Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Ooops - my big mistake, sorry sam I replied in the wrong area

Posted By: meant to reply to Holycrap below. on 2008-09-22
In Reply to: Thanks - I've got more research to do - Kaydie

I meant to reply to the one right below this posted by holycrap.

Sorry for the mixup, after it was posted and I saw where I said to myself - Holycrap, I posted in the wrong area. HA HA HA. Sorry. That's what I get for trying to function on 4 hours of sleep last night and not enough coffee today.


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

Sorry, replied to the wrong post.
I meant to reply to the conservative way post.
oops I replied in the wrong place
I was actually replying to the post that said So Einstein's sentiments mean we're all morons. Sorry....guess I'm the moron here. HA HA
Ooops, don't know how
but you had already posted about this, my apologies.
OOOPS this should have gone under what's up with that.x
x
Ooops - posted by me,

Ooops, I just reposted this. I didn't see your post. sm
Cutting Medicaid and student loans but has hundreds of billions while throwing hundreds of billions at Iraq.
Ooops, didn't work..what happens when you're in a hurry.
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/horsey/print.asp?id=1412
Thanks. I got it and replied.

Great to see you again!


Thank you - just replied.
x
In our area
a 3-year-old boy was smothered by his mother and buried on a playground. I'm pretty sure he wasn't a homosexual. People use the "homosexuals are murdered every day" ruse to garner sympathy for a certain group of people who are killing themselves every day because of the sexual acts they chose to engage in. A death is always a sad event, regardless of who it is. But some people choose to kill themselves...drugs, alcohol, homosexual acts. It is their choice.
I am the one who replied to you earlier.

God forbid I step away from my computer to take my son swimming and didn't answer your post before I did so. 


I am not a republican.  I used to be until the past administration and now I've pretty much said to heck with both parties.  If you wish to talk to terrorists and if that is what Obama wants to do....more power to you.  I will say a little prayer that your head stays attacked to your body when you go to talk to the very people who HATE us.  This isn't fearmongering....that is fact...plain and simple and YOU are so busy spewing democratic ideology that I'm about to vomit over here. 


And for the last friggin time.....TERRORISTS ARE NOT COVERED UNDER THE GENEVA CONVENTION!!!!!  Regardless of whether we captured them and held them forever, whether we tortured them, or whether we just said to he!! with it and shot them dead......they would still hate us.  Us being all sweet and nice is making them think nothing more than we are a bunch of friggin pu$$ies and why should they worry about being captured because their pal Obama will take care of them.  Give me a break.  The next time you jump down someone's throat and give them he!! because you think they are spewing republican values.......why don't you look in a mirror and see that all you do is regurgitate the BS that MSNBC and mainstream media dish out.  Oh....but don't watch Fox even though the ratings are way better than anything you watch because they obviously don't know what they are talking about even though more people seem to be relating themselves to that network than any other. 


So go on with your democratic rhetoric about how Bush is to blame and Obama will not only save our country but the world and we will all be peaceful and harmonious with one another and skip around and giggling....oh happy day....yippee.......(PUKE)


Well that was stupid, I just replied to my own post.
When I wanted to reply to the one below. Maybe it is time for a break tonight.
Oops -replied to my own message LOL
This was suppose to be a reply to Does your mother know you are on the computer again.
It was this 'person' who replied to my post with
Oh, I get it alright and it's becoming more clear by - the minute............... NM

This 'person' has no idea that it is

clear
clearer
c;earest!

Did you get it, finally?

I am born in Europe!

Understood!
Is ignorance your only area
rasberries
Good for you - The post you replied to was revolting
I couldn't even reply to it because it was so revolting and disgusting. It left that bile taste in my throat.

For someone to call someone who is not worshipping the ground Obama walks on an anti-American? Yet here is a man who is going to change the Constitution to fit his needs and wants. What do you call that? Anyone who agrees with that is most certainly anti-American and un-patriotic. I am so sick of the Obama worshippers coming on here attacking those who don't agree with them and then turning around as though its everyone else's fault and the "poor me" routine.

You were right on with your assessment of them "fantasizing a secret plot to overthrow their beloved one". I couldn't have said that any better. Then to go and blame something that has not happened on Bush? This is getting totally out of hand. I'd just say if anything does happen they need to look no further than the lady (HC herself) who sat and told the world why she was staying in the race. "Remember JFK?" I think those were her words, but I think she even elaborated on when the tragedy would happen.

But I'll tell you one thing, I'm glad I didn't read the above post before I ate breakfast or else it would have come up.

It also looks like she pulled a Michelle Obama. "I was the proudest American I've ever been in my life". Not much of a life I would say. There have been many many many times in my life I've been proud too numerous to mention.

So I will just say without repeating what you just wrote that I agree with you 100%.

THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm sorry, that was not meant to be all. But in the area where I live sm
that is generally the case. I don't judge people by their age. I am 41 myself. My point was supposed to be that as time passes I think we are all becoming less prejudiced with each generation. I know for sure that not everyone over 40 is prejudiced and I apologize if that is how it came across. I think if you go back 50 years ago you would find a lot more racial prejudice than say 40 years ago, and even less 20, and less now. That was supposed to be my point, but I worded it poorly.
the polls to be open in my area
x
SP is a one-woman disaster area, but she'll
when it comes time for McC to start pointing fingers, the way some of the brighter pubs have already been doing.
In our area, all the "Handicapable" work programs are
subsidized through the state or private donors. The state is broke. They have already announced this is one of the areas of the budget that will be eliminated, along with the subsidized housing programs that provide the same people with independent or assisted living residences. The private corporate donors in our area are announcing layoffs by the thousands and have cut way back on community donations.
That was not the question....Gitmo is a holding area for terrorists...
The Hanoi Hilton housed American soldiers. And yes, I think it is VERY important that a presidential candidate is a patriot, has integrity, strong in the face of unimaginable pressure, and puts his country even before himself. Yes, I think all those are VERY strong criteria for the Presidency. Obama has nothing in his resume to indicate that he is that patriotic, that UNself-serving, showed that he put his fellow prisoners above himself...and you compare that to a terrorist in Gitmo. Good grief. ??
I do believe Savage in this case, cuz announcements in the paper are the same way in my local area..
Where did I say anything else, I was just commenting on the announcement in the paper.  GEESH. 
Yeah, I really see the unemployed folks in my area clamoring for those meat- sm
packing and farm labor jobs....NOT. Look, let's pick our battles over illegals. I live in a rural area where primarily Mexican immigrants slave in the asparagus, hops, grape and onion fields from dawn to dusk, bent over and doing back-breaking work. You couldn't get the lazy American folks to come take those jobs in million years.
Listen/Request Alan Colmes radio show in your area.

See link.


Ha Ha my mistake
I missed that paragraph in your post. Sorry. I just gave myself 40 lashes
That's not a mistake.....
...everybody knows O can raise the dead with the proper stimulus.
Huge mistake
I have been banned from this board a long time, and finally they let me back in.  There is a post from this Nan person, a cartoon justifying it as filbustering T. Kennedy; when in essence it makes a mockery out of thousands of Americans, and even more Iraq's lives lost.  I did go on the wrong board, I did not intend to, honestly.  I have not been on this board for more than 4 months until last night; and I can understand the moderator's decision to change it; but I really did not know.  Who is this Nan person?  She must be a moderator because if you challenge her with the truth one iota, your posts are deleted.  Again, the moderators have allowed me to get away with a lot.  I do understand their decision to split it into conservatives and liberals; and I have no excuse, I have had an extremly stressful week, went on there to express my opinion and my posts were deleted, I simply went on the wrong board and once again was called a troll.  Anyone who disagrees with this Nan person is accused of being a troll. 
Yep, made a mistake, should have been why would anyone BAN you. SM
People do that all the time on the board, don't make a big deal out of it and I am perfectly FINE here.  Why.....feeling uncomfortable?   It's not like you guys don't take pot shots on the Conservative board now is it?
No we didn't and it was a mistake, but it
also wasn't our stated mission to TAKE OVER THE COUNTRY, just to get them back out Kuwait.  You'd have griped even louder back then if we'd done that, screaming about going against UN mandate.  The likes of Phil Donohue didn't even want us to go after the Taliban.  to some there is nothing worth war.  It never ceases to amaze me the lengths you people go to find fault and place blame and denigrate your own country.  Of course that is until a Democrat gets back into office.  Then none of this will matter, right?  I can't wait to see you explain away the next terrorist attack or disaster that will most certainly occur once you install Billary into the white house.
It was a campaign mistake for her to go on
She wasn't funny. They made fun of her. I thought it was humiliating for her.
Please do not mistake this for the real
Nanaw!
I'm sorry. i made a mistake

I got it mixed up with the EMS tax of $250. It's called Per Capita Tax (right to breathe) . The PCT s only $5.50. Then we have occupational priviledge (right to work) tax of $10, local income tax 1% of gross income, school tax (and doesn't matter if you don't have school kids) $1500, county tax $400. Then there is the business priviledge tax if you operate business $10. On top of that is the state and federal income tax.


All taxes are due April 15th except the county and school taxes. They are paid April and October but still, it's just sickening what we pay. Now the gov. wants to raise the sales tax and make us pay it on everything we buy.


It has to stop. Oh, yeah, that's right, it will when we are dead and buried unless they put a yearly tax our final resting place. Oops. Shouldn't have said that. They might get the idea to do just that.


 


 


gt you just made a huge mistake. sm
You have no idea what my religion is.  I would never make an assumption like this.  This one statement of your's and the other person who called me a Xtian (too darn lazy to type out Christian) reveals the true inner workings of the leftist mine.  If you are not with me, you are against me.  That's your motto and no one could possibly be as well-informed as you.  Why, if I were to take some of your bizzare sayings, i.e., burning in hell and such, I might think you are a satanist.  Are you?  Can't prove it by me.   Amazing.
I would never make the mistake of a prediction like that.
for either side.  Having confidence in your party is one thing.  Speaking for your party is another.  I believe there are many liberals who would find the things you have to say and the way you say them anathema. 
Hopefully a mistake, but why try to sweep it under the carpet?
nm
So this is a mistake? Reading that article

Was this a planned pregnancy?  Maybe, maybe not?  Who knows but the girl that obviously is having sex and not using birth control.  Hello?  Is this the year 2008?  Whewee... 


Sounds to me like this young father is stepping into quite a family!  VP as his MIL; whatta guy!!!!!  It's a shame more young fathers don't step up and marry their children's mother, but this one sure is.... 


Help please...you mean a mistake to vote democrat for....
congress last cycle?
You say God is creator but mistake of nature....
xx
Where do you see a mistake? His nickname starts with D nm
x
dont mistake your distorted

opinion for fact.


 


oops, terrible mistake, but looks like some
xx
As a Christian that is not a mistake you would make.
Would you ever hear a middle eastern person accidentally say "my christian faith"? I think not.
My mistake too....I did not want to debate and asked not to...you kept...sm
trying, too, though, and I should have ignored your barbs, even though you didn't think that they were.

My apologies for not having a thick skin of armor on.....will not in the future respond back.
Even GREENSPAN admitted to his mistake to believe
correct themselves. Deregulation and the politics of greed are not a democratic platform plank. Unbelievable that this camp would STILL be trying to garner all that compassion and sympathy for the rich.
Greenspan...I made a mistake to think the
Being familiar with your posts, I will not be spending too much time here trying to get you to open you mind up to something other than your own opinion. Try tuning in to the money talk shows on CNN and CSPAN or listen to what some of the leading economists are saying about THIS particular set of circumstances. Studies of 2004 could not have foreseen the destruction that IS the W. Either you are interested or not. I'm done arguing with or trying to do someone else's reasearch for them. Election's over and I will be spending my time planning to take advantage of the new opportunities that will be opening up for small businesses for me and my husband, now that an affordable health care plan is within sight and there will be SB resources popping up right and left in the near future. It pays to plan ahead and at long, long last, my plan is to blast myself as far away from the outsource and decay of my MT profession of 27 years. Greener pastures are in my future.
No, but it goes to show you anyone can make a mistake
Heck, I always though Africa was a country...i.e. - What country are you going to on vacation? Answer: Africa.

The fact that she didn't say it makes it less credible to believe any of the malarky.

Which by the way according to Obama we have 57 states
I posted your reply above by mistake....
the "You don't have to look" post.
It was Roberts' mistake...here are the facts.
WASHINGTON - It was merely a formality and it’s probably a few phrases that both Barack Obama and Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts have practiced several times, but the leader of the Supreme Court may have been just a tad nervous when he got one word of the presidential oath of office a little out of order.

Obama smiled slightly when he realized that Roberts, a fellow Harvard Law School graduate, misplaced the word “faithfully” during the oath. but the new president joined in the fun and repeated it the way Roberts initially administered it. (Lest we forget, in the Senate Obama voted against confirming Roberts to the high court. Last week Obama met with him and the other Supreme Court justices during a courtesy call.)

Here is how the oath is supposed to be administered: “I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

And here’s how it went:

ROBERTS: I, Barack Hussein Obama…

OBAMA: I, Barack…

ROBERTS: … do solemnly swear…

OBAMA: I, Barack Hussein Obama, do solemnly swear…

ROBERTS: … that I will execute the office of president to the United States faithfully…

OBAMA: … that I will execute…

ROBERTS: … faithfully the office of president of the United States…

OBAMA: … the office of president of the United States faithfully…

ROBERTS: … and will to the best of my ability…

OBAMA: … and will to the best of my ability…

ROBERTS: … preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

OBAMA: … preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

ROBERTS: So help you God?

OBAMA: So help me God.

For any conspiracy theorists worried Obama isn’t president because the oath was a little off, the 20th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that the new president assumes office at noon on Jan. 20.
His real mistake was not choosing the
hero, Mr. O, wanted him to choose!
I made the mistake of feeding the gt troll
won't make that mistake again.  There is no debating with a sociopath.
Democratic Hawk Now Sees War as a Mistake

Friday, November 25, 2005 - 12:00 AM


Permission to reprint or copy this article or photo, other than personal use, must be obtained from The Seattle Times. Call 206-464-3113 or e-mail resale@seattletimes.com with your request.


src=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/ABPub/2005/11/24/2002645096.jpg


Rep. Norm Dicks voted in 2002 to back the war.


src=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/ABPub/2005/11/24/2002645169.jpg

JIMI LOTT / THE SEATTLE TIMES, 2003


U.S. Rep. Norm Dicks, center, with military officers at ceremonies marking the opening of new facilities at Naval Station Bremerton in 2003.





Defense hawk Dicks says he now sees war as a mistake


By Alicia Mundy
Seattle Times Washington bureau


WASHINGTON — It was after 11 p.m. on Friday when Rep. Norm Dicks finally left the Capitol, fresh from the heated House debate on the Iraq war. He was demoralized and angry.


Sometime during the rancorous, seven-hour floor fight over whether to immediately withdraw U.S. troops, one Texas Republican compared those who question America's military strategy in Iraq to the hippies and peaceniks who protested the Vietnam War and did terrible things to troop morale.


The House was in a frenzy over comments by Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., who had called for the troops to leave Iraq in six months. In response, the White House initially likened Murtha, a 37-year veteran of the Marines and an officer in Vietnam, to lefty moviemaker Michael Moore.


Then a new Republican representative from Ohio, Jean Schmidt, relayed a message to the House that she said she had received from a Marine colonel in her district: Cowards cut and run; Marines never do.


During much of the debate, Dicks, a Democrat from Bremerton, huddled in the Democrats' cloakroom with Murtha, a longtime friend. Both men are known for their strong support of the military over the years. Now, they felt, that record was being questioned.


There was a lot of anger back there, Dicks said in an interview this week. It was powerful. I can't remember anything quite as traumatic as this in my history here.


Near midnight, he drove to his D.C. home, poured a drink and wondered how defense hawks like he and Murtha had gotten lumped in with peaceniks by their colleagues and the administration.


And he thought about all that had happened over the past couple of years to change his mind about the war in Iraq.


Voted to back Bush


In October 2002, Dicks voted loudly and proudly to back President Bush in a future deployment of U.S. troops to Iraq — one of two Washington state Democratic House members to do so. Adam Smith, whose district includes Fort Lewis, was the other.


Dicks thought Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and wouldn't hesitate to use them against the United States.


After visiting Iraq early in the war, Norm told me the Iraqis were going to be throwing petals at American troops, Murtha said in an interview this week.


Dicks now says it was all a mistake — his vote, the invasion, and the way the United States is waging the war.


While he disagrees with Murtha's conclusion that U.S. troops should be withdrawn within six months, Dicks said, He may well be right if this insurgency goes much further.


The insurgency has gotten worse and worse, he said. That's where Murtha's rationale is pretty strong — we're talking a lot of casualties with no success in sight. The American people obviously know that this war is a mistake.


Dicks, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, says he's particularly angry about the intelligence that supported going to war.


Without the threat of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), he said, he would absolutely not have voted for the war.


The Bush administration has accused some members of Congress of rewriting history by claiming the president misled Americans about the reasons for going to war. Congress, the administration says, saw the same intelligence and agreed Iraq was a threat.


But Dicks says the intelligence was doctored. And he says the White House didn't plan for and deploy enough troops for the growing insurgency.


A lot of us relied on [former CIA director] George Tenet. We had many meetings with the White House and CIA, and they did not tell us there was a dispute between the CIA, Commerce or the Pentagon on the WMDs, he said.


He and Murtha tended to give the military, the CIA and the White House the benefit of the doubt, Dicks says. But he now says he and his colleagues should have pressed much harder for answers.


Norm ... has agonized


All of us have gone through a difficult period, but Norm really has agonized, Murtha said this week.


Murtha and Dicks were appointed to the House Defense Appropriations subcommittee in 1979, three years after Dicks first was elected to Congress. They rarely have disagreed, especially in their support of the military.


In October 2002, Dicks made an impassioned speech during the House debate over whether to authorize the president to send troops to Iraq without waiting for the United Nations to act.


Based on the briefings I have had, and based on the information provided by our intelligence agencies to members of Congress, I now believe there is credible evidence that Saddam Hussein has developed sophisticated chemical and biological weapons, and that he may be close to developing a nuclear weapon, Dicks said at the time.


By spring 2003, U.N. weapons inspectors said they hadn't found hard evidence of WMDs in Iraq. But Dicks remained convinced of Iraq's threat.


We're going to find things [Saddam] had not disclosed, he said shortly before the war began in March 2003. There is no doubt about that. Period. Underlined.


By June of that year, with no chemical, biological or nuclear weapons found, Dicks remained steadfast in his support for the war but called for a congressional inquiry into the intelligence agencies' work on Iraq. I think the American people deserve to know what happened and why it happened, he said at the time.


That same month, Dicks was upset when a good friend, Gen. Eric Shinseki, the Army chief of staff, was forced into retirement after telling Congress that the secretary of defense was not sending enough troops to win the peace.


Growing doubts


On July 6, 2003, Dicks awoke to read the now-famous New York Times opinion piece by former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who had been sent on a CIA mission to investigate a report that Iraq had tried to buy nuclear materials in Africa.


Wilson wrote that he had found no evidence of such Iraqi intentions and criticized Bush for making the claim in his State of the Union address two months before the invasion.


That Joe Wilson article was very troubling, Dicks said.


Dicks grew somber about Iraq. Rep. Jim McDermott, who represents Seattle and had opposed the war from the start, talked with him about it.


Norm is a lot like Jack Murtha. These are guys with a somewhat different philosophy than me, McDermott said recently. This an extremely difficult time for them because they have to reassess what they were led to believe about prewar intelligence.


The White House maintains it did nothing to mischaracterize what it knew about Iraq and its weapons.


Dicks' private concerns became more public two months ago. At a breakfast fundraiser on Capitol Hill, Dicks surprised the guests with a tough talk against the war.


The White House last Friday called Dicks to gauge his support. House GOP leaders were pushing for a vote on a resolution they hoped would put Democrats on the spot by forcing them to either endorse an immediate troop withdrawal or stay the course in Iraq.


Dicks said he told the White House that their attack on Murtha was the most outrageous comment I've ever heard.


The resolution, denounced by Democrats, ultimately was defeated 403-3.


Dicks says the Pentagon should begin a phased withdrawal and leave some troops to help maintain order and train a new Iraq army. We've got to be very concerned that Iraq comes out of this whole, he said.


But he added, We can't take forever.


Some people say it takes eight to nine years to control an insurgency, Dicks said.


I don't think the American people will give eight to nine years, and I sure as heck won't.


Alicia Mundy: 202-662-7457 or amundy@seattletimes.com