Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Yup, the Real Republican Party will rise again....new blood is definitely needed, that's for sure

Posted By: nm on 2008-10-22
In Reply to: Ashes are all that's left of the shrub's scorched earth policies. - Pubs will rise again...sm




Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

The Real Face of Satann Coulter and Republican Party
http://satanncoulter666.cf.huffingtonpost.com/
THis is not about the Republican party....
it is about socialism. I am a registered Independent, not a Republican. I just don't want a socialist America. What part of that do you not understand?

There is nothing positive about socialism that I can see.

Fear mongering...good grief. I am not fearful, I am angry. That man wants to highjack my country and a good many of my countrymen/women seem all to eager to help him do so. That doesn't make me afraid...it makes me angry.
However, there is nothing I can do about that, except vote for what I want, just like you are apparently going to.

If you get your way, and by the end of his term we are up to our eyeballs in socialism....one thing you can be sure of...I had nothing to do with it.
82 Republican party sex offenders
xyz
The republican party is not in disarray....

...because Obama got elected.  He got elected because the republican party is in disarray.  You got cause and effect reversed.  In this era of political correctness the republican party has been trying to become more *moderate*  and it cost them this election.  By trying to water down the conservative message to *dem lite* they have lost their conservative base. 


I voted, not for McCain, but for Palin and against Obama/Biden.  The idea that Palin would be *one heartbeat away from the presidency* was a plus in my book.  She was the only candidate who made any sense to me.  Did not mince words.  Said what she meant, meant what she said.  Ya' betcha!  No question about her stance on anything. 


Whatever your feelings about the pro/anti-abortion issue, there is no question how Palin felt about it.  She wasn't just against abortion until she and/or her daughter could've used one.  And her own diluted republican party did a number on her, trying to marginalize her so she would be in a poor position to run in four years.


Meanwhile, if Obama's daughter had an unwanted pregnancy he would not want her *punished with a baby.*  What an odd way to put that!  


And please, just to head off the backlash over the abortion issue, that is certainly not the criterion by which I cast my vote, just an example of a candidate taking a stand - even an unpopular one - and sticking to it. 


As a Republican I was not real impressed...

by Palin last night.  I thought she spoke well and had a good speech getting the crowd going, but I was sad to see so much bashing from the speakers last night.  I guess as a Rep. I think we should be above that.  .  One of the things that bothered me was Rudy and Sarah going after Obama for his work as a community organizer.  Excuse me, but shouldn't that be a good thing.  I also wished she would have stayed away from the whole bridge to nowhere considering she was all for it until the heat came on that it was pretty much a joke and then she decided she was all against it.  I'm not saying I am crossing party lines but I am not completely sold on the McCain/Palin ticket, and last night's speech certainly didn't clinch it for me either.  I just hope that soon that junk will be pushed aside on her her so we can get to the issues and some actual hardline questions and answers.  Below is a blog post from The Dallas Morning News.  I know, it is just a blog but I thought it had some good points.  Read on.



Why do Republicans mock "community organizer" role?

9:04 AM Thu, Sep 04, 2008 |  | 

Yahoo! Buzz
Michael Landauer   E-mail   Suggest a blog topic



I really don't understand the mocking of Obama for being a community organizer as a young man.

Giuliani last night: "On the other hand, you have a resume from a gifted man with an Ivy League education. He worked as a community organizer. What? He worked -- I said -- I said, OK, OK, maybe this is the first problem on the resume."

Palin last night: I guess a small-town mayor is sort of like a "community organizer," except that you have actual responsibilities.

Now, the truth is that, starting at age 23, Obama ran a faith-based charity called the Developing Communities Project.



It was made up of eight Catholic parishes when he got there and had one staff member. He was its director, meaning he was in charge. He made decisions about it, including staffing, budgets, etc. And when he left in 1988 to go to law school, he had grown its budget from $70,000 to $400,000, its staff from 1 to 13 people. More important, he created a job training program for this community and a college prep tutoring program.

As mayor, she built a hockey rink/rec center using eminent domain (because apparently there just isn't enough land in Alaska).

And keep in mind the timeline here: Obama did this as a young man BEFORE going to law school, becoming a successful lawyer and a law professor.

I don't think it's right to attack someone for working in a faith-based charity out of college. I think we all have some embarrassing first-jobs in our past. I would not make fun of Palin for being a beauty queen and sports reporter out of college during these same years. Although, I do think Obama's experience shaped his political future a bit better ...


He made the republican party look ignorant.
nm
Whose reality? The republican party is in the midst of
voters across the board. That's my reality and I have had 8 years to prepare for this moment. My reality has set in just fine. Yours is only just beginning. PS: This just in. Arizona too close to call.
It's not the Republican PARTY painting him as a Muslim.
x
I mean Dean is a real republican, not like the ones today.


Yes, I would agree Rove is loyal to the Republican party...
he is still not one of my favorite people. And yes, he is brilliant as far as politics are concerned. Frankly, I think he said the stuff about Romney because he figured McCain would not pick him. I really never thought he would. They just don't fit, in my opinion. In a lot of ways, and if you are going to run this country with someone, basic ideas need to be the same. That is why the #1 most liberal senator and the #3 most liberal senator are running on the Dem ticket.

Of course, Rove is toeing the party line now and saying that Palin was a good pick, but still saying he thought it was going to be Romney. So we will see...all I can speak for is myself, but I would not have been nearly AS energized for a Romney pick as I am for Sarah Palin. I would still have supported McCain...but not as enthusiastically.
Plus - does the Republican party understand the meaning of MAVERICK?
Agree with you - what did they expect with her zero experience (in foreign policy) AND the fact that she's under investigation?

Re: maverick. There are subtle variations of this word like "eccentric" that could apply to just about anyone, but the central meaning is 'nonconformist'

When you look at someone who has VOTED WITH GEORGE BUSH 90% OF THE time, where do you see 'nonconformist'?

And this from a man who was hammered by Bush when they went toe to toe. Please sir can I have another?

I see REPACKAGED MATERIAL, not 'maverick.'

That said, I have TONS of respect for his POW experience - all the MORE reason for him to NEVER ALLOW AMERICA TO ENGAGE IN WARS BASED ON LIES!!!

What's nonconformist about his support for our current fake war?

He should under the banner of HYPOCRITE, not maverick.
Sarah Palin was being "groomed" by the republican party.

They wanted to polish her up, dress her in designer duds, and make her into what they wanted her to be.  There were probably stylists who brought clothes to her.  I am sure Sarah Palin did not take time out of the campaign to go shopping at Saks.  Clothing was brought to her, she tried on outfits, decisions were made, and that was that.  She probably have very little to do with what was spent. 


Now, those behind the scenes want to cry foul.  It's just stupid and petty. 


Sarah Palin WAS treated unfairly.  She was thrown into a shark tank.  Her life will never be the same.  It sucks and the Rep. Party needs to quit laying the blame on her for their loss.  Shoulder some responsibility themselves.  McCain was/is a seasoned politician as many Reps were behind the seens.  EVERYONE has done nothing spout how inexperienced and ill-equiped Sarah Palin was and now they want to say it's her fault?!?!!?!?  I find that incredibly cowardly!  She's absolutely right! 


The republicans should be looking at the mess their party is in and figure out what went wrong and how they can rebuild.  Leave Sarah alone!


southern evangelicals are running the republican party and I am

I believe the term you are really using is not "arrogant", but "uppity." 


I hold no real party alliance........ sm
and had Obama been running on the Republican ticket, I still would not have voted for him. I see corruption in all of politics, that is just the nature of the beast. I cast my vote for the person, not the party, and it was the person of Obama who caused to me vote on the Republican side.

I find it rather interesting that our "run away train" didn't start gaining speed until after Obama was chosen over Hillary and has started picking up amazing speed after the Nov. 4 election. Sure, the economy was not at its best prior, but Obama's rise to "glory" seems to be the touchstone for the whole nasty mess.
Yes, time to end the 2-party system, need more real choice in government, less partisanship!..NM
nm
We will rise up
Flash to you:  There are MANY MANY who think like me..Hurry up and hide behind your gated community, cause we are growing, more and more and more of us and rising up..The Democratic liberal ideology is the future..The Republican me-me ideology is dying..YEEHAAWW..Night to you to, sweetie..
RISE UP
i THINK WE PROVED IN THE LAST ELECTION WHO THE MANY ARE
What with the rise in the cost of living....(sm)
its hard to make it on just $169,300 a year.....ROFL...they should try working with my budget.
'The South Will Rise Again?"
Obviously you've never lived in the deep south.

The only thing folks down here are going to 'rise' is the welfare ranks.

Too stupid, too poor, and too lazy to organze a war.
Besides, the guys with all the nerve are already in Iraq.
No more blood for oil.
I am so upset about our people dying in this civil war.  I am so upset about conservatives questioning my patriotism.  I am a soldier's daughter.  I was in cold war Germany all of my childhood.  I saw my father go to VN twice in his Class A uniform, to come into my room at 4 or 5 a.m. and say "daddy's got to go to work".  I am so upset with all of this; I am more upset with conservatives questioning my patriotism, when I in fact bought it.  Served it.  Got spat upon.  No more oil equals blood. 
Rise of the United Socialist States of America

If you can honestly approve of all this, I just don't know what else to say...


Click here: The Rise of the United Socialist States of America


 


Report: 50% rise in violent hate groups

Southern Poverty Law Center: 50% rise in violent hate groups






David Edwards and Muriel Kane
Published: Wednesday April 15, 2009



A new report from the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which tracks the activities of violent hate groups in the United States, has found an alarming rise in the number of such groups, from 602 in 2000 to 926 in 2008.

This comes on the heels of a controversial report on "violent extremism" from the Department of Homeland Security, which has outraged many conservatives by seeming to lump them in with extremists.

Morris Dees, the founder of the SPLC, told CBS's Harry Smith on Wednesday that he believes the two reports do "synch up pretty much" and that "the report from the Department of Homeland Security should be taken very seriously."

However, the SPLC's own report focuses very narrowly on groups which actively preach violence, including neo-Nazis, the Ku Klux Klan, and the "racist skinhead subculture." It also notes the surprising rise of "anti-Semitic black separatists calling for death to Jews on bustling street corners in several East Coast cities."

"A key 2008 hate group trend was the increasing militancy of the extremist fringe of the Hebrew Israelite movement," the report states, "whose adherents believe that Jews are creatures of the devil and that whites deserve death or slavery. These radical black supremacists have no love for Barack Obama, calling him a 'house nigger' and a puppet of Israel. They preach to inner-city blacks that evil Jews are solely responsible for the recession."

Dees told Smith, "The political climate, the election of Obama, the immigration issues ... and now, especially, the economy is almost causing a resurgence of what we saw in the days of Timothy McVeigh, almost a militia movement that's being reborn. ... I think that an American person is much more likely to be harmed by a domestic terrorist extremist group than by one from abroad."

Dees also emphasized that many extremist groups are recruiting Iraq veterans and even active-duty members of the military because of their expertise with arms and explosives. "It's a serious issue," he stated, "especially with a lot of these guys coming back with post-traumatic stress syndrome, coming back to a failing economy, the inability to buy a home and get a job and get credit."


This video is from CBS's The Early Show, broadcast Apr. 15, 2009.


Video at:  http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Southern_Poverty_Law_Center_50_rise_0415.html





Here is something that should chill your blood...
News flash: 

U.N. NUCLEAR WATCHDOG AGENCY FINDS UNEXPLAINED PLUTONIUM, ENRICHED URANIUM TRACES IN IRAN WASTE FACILITY (this is in all caps because it was a news blurb, I am not shouting, sorry)


and just this morning ahmadinejad was saying how he wanted Iranians to be the next wave of Al Qaeda leaders.  Think you might want to concentrate a little more on terrorism NOW and a little less on George Bush????


No, but I have been "washed" in the blood of
Jesus. 
Fears of Brutal Outcome In Iran Conflict Rise

More at the below link:


"Reporters Without Borders said 20 journalists were arrested over the past week. The BBC said today that its Tehran-based correspondent, Jon Leyne, had been asked to leave the country. The BBC said its office remained open.


Today, Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki held a news conference where he rebuked Britain, France and Germany for raising questions about reports of voting irregularities in hardline Mr Ahmadinejad's re-election - a proclaimed victory which has touched off Iran's most serious internal conflict since the revolution.


Mr Mottaki accused France of taking "treacherous and unjust approaches". But he saved his most pointed criticism for Britain, raising a litany of historical grievances and accusing the country of flying intelligence agents into Iran before the election to interfere with the vote. The election, he insisted, was a "very transparent competition".


That drew an indignant response from Foreign Secretary David Miliband, who "categorically" denied Britain was meddling. "This can only damage Iran's standing in the eyes of the world," Mr Miliband said.


An eerie calm settled over the streets of Tehran today as state media reported at least 10 more deaths in post-election unrest and said authorities arrested the daughter and four other relatives of ex-President Hashemi Rafsanjani, one of Iran's most powerful men.


The reports brought the official death toll for a week of boisterous confrontations to at least 17. State television inside Iran said 10 were killed and 100 injured in clashes yesterday between demonstrators and black-clad police wielding truncheons, tear gas and water cannons. "


 


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/fears-of-brutal-outcome-in-iran-conflict-rise-1712147.html


why are you saying obama's blood will be on my hands
his blood will be just as much on your hand's and gourdpainter's as mine. you don't even know who i am. how dare you blame me for anything when you don't even know me.
He doesn't have "slave blood"
But Michelle does. Get over it, already y'all!

This white guilt is also more than tiresome! I had nothing to do with it, and likely the vast majority on this board didn't, either!

Obama wants nothing to do with his HALF Caucasian blood. Now why is that?

And how about ditching the spelling police, oh, perfect ones?
brain "washed" in the blood
you are beyond reason. This is the nature of brainwashing.



Storing cord blood........sm
is just another way of making money. Cord blood donation should be made mandatory if the parents don't want to store it for their own child. As far as stem cell research, I just don't believe that using aborted fetuses should be allowed either.
Well, sure. Pretty soon blood screening

for nicotine, alcohol, drugs, THC and anything else ''unhealthy'' we consume that they can identify could be a healthcare rationing device.  And why would they waste valuable healthcare resources on those of us with high cholesterol?  Pretty clearly, we are refusing to eat healthily. 


I saw a commercial about designing a ''smart planet'' and my flesh crawled.  ''Soon, we will be able to tailor treatment to your genetic code''?   Oh, super!  Sounds so warm and fuzzy, doesn't it?  But in reality, who wants a national genetic database storing information on who has the gene for breast cancer or other diseases they can now predict a predisposition for?  Nice, if it's actually used to help us (what are the chances of that?)  Really bad if they won't waste treatment on somebody they feel is already a goner anyhow. 


Republicans will rise from the ashes of the Obama years....waiting patiently.

Which is exactly why your leftist/lib basher blood boils...sm
To come over here and attempt to stir us up and run people off.

Glad to oblidge you, no shoe.
What part of they come from the same Semitic blood line
do you not get? It does not MATTER who was there first, who staked claims or which Holy Book tell what people no one else belongs there. Israel only became a POLITICAL national entity in 1948 as a culmination of western interference that dates back to 1916 to 1919. This is a political/humanitarian problem. The rest of it is HISTORY. Get it?
No idea....looked like maybe a broken blood vessel?
It DID look bad.
No, goofy. Republicans are REAL people, real
nm
If the real folks, with real hope, faith, and
and for our country's future who participate here on this forum were just a tad as healthy, wealthy and wise as this poster considers herself, we probably wouldn't be sitting in front of these silly computers trying to make a living!! Can't figure why she is here other than tell us how healthy, wealthy and wise she is and we are not!
The Anti-Republican Republican Who is Really a Republican
The whole anti-Republican Republican ruse might have succeeded, were it not for the fact that McCain's rhetoric was at odds not merely with his own voting record - 90 percent with Bush - and his own Bush-on-steroids agenda.

    Even as he was pledging to "change the way government does almost everything," the senator from Arizona announced his commitment to much, much more of the same.


    He pledged to maintain endless occupations of distant lands that empty the U.S. Treasury of precious resources that might pay for infrastructue renewal, housing and job creations initiatives for hurting Americans.


    He outlined trade and tax policies that would extend, rather than alter a failed economic status quo.


    He reintroduced flawed proposals for health care, education and entitlement reforms that Americans have wisely rejected.


    And he threatened to achieve "energy independence" by declaring:


    "We will drill..."


    "We'll drill..."


    "More drilling..."


    McCain's rhetoric was that of a liberated man declaring his independence from his party's failed president and corrupt Congresses.


    But his platform was that of Republican candidate who, for all of his talk of reform, offers the crudest continuity to a country that is crying out for change.


http://www.truthout.org/article/the-anti-republican-republican-who-is-really-a-republican


I am an independent....neither party is "my" party.
THis election cycle I believe the best man is a Republican. Do your research. John McCain warned about this in 2005, named Fannie and freddie by name, co-sponsored legislation to control them. Blocked by Democrats, led by Chris Dodd..same guy now trying to fix what he and the Dems broke. Chris Dodd, #1 on contributions list from fannie/freddie, followed closely by #2, your shining knight Mr. Obama. The chickens have come home to roost all right...or should I say the donkeys. :)
and all he needed was one win,

as he KNEW he would get it in 2004!!


I needed that :)

He got done what he needed to get done...
before he went back to Washington the only people who were represented in the so-called meetings were senators. There was no representation for the Republican side of the house of representatives. There was no "agreement in principle." The plan as it is now was not going to pass the house anyway, so it would have wasted precious time. We now have 4 guys with both house and senate represented hammering out the details. That is light years away from where it was yesterday, because when they come out in agreement, they will have a bill that will pass without delay. There is no good reason for him to miss the debate now. If he had not gone to washington and asked the president to bring ALL the leaders, house and senate, and he and Obama, this would not have happened. It brought the spotlight OFF the presidential campaign and ONTO the congress to get something done. I think he did exactly the right thing, no matter how the pundits on either side try to spin it. He still has my vote, even more solidly. That is the kind of man I want in the white house. Not one who will handle an emergency like a looming financial crisis with his blackberry instead of his presence in the name of multitasking. It did not take long for me to see where Obama's priorities are. With Obama.
To me he has been way short of Presidential in this issue, in my opinion.

Mccain did not care if it hurt his campaign or what people would think of him doing it...he did it because he realized the importance of a quick resolution and he acted on that. Again, put his country ahead of his political ambitions. Yes indeed, THAT is the attitude I want in the white house. If you prefer the blackberry approach, that is certainly your right.
Thanks, we needed that.
x
sarcasm not needed really.

I just was not clear on her preference in this election.


 


that's okay - I just said we needed something in place nm
x
Bravo to you, this needed to said on here because she
is the biggest hypocrite of all.
I know - sure needed a laugh here
Lifes too short to let things get to you. Of course people get mad (especially on this board), but after a few new posts it is forgotten. What really made me wonder was a post I read that said the OP was asking someone to be banned for what they wrote 3 or so pages back. Then when I read the witch hunt comment that's exactly what I thought too. Then when I saw both original post and reply I could not tell who was for what and who was mad about what, and it just got me laughing. I'm glad this is topic is turning humorous though. I'm reading all the funny posts and one thing I think all MTs have in common is a good sense of humor.
That made my day. I needed a lift. nm
nm
The mansion was over 100 years old. It needed...
to be upgraded. It costs about $10 a month to run a tanning bed, if that much. Costs more to run a clothes dryer.

Like I said, let's see what has been added to all the governor's mansions in the lower 48 and what THEIR electric bills are, shall we?

She is a maverick in that she does not run in lock step with her party, which is what that term means. While she is a former mayor, she is also a sitting governor, and it is as a sitting governor she is running for VP. More than a few sitting governors have also run for President.
ROFL. Thanks for the laugh. I needed that.
.
HA, that was a good one. thanks for the laugh! I needed it!

I would say he has shown it to the people that he needed to -- nm
x