Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Weren't they. I kept thinking someone was going to yank the cord...sm

Posted By: Democrat on 2006-05-09
In Reply to: It was the truth & I admire Colbert's guts. sm - LVMT

*In a post-911 world* (I just wanted to say that :) I kept thinking special services was going to swoop in and take him down at any moment for the things he was saying.

Heehee. I'm in a laughing mood tonight.


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

Don't bother trying to yank our chain.
You lose.
Storing cord blood........sm
is just another way of making money. Cord blood donation should be made mandatory if the parents don't want to store it for their own child. As far as stem cell research, I just don't believe that using aborted fetuses should be allowed either.
Life doesn't begin 'til the cord it cut and the
Until then, it's just a fetus/piece of tissue/etc., and has no rights.
you weren't there - you don't know
XX
And I never said you weren't entitled!
Give me a break!  You have religious freedom.  I never said you didn't!
First off, weren't there tapes by OBL after 9/11
I thought that's how they knew who it was. I guess I recall the events surrounding 9/11 a little differently. Second off, I agree there's a good possibility he's already dead, but even so, let's be certain. Also, he's surely designated followers to carry out any other plans he had, so dead or not, we need to keep searching and hopefully take down as many of his right-hand men as possible along the way. Finally, OBL is already on the FBI Most Wanted list for murder for the 1998 bombings and as suspect in many others.
You said it. Glad we weren't the only ones.
x
I know you weren't attacking me....
I was just telling you why I thought what I thought. sorry if I sounded defensive, didn't mean to be. :)
No - they weren't facts.......
Twisted spin that fools no one but yourself. You try to pass your drivel off as facts, but, well, I'll let them speak for themselves.
okay, that means they weren't......
$$
So, you weren't exactly being honest.
If your husband is sitting at home buying and selling stocks for your own portfolio, he does not "work" in stocks/trading. I am not assuming anything, I am just going by what you say, which apparently is not true.

It seems that you are the one who is assuming much more about what I am thinking than I have actually said. I thin it's time you visit the "real world."
HOW do YOU know that they weren't tortured?
Did you speak with them and they told you so?

Some were tortured, although innocent, this surely did not make them change their mind.

I defend the innocent ones.

If you weren't so unhinged and WRONG
that post would anger me.  Your ignorance only goes to show why you extreme leftists are ruining the democratic party.  I actually feel sorry for the good level headed democrats who have to put with the hateful deluded people like you.
Okay if you weren't shooting me the bird
then what were you trying to tell me oh and high and mighty one?
You consider *it would be so nice if you weren't here* an attack? sm
Wow. 
Excuse me, but I thought we weren't... sm
Supposed to cut and paste large things like this because it takes up too much bandwidth?  I thought we were supposed to provide the link to a website instead. 
If it weren't for uninformed voters

NEITHER candidate would have a chance. 


VOTING BY WRITE-IN VOTE FOR LOU DOBBS!!!!!!!!!


Au contraire. Would't be asking if I weren't interested.
wanna help me out here?
They weren't 'LET OFF THE HOOK"
For starters, Obama did not dismiss these charges, Susan Crawford, described as a TOP LEGAL AUTHORITY for military trials did. Obama orders were to simply FREEZE the court proceedings (hello) PENDING the results of ongoing reviews of Gitmo operations.

Crawford's dedcision seems perfectly appropriate to me since dismissing the charges (ahem) WITHOUT PREJUDICE means he can be charged again once the results of the reviews are in, ESPECIALLY in light of the fact that Abd Al-Rahim will remain in custody.

It looks as though you weren't really paying attention...
He said the same thing over and over. Withdraw troops from Iraq and put more boots on the ground in Afghanistan..........how could you have missed THAT? Selective hearing? Selective posting, too, I guess.
If they weren't qualified - how did they get the loans?
Get real. When I bought my house it took MONTHS to prove my income, the down payment had to sit in my banking account for months, the bank found an old unpaid hospital bill (I was unaware of) that was 10 years old that I had to prove I had insurance at the time and either the hospital screwed up or the insurance company never paid - I almost did not get the loan because of this! So, how do all of these unqualified people, irresponsible people, get home loans when they are so woefully unqualified? Because the lenders didn't give a rats whether or not the person could pay it back. They were boxing these loans together and selling them as securities. Did YOU ever buy a house? Did YOU have to jump through hoops? I sure did and I still have the house. So smoke that!
What makes you so sure they WEREN'T terrorists?
nm
Weren't you the one crying and whining

about how dare CA take away the rights they had given to gay people and how it shouldn't have been voted on and blah blah blah.  You even brought up women's right to vote and how about we overturn that....blah blah blah.  Now you want to take away the benefits that marriage has always had just because gay people want everything equal.  I do believe that you were one of the ones that said it wasn't fair for gays to have to settle for civil unions and how dare I suggest such a thing. 


Honestly....I'd agree to this just to shut you people up because I'm so sick to death of hearing about gay rights and poor gay people.....blah blah blah.  Once again....I guess the Bible thumpers that you hate so much will do the compromising and once again give up something of ours to make you happy.  Feel better now?


Weren't you just thanking God on the conservative board because

Which God was that?  THe one that plays favorites?


Well, obviously they weren't impress with the moderator's call...
to stick to politics and not attack anyone personally. Not a whole lot of politics going on here tonight. lol.
LMAO. If it weren't so pathetic it could be funny.

I never said citizens weren't allowed to vote.

I just do not think that same day register and voting should be allowed.  That is my personal opinion and I have the right to have that opinion regardless on how a court ruled on the subject.


A Quiet Windfall for US Banks (While You Weren't Looking)

Here's you starter-kit that went under the radar screen, tax and spend lovers...


» Washington Post: A Quiet Windfall for US Banks


Why weren't they returned to Afghan/Pak or China ? ..nm
nm
Weren't they captured in Tora Bora? Innocent, I'm not so sure.
nm
If it weren't for uninformed voters, Obama wouldn't have a chance.
Did you happen to catch John Stossel's report on 20/20 last night?
AWWW....you weren't supposed to tell anyone!! Can't keep a secret worth a dang!!

Thinking











Subject: Thinking is
> dangerous
>
>
>
>
>
> It started out innocently enough.
>
> I began to think at parties now and then -- to loosen up.
>
> Inevitably, though, one thought led to another, and soon I was more than
> just a
> social thinker.
>
> I began to think alone -- to relax, I told myself -- but I knew it
> wasn't
> true.
>
> Thinking became more and more important to me, and finally I was thinking
> all
> the time.
>
> That was when things began to sour at home. One evening I had turned off
> the
> TV
> and asked my wife about the meaning of life.
>
> She spent that night at her mother's.
>
> I began to think on the job.
>
> I knew that thinking and em! ployment don't mix, but I couldn't stop myself.
>
> I began to avoid friends at lunchtime so I could read Thoreau and Kafka.
>
> I would return to the office dizzied and confused, asking, What is it
> exactly
> we are doing here?
>
> One day the boss called me in.
>
> He said, Listen, I like you, and it hurts me to say this, but your
> thinking
> has
> become a real problem. If you don't stop thinking on the job, you'll have
> to
> find another job.
>
> This gave me a lot to think about.
>
> I came home early after my conversation with the boss.
>
> Honey, I confessed, I've been thinking...
>
> I know you've been thinking, she said, and I want a divorce!
>
> But Honey, surely it's not that serious.
>
> It is serious, she said, lower lip aquiver. You think as much as
&! gt; college
> professors, and college professors don't ! make any money, so if you keep on
> thinking, we won't have any money!
>
> That's a faulty syllogism, I said impatiently.
>
> She exploded in tears of rage and frustration, but I was in no mood to
> deal
> with
> the emotional drama.
>
> I'm going to the library, I snarled as I stomped out the door.
>
> I headed for the library, in the mood for some Nietzsche.
>
> I roared into the parking lot with NPR on the radio and ran up to the big
> glass
> doors...
>
> They didn't open. The library was closed.
>
> To this day, I believe that a Higher Power was looking out for me that
> night.
>
> Leaning on the unfeeling glass, whimpering for Zarathustra, a poster
> caught
> my
> eye.
>
> Friend, is heavy thinking ruining your life? it asked.
>
> You probably recognize that line.! It comes from the standard Thinker's
> Anonymous poster. Which is why I am what I am today: a recovering thinker.
>
> I never miss a TA meeting. At each meeting we watch a non-educational
> video;
> last week it was Porky's. Then we share experiences about how we avoided
> thinking since the last meeting.
>
> I still have my job, and things are a lot better at home.
>
> Life just seemed...easier, somehow, as soon as I stopped thinking.
>
> I think the road to recovery is nearly complete for me.
>
> Today, I registered to vote as a Republican...
src=http://webmail.bellsouth.net/i/s.gif
src=http://webmail.bellsouth.net/i/s.gif







src=http://webmail.bellsouth.net/i/s.gif







 
  Move To: 







WHAT was I thinking!!!!

I forgot only your opinion counts.  Please forgive me. 


 


Whatever was I thinking? NT

m


W's thinking (or not)
W. finds time to attend the services for the VT students (as he ought), yet fails to attend a single funeral of any one of the soldiers he has sent into war; no excuse in my book. I am currently listening to the service on TV and the Governor of VA is saying how W knows **first as a governor and now as president the importance of comfort and consolation necessary in these sad times.** (paraphrased a bit) Soldiers and their families don't need comfort or consolation...that is just wrong. People who have voluntarily put their lives in danger at the behest of their president and in duty to their country are not afforded the respect of the man's (who sent them there presence??) This is not to minimize in any way the tragedy at VT. I realize that one cannot attend 3300 funerals but maybe at least 1 in each state or something. These soldiers deserved better.
Gee, with this way of thinking, I should
be VP, a heartbeat from the presidency.  I am NOT Washingtonian.  I am a normal person.  My husband is a blue collar worker.  I have three children and six grandchildren.  Hmmmm.... Why wasn't I called!?   Since 1984, I have felt that the American people are so stupid, and as it turns out, I am right.
Like he said...he kept thinking they would do something...
and they aren't. ANd you would think that the man who is going to be president would want to BE THERE and hear things FIRST HAND on the biggest crisis of the country. Good grief, admit it, if Obama had done it first you would be singing his praises and saying all the things we are saying about McCain. Just admit it...lol Geez.
What are they thinking???!!!
I am a republican, and plan to vote for McCain.  Why in the world did they allow Sarah Palin to go on that piece of crap Saturday Night Live?? 
Your thinking about this too much!
Here this should put you to rest! LOL (this is the most unbiased one I could find)
I am thinking that
it is a bad idea to kill any industry while bailing others out in a failing economy, but that's just my way of thinking. It seems silly to throw money at industries that are doing poorly while trying to bankrupt industries that are doing well.
Exactly what I was thinking.
nm
Now that I am thinking about it.....
That we should transcribe ESL without complaining! We should be politically correct and polite, and understanding, but the different accents just kept coming from all over the world and we were expected to be professional and productive, but that has been hard also.
Just what I was thinking of
x
I'm thinking about doing that too...(sm)
I'm 45 with at least 20 yrs to go.  I figure I'll only put in money that I can spare--yeah that's a joke.  Instead of buying extra stuff I don't need (assuming that's an option in the future), I'll save that back for investing.
I was thinking 7 too....are we right, m?....nm

HA HA HA HA HA - That's what I was thinking.
Oh my gosh I laughed so hard at your reply. That's the funniest all morning. Thanks for the laugh.
LOL! Thanks for saying what I was thinking, JBB.
:)
What ARE they thinking?
report on anything whatsoever that does not help to advance the culture wars? You are so right. What we need is a 24/7/365 media blitz belittling the evil prez and drumming up as much opposition as possible to any avancement toward a fix for the economy. Good luck with that. Seriously. It's about the only hope the GOP has for being able to make face in 2012 or to orchestrate that all important revolution in Congress in 2010. Hang all those pesky folks who are losing their jobs and homes.
I'm thinking that the only ones to be
bummed out by all these developments are the productive members of society, who see their lives not really being improved by all this hope and change.  So it would be in the government's best interests to keep us from checking out, so that we can be kept subsidizing everyone else.  This is not really concern. They are just trying to prevent escape.
if it weren't for double standards, liberals wouldn't have any standards at all!
nm