Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Objective?? ROFL.....

Posted By: sam on 2008-09-04
In Reply to: Being an objective observer, the repugnants appear to be the most evil. - Surely you jest.

that being said....wow. I invite everyone to read this speech and replace Republican, Redneck, religious right-winger with Jew. Hitler could have made this speech. What nasty, vitrolic hate speech. This is what the democratic party has become.

Whew.



Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

They have to stay objective. It's their job.
One of our family members is a well-known political analyst on t.v. At family functions, we all hear the full-on opinions. Believe me, reporters are human, and they certainly do have their opinions! But their job isn't to discuss their own point of view. It is amazing, though, isn't it? I don't think I could control myself if I had to interview some of these people!
From an objective observer.
nothing further to add to te nothingness of this post
Being an objective observer, the repugnants appear to be the most evil.
Defend the republican party all you want with your self-righteousness, but in the end the republican party will always be a party that represents big business and the rich.

You religious right wingers, rednecks who were undereducated and/or raised by a long line of redneckers will never get it so I won't even address you as your perception of reality is hopelessly distorted.

However, I will say that, anyone who makes under 250 grand a year and who votes for the republican tick is a fool.

This next presidential term will all be about taxes now that Georgie has sold out the country to foreign lands to pay for his war and cover his tax cuts to the wealthy, and someone's taxes are going to be raised and if you vote republican and earn less than 250 grand, it will be YOURS.

Funding under republicans will also be cut to social services and that means more crime, and if your town is like mine, police and fire departments are laying off due to budget cuts - hey, what an oxymoron, cutting police forces while fighting terrorism.

Republicans are not for the people whatever you say. They pander to the religious right and those high school drop out rednecks for the votes. Abortion is and always will happen as it has since the beginning of time and I don't think you will ever stop it from happening. You can try to romanticize reproduction all you want but in this world, as we watch babies starving, dying from curable disease and, even raped, it just doesn't hold water.

Republicans are as evil as greed is evil.

Your arguments are weak as always.
gourdpainter objective,fair, straightforward and
There is absolutely nothing offensive about what she said or how she said it. She is right. I don't know her age, but I suspect she is (like I am) old enough to recall the devastating losses via political assassinations of our past civil leaders.
1. Medgar Evers, NAACP field secretary, June 12, 1963 by KKK member.
2. JFK November 22, 1963.
3. Malcolm X, February 21, 1965.
4. MLK April 4, 1968.
5. RFK June 5, 1968.
6. Fred Hampton, December 1969.

Regardless of whether or not you agree with any of their political views, the fact remains that these Americans gave their lives fighting for the beliefs they held most dear and in their own ways, were all striving to make our country...your country...a better place.

Four out of six were black leaders, one a president, the other a presidential candidate. In hindsight, it is plain to see that there were common threads shared by each and all in terms of their circumstances and their times. That common tie was hate speech and bigotry. We would like to tell ourselves, "that was then and this is now," but for those of us who lived through it, I can tell you it is never really very far behind us.

The scenes I see at these rallies and the words I read on this forum are chilling reminders that we must never forget those days, that time and the losses we suffered. To some of you who think you are being smart or cute or somehow take pride and pleasure in your thoughtless, juvenile, petty one-ups-manship, I tell you now, along with the gourdpainter, you do not realize what it is you are doing. This is not about a candidate, a platform, a party or an election. This is about the preservation of human dignity and human life. She is absolutely right to say that should anything happen to Obama of this nature, his blood will be on your hands and all the denial in the universe will not change that fact.
Good Source for (more) objective news
http://www.democracynow.org/
who woulda guessed you wouldn't be objective...nm
nm
No objective person can state with 100% certainty what happened 9-11-2001.
Some believe what they were told via news, some believe the new presentation of facts, theories, evidence, and logic. I believe that al-Quaeda terrorist attacked the US on 9-11. I take to the conspiracy theories with a grain of salt, until different is proven to be true. Out of all of the theories and logic presented, the one unanswered question is why was the bin Laden family allowed to flee America the day after the attacks??? It's at least one piece of the puzzle that doesn't fit and to me the American public has not gotten a satisfactory answer. Heck, most don't even know or care.

On a lighter note, have you seen The Seige starring Denzel Washington and Bruce Willis? Released in 1998 and eerily similar to post 9-11.
ROFL!!!
Pullezzeee....stop being condescending long enough to recognize facetiousness. I won the bet; I said you would not get it and would come back even more condescending and you did not disappoint! Right down to refusing to explain your *big picture* point. Right down to the right down to the linear and logical remark. If I had a nickel for every time I have seen that exact phrase used by liberals I would be rich. You are nothing if not predictable. Try to get a sense of humor, Teddy. Try not to take yourself quite so seriously. It will make life a lot more pleasant. Thank you so much for the amusing exchange. I needed a good laugh this evening. You have a good night now...y'hear? :)
ROFL
Very cute.

Inc ase you are really interested,these are examples of liberal media:

CBS
NBC
ABC
(all major broadcast networks in this country in case you didn't get it)
CNN (who brought us the lovely sniper video of terrorists shooting American soldiers...gotta love that; and who hid the truth about what was going in Iraq (torture, genocide, etc., little things like that) for years. Lovely liberal mouthpiece is CNN.
Air America
NPR
New York Times
Washington Post
Los Angeles Times
Michael Moore
Boston Globe
Al Franken (makes Ann Coulter look like a Girl Scout)
Michael Moore
Babs Striesand
Most of rest of Hollywood

and many, many others

In case you are really interested in the truth, UCLA did a study on liberal bias in the media, funded independently, and guess what...their findings indicate it is true! Wow. Imagine that. Do a Google search.

Honestly, anyone who thinks the majority of the major media in this country does not lean hard to the left has no grasp on reality. That is a simple truth. And the fact that liberals continue to deny it is ludicrous. That is how the kool aid drinkers thing got started, and can you blame people for thinking that? I do not say that to be bashing. I really, truly do not understand it.

Just an observation.

Have a nice day!


ROFL.
You kill me.
HA HA HA HA - ROFL
That is too too funny!
ROFL! nm
nm
ROFL! nm
nm
ROFL
Actually anything is possible. Too scary!!!!!
ROFL! nm
.
ROFL HA HA HA - :-) - nm
x
ROFL...sorry about that

ROFL HA HA HA - :-) - nm
x
ROFL!!!
HAHA oh that was good! Too funny!
ROFL...that is exactly what we have done....

right down to the fruit trees and the garden.    I will have to admit though that gardening is a huge hobby of mine, so it wasn't all about the coming depression.


ROFL
Why is it the only places I have seen Obama called the Messiah or the Chosen One are conservative media outlets or blogs?
ROFL....nm


ROFL.....(sm)
I like to think those turkeys in the grocery stores were suicidal and gave of themselves willingly for the betterment of mankind.  LOL.  We actually buy beef on the hoof (well, my husband does-- by the time I get it, its in those nice little packages), but I don't want to see it.  I was just amazed that it made it on TV like that. I saw that and didn't know whether to laugh or cry...
ROFL!!!!!! nm
XXX
ROFL.....(sm)
Would that make us racist against his white half or his black half? 
ROFL.....(sm)

Middle of the road -- right between W. Bush and Rush Limbaugh. 


They report on stories other networks ignore -- would that be the real ones or the ones they make up? 


It's a sad day in America, and I hope we can hold out and hold on through the next stormy four years. -- I guess the last 8 years were a peach (the results of which we are seeing now).


ROFL.....(sm)
The event will be covered on TV station WICA-- in a special report by Jeff Rense. 
ROFL

ROFL.....(sm)

I was thinking just a little more casual.  Alcohol and dancing will be involved, so the heels are out.  Love the halters, but I do believe polka dots are in order. -- Maybe a simple polka dot poodle skirt, plain tailored top, a scarf (of course), and some cat-eye glasses. 


:-D


Joe's new job....ROFL....(sm)

Joe the Plumber, Now Joe the War Correspondent in Israel, Is Still Joe the Clown


January 13, 2009 10:30 AM ET | Robert Schlesinger | Permanent Link | Print



By Robert Schlesinger, Thomas Jefferson Street blog


Samuel J. Wurzelbacher, aka Joe the Plumber, aka Joe the War Correspondent, has been in the Middle East on his new covering-the-war-as-a-reporter gig long enough to conclude that reporters should not be permitted to cover wars. Alas, I think he was referring to reporters not named Samuel J. Wurzelbacher.



To be honest with you, I don't think journalists should be anywhere allowed war [sic]. . . . I liked back in World War I and World War II, when you'd go to the theater and you'd see your troops on the screen and everyone would be real excited and happy for them. Now everyone's got an opinion and wants to down soldiers—our American soldiers, our Israeli soldiers. I think media should be abolished from reporting.


Memo to Joe the Propagandist: That's been tried. Do you remember Baghdad Bob? He was certainly good for entertainment, though I can't speak to troop morale. It's been tried by people in other countries as well, some of whom were the villains in those newsreels Joe the Historian recalls so fondly.


Let's skip the basic civics lesson about the role of a free press in a free society; and let's skip slippery-slope questions like: If Joe the Philosopher is right, then when engaged in a "war" without front lines, should independent media be abolished entirely? (Could we keep sports reporting?)


And while it may not occur to Joe the Television Consumer that people might have ever gotten their news in any fashion other than from a screen, war correspondents existed well before either of the World Wars. Reporters like Edward R. Murrow and Ernie Pyle were revered and beloved by not only the soldiers but by families back home anxious for news—not propaganda—about what was going on at the front. The military worked to keep Pyle at the front lines for morale reasons during World War II—and he was killed there by sniper fire.


I covered the Pentagon—which is not to suggest that I was a war correspondent—for a couple of years for the Boston Globe. I once had the opportunity to see retired Gen. Harold Moore speak about military-media relations. Moore fought in Korea and Vietnam. Joe the Film Critic might remember Moore as having been played by Mel Gibson in the 2002 movie We Were Soldiers about the famous IA Drang battle in Vietnam. The movie was based on a book" Moore cowrote with—wait for it—a reporter who was there with the troops.


Moore told us that he had welcomed reporters in Vietnam. "I just loved for my troops to get bragged about and for the press to write up my troops," Moore told us. "I was so darn proud of my troops for what they were doing in that tragic war."


When we asked Moore about the notion that the media lost the Vietnam War by ginning up criticism at home, he replied: "That didn't bother me. People in America have a freedom to do that. I fought in a couple of wars for that freedom."


But I'm sure Joe the Military Strategist knows more about such things than does Hal the General.


http://www.usnews.com/blogs/robert-schlesinger/2009/01/13/joe-the-plumber-now-joe-the-war-correspondent-in-israel-is-still-joe-the-clown.html


ROFL.
x
ROFL.....(sm)
I had forgotten about the man and fish thing....
ROFL.....(sm)

          l


          l


          l


          l


          V


 


ROFL.....(sm)
If human rights scare you, then maybe Africa or Saudi Arabia would be better choices.
ROFL.....(sm)

*You can hear a pin drop.*    Hey Rush, that's what it sounds like when people listen....


Thanks!!....that was hilarious.


ROFL
.
ROFL.....(nm)
x
ROFL.....(sm)
He couldn't have given a more anit-republican speech if he tried. 
ROFL.....(sm)
I think you have a good case of "gotta have the last word."
ROFL.....(sm)
They should have checked the place for a Pee-wee Herman how-to handbook.
ROFL.....(sm)
Change the channel off Fox and you'll see what the rest of the world sees.  I think you pubs have president envy.  LOL.
ROFL.....(sm)
So who will you be teabagging?  You might want to Google that term.
ROFL.....(sm)

Has it ever occurred to you that you actually ARE an extremist and that the majority of the country thinks you're nuts?  Sounds like Fox has you good and worked up and ready for the teabagging festivities....


I'm mad at ACORN...no, I'm mad at Pelosi....no, I'm mad at Obama.....I'm just mad....AARRRRGGGG.....


At my house we call that a "wasted mad.".....LOL.


ROFL
You are a caricature of the typical Fox News viewer. I suppose you think they are sincere and truthful. I bet you read WND too.

When you have actual facts to back up your hysteria let us know.
ROFL.....(sm)

AARRRGGG!  I'm mad.  I'm gonna rant some more.  Don't you have a party to go to? 


ROFL!!!!
00
ROFL.....(sm)

You're going to make their brains explode if you don't get back in the box....



ROFL!!!
nm
ROFL.....(sm)

So now I'm supposed to be a black, gay, pro-abortion, athiest Kool-Aid drinker?  (Anyone see any possible conflicts of interests in there?  LOL).  -- (Also referred to as the antichrist.)  While I would be honored to be a member of any and all of those groups I can only take credit for 3 of them, so keep guessing.  What you simpletons don't seem to understand is that a person doesn't have to have had an abortion to be pro-choice, they don't have to be an athiest to understand religious persecution, they don't have to be gay to understand and support the gay community, and they don't have to be black to be a democrat or support Obama. 


However, I do understand your inability to understand any ideas that don't fall in line with your own beliefs and the fact that the only way you seem to be able to deal with someone with those ideas is to label them.  In my book, that's called a coward.  Pull up your pants  -- your true colors are showing.


ROFL!!!

nm


ROFL.....(sm)

Please note that the pubs requested that it be read out loud.  They also tacked on a ton of ammendments that they knew wouldn't pass.  The whole point was for the pubs to delay the passage of this bill. 


I guess both parties can be silly when pushed.  LOL.