Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

I didn't have the best experience, but it was not a good fit for me. Still waiting to get

Posted By: paid from work done months ago on 2008-06-03
In Reply to: Millennium Business Solutions (MBS) - Angie

hh


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

I'm still waiting. Good luck to you. nm
nm
I hope you're right. I've been waiting 4 wks for an ID - still waiting! nm
s
Didn't have any "attitude." My experience
I have the experience and my skills are very much in demand.
This was my exact experience so I didn't
x
I wish they didn't require 5 yrs experience ..
I've only got a little over 3 years.
I didn't experience the same with Transcend...sm
I trained 2 days after I completed my paperwork and have 2 accounts. I rarely run out of work and if I do - if I take a 15 minute break and go back in there will be work there.
Awful experience with them. I didn't
have to buy Word because I already had it but the QA person was horrible and very rude.  She kept telling me to use the samples but the samples made absolutely no sense. I'd get reports back with things filled in that I knew had not been dictated.  I was trying to transcribe what I heard and pointed that out but was still told to use the samples.  Horrible experience and knew it wasn't going anywhere so got out.  Very happy in my new position without the QA rudeness.   
Was offered 8-1/4 cpl for experience. They use MT World software. Didn't take the job. nm
s
I was offered 8 cpl w/years of experience. He wouldn't say if pay would go up if I didn't take
s
I was feeling bad that they didn't get back to me with my 35+ years of experience, sm

but if that is the pittance they offer for pay, I'm glad they saved me the trouble of turning them down.  Pretty soon, scrubbing toilets will pay more. 


I assumed it meant you didn't need years of experience..what does entry level mean to you?
nm
Feel lucky you didn't get a rejection email. I have over 16 years experience
and this is the first test, since the very beginning of my career, that I have not passed.  I am stunned.  I'm not perfect by any means, but this is the first real rejection. I understood it early in my career, but after all this time, and working the past five years doing acute care for a couple of nationals, I get turned out by this company because I failed the test and they do not even tell you which part. I needed this job, but I guess it's back to the drawing board.
Really?? I didn't know that! Good to know, thx. nm
nm
Good for you. Just hope you didn't
displace a former MT who worked for the transcription company.  A friend of mine is an MT with a national and is in a situation where her company hired the former Transcriptionist of the client/customer and she's losing her account because of it because they're bending over backwards to keep the former employee happy and my friend is very upset about the preferential treatment this new MT is receiving.
Oh, guess it is good I didn't then:)
nm
Good to know. Didn't know there was a base raise
//
I did and didn't have any trouble. Good luck!

Didn't Webmedx get good reviews here?
I was under the impression they were a-ok? Hmm...
i didn't find the communication to be good
well, it was as long as i said everything was rosey. Soon as things weren't so perfect, they became much less than friendly.
good idea...I agree...but didn't they have one once? nm
nm
Back in the days of YOG FN didn't have a good
name either.  Your post shows just how unprofessional FN is and surely does not entice anyone to apply with your company.  Even if what the person posted is not true, you could have chosen to take the high road, but instead you took the low road. 
Yes. I wouldn't classify them as good or bad. Pay was okay. Account I was on was okay. Didn&#
like my supervisor very much.  She was kind of disorganized and didn't really communicate all that effectively.  All in all, pretty comparable to other places I've worked.  There was a problem with running out of work and when you are an employee instead of IC you are expected to sit there and keep checking for work during your shift which kind of sucked cause you didn't get paid for basically being on-call.
Webmedx didn't about 1-1/2 years ago. Good luck. nm
x
Hello other ex-Genie. YOG was a wonderful company indeed. I didn't know how good I had it. Those
x
My experience with them has been good sm
Their expectations for style are given out and I have never had any problems with QA. I rarely have to send anything to QA and when I do on occasion, I never get direct feedback as you can check your reports at any time for what the blanks were.  I guess if you are doing something incorrect that needs addressed they might do that, but I have never had any negative or nitpicky experiences with them.
Not a good experience
They will keep you on QA for as long as they can.. they even make up mistakes that they state you make.... not a good place to work.
my experience has been good
pay is on time, work is steady, everyone is nice - - some posts have been negative but you will get negative posts about any company you ask about on this board, GOOD LUCK!
I ddi not have a very good experience either sm
Pay was average, but at least on time.  Lots of times not enough work.  You have to be on IM all day and it is very disruptive.  MT World is in my opinion outdated.  There is much better out there.  JMHO
Good experience with them
so far. Lots of work where I am, not saturated with foreign dictators. Platform easy, lines good so far. Lead MT is extremely nice, very down to earth person. I received a welcome card, a really nice personal touch goes a long way.
I have had a good experience...sm

with Webmedx.  I have not received the emails threatening to offshore like the other employee mentioned.  My account always has more work than we can handle...thus the overtime (been on account about 4 months).  As well, I have a secondary account.


I don't dislike the platform.  There are some days when some functions are slower than others, but it has not seemed to have affected my line count. 


Full time is 35 hours a week, and handbook states that you will loose benefits if you do not work 35 hours.  You know that going in, and I don't think that is unreasonable.  You'd be expected to work 40 hours if you worked at a job on site.  IMHO, they seem to fair all the way around.  Things might change, but today I am happy. :)   Hope this helps.   


Not a good experience for me at all.
I tried working for them.  Nice people to work with.  The problems I encountered was that they used EXText, which was extremely slow running for me and I have a high-speed cable modem.  The pay was only 3 cpl and they expected 100% QA.  With the pay being so low and spending more time sitting there waiting for things to download and open, I wasn't even making minimum wage.  I had no choice but to quit with wages that low.  Apparently, EXText utilizes a VPN connection, which my Cable internet technician told me was probably overloaded with people trying to work all at once, which was the reason everything ran so slowly.  He said there was nothing wrong with my internet speed at all. 
My experience has been very good!
I have been with Focus Infomatics for just over a year, and I like it very much indeed. Pros are good, flexible, knowledgable supervisors, direct deposit (has never been late), Escription platform (best I've used), flexible schedule, good feedback, fair QA'ing. Only con I can think of is sometimes the work flow is slow, but by asking for more work I almost always have all I need. I recently converted from IC to full-time to qualify for health insurance (their BCBS plan is excellent). When I started there I was told the editing/transcription ratio is about 80/20, which is about right, though it varies from day to day, of course. Again, the Escription platform is very easy to use. My supervisor is great; polite, helpful. I realize Focus may not be right for everyone, but then again, everyone is not right for Focus. BTW, I have been an MT for over 20 years and this is the best company I've ever worked for.
I did not have a good experience with them. sm
I went backwards to archaic ways with phone lines and lanier stations. There was never enough work on my huge account. Never work on my secondary or third accounts either. Tried the on-line accounts, and no work there either.

When I did get a few reports, the line count was terrible on Bayscribe and the spellchecker sucked!

I gave it a couple of weeks, was off QA the first 5 reports; however, I knew in the first day or two, this was not going to work out. But, I gave it a chance and it was not a good experience.

I could not stand all the no so positive e-mails daily either.

This was just my experience. Not a good fit for me!
My experience was not good...sm
I agree with the OP that most companies have good and bad points. I enjoyed most of the people I worked with/for at KS during the 9 months I was there. But when the work on my account slowed down I then started getting one backup account after another where the work would last only briefly. I was trained on 4 different platforms while there. There was some dishonest communication, and while the intentions may have been good, intentions don't cut it when a person has bills to pay. Once it became clear that they were not being up front with me about workload/accounts, I chose to leave, and I wouldn't go back.  I have since dealt with 3 other companies, all of whom were more straightforward with me (even when the work ran low) than KS was. Just my 2 cents. Wishing you the best of luck.
Good experience sm
I did some IC work on a Urology account about 3 to 4 years ago.  Dictators were good.  Pay was on time.  Good communication. 
Overall good experience
The platform I am on is good to very good with regard to audio.
my experience has been good
I've been there less than 6 months. Before working for them, I'd held only one job. On that job there was no platform - we used Word/WP. This was a local group of doctors. Since I have no experience with any other platform than Inscribe, I have no comparisons. I don't find it slow, though.

As well, I have a very competent and courteous account manager. She is polite, as friendly as an AM should be, and never rude or contradicting.
I was an IC for them. No complaints. Good feedback. One thing I didn't care for (sm)

was that if I had been an employee instead of an IC, I would have had to conform to their mandatory ergonomic protocols and send a picture of my desk/work environment as proof of compliance.  Monthly meetings were sometimes interesting, mainly routine--not paid, or at least I never was for them.  


I worked on their Vianeta platform, but many accounts were on Emdat, which I have never used and don't know if I would want to.  Pay was good (set by me and okayed by them) and on time with DD. 


I was only with them a few months and quit mainly because of too much work on my other, older accounts, and I didn't think it was fair to them or InterPro (or me) to try to keep up with them all. 


It's a good place for experience, IMO
But not for $$ or benefits. They do hire a lot of newbies and they don't hassle you if you haven't reached your goals (unlike other companies I have read about).

However, I do think it is somewhat of a sink or swim situation. Not a lot of handholding here, if that's what you need. I don't even know if they do any clinics. I have all acute care, almost all ESL, and lots of ops. I personally don't find the audio on my accounts to be bad; it's usually the dictators and background noise that are bad. By comparison, I did 3 months for MQ simultaneously, and while the dictators were better, the audio was crap and you couldn't use your own wav player. I was doing stinky derm and ENT clinics - yuk - and when they finally put me on acute care, I never got the same dictator twice.

SS has started to provide a breakdown by job of line counts, which is a good thing. Constant changes in supervisory/management personnel. In summary, if you can do without the $$ and benefits and can jump in with both feet, SS is a good place to get experience.
Rapidtranscript..did not have good experience with them

lack of communication and support, I quit the first day!


Does experience make a good MT?
I am so confused right now.  I am a newbie trying to get a foot in the door.  I finally was accepted in a mentor program for a national.  In the mentor program you must reach 516 with 98% accuracy before you are allowed to become full time.  I am unable to make the line count because there is never enough work.  I am happy for this opportunity, but I feel because there is never enough work, I will never make the line count.  I have been offered a full time position to do operative reports and discharge summaries.  I am doubting my abilities and do not know if I can do the operative notes.  Should I go for the full time position or do I need experience before I am a good MT?  How do you know you are good enough to take on a job doing operative notes.  I want to go for it because the mentor program never have enough work to meet my goals, but what if I am not good enough yet?  helpful advise is appreciated.  Thanks
I would go with Keystrokes, had a good experience
with them, I left for my own reasons, nothing to do with them at all, they were great. Above poster is right, stay away from Landmark, I had the same experience with them.
I had a good experience with Transcend
I had to leave for personal reasons.  I can say though the training was adequate.  The people were very nice and communicative.  The pay was not bad at all and actually better than most companies.  Unfortunately I am not allowed to discuss what the pay was because it is not allowed to be discussed.  I would say so go for it.  The recruiter was really nice and answered all of my questions.  If she did not know the answer, she got it fairly quickly.  I dont' have a bad thing to say.  They do pay on time. 
Good for newbie experience
I know an employee making less than stated by MslaMT for Escription. It is apparently different rates for different accounts. They will decided the difficulty level for you, the MT, doing the work. Maybe not a career move, but certainly a good place for good newbie experience.
Amen, I had the same experience, not good, and
I absolutely noticed that the line counter was jacked. Even besides that, I would check and the paycheck was always a little short. I had to call the person who was in charge of that every single pay period and every single time she was annoyed. One time she told me to hold on, and then she dropped the phone on her desk and I listened to her type whatever she was typing. It was really rude. She wanted to finish what she was typing. Well then don't answer the phone. I guess she didn't look at her caller ID to see that it was only me calling again about another shorted pay check.

As for that Karen person, I felt the exact same way as you. That person smelled insincere from the first time I read her post. I thought it was someone who works for MedScribe trying to improve their image. Every time someone asked about MedScribe, the same Karen would chime in about how great it was. Since I worked there for a year, I knew that nobody in their right mind would chime in about how great they were and so Karen had to be a fake.

I started to make more money after I left there also.

The other thing I absolutely hated was all the emails all day long, scolding people. It depressed me. I even asked them to only send me emails that apply to me. They were so lazy that if one person did something wrong, they would email the whole crew and berate them. They told me if it doesn't apply to me to just ignore it.
10 years experience... that is good for 8.5 cpl. YUP, thats it.


yes, I did a couple yrs ago. I had a good experience

..good co to work for, liked my supervisors, no prob with pay.


I recommend Keystrokes also, good experience with them.
x
Offered pay for 6 months experience... any good?

I got offered a position to type some reports in a specialty I have been typing for 6 months.  I was offered 7cpl for 65 character line.  Does not pay for hard returns, tabs, empty lines, headers, footers are not paid.  Spaces between words are. 


At my other position I was getting 6cpl including hard returns. 


How do I figure out if this new offer is equal or better than what I already had? 


Yes, I know neither are high paying.  I am new to the industry, only finished my course 7months ago.  BUT, this particular specialty is easy for me and I have very high marks with QA.


Any and all advise is welcome.  Thanks!


not flexible at all. they are scatterbrained and it was NOT a good experience.
I was so excited to work for them and it was a nightmare. QA is not a good thing at DTS.
YOG, hands down. Also got some good experience with Lanier.
nm