Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

What is it with these links today?

Posted By: no message - Starcat on 2006-09-01
In Reply to: Here we go again!!!! nm - Brunson




Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

Thanks for the links! nm
nm
thanks for the links
I will check them out after finishing my IC work!
I am still an IC and I don't know why my taxes are high, I have been doing it for over 10 years, but I have an accountant do them, and I pay quarterly's yes I do... I still always end up paying at the end of the year even if I try to calculate it correctly because of deductions I thought I had, etc. The only thing that changed in my personal life was two years ago I bought a house. Did that cover the questions?

I just don't trust either politician, but align myself with the Republican values more strongly.
Thanks for the links....sm
...but this was the year after she was no longer the mayor of Wasilla, and three years before she became governor, so she was not in office in 2003. I notice they don't even try to link her name to this. I'm sure they would have, if they could have.


Anyway, sure doesn't excuse the drug problem in the communities, though. I still don't like it one bit.

Links

I do not understand why so many links are put on this board?


On a blog forum one should put one's own opinion, not what is posted on the internet.  At least one should put it in one's own words.


Here are the links again...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html


http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=15918


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/21/AR2006062101837.html


http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htchem/articles/20060123.aspx


Here's two links...sm
First off, when you have a private meeting with the president, it's private. But then parts of it were leaked to the press. Then the White house asked for a retraction of false statements made by Obama camp. Then the Obama camp retracted what they said.



There's more to it than these two stories, but these are the best I can find at the moment.


http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/11/11/obama-urges-bush-help-auto-indusstry/

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/Business/story?id=6231372&page=1


Links
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2129667/posts

This link has a clip:
http://motownsports.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1685563
Some links for you
Sorry it took so long. I kept reading about his plans to keep the military over there but sure enough when I want to find the exact article I can't. Here are some articles I did find. (P.S. - I think it odd the person who is chosen for SoS position (Billiary) is the same person who said they would "obliterate Iran". Am sure that's going to go over well with them.

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/04/obama-adviser-keep-80000-troops-in-iraq/

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1857338,00.html

http://www.laboreducator.org/troopshome.htm

Here's what some people say (so it's not just me) -

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081112052420AAQI2Su

And here's one of the scariest things I've heard (out of Obama's own mouth - if you can listen to it without watching his eyes read the teleprompter). He's pretty much telling us "Yes I can make us defenseless".

http://msunderestimated.com/2008/03/01/obamas-plans-for-our-military-video/

Links...(sm)

Warning:  On this first one there are some terrible pics, but I posted this for the text.


http://www.staticbrain.com/archive/pentagon-censors-soldiers-access-to-internet/


On this one, please note where he says *When you’re in an environment where you don’t have access to any information sources, independent or otherwise, all you can do is conjecture. We didn’t have any access to newspapers or the Internet. *


http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/issue/2008-03-14/article/29458?headline=Iraq-Veteran-Speaks-Out-Against-War


Here's a reality check for you:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOj7Nxcn6gg&feature=related


Here's two links for you
These were posted before some of the crap was taken out, so some of it may be old, but these give a good idea how the government plans to spend our money, and our children's money, and our grandchildren's money, etc.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123204034869386185.html



This one uses Adobe.



http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/AmericanReinvestment2009115

Here's the links for ya.

 


http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iVg2jiaBA1jwVfCdsisXI0FbZD0AD965BKCG0



 


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29030191/


See links
http://www.knowthelies.com/?q=node/3817

http://foro.univision.com/univision/board/message?board.id=cubanosenmiami&message.id=55144


See links
http://www.knowthelies.com/?q=node/3817

http://foro.univision.com/univision/board/message?board.id=cubanosenmiami&message.id=55144


SM, better links than supplied by OPs

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/01/019637.php


http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1200572509823&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull


 


Can you give links on any of this....
other than..."I heard..." Believe me, the way auto sales are falling, if they could manufacture one that ran on water and sold for $1200 they would be selling them, because $1200 is better than zero...good grief. Talk about your conspiracy theories. All the automakers are downsizing and grasping to try to sell cars and they would NOT ignore something they could build and sell cheap...simple economics 101. The Wal-mart approach to car sales, and they all know how successful wal-mart is, because all the pieties about "I only buy American" and "offshoring" fall to the wayside in favor of "cheap." All those same people who gripe about wal-mart buying overseas and supposedly mistreating their employees run over each other to get to the sales, and don't think they don't. Typical Democrat mantra...do as we say, not as we DO.

As to the car McCain offered the bounty for on the battery...he was talking about one that would replace what is in use now...not one whose top end is 30 mph and you have to charge it after an hour. Good grief, get your facts straight. :-) I am sure he meant one that would at least do 50 mph and you could drive it to the quick pick and back without having to plug it in. That being said, I did see where Toyota (on the US side) is working on technology to attach solar panels to charge batteries. Of course, that would mean leaving that sweeetttt little sports car out in the sun...ahem. Bet Teddy Kennedy won't be buying one and I bet RFK Jr. won't either...lol. Gotta love'em. DO as we SAY...not as we DO.
Links provided
The words were witnessed by two McCain aides and three reporters who did not report it at the time.

If it wasn’t true there would be lawsuits (which there are not). And with him running for president you KNOW he would be denying it as he is denying other things, but he is not denying it.

Here are the links below where this information can be found. Many more links but I think five are enough.

http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/05/02/194648.php

http://www.thepost.ohiou.edu/Articles/Opinion/Columns/2008/04/15/23789/

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/4/8/17456/91972/887/492360

http://agonist.org/schecter/?p=8571

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=536_1210293502


URLs or links only, please. nm

Terrorist links
Can you PROVE beyond a shadow of DOUBT that this is TRUE?? sheesh!!
Actually, after that, I'm not opening links
.
Why don't any of your links work? nm
.
Providing Links
Just because someone on this forum provides a link to prove their point does not mean that the link is truthful or valid. There are thousands of downright lies posted on the Internet each and every day, and providing a link to one of them does not prove anything. There are an abundance of right-wing fanatic links that provide lies and smear tactics, shameful racist links, and right-wing political links posted by raging lunatics. The links to provided to validate a poster's claim are a waste of time unless they come from a proven reliable news source.
The links go to a PDF of his tax returns
This is his one from 2006

http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/files/obama_2006_tax_return.pdf

They also said Obama posted his tax returns on his website but I haven't found them yet. Supposedly they were released when Hillary was still in the running.

I hate trying navigate through any of the candidate's sites! They need a search menu!
Here's 3 links. Any questions?
http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/issues/EnvironmentFactSheet.pdf
Page 4 of this document. Includes a video.

http://thinkonthesethings.wordpress.com/2007/10/08/full-text-barack-obama-speech-real-leadership-for-a-clean-energy-future/


http://www.jacksonholestartrib.com/articles/2008/03/08/news/casper/doc47d2397a06235615103300.txt

No. They don't "do" links.

If you copy and paste the entire thing, you stand about a 12% chance of them actually reading it.  So here is, ironically, what you get when you click on the word "REQUIRE."


It might be too many words for some, but the bottom line is that this is a choice, NOT a REQUIREMENT.



America Serves


"When you choose to serve -- whether it's your nation, your community or simply your neighborhood -- you are connected to that fundamental American ideal that we want life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness not just for ourselves, but for all Americans. That's why it's called the American dream."

The Obama Administration will call on Americans to serve in order to meet the nation’s challenges. President-Elect Obama will expand national service programs like AmeriCorps and Peace Corps and will create a new Classroom Corps to help teachers in underserved schools, as well as a new Health Corps, Clean Energy Corps, and Veterans Corps. Obama will call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by setting a goal that all middle school and high school students do 50 hours of community service a year and by developing a plan so that all college students who conduct 100 hours of community service receive a universal and fully refundable tax credit ensuring that the first $4,000 of their college education is completely free. Obama will encourage retiring Americans to serve by improving programs available for individuals over age 55, while at the same time promoting youth programs such as Youth Build and Head Start.


I'll look at your links a little later..... sm
fighting the clock right now!

I realize it is illegal to fire an employee over religious beliefs. However, I would point out that in "at will" states, an employer does not need to give a reason for terminating an employee. Also, if the cashier were true to their Christian Science beliefs, I would have to wonder why they would seek employment at a store that sold antibiotics in the first place. Kind of like a Baptist working in a liquour store. We might shop there, but we wouldn't be caught dead working there! HAHAHA!!!
Not a fabrication - see links
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/aug2007/2007-08-28-092.asp

http://www.wrmp.org/design/

http://www.sfwetlands.ca.gov/

Just a couple links - not a fabrication.
I, for one, would like to see those links you don't want to post.

Then I will make up my mind.


Don't forget, he was po'd because the CIA and FBI did not work together and he was getting conflicting  info from both sources, but tried to unravel which was true, or did you forget that, too?


Not OP but here are the links to the stories...
http://www.topix.com/forum/louisville/TE5VN7EJ0BLN8QHCL



http://www.foxnews.com/video-search/m/22062919/reverse_discrimination_suit.htm


http://newhavenindependent.org/archives/2009/03/rights_groups_b.php



All I had to do was type in "firefighters reverse discrimination test" and up popped a million links.
Interesting links
Thought these links at the bottom were good.

"We ask that he be remembered as a good husband, father and grandfather and a dedicated servant on behalf of the rights of women everywhere," it said.

http://www.lifenews.com/state4187.html

http://churchethos.com/2009/06/01/terminating-tillers-life-is-worse-than-tiller-terminating-olives/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGBYmsNlEZ8


Let me now state that I do NOT agree with what he did, but he was a living human being. He had a wife, children and grandchildren.

Murder is never justified no matter how much you don't agree with what someone does. That is what the law is for.

It's a sad time for all.
Could have been me who posted links, but I never said Bush did it.sm
I post the links because I want everyone to research the issue, want to know what everyone thinks, but most stay quiet. My suspicions would be connected to Cheney and the members of Project for a New American Century.
I dutifully went to all these links and checked...
all refer to the book by Cliff Shechter...they are quoting him. No one else has independently corroborated this. His book says "three reporters who reported anonymously." I understand that you believe, based on what this man said in his book, even though no one else apparently heard this...that it is true. I just don't have similar belief. Just like I don't assume that Hillary Clinton liberally used the "F" word because some unnamed or anonymous sources said she did. Do a search on Hillary CLinton F word secret service and look at all the crap that comes up. That's what I mean. And her "people" always declined to deny it. They did not dignify it with a response. Same case here. Only it is not one quote...it is several. But, using your logic, it must have been all true or Hillary would have sued those who were saying it?

Bottom line is you choose to believe it, I don't. Answer this for me...if a conservative wrote a book about Obama and said he had three anonymous sources who heard Obama call his wife the C word, would you believe that as readily as you believe this?

Just asking.
Thanks for the links. I started reading through them. sm
I started with the first link and only got partially through Palin's. Hope to go back later to finish it and read the other candidates too.

One of the things I read it said where her husband worked for BP. They had said that he would quit if she were elected gov. but after she was they backed out of that and stated that since he was not management it wouldn't matter or wouldn't be a conflict. But wouldn't it be? He works for an oil company, she is for the drilling of oil, etc. To me that is still a big conflict.

Also, why is one thing saying he quit and another thing saying he still works there part-time. This link from above was a direct quote from them I believe.

Anyway, again, thanks for the links. Hope to read up some more tonight.
Umm, read links. SP's words are in there.
nm
I have been told to post links, which is what I have done.
if you want to know Mccain's stand on the issues, follow the links and read them.


Now that you mention it....here are links to get you started.
Ignore it if you like...but you know, the duck thing...if it quacks like a duck.

All of these things can be independently verified. The policies that he is proposing are socialism 101...redistribution of wealth. The "people" of Cuba has not done so well after the Castro/Che Guevara revolution, now have they?

http://politicalcenter.newsvine.com/_news/2008/05/04/1466498-obamas-marxist-revolution-must-be-rejected-

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/07/what_barack_obama_learned_from.html

http://www.aim.org/aim-column/obamas-international-socialist-connections

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/08/31/america/France-Socialists-Obama.php

http://www.acton.org/commentary/443_marxist_roots_of_black_liberation_theology.php

http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2008/08/michelle_obama_4.php

http://www.tysknews.com/Articles/dnc_corruption.htm

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=75101


PLEASE post links not copies
of entire articles -- the rules clearly state -- rules and regulations -- rules and REGULATIONS!!!!!!
darn links never work right...

As the controversy surrounding Sarah Palin's pastor grows to one of near biblical proportions, certain very important questions are beginning to come to light. Questions like, if Reverend Wright's statements of opinion about America were so damning that Obama had to distance himself, then what of Muthee's Kenyan witch hunt? What of his continued, almost paranoid, remarks about witches in his prayers?

Many people, except those who truly take every word of the Bible as literal truth, are rightfully critical of Muthee's beliefs. There is one word to say for it -- extremism. Extremism in the same way that some of the Muslim faith believe that it is right and just to fight 'Holy Wars.' Extremism in the same way that supposedly justified murder for any cause is extreme.

But there it is, plain as day, in the Holy Bible's own Exodus -- "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live." If you happen to be one of those people who believe that every single word in the Bible is true, then this becomes a very troubling precedent. Based on your beliefs that the literal Bible is infallible, you must agree with this rather extreme statement since it did, in your view, come from God.

At this point, it becomes a matter of some debate as to what a witch actually is. It's pretty key since the Bible itself mandates killing them. So who is a witch? Is it a lady who practices magic? If so, then what is magic? Is it praying to gods other than those in the Christian faith? Is it practicing fortune telling? Is it simply being a woman involved in spiritual work? Is it being someone alleged to have made crops fail or traffic accidents to have happened? I ask these questions because all of the above have been accused and punished for supposed 'witchcraft' often with death as is the Bible's precedent.

WARNING about opening links some
got a nice, nasty worm on my computer for my trouble.  Attacking verbally is one thing, but attacking people's computers is pretty low.  That poster better hope like he!! her employer doesn't get that same worm from her.
The facts were given in the links above in the thread nm
really now
No they were not....don't twist what little facts that were in those links..nm

What you meant was don't follow links that
//
the links aren't working
:(
I think you may find these 2 links helpful.
http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/uploadedFiles/ballot%20verification.pdf
Go here and check out language for Arizona.

http://www.co.yavapai.az.us/WorkArea/showcontent.aspx?id=18500
This is a 5-page document with Provisional Ballot information specific to Arizona.

Seems like they will count once address, ID and precinct information is verified. If your daughter votes in accordance with your posts, I may be cancelling out my own vote here, but above all, we want all voices heard and fair elections to the best of our ability. Hope this helps and good luck with your picks.
Excellent post and links...(sm)
Thanks for the info.
Thank you - read the links - see message
There were a lot of links - see why you couldn't post them all. This is what I found researching through link after link.

President Kennedy - I could not find anything anywhere showing that he used to have weekly frat parties. I do understand the necessity of holding formal dinners for dignitaries of other countries. That is a most respectful and dignified "use" of the white house. President Kennedy and First Lady Jackie, honored their roles and kept the dignity of the white house and never did anything to make the American people ashamed.

Bill Clinton - While I certainly was no fan of BC's, I also could not find anything about him turning the white house into a party palace. I saw numerous article after article about state dinners, etc. Again, a most acceptable use for the white house. He entertained dignitaries, held the usual Christmas dinners, etc, but no where could I find any articles about weekly parties (especially when the countries economy was not nearly as bad as it is today).

President Carter - nothing

President George Bush - Again nothing (much unfortunately for the Bush-bashers).

So with all the past president they utilized the white house for the purpose it was intended for. They did not "disgrace" it with weekly parties for staff members.

Then we have the O - weekly wednesday parties, conga lines, high priced entertainers, all at the expenses of the taxpayers. And when everyone in the country is losing their jobs, homes, health benefits, no hope for the future, they are partying it up back there.

Entertaining foreign diplomats and having dinners is one thing. But having weekly parties while the rest of us are saying "what in the world is going on, you told us we have to cut back, is a whole nother thing". You think George & Martha Washington, and John & Abigale Adams and the other founding fathers even thought that one day the once respectful white house would be turned into a party-house. I don't think so. It's disgraceful.

The White House has stood as a symbol of the presidency, the government and the people of the country. This is gluttony and disgrace. While GB may have not been the president, never did I feel as ashamed as I do today to know this is how they treat a national landmark that is suppose to represent us.
links to the COPYRIGHT LAWS
xx
You won'the provide links because you have none, and
FREEREPUBLIC???? Are you kidding me? They are known to be the whackiest of all the whackos. The majority of republicans even disown them, but that certainly explains a lot about your mentality.
cannot open the links you are posting.
I assume my firewall is too strong. I have to enter msnbc.com, but then I do not find the specific story.

People pay good money to have their links

show up under a certain word search.  Do you actually think that this happened by pure chance, or because the google search engine defaults the word failure to immediately pull this POS site by happenstance?  It was paid for.  What's even more hilarious is how much this poor schlump parted with for that privilege.  You all seriously need to find some adult topics to talk about instead of thinking that google has a liberal's brain.


 


She also posted the links to check the votes...
unless the Congressional Record is also conservative propaganda. Lurker had one opinion about what happened to the Dem party after the vote in 1964, this lady had another opinion. Lurker's opinion is somehow more true than this woman's opinion? If so, how may I ask?
Links are dead bc of overwhelming # of hits.
and all the other new articles popping up since I did this early morning survey hardly all liberal blogs. Even if they were, still a bit disconcerting for pubs to be in the position to bash words coming directly out of Palins mouth and (oops) caught on video.