Not pro-war, oh yeah, just pro-killing.

...and they look like such nice boys.....

• pro war protest - gt
  • You just blew your pro troops facade. sm - sm
    • Neocon human shield - gt
      • Pro-war..what a nice little spin - Reality check
        • What a nice group!!!! - Yes, indeedy
        • prowar - gt
          • Most significantly out of control post of the day award goes to gt. Geesh! nm - sm
            • Thank you - gt
      • I don't know anyone who is pro war. sm - sm
        • Protestwarrior.com is basically pro-war. - Just the truth, please
          • Not true. sm - sm
          • Protest Warrior - Reality check
            • Not pro-war, oh yeah, just pro-killing. - Truth-seeker
              • I feel the need to answer on this board regarding this post. SM - Brunson
                • Please direct me to the bible verse where it is written - Democrat
                  • I read Brunson's post. You are being disingenuous. SM - MT
                    • Well, call me what you want, but I wanted to know. - Democrat
                      • I guess I didn't take B's post that way. SM - MT
                        • I wouldn't expect you not to agree with B. That's nothing new. - Democrat
                          • Welcome! :) NM - MT
              • They are nice boys. Learn how to post pictures. nm - sm
                • PIx didn't come through - pictures were all of guys waving large guns around... - How nice.
                  • They don't make threats. SM - Brunson
                    • I sense a little ignorance on your part, you say they are no more pro-war - Democrat
                      • Well, good, cuz I am not following you at all. SM - MT
                        • Not a good analogy, at all. sm - Democrat
                          • I thought it was, but I guess that's why we are on opposite sides of the SM - MT
                            • Ditto. nm - Democrat
                              • Nothing further need be said. NM - Brunson
                    • Play nice, boys. - Yuppers
                      • I say again, SO WHAT! sm - sm
            • Looks kind of pro-war to me. - ???
              • So what!!!!! nm - sm
                • SO WHAT?? That's what my sixth grader says when he can't reason something out. - Ha-ha...nm
        • you are the lame one - gt
          • Liberal talking point for the day - Reality check
          • There was no one cogent thought in that post. Not one. sm - sm
            • I agree - Reality check
              • Since you're over here, please tell us what you don't agree with Bush on? - Democrat
                • Now Democrat, you know that isn't true. sm - sm
                • What I don't agree with Bush on - Reality check
                  • I agree with 1, 2, and 4. But I think peopel should be given incentives - Democrat
            • Good, there's no hatred on the right. Glad to hear, BUT how easily - Democrat
              • Thank you Dem for adding some saneness to this thread. - Reality check
                • Oh please - gt
                  • and "the polls" said Kerry was winning on election night - Reality check
                • I'm not going to get into the Clinton vs Bush lies because - Democrat
                  • LIke I said.. - Reality check
                    • OK, they agreed. Doesn't mean the intelligence was correct, and it obviously - Democrat
                      • The main reason we went to war with Iraq - Reality check
                        • You mean, Bush's patience ran out with Saddam after 9/11. - Democrat
                        • That should read U.N. sanctions - Reality check

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

I have never said I defend Hezbollah.  I don't defend Hezbollah.  They're terrorists, and they're horrible.

But blindly defending Israel, regardless of what they do, doesn't work for me either.  What is most disquieting to me is that you defend Israel's placement of landmines to kill innocent civilians, designed to go off at a later date when people least expect it?  Why don't you consider that terrorism, as well?

NM

That's first and foremost in his mind, and Americans can go to hell, as far as he's concerned.

He thinks the war is more important than anything, including funding of projects to prevent a hurricane from destroying vulnerables, including funding border patrols, including forcing Americans to go broke just because they want to stay warm in the winter.

I overheard a conversation last night in a store.  A woman was complaining of gas prices and said she didn't know if she'd be able to afford to heat her home this winter.  Another woman told her about Jessie Jackson and his visit to Chavez and Chavez' offer to help low-income Americans with heating fuel.

This woman (who reminded me very much of some of you who post here, always in attack mode) said she and her children would FREEZE before she'd take any welfare from a communist.  She then went on a tirade about the kind of people who receive welfare (not fit to print on a public forum like this).  I was shocked, and the first three things that popped in my mind were Jim Jones, David Koresh and PEOPLE LIKE YOU.

Is there any length you people WON'T go to to defend this idiot president who doesn't care enough about YOU to make gasoline and heating oil affordable? 

Not easy to watch, but if she's for this, then I'm against her.

https://secure.defenders.org/site/Donation2?idb=0&df_id=1547&1547.donation=form1&s_src=6JY08WDC4F&s_subsrc=6JY08WDC4F_EJI08D1web

That's exactly what I said.  Scarborough has always supported Bush.  There is a difference between supporting and blindly following.  For example, you see nothing wrong with how this case was handled.  You see nothing wrong with Bush lying every time he opens his mouth.  That's blind faith.

Scarborough is an objective Republican who believes in honesty.  I realize this is a difficult concept for some CONS to understand.  Once upon a time, honesty was considered a good thing in the United States.  People who were honest were considered to have moral character and integrity.  Scarborough is one of those rare of Republicans, totally foreign to you, I'm sure.

To blindly follow (which I'm sure you're quite familiar with) means worshiping a man as if he's some kind of god, believing every single word he says, even when you see evidence to the contrary right before your eyes.   He lies every day; those who follow blindly believe him every day.  And when it becomes common knowledge that he's lied and when they can't twist and manipulate the lie out of recognition any more, then his blind followers make excuses for him, usually blaming democrats or anyone else who is handy but never blaming the liar himself.  And they justify all the lying because they have that special *connection* with God.  They can lie all they want and God just winks at them and says it's okay because their place in heaven has already been guaranteed, unlike the rest of us poor slobs out there without that special connection.

The only thing that scares me more than Bush having the same credibility as Al Qaeda is the fact that there are so many morons who blindly follow him, who just aren't smart enough to figure out that Bush was never on their side - he's only on the side of big money.  He even joked about his *base* - the *haves* and the *have nots.*

By the way, you are on the liberal board.  If you don't care for the liberal point of view, the CON board is ---->

I was responding to this:  *And know a lot PK. I know A LOT about your posting habits more than you could ever imagine.*  I was accused of doing something I simply didn't do, so that just shows me how much you people really DO know, and, yes, I can *imagine* a LOT when faced with this kind of ominous post. 

Those of your ilk have dark histories of murdering people of different beliefs (for example, personnel at abortion clinics), and the latest tactic of the Neocons is intimidation and retribution.  Just ask Valerie Plame, who used to have a career before her husband spoke the truth.

If someone said that to you on your board, you'd be accusing them of threatening to assassinate you and contacting the FBI.  Who are you KIDDING?  Typical neocon double standard and hypocrisy at work again. 

but the point is, the far left hates Cheney as much or more than Bush, so impeach Bush, get Cheney, then what?  Impeach Cheney?  Then you get Hastert. I know the far left doesn't like him. Impeach him and get Ted Stevens.  He's a Republican, too.  (President pro tempore of the Senate).  Impeach him and get...Condi Rice...if she isn't buying shoes.  What have you gained. Absolutely nothing. Well...maybe some payback for Clinton, which is what this is all about anyway.  Why not just wait until 2008 and vote the bums out.