Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Speaking from experience.. you work all day and make nothing. I also have worked for other companies

Posted By: See posts below on Focus.. on 2006-04-26
In Reply to: Focus Infomatics Editors - not sure what to think

on Escription and made a lot more.I just came to the conclusion that they do not pay for headers, footers, spaces etc.. I swear I would work 8 hours and be lucky to make $50. It was my first Escription account so when I changed companies I could not believe it. I make in a few hours what took me 10-12 hours to make at Focus. Dont waste your time. They design it so you dont make any money. What a waste of time working there.


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread
  • Focus Infomatics Editors - not sure what to think
    • Speaking from experience.. you work all day and make nothing. I also have worked for other companies - See posts below on Focus..

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

Gee, I only make negative comments about companies I've actually worked for
and have the scoop on. I never said the line rate was high for this company, but nice fast software is what saves a good MT's line count. There are plenty of ESLs too, but no more than most acute care hospitals. So if you can't handle ESLs, you wouldn't want to work for TT (or most other hospital accounts). The new accounts are not teaching hospitals, which is good for me because I don't like doing residents. For now there is plenty of work and OT when you want it. So IMO a starting line count isn't the only important factor for how much money I can make, and certainly not the only factor in my job contentedness. They are fair and respectful and use good software, and those are the facts, not theories.
Speaking from 30 years' experience
nm
When I worked for Keystrokes, I NEVER had enough work to make
even 1000 lines a day!  If I had enough work, maybe, but I NEVER did.  It ALL depends on your account 150%!!
R U speaking from personal experience w/Webmedx?

There are companies that manage to make it work. OTI, for example. nm
x
I do not work for KS but have worked for enough companies to know that sm
you are on your own for training after a brief training for the most part but that if you ask questions, you will get answers. I would prefer that, with a good manual, than sitting in a few 8-hour days of training, which has happened at 2 companies. I learn fast and get bored with long training. Different strokes for different folks :)
BTW, I don't work for Transcend, I am speaking SM
about VR as a whole.  I have used it at more than one job and your production rate DOES NOT increase.
Speaking of low work, does anyone have an idea when the new...
accounts are coming on? I am really, really trying to hold out and not get a second job.


Glad it worked for you. I have worked for companies
that were more reliable and paid without the delay I had. Maybe you started before they started doing that but it makes no difference. I TOO am a single parent.

You are not trying to argue? Sounds like you not only are trying to argue but you are just waiting for anyone to post anything about the co on here so you can just get out there and respond, which seems to be the way I have always noticed it. It's like all the MTs or whoever that work there are just waiting to respond.

This board is about the good points and bad points about companies. I am telling my experience.

The people were nice people though, but my experience was not a good one and I will not say it was.

I can go a week after the end of payday and even 10days later but that's it. Kids would starve.
Does experience make a good MT?
I am so confused right now.  I am a newbie trying to get a foot in the door.  I finally was accepted in a mentor program for a national.  In the mentor program you must reach 516 with 98% accuracy before you are allowed to become full time.  I am unable to make the line count because there is never enough work.  I am happy for this opportunity, but I feel because there is never enough work, I will never make the line count.  I have been offered a full time position to do operative reports and discharge summaries.  I am doubting my abilities and do not know if I can do the operative notes.  Should I go for the full time position or do I need experience before I am a good MT?  How do you know you are good enough to take on a job doing operative notes.  I want to go for it because the mentor program never have enough work to meet my goals, but what if I am not good enough yet?  helpful advise is appreciated.  Thanks
My experience is I worked about
the archives before applying.  Much of it was about bad QA, a horrible platform and bad dictators.  My QA experience was actually very positive and I had someone who was patient and took a lot of time attempting to help me adjust.  It was very personalized which I loved.  I almost felt guilty when I decided I had to leave.  There is no way I was going ot pay my bills or enjoy coming to work each day.  The dictators and voice files were terrible. The platform was just no frills.  Nothing good or bad about it in my opinion except maybe a little slow?  The office staff was friendly enough but I don't think they actually knew what they were doing.  Maybe they were new to the company too?
It will be great experience if you can stick it out, and make
nm
I make 4 cents a line, work part and make
over $500 a week on part.
It's been my experience that it ends on your last day worked. nm
xxxxxxxx
I had this experience when I worked for Precyse.
Glad to be gone from that nonsense.
I make 7.25, do acute care, and have worked at MQ sm
since 1992. From reading other posts on this board, I think I make the low end of normal.
I worked there for awhile, couldn't make any sm
decent money. They changed their QA and guidelines and I made even less due to extra proofing, looking up in their Style book and the BOS which oftentimes conflicted. Their spellchecker was full of misspelled words.  Drugs were way outdated. Couldn't use my own word expander. Took about three weeks to get feedback sheets and sample reports. Wasn't worth it. I figured if I had to produce a superbly quality document, I would go elsewhere for more money.
If you can make the grade, this will be the best company you have ever worked for.
What specifically would you like to know?
I worked for this company and it was the worst experience of my career.
I would advise you to search the archives on this board. You will be able to make your own decision based on that info.
Has anyone worked with Linda Kelley of TTS/Medware & can you tell me about your experience, please?

Has anyone worked with Linda Kelley of TTS/Medware, and can you please tell me about your experience??  THANKS SO VERY MUCH, your time is greatly appreciated!!!


 


 


Only if you need the experience I guess. I worked some real low-paying ones -
in the beginning for that reason. If you mean the letterhead and like page numbers, then no. But if you're referring to the headings like HPI, PMH, etc., those should be included. You have to put them in. I know at least 1 company that cleverly didn't pay for them. That was quite a few years ago. I quit in 3 mos.
Absolutely not. In my recruting experience many were old-timers having worked
It is frightening.
I had a good friend who worked for them and had an awful experience.

She said that the work load was sporadic at best.  They would either be drowning in work or starving.  She said that her pay was late two or three times and when she questioned management on it they were extremely rude.  She said that the owner/manager of the company was a nightmare who was prone to screaming fits and berating those who disagreed with her.


You can take this for what it's worth.  I hope it helps with your decision.


Are there any companies that don't make you

work from a pool, but allow you to download or send you so many minutes or files per day from a particular clinic or hospital dictator(s).   I just want to do my jobs and be done when they run out.  I don't want to have to wait around for more dictation or have dictation from unknowns put in my queue to fill up my shift.  Do such places exist?


Which companies don't make you punch a
I'm currently an IC and hate the thought of clocking in and out for a measly potty break.
oops, make that which companies? nm
x
Companies that require five years' experience...sm
This October, I will be working as an MT for five years. I'm now looking to change companies and I notice there are several who require a minimum of five years' experience.

Would I be better off waiting until October, when I will have been an MT for five years, to change? Do these companies pay any better than those who require less experience? Or are they all pretty much the same and I may as well go ahead and apply to the ones who have less stringent prerequisites?

I've only worked for one MT company so I'm not very savvy on the MT marketplace. Any advice would be appreciated.
I agree on all fronts! Same experience, but 3 different companies. All
b
Here, here. Exactly my experience also, even down to the 10 year work experience. nm
:+
He worked for YOG, JLG, MDI-MD, QT, and God knows how many other companies. sm

He had groupies who would follow him wherever he went ........ and then also groups who detested him.


 


Me, I just never understood his overinflated opinion of himself, but then again, I suppose a healthy ego is good for us.   Good for him, I guess.


How many companies have you worked for?
It sounds like you have had a lot of experience with different companies...  Just cuious..... 
Because I worked for all 3 companies
and lo and behold there she was. I used to wonder why I couldn't get quick answers from her, it was because she had her finger in too many pies at once. She is no longer at one of the companies but she is still at the other two. The difference was I wasn't double dipping, I was getting paid per line whereas she was in salaried positions for each company. I just had one FT job and two IC PT jobs.
The last 3 companies I have worked for have all...

overhired.  They weren't scrambling to keep the positions filled.  They certainly weren't working to keep skilled MTs from leaving.  They were concerned about their TAT and only their TAT.  They offered incentives to clients for their business by guaranteeing discounts for reports that were out of TAT.  The larger MTSOs were working on technology to promote quantity rather than quality. 


Instead of thinking at the next level, step back for a second.  In order to be paid for their services, clients HAD to have their transcription completed.  Before NAFTA, the clients compensated fairly for their in-house or remote personnel.  Even after the larger MTSOs tried undercutting the independent MTs, they were still paying a fairly high rate for transcription...sometimes paying the MTSOs up to 18 cpl (or more).  After NAFTA, they found they could virtually eliminate their transcription departments (if they were smaller hospitals/clinics) or at the very least cut them to bare bone because it was saving them a tremendous amount of money by using offshore outsourcing services.  They were doing the same things all the large companies were doing.  Now in order to make the money, the MTSOs have to produce large quantities to compete, which can only be done by foregoing quality. 


So, when thinking at the next level, I do agree with you that there will be consequences of the tax changes.  But it was a very poorly thought out plan to begin with and now we're reaping the consequences of it.  I just don't agree that there is a shortage of American MTs when there are so many MTs scrambling for work. 


Too many companies invested money in VR, and they are going to make
sure they can use it, no matter what. So even if it can only type if, and and the correctly, it will be put into VR and the poor MT that has to straighten that garbage out will be paid a big fat amount of around 4 cpl. These companies are the greediest bunch I have ever seen. None of them are worth the ground they sit on.
Any companies who DON'T make you do voice recognition?

I can't stand VR and am looking for a new job where it is just straight typing like it should be - anybody work for companies who are not jumping on this wagon?


are you serious? This board is for MTs to get information about companies from personal experience.
nm
Are you getting decent responses from companies for positions if you have experience and are
a good transcriptionist.  I am going to start looking but it seems there are so many looking I am just wondering how it is going job wise. 
Those are the same companies I thought about telling her. She has maybe 25 year experience in the
hospital setting.  I will recommend these companies to her.  I think she will be fine with one of them.  The hospital is going voice rec.
I make more than that with Spheris but never have work. I would rather make $1.25 and have work. s
My SIL works for KS, and she gets paid double for linked reports too. Where do you get $2.25? I am ready to leave Spheris.
I am glad you know who they are; I don't. I have worked for several companies
as QA and in all but one case, the QA manager was an MT with much experience. The job I have now, the QA have a lot of latitude with the MTs and mentor, but none of them have the attitude of feeling better than the MTs or project it. It sounds as if you are trying to talk yourself out of it. I love my job and I love working with the MTs. It is all in what you want out of the job how the job will be. You must like doing QA though because you will not make the hourly rate that you would make doing MT work if you were a fast MT (like I was). I enjoy doing my job. I cannot find anything that I can say against QA other than the fact that there are cheap companies out there that try to get away with paying QA by the line and I would avoid them like the plague because that's what they are. They truly cannot care about quality if they pay on quantity for their final product.
I worked for several of these companies, just found
greener pasture, but in defense of the companies, I was hired immediately, I did not wait for weeks, days, etc. Perhaps part of it is that I do all work types, I am flexible with my schedule, I will work weekends and/or holidays, etc., and my test results, when given, are very high.
This is the norm at the companies I have worked for. sm
Don't take it personally. A lot of us go through the same thing. It hurts when a punctation error is pointed out, yet no mention is made of what a great job you did on the medical terminology. Kind of wounds the pride. Take comfort in the fact that the rest of your report was without error. You should learn to follow the style your company wants you to follow. They each have their own rules.
DSG is one of the worst companies I have worked for
and I think they have a very high turnover rate. I did not even get my start-up paperwork for 3 weeks and I honestly feel this is because they have so many people quit the first 2 weeks they wait to see if you make it that far before they bother mailing out the package to you! I lasted 4 months - I was absolutely desperate or would have quit sooner. Their accounts are absolutely horrible, management is the worst I have ever seen - do not answer emails, demand you be on IM but only to IM you - never to answer an important question, if you bring up a legitimate question on an account specific they ignore you as if not important, inconsistent as heck on the account specifics, ask if they can call you and then finally call 2-3 days later, make a huge ordeal about minor things. Only thing they have going for them is the platform - other than that they pretty much are a horrible, horrible company and I would steer clear of them seriously.
I have worked for 6 companies using Extext
You can do a ctrl-s and do documents typed today and get a list of them.
I have worked for 3 companies by the minute. sm
It always seems to balance out if you do a lot of work. I have had formulas of 10 lines per minute, 10.2 lines per minute and 11.4 lines per minute. It comes out to between 0.08 and 0.09 per line when you do it that way and seems fair to me.
The last 2 companies I worked for DD my check the
first pay period.   There could possibly be a bank issue, but it isn't an across the board issue. 
I've worked for several companies
and I would hate to be on a list like that - eeek!
As someone who has worked for many large companies, sm
I've seen this many times before. Companies downsize or streamline or whatever they want to call it OFTEN, especially management level positions. I wouldn't blow this out of proportion.
What companies don't make you follow exact schedule?

Looking for a company that allows some flexibility on what time I type each day instead of a strict schedule that I set up.  This is just to deal with occasional appointments or if the kids have a class play I want to see, etc.  Most days a schedule would be fine but I also don't want to be stuck with it!


The company I used to be with was like this but they now require schedules to be followed. I see the point in that but I also know that some exist with more flexibiity!


Any ideas?


 


Thanks!


Thanks -- I'll make a note of those 2 companies and check them out. sm
Unfortunately, I am reaching that ripe old age where I see a crown in my future
Fifteen years experience here and also offered 8 cpl as a max at multiple companies. This biz is
going down hill fast. I remember making 10 cpl 10 years ago and that was cheap..Only profession I know that has gone down in wages rather than up. Very sad. If you offered 8 cpl..take it..