Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

The facts were given in the links above in the thread nm

Posted By: pay attention on 2008-10-20
In Reply to: I suppose that may be true, but you give no facts, just your opinion...nm - indy

really now


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

No they were not....don't twist what little facts that were in those links..nm

Lies? What we show are facts, links, articles.
What about poor Palin?  She is a human being and look at the ATTACKS on her.  By the way, she is a republican and I would say Dem's are bashing.  We are not bashing Obama, we try to show you articles, links from CNN who by the way supported Obama, and you state we are bashing Obama.   
Facts are facts - sorry you don't like it cos it doesn't support your candidate
You can't change facts. That's what makes them facts. You may not like it but that's the way it is.


Facts are facts. No bash intended.
It will be this stellar record from which voters will be assessing her and her running mate.
If you're offended, too bad. Facts are facts...
I know Muslims in this country who have turned from the hateful evil beliefs that were forced down their throats. They did not have the freedom to learn anything else growing up. But after they gained their freedom and came here, they were able to receive the Word of God and they have told me that NEVER were they taught anything about loving others, just other Muslims, and that the God they learned about spoke of nothing but killing and hate... so if Obama is receiving large donations from those middle eastern countries, as you say, and he is grounded in Muslim culture, being taught this in school for years as a child, do you honestly think he doesn't carry some of those beliefs with him? He's never denounced it.

Here ya go.........

http://bibleprobe.com/muhammad.htm
stating facts folks, just the facts....if it's getting
xx
Folks want facts, you give'm facts and still
xx
This poster wants facts, facts, facts...
xx
Poster wants facts, facts, facts.....
xx
When you can't fight facts for facts
then it's buh-bye....well buh-bye to you too....I'll have a dicussion with someone who will discuss and not blame.
When you can't fight facts for facts then it's buh-bye.

Facts, stick to the facts...sm
The subject here is the media and their treatment of Gov. Palin, which continues to this day, to this minute, by the liberal left.

Tthe media threw down their gauntlet as soon as she was picked on that Friday, and hounded her for almost a full week.

And you think she should have waved a white flag at them in her acceptance speech? She put them on notice, that she is above them. And continues to be, with grace and style.

She's not whining, and neither are we.

I just shake my head at your audacity.

The media is the one that started this with her, and you would do well to remember the facts in her case.




IN this case, the facts are the facts.........
--
Every thread of yours
0
New thread above.
nm
And, that has what exactly to do with this thread?? SM
BTW it's Western KY University. There is no Southern KY University.
The thread was that someone said he never...
talked about religion. I pointed out that he DOES.
actually this thread is about...
whether the members of military support the effort or not. you turned into something about info available when you claimed that you have more info and a more clear picture than they do and that they are "just following orders" And you are the one who didn't agree with the sentiment of the original post and started the "i don't like people who disagree with me," not dnh, when you started saying you had a clearer picture than they. You are simply out to argue and stir the pot. Not worth the effort to debate with you.
Thanks for the links! nm
nm
thanks for the links
I will check them out after finishing my IC work!
I am still an IC and I don't know why my taxes are high, I have been doing it for over 10 years, but I have an accountant do them, and I pay quarterly's yes I do... I still always end up paying at the end of the year even if I try to calculate it correctly because of deductions I thought I had, etc. The only thing that changed in my personal life was two years ago I bought a house. Did that cover the questions?

I just don't trust either politician, but align myself with the Republican values more strongly.
Thanks for the links....sm
...but this was the year after she was no longer the mayor of Wasilla, and three years before she became governor, so she was not in office in 2003. I notice they don't even try to link her name to this. I'm sure they would have, if they could have.


Anyway, sure doesn't excuse the drug problem in the communities, though. I still don't like it one bit.

Links

I do not understand why so many links are put on this board?


On a blog forum one should put one's own opinion, not what is posted on the internet.  At least one should put it in one's own words.


Here are the links again...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html


http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=15918


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/21/AR2006062101837.html


http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htchem/articles/20060123.aspx


Here's two links...sm
First off, when you have a private meeting with the president, it's private. But then parts of it were leaked to the press. Then the White house asked for a retraction of false statements made by Obama camp. Then the Obama camp retracted what they said.



There's more to it than these two stories, but these are the best I can find at the moment.


http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/11/11/obama-urges-bush-help-auto-indusstry/

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/Business/story?id=6231372&page=1


Links
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2129667/posts

This link has a clip:
http://motownsports.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1685563
Some links for you
Sorry it took so long. I kept reading about his plans to keep the military over there but sure enough when I want to find the exact article I can't. Here are some articles I did find. (P.S. - I think it odd the person who is chosen for SoS position (Billiary) is the same person who said they would "obliterate Iran". Am sure that's going to go over well with them.

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/04/obama-adviser-keep-80000-troops-in-iraq/

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1857338,00.html

http://www.laboreducator.org/troopshome.htm

Here's what some people say (so it's not just me) -

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081112052420AAQI2Su

And here's one of the scariest things I've heard (out of Obama's own mouth - if you can listen to it without watching his eyes read the teleprompter). He's pretty much telling us "Yes I can make us defenseless".

http://msunderestimated.com/2008/03/01/obamas-plans-for-our-military-video/

Links...(sm)

Warning:  On this first one there are some terrible pics, but I posted this for the text.


http://www.staticbrain.com/archive/pentagon-censors-soldiers-access-to-internet/


On this one, please note where he says *When you’re in an environment where you don’t have access to any information sources, independent or otherwise, all you can do is conjecture. We didn’t have any access to newspapers or the Internet. *


http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/issue/2008-03-14/article/29458?headline=Iraq-Veteran-Speaks-Out-Against-War


Here's a reality check for you:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOj7Nxcn6gg&feature=related


Here's two links for you
These were posted before some of the crap was taken out, so some of it may be old, but these give a good idea how the government plans to spend our money, and our children's money, and our grandchildren's money, etc.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123204034869386185.html



This one uses Adobe.



http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/AmericanReinvestment2009115

Here's the links for ya.

 


http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iVg2jiaBA1jwVfCdsisXI0FbZD0AD965BKCG0



 


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29030191/


See links
http://www.knowthelies.com/?q=node/3817

http://foro.univision.com/univision/board/message?board.id=cubanosenmiami&message.id=55144


See links
http://www.knowthelies.com/?q=node/3817

http://foro.univision.com/univision/board/message?board.id=cubanosenmiami&message.id=55144


And no actually, if you follow the thread SM
I was posting to American Woman.
I read this whole thread here. sm
MT was very careful to say it was not word for word. Gosh, all the calling people liars.  It's terrible.  She said it wasn't word for word more than once.  How about recalled incorrectly?  Liar is a horrible word and I have been called it so many times on these boards for no good reason.  Anyway, as I said, I am mixed race and I am not offended.  That's all I am going to say because there is no use posting here.  Flame away gt.  Call me a liar yet again.  I really don't care and as Republican said, you don't scare me.  I think you are sad and pathetic and I think your life must be very empty to be as hate filled as you are. 
This whole thread is stupid!

MT did not say she was going back to Iraq...she was answering a poll!!!!  Where's the lie?


The subject in this thread is a cat.
How did we get to this?  And is it really necessary to call names?  I mean, we are civilized people after all. It's rather hard to understand why you attack someone even when they are AGREEING with you.  I try to be respectful here, but it's very hard to communicate when the subject is changed constantly in a thread.  Perhaps an I hate Bush and all conservative thread would be best started and all posts to that effect might go there.  Nothing is being furthered here except what seems to be a very bad grudge.  In a public forum.  Really not cool. 
Your 1st post in this thread had NOTHING to do
pardon me for being a bit puzzled about why you brought it up.
Dead thread.
nm
The only bash under this thread is
Just can't resist slamming a different perspective, can you? Not even one time is this possible.
awww, don't want to go there so this thread
has ended?  "Case closed" I guess.
Have you not read this thread?

Simply stating Christian beliefs.  This country, although based on religious freedoms, was founded by Christians.  In God We Trust ring a bell?


I'm sorry, it's not me. Wrong thread?
???
let this thread die. The stupidity
of it speaks louder than any response trying to explain things because they don't "understand"   They want to keep the subject off the issues. 
Sorry, got tripped up in the thread... the ol'

Evidently you are not following your own thread
The rational people are the Obama folks who will not engage in the foolishness of the conspiracy theory to nowhere and the brick wall...well, that would be you, "Everyone should be interested!"
I might have missed that thread but I...
didn't miss the thread of negativity in your posts.
If you are not able to follow my thread,
at least try to follow your own. I was replying to your right-from-wrong post where, in an attempt to avoid the points I had made about Israel, you stated I had listed all of Palestinian atrocities. My reply followed consecutive order.

The first item on the list you were trying to attribute to them began with occupation. Since you made the blanket, all-encompassing statement that I had just listed ALL of their atrocities, I began my reply with occupation and followed point-by-point with responses to the other listed items. You would probably have a vague understanding of that if you actually engaged in debating substance rather than simple vollies of empty, vacuous put-downs and denials.
He sure does have a relevance to this thread
Because your comment was same sex people can't ever have sexual intercourse. The relevance is that Bill Clinton came out on national TV and told the world "I did not have sexual intercourse with that woman...Ms. Lewinski?" Both are bold face lies.

Two woman are perfectly capable of having a sexual relationship as are two men. And that is why we have sperm donors and other means to allow woman the capability of having a child without having sex with a man. Maybe if you got out of the "puritan" mind set you might just even have a little fun. But somehow I doubt that. Reminds me of my aunt telling me that sex is only for pro-creation. Once you don't want to have kids anymore then you shouldn't be having sex anymore. Is this you aunty???????
Maybe you could begin in another thread.

Day of Prayer and the absolute vicious lies about Obama's faith.


Just because you believe he lied about other things does not automatically make him a Muslim.


Patty, just get off this particular thread.

It is very obvious that you are a minority here and you're just trying to stir the pot, as you always do.  Nobody wants to hear your bigoted idiotic statements about something you know nothing about, so just keep handling your snakes and leave everybody else's sex life alone.  It is none of your business!!


What is it with these links today?

SM, better links than supplied by OPs

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/01/019637.php


http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1200572509823&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull