes I have kissed Sam's butt all the time
    How about further down where I defended Gourdpainter? I blindly follow no one, and GP and I have agreed and disagreed on a lot.

    I'm not the one who views my candidate as the messiah and his supporters as the angels.
    Nobody asked you to butt out of the conversation.
    You are being asked to respect the SEPARATION between the politics board and the faith board. If all you have to offer is religious in nature, your post does not belong here.

    This breaking news just in....religion and politics are only as "intricately intertwined" as the secular among us allow it to be. There seems to be a consensus in America as there is in other western nations that the two do not mix well and certainly are not conducive to democratic process. I am neither atheist, agnostic or Christian, but I do consider myself to be a spiritual person of Universalist faith. I count myself among the secular citizens who will fight tooth and nail to keep religion out of politics and out of the government. There is a place for it in our society and in our lives...churches, synagogues, mosques, temples our homes and in our psyches. Why is that not enough for the theocrats? This constant push to pervade is a REAL LIVE BUMMER. Cease and desist, won't you?
    Get your head out of O's butt and pay attention!!
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29042139/
    Don't mean to butt in but the above message you posted is

    exactly what IMHO is talking about. I've seen plenty of your nasty messages and after this one (which is one of your calmest messages), I haven't opened or read your messages for over a week or so.


    Name-calling and nastiness is not allowed on this board. If you can't adhere to the rules, you need to leave or at least at mature.


    JMHO


    I consider him a traitor and just out to save his own butt

    He figures he can win on the Dem ticket because PA has turned Dem. Well, I have news for him.....I doubt it. He only won by a couple votes in the last election because of Pat Toomey running against him. He will definitely lose this election.


    I always split my ticket and I usually voted for him, but no more. I don't care what party anyone is affiliated with; but, to me, he is a traitor and that's someone else who is not needed in the Senate.


    To those who vote straight party, open your eyes. They are only out for themselves (but is that really news to anyone?)


    As posters have said before, we have to educate the people who don't watch/investigate/read up on the candidates running to make sure we vote the best candidates for the job...those who value the constitution, listen to their constituents (which is hard), and vote for the good of the country. Get rid of the a-holes who are in there. We really need to clean house this coming election.,


    WOW. I've even tried kicking myself in the butt for posting it...sm
    It adds nothing to the debate, really, except sidetracking the issue at hand.
    I hate to butt in but one story seen on the news and

    really scared me was when Obama was in Germany and a German citizen stated, "He's the new Messiah." This was on the evening news when he was on his around the world blitz. He really had no reason to do all that traveling as if he was already the President. What was he trying to prove??? That he can charm the world? It won't work if he becomes President.


    'Nuff said.


     


     


    Your stick-up-your-butt rigidity and intolerance -
    What goes around, comes around, and people who think with their retentive anuses instead of their minds, usually get what's coming to them in the end. So if that's the thinking and the politics you align with, then I'm just so very happy for you.

    You've been spouting off for weeks with reams and reams of copied and linked material that you think was written by God himself. You criticise every post that suggests that the poster is of another party, or even that they are open to ideas other than YOURS.

    And the REALLY sad thing is, you actually think that what you write actually MATTERS, and that people listen to what you say and think, and that they actually care. Well know what? Most people on here don't give a flying F_ _ K what you think.
    It does not sound like someone who is working therir butt off to me. nm
    .
    It's called hard work and get off your butt
    @
    Geez sweetpea. Butt envy?? LOL. nm
    nm
    Obama can't make up his mind whose butt
    nm
    Maddow was kissing his butt before the election....
    --
    Watch out, Marmann, here I come kissing your butt again! s/m

    You are so right in your description of yellow jackets!  Just a bunch of brainless aggressors that attack blindly and viciously.  LOL


    I am enjoying this very much and find it oh so entertaining!  Mob mentality is the only fitting way to describe these people.  I just haven't figured out if it's just mental defectiveness, self-loathing or just plain needing a good 'ole roll in the sheets!!  


    Wow, usually people that work in the same industry find a common kinship and are very supportive of each other.  Sadly, I don't feel any kinship with a lot of these people.  In fact, I go out of my way to avoid people like this because their joy is killing other people's joy and that's a "disease" I just don't want to catch!  Besides, I have a feeling that all the negative posts on this thread are all done by the same person.  It must be awkward to be so socially inept.


    I look forward to more posts by you and JTBB and, disturbingly, to the putrid spewing that will then ensue!!    Bring it own, bee-atches!


    In realty I'm a guy dressed up like a girl, that's why I'm butt ugly.
    x
    Unclench butt cheeks, take a deep breath, and
    nm
    Hey, that's the American dream - I'm all for sitting on my butt and making $$$
    Hurrah!!
    I think Larry Craig has the weird butt..he even has a wide stance! nm
    x
    What the Republicans Don't Want You to See.

    Stephen Crockett posted this twice (at least) on the Conservative Board, in response to an old quote of his being used out of context and distorted by the usual suspects there.  Each time he posted it, it was deleted from the board.  It's certainly easy to understand why they don't want anyone to see this. 


    Please read quickly.  They think they should control our board, as well as their own, so it probably won't last very long here, either.


    African-American Voters Scrubbed by Secret GOP Hit List


    Published by Greg Palast June 16th, 2006 in Articles
    Massacre of the Buffalo Soldiers
    by Greg Palast
    As reported for Democracy Now!


    Palast, who first reported this story for BBC Television Newsnight (UK) and
    Democracy Now! (USA), is author of the New York Times bestseller, Armed
    Madhouse.


    The Republican National Committee has a special offer for African-American soldiers: Go to Baghdad, lose your vote.


    A confidential campaign directed by GOP party chiefs in October 2004 sought to challenge the ballots of tens of thousands of voters in the last presidential election, virtually all of them cast by residents of Black-majority
    precincts.  Files from the secret vote-blocking campaign were obtained by BBC Television Newsnight, London. They were attached to emails accidentally sent by
    Republican operatives to a non-party website.


    One group of voters wrongly identified by the Republicans as registering to vote from false addresses: servicemen and women sent overseas.


    *******
    For Greg Palast’’s discussion with broadcaster Amy Goodman on the Black soldier purge of 2004, go to
    http://gregpalast.com/armedmadhouse/palastDN6-14-06.mp3


    *******


    Here’’s how the scheme worked: The RNC mailed these voters letters in envelopes marked, Do not forward, to be returned to the sender. These letters were mailed to servicemen and women, some stationed overseas, to their US home addresses. The letters then returned to the Bush-Cheney campaign as undeliverable.


    The lists of soldiers of undeliverable letters were transmitted from state headquarters, in this case Florida, to the RNC in Washington. The party could then challenge the voters’’ registration and thereby prevent their absentee ballots being counted.


    One target list was comprised exclusively of voters registered at the Jacksonville, Florida, Naval Air Station. Jacksonville is third largest naval installation in the US, best known as home of the Blue Angels fighting squandron.


    [See this scrub sheet at http://flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=160156893&context=set-72157594155273706&size=o


    Our team contacted the homes of several on the caging list, such as Randall Prausa, a serviceman, whose wife said he had been ordered overseas.


    A soldier returning home in time to vote in November 2004 could also be challenged on the basis of the returned envelope. Soldiers challenged would be
    required to vote by provisional ballot.


    Over one million provisional ballots cast in the 2004 race were never counted; over half a million absentee ballots were also rejected. The extraordinary rise in the number of rejected ballots was the result of the widespread
    multi-state voter challenge campaign by the Republican Party. The operation, of which the purge of Black soldiers was a small part, was the first mass challenge to voting America had seen in two decades.


    The BBC obtained several dozen confidential emails sent by the Republican’’s national Research Director and Deputy Communications chief, Tim Griffin to GOP
    Florida campaign chairman Brett Doster and other party leaders. Attached were spreadsheets marked, Caging.xls. Each of these contained several hundred
    to a few thousand voters and their addresses.


    A check of the demographics of the addresses on the caging lists, as the GOP leaders called them indicated that most were in African-American majority zip codes.


    Ion Sanco, the non-partisan elections supervisor of Leon County (Tallahassee) when shown the lists by this reporter said: The only thing I can think of - African American voters listed like this - these might be individuals that
    will be challenged if they attempted to vote on Election Day.


    These GOP caging lists were obtained by the same BBC team that first exposed the wrongful purge of African-American felon voters in 2000 by then-Secretary of State Katherine Harris. Eliminating the voting rights of those voters —— 94,000 were targeted —— likely caused Al Gore’’s defeat in that race.


    The Republican National Committee in Washington refused our several requests to respond to the BBC discovery. However, in Tallahassee, the Florida Bush
    campaign’’s spokespeople offered several explanations for the list.


    Joseph Agostini, speaking for the GOP, suggested the lists were of potential donors to the Bush campaign. Oddly, the supposed donor list included residents of the Sulzbacher Center a shelter for homeless families.


    Another spokesperson for the Bush campaign, Mindy Tucker Fletcher, ultimately changed the official response, acknowledging that these were voters, we mailed to, where the letter came back - bad addresses.


    The party has refused to say why it would mark soldiers as having bad addresses subject to challenge when they had been assigned abroad.


    The apparent challenge campaign was not inexpensive. The GOP mailed the letters first class, at a total cost likely exceeding millions of dollars, so that the addresses would be returned to cage workers.


    This is not a challenge list, insisted the Republican spokesmistress. However, she modified that assertion by adding, That’’s not what it’’s set up to be.


    Setting up such a challenge list would be a crime under federal law. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 outlaws mass challenges of voters where race is a factor in choosing the targeted group.


    While the party insisted the lists were not created for the purpose to challenge Black voters, the GOP ultimately offered no other explanation for the mailings. However, Tucker Fletcher asserted Republicans could still employ the list to deny ballots to those they considered suspect voters. When asked if Republicans would use the list to block voters, Tucker Fletcher replied, Where it’’s stated in the law, yeah.


    It is not possible at this time to determine how many on the potential blacklist were ultimately challenged and lost their vote. Soldiers sending in their ballot from abroad would not know their vote was lost because of a
    challenge.


    __________________________________


    For the full story of caging lists and voter purges of 2004, plus the documents, read Greg Palast’’s New York Times bestseller, ARMED MADHOUSE: Who’’s Afraid of Osama Wolf?, Armed Madhouse: Who’’s Afraid of Osama Wolf?, China Floats Bush Sinks, the Scheme to Steal ‘‘08, No Child’’s Behind Left and other
    Dispatches from the Front Lines of the Class War.


    http://www.gregpalast.com/massacre-of-the-buffalo-soldiers


    what about republicans?
    As John Dean recently said I'm still a Goldwater conservative. Today, that places me left of center
    What is says is that I and many others, Republicans,
    Independents, Progressives, Green Party are sick of having these insane **wars that cannot be won** wars that have no **definition or reason** foisted upon us. You think that winning, whatever that is, is worth whatever it takes including more American and Iraqi lives. We did not leave Viet Nam because of the left and we sure as heck won't be leaving Iraq because of the left. The **American people** the majority (even on Fox news) are dissatisfied with Iraq, the lies and the incompetence. The same was true for Viet Nam. They would take the hill, then lose the hill, then take the hill, then lose the hill, never knowing what having the hill was all about but a whole slew of people would be dead at the end of it. Incompetence, arrogance and ignorance. That is what got us into both these wars. Some times you just have to suck it up and move on, cut your losses and get out. We, the liberals, did not start this nor is it our fault that it will end the way it will and it will end and it won't be pretty.  We do not belong there. We cannot win anything. There are those who will hold on till the bitter end and even then will refuse to give up. Years after Viet Nam you guys are still fighting that war, er, conflict.  When the state I grew up in, Indiana, is voting Democratic, you know the gig is up. Although Hoosiers vote for Democrats on a local basis, I cannot remember a time the state did not send all of its electoral votes to the Republican party and Indiana is usually the first state to be called for the Republican side, but not today. As much as you would like to malign the left and blame us if we do leave Iraq before you think it is time to, for the first time in a long time, you are in the minority. Middle class middle America, Indiana, is voting Democratic. That is huge. Many of them on exit polls cited the corruption in Congress as a second reason they were not voting Republican.
    But the same can be said for many republicans.
    To decide you will never vote democrat again based on the actions and words of a few radical examples on an internet message board for medical transcriptionists is hardly objective. I can think of extreme examples of republicans, too, but I do not judge all republicans based on those examples. There are plenty of republicans who support Bush just because he's republican. No difference.
    Republicans
    amen sister!
    Sorry. IMO it is the republicans that are...sm
    constantly comparing Palin to Obama and we wish you would stop, and so does he and has said so several times. I am willing to compare Obama to McCain and Palin to Biden, no problem. You call the dems extremists, look in the mirror.
    what does that have to do with republicans? nm
    nm
    Well...what the Republicans DID NOT...
    do for me was cripple the economy. THANK YOU, REPUBLICANS. What they did not do was raise my taxes. THANK YOU, REPUBLICANS. They are right now trying to keep Democrats from a huge wasteful expansion of welfare programs when we are in grave economic straits getting worse by the day...THANK YOU REPUBLICANS. And just for the record...I am a registered Independent.

    Kool-aid....good grief. If it comes out of the Great O's mouth people just buy it, hook line and sinker. He doesn't have to explain anything. Hey, we are going to spend a trillion more dollars and help all those poor people, especially the ones who don't even PAY taxes. Bless their hearts. And WHO is paying for this...oh well, that would be you and me. What happened to the middle class tax cuts? Oh well, we can't do that...we are in a recession. But let's spend a trillion on even more programs. Why not??

    Do you really not get ANY of that? Just asking.
    Because the REPUBLICANS
    Obama has tried to engage the Republicans, but as you can see by this board, there is no way they will ever cooperate. No matter what Obama does or says will never be good enough for them.

    Just a microcosm of the real world. Republicans need to learn to get along and stop trying to set themselves up for office in 2012. Their posturing is hurting the American people.
    Many Republicans were against the ...
    bailouts. I sure was and am. Keep in mind that many Americans ARE Republicans. It is certainly not the goal of Republicans to see the country fail. My family and many other families are military families that are more than willing to fight for this country. Nobody laughs about this mess, guaranteed.
    I think the republicans have been more ga-ga over...
    putting more earmarks in bills coming across Congress. Did you see that over 40% of the earmarks in this omnibus bill are from republicans? I was so excited after almost every one of them voted no on the other bill because of earmarks, but I guess I shouldn't have expected that to last long. These are politicians we're talking about - one side is just as bad as the other.
    hey republicans, did it hit a nerve?
    For the post of failure=bush to have gotten such a response, IMHAO makes me think we have hit a nerve, LMFAO.  If it meant nothing because they thought their leader was so righteous, so smart, so dang right in his policies, they would have dismissed the post about failure=bush..When you protest so loudly, you prove we are right and it irks you..sigh..too bad..
    The Republicans actually blew it, thank you.
    That sordid little event in Clinton's office never had to become public in the way that it did. It became public because the Republicans desperately, avariciously WANTED it to become public. So no crocodile tears now about how Clinton spoiled everything when that is exactly what you wanted to happen. If the private, cheating, sordid lives of all politicians were to PURPOSEFULLY AND DELIBERATELY be made public - especially including those who most adamantly prosecuted Clinton - I think all the tearful nellies who think our leaders were all fine upstanding moral guardians before Clinton came along would simply have their naive little heads explode from the shock.
    not all republicans are liars
    No I dont think all republicans are liars.  I think many twist the truth to try to justify their opinion and beliefs instead of looking at the cold hard facts.  I judge each person individually, however, when someone does lie consistently or believes in a fantasy world, like Bush does..telling us every day Iraq is getting better when we can clearly see that it isnt..when people manipulate the science and change the figures or the intelligence data for their own agenda and gain, then I judge those people harshly and never believe them again.  Bush is like the little boy who cried wolf.  He has lied so darn much, I dont believe a word he says any more and I dont trust him at all.
    Republicans cared, that's who. sm
    And this *Christian* pornstar is confused. Bush needs to read her some scripture over dinner. You didn't see Clinton running around professing Christianity to any one who would listen either.
    I don't think US preempting another war will bid well for republicans..sm
    Or anyone else who supports them. Thus the attempt at 6-party talks, etc with Iran. Though you you musn't rule anything out with this bunch.

    BTW, I stopped getting in a tizzy over the terror alerts long time ago. I know it's better safe than sorry, but when there's a terror alert every time you turn on the TV you might as well just live your life.
    Democrats vs Republicans...
    I agree that problems occur on both sides of the aisle...obviously. What I find troubling, and I am being serious here, is that Democrats seem much less likely to own up to it when they do something wrong, even when caught, and the entire party seems to rally around them and somehow want to twist the wrong into a right or rationalize the wrong (he only lied about sex for example. He committed felony perjury, doesn't matter what the lie was about. If it was no big deal, why didn't he just tell the truth? I guess that depends on what the meaning of truth is?). Republicans generally fall on the sword when caught. There just seems to be something skewed about the Democratic party as a whole and their vision of what is wrong or right and it seems to be directly correlated to whether one of their party is guilty or the other party is guilty. This is just an observation. I am not a registered Republican nor Democrat. I am conservative, I am registered Independent but vote for whoever most closely follows my belief system, though they as a rule don't do as they say...and I mean ALL politicians. I just keep hoping for an honest one. Bush did what he said he would do for a long time, but I see him waffling now, and I am not sure that is a good thing. As I look at the two major parties in this country, it just seems to me that on the Democratic side they are more likely to support each other and try to spin wrongdoing even when caught at it, rarely if ever admitting to wrongdoing. I do not see that so much on the Republican side. I suppose now I should go back to the conservative side and let the process continue. I thought the boards were about opinion and discussion and debate. How can you expect to change any minds if you only talk to the like-minded? Thanks for your time, Lurker. I do enjoy talking to you.
    I see it with Democrats and Republicans. sm
    Where are all the progressives and antiwar people?
    Republicans, Help me to understand
    This is not a joke, and not meant to provoke but...

    1- Do you think Bush is a good president?

    2- Do you like his policies?

    3- Would you like 4 more years of that kind of leadership?


    Why?

    Democrats vs Republicans

    1.  My research on the black liberation movement of which Obama's church is a part tells me all I need to know about whether or not I want to see him in office.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_liberation_theology


    2.  If McCain is elected I believe we will face a great depression which will make the depression of the 30s look like a Sunday School picnic.  People already losing homes, jobs, exploding deficit (and the piper will be paid sooner or later), cost-of-living getting so people can hardly afford to live.  McCain's judgement is questionable in his choice of a  running mate.  Totally reckless to name someone he has only met once but then there's oil in Alaska.


    I will not support or vote for either of them as were doomed either way.


    Were there Republicans in Denver?

    Not only did Joe Lieberman speak, there were signs "Democrats for McCain," and they didn't get beaten or threatened, like the Michelle Malkins out there.


    For all the Bush-bashing (I give no one a free pass), when did he openly get credit for Colin Powell, Condi Rice, etc.? 


    Funny thing about facts that way.  Pesky little things, aren't they?


    The Republicans are totally AGAINST
    Just wait. If they get in office another 4 years, there are freedoms we have today that could disappear tomorrow.