Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

No, sorry, no bravos to someone who does not rescue someone

Posted By: hmmm on 2009-04-12
In Reply to: Oh Please... - samonella

Did you say Bravo when President Bush gave orders for the professionals to go in and save hostages in Iran, or many other orders President Bush gave to have the professionals save hostages. No, you did not. Sorry you go get to say Bravo to the O when you don't say Bravo to President Bush.

Leave the Bravo and thanks to the real hero's. The one's who saved him.

Can't have it both ways.




Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

"Democrats, too, are insisting that the rescue ....sm
include mortgage help to let struggling homeowners avoid foreclosures. They are also considering attaching additional midle class assistance to the legislation despite a request from Bust to avoid adding controversial items that could delay action. An expansion of jobless benefits was one possbility."



Translation == dems (i.e., Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, et al.) are going to try (and probably succeed, buried in deep in the bill) to add at least $50 million more to this bill for their social agenda programs, that we the people are going to foot, yet again.

Imagine that. Nice way to pile on Democrats....nice


Some of this is a rescue caused by those buying
nm
Billions More Needed for Rescue?

 This is over and above the new so-called stimulus package.


In my local newspaper, it states "More proposals waiting in wings" then it goes on to state "The obama adminstration is developing proposals to help rescue the banking system that could cost taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars beyond the $700 bililion bailout Congress already has approved.


Details are still being worked out but the administration is looking to spend hundreds of billions more to address the foreclosure crisis, help banks get out from under weighty bad assets and expand liquidity programs."


I'm really starting to get sick literally over this. We can't spend billions of dollars when the money isn't coming into the treasury.  We can't printing money without anything to back it up.


If any of you think these packages will not help the economy, please, I'm almost begging you, email or call your reps and get it stopped.


 


How does one rescue a sinking ship? That was the
problem Obama was, is and will be facing for a long time.

Obama did not make the holes in the ship, somebody else did.

He tries to repair the damage.

Or do you really think that O's conscious intention is to harm America and Americans?

Can you prove that somebody else would have done in these 4 months a better job in repairing America?

Name him and PLEASE NO PROPHECIES !

Uh-oh. Obama is directy addressing rescue plan for the economy. .

In the absence of a direct response from the bankrupt McCain campaign, dems better take cover and ride out the next avalanche of hate speech that looms on the horizon. 


So now we taxpayers are expected to pay for a motorsports racing track facility and a mine rescue tr
What the ... ?

A tax exemption for wooden arrows made for use by children?

And economic development for American Samoa?

An increase in the rum excise tax for Puerto Rico?

Do these senators think we CAN'T read? Or just hoping that we WON'T?