Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Please excuse the typo in my subject line.

Posted By: Trigger Happy on 2009-05-05
In Reply to: If we all we're being so stubborn about this - Trigger Happy

I was in a hurry.


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

oops - my subject line got cut off
I just like that she is "up" on energy policies - not sure if that's coming out right, but i've been reading good things about that.
And the one below judging me and my *rock* right in the subject line

it's funny you only come out from under your rock




[Post a Reply] [View Follow Ups]      [Politics] --> [Liberals]

Posted By: ??? on 2006-03-10,
In Reply to: To Monitor: A CON says your rules are *stupid* - PK

when you smell blood in the water---just in time to run tattle tale to the monitor. When your people are posting here you never to be found. Good luck with that...


gt's post may have been a joke; howver, her subject line sm
makes it something she encourages.  The assassination of the President.  She has come close to saying it before.  This time, there is no doubt.  Save the keystrokes psychoanalyzing me. I won't stick around to see it.
In the last sentence of her post she retracts what she said in her subject line, lol!..nm
nm
last line of Matthews piece cut off in error. 1 line sm
complained in a letter to his boss that Matthews had shown a pattern of sexism.
Actually, I answered your posts line by line
about not "allowing" you to have an opinion. Those are your words, not mine. This is a good example of how this discussion has escalated from a simple link to this utter squashed bug nonsense. Why are you not able to simply debate the original issue at hand...the Eric Holder appointment? Too much of an intellectual challenge when somebody presents a THIRD-PARTY alternative viewpoint? You are the one who mentioned losing sleep and I remarked that it was probably unnecessary since you were blowing something out of proportion....something you have been doing all afternoon. You takes things WAY too personally.
I will not mock the typo. I will not mock the typo.
Oh, what the heck, I owe her one - ROFL!!!!

Oops,sorry about the typo. I should know better sm
after 25 years as an MT. 20 lashes with a wet noodle.
yep, I thought the RNC was a typo...LOL.
nm
I know...I was referring to my typo (nm)
xx
hey gourdpainter -- was this a typo or not?

The ex-wife, scorned "pubically" -- was that what you really meant or did you mean publicly?  If so, it's the best typo I've seen all day.  If not, I'm still laughing!



Thanks -- I needed one today!


I meant think so....sorry for the typo.
No reason to get out the typo gestapo or anything.  LOL
Sorry for the typo - should be misconstruing
:P
Last try - ignore typo ś" after why.
xx
display--typo nm
nm
Oh well crap...typo.

I should have typed accept instead of except.  Sheesh.  I thing I need another cup of coffee.


Pardon the typo in the post above....
meant to say $120K a year, not $120 a year...sigh LONG DAY...lol
Call off the typo police.
nm
Oops...nice typo! (nm)

Actually, it was your own typo in your original post...nm
nm
should be "venomous," not venous, sorry for the typo
nm
Please ignore the typo ś" after the word why.
xx
Typo - meant the other side, not other said.
Geesh. Nothing like a typo when I'm trying to make a point. HA HA
my own typo, sight, not site; must be an MT..nm
"""
Most of us make the occasional typo,

but nobody on this board makes them on as grand a scale as you do, several per post, often right in the subject line.  It indicates a lack of respect toward the reader when you cannot be bothered to pay attention, take your time and be accurate (or you are incapable of accuracy, and this casts doubt on the notion that you are an MT).  From someone who claims to possess superior intelligence, this is such a disappointment.  When you address other posters as *stupid* it is just too tempting to point out your numerous typos.


To call the rambling word salad you produce a *style* is a stretch.  It really would help if you'd place your reply directly under the post you are responding to. It is not always clear what you're raving on and on about.  Finally, you might also stop addressing other posters as low-life, cretin, stupid, etc. 


ROFL. Enter the typo police....
at least you found a different subject to attack on. Still snide, but nevertheless...attack, attack, attack. I look forward to your report on all the other posts and then posting our QA scores. Hop to it! LOL. geezzzzz.
Well, your erstwhile cohorts corrected my typo...so....
however, my point was more directed at the progressive. Your attitude toward unwed mothers is about as far from progressive as I have ever seen....?
oops typo for first word - meant An (not In)
.
Befoire you sic the typo police on me, make that
x
Correction of typo - "It" happened.

Typo - meant god's good earth.
x
Typo! (Used the wrong contraction - it should've been
N/M
it's a typo, stupid, and I do not make 'fun'
of you, the state of your intelligence is very sad, IQ of 70 is a cretin, this is French, look it up, I bet the only language you speak is slang American, not even English.
oops typo, *Not Without My Daughter* (Sally Field).....
xxx
LOL...off the subject

Don't know if that's true about Bill or not, but the graphic showing the top 3 newsmakers with Mr. Floatie--join the movement gave me my much needed gut laugh for today....  


What can I say...I like potty humor...please don't flame me 


On every subject

one can see good and bad.  All people will never agree on anything.and there is good and bad in all people.  I most certainly do not think blacks need to be compensated for their ancestors but count on it, that will happen no matter who is in the White House.  I don't think slavery was right either but you know what?  I wasn't around 150 years go to own any slaves so I'm not accepting any guilt trip.  The repatrition (or whatever the word is), if that gets seriously considered in CONGRESS, you can bet my Senator and Representative will get an ear full from their old "friend" the gourd!  LOL


I certainly don't mean to start a race war but blacks have the same opportunities in this country as whites.  Have a look at one of the presidential candidates.


Do you even know what the subject is here?..(sm)

Yeah, I think I'm through with this board.  The incoherent ramblings from pubs on here is getting boring.


He already has been subject to a different
standard.  He had to run a campaign with little or no mistakes, which he did.  He has always been held to a higher standard.  If he had run a campaign like Clinton's or McCain's, he would have been a laughing stock.  Being held to a higher standard will probably make him the best president we've seen in our lifetimes. 
Just a little touchy about this subject.
Get so darn mad about the whole Iraq mess we are in, and wish it would go away.  Bin Laden is a thorn in Bush's side because of the friendship between their families that it would be obscene for him to kill his friend.  So transparent.  Makes me ill to think of what he has done to this country, when there is a REAL threat with Iran.  Now what?  Our troops in Iraq fighting a war that can't be won, but Iran is now free to do whatever they want.  Sorry about the harsh words earlier, just sick of the whole matter, and where we as a nation are headed.  And it is good to see that his lying is finally coming out, what dispicable things he has said and done, and what a can of worms!  Thank goodness it is coming out.
The subject in this thread is a cat.
How did we get to this?  And is it really necessary to call names?  I mean, we are civilized people after all. It's rather hard to understand why you attack someone even when they are AGREEING with you.  I try to be respectful here, but it's very hard to communicate when the subject is changed constantly in a thread.  Perhaps an I hate Bush and all conservative thread would be best started and all posts to that effect might go there.  Nothing is being furthered here except what seems to be a very bad grudge.  In a public forum.  Really not cool. 
On the subject of Plame...

what about Richard Armitage?  Certainly no conservative, certainly no Bush lover, definitely against Iraq war...he said HIMSELF that he talked to the Washington Post about Plame being in the CIA before Libby said anything to Novak.  He felt comfortable doing so because "it was common knowledge around Washington that Wilson's wife worked for trhe CIA."  Wilson himself brought all this on with the op ed piece he wrote in the times trying to smear the administration.  That is what made Novak say...hmmmm....why would the administration send a Bush hater to Niger?  Welllll because the CIA suggested him...and whoooo in the CIA suggested him?  Valerie Plame.   But no one, including the illustrious Patrick Fitzgerald, paid a lick of attention to that. 


Agendas, agendas, agendas.  Wilson and Plame out to get the administration, Patrick Fitzgerald to get a name for himself...no matter what the cost.  And poor old Scooter took the fall, along with the first amendment. 


Oh well....all for the cause right?  Get Bush no matter what.  Sigh.


Looks like you want to keep arguing on a subject that's old and done with
We don't need to keep going over issues on abortion. We all know what abortion is. I started reading your post and didn't know if you were trying to give us a medical course on "what to expect when your expecting" or if you were preaching to us from a religious standpoint. This issue was discussed and debated and argued over extensively below. It looks like you were'nt satisfied and want to argue some more - and from what it sounds like from others this has just bored all of us to sleep. I thought the political board was for political discussions, not pregnancy lessons or religious beliefs about when a fetus actually becomes a human being.

Move on...too many other topics to discuss. BTW, no need to shout at us with your headline.
Well, on the subject of sex education...
I doubt Bristol thought what she engaged in could not cause pregnancy. I feel sure she knows what makes babies.

Now I am sure that out here in real america there are many thousands of families who have had a pregnancy like this in their families or know of one in close acquaintances. I don't think this argument is going to hold any water with them and I think they would be insulted by this.

Your Candidate knows that, that is why he just wishes that all his supporters who think they are helping him would just stop.
Your subject is JM's temper....sam's is
media bias, which is rampant, 100 to 1, if not more on the side of democrats. It's a fact. Period. No amount of spinning off subject can change that.
NP. This is most definitely a touchy subject
You got the right idea. Wish I had that kind of self control to just say no.
Yes, let's change the subject, shall we? NOT

nm


Not going to broach the subject with you nm
x
the subject is deregulation

of insurance companies which would result in collapse of the industry. Can you image the results of that?  Do you think it might affect your teeny tiny job in any way?


 


the subject is mccain's
suitability for president not your sick interest in Bill Clintons sex life.  Contemplate it as much as you want to; the issue today is McCain vs Obama.
We are getting off the subject here...your point was...
why should anyone be afraid of him because he is just one man and he would have to get past Congress. My point was...they will have the majority. THere is no getting past then...clear sailing. Whatever agenda he wants...goes through. THAT was my point.
what does dancing have to do with the subject?
nm