Fox is NOT one-sided. Anyway, how would YOU
Posted By: know since you refuse to watch?!!nm on 2008-12-13
In Reply to: Are you kidding me?...(sm) - Just the big bad
nm
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
I never said it was all one sided.
I was just using the example of my stepson's great-grandpa who...BTW...is of no relation to me. He is a great-grandpa on my stepson's mom's side....not my husband's side.
I know that racism runs deep on both sides so no matter what people say....race does play a big part in this election. It is sad but it is also a fact.
Actually, no I don't believe in one-sided tolerance...sm
This particular sign could have easily been displayed away from the creche, I feel, and it wouldn't have bothered me the least to see it.
You see, I also celebrate Winter Solstice, and the earth and the animals.
However, this particular sign seemed to be placed next to the creche to invoke upset from those who celebrate Christ's life and birth.
I like to imagine that perhaps baby Jesus kicked the sign to the ditch myself. He could have if he wanted to.
Only MSNBC and FOX are one sided, not CNN or the others AT ALL
but fox is by far the worst... at least MSNBC doesn't LIE outright.
So, you only believe in one-sided tolerance? (sm)
As in the ditch was well deserved?
She's very liberal and one-sided and VERY
@@
Sorry, but your facts are one-sided whereas
I checked the facts on BOTH candidates. McCain is still my choice even though he's no JFK or Clinton.
In reality, neither candidate is capable of running this country but I'll take the lesser of two evils, which happens to be McCain/Palin.
Two-sided Obama
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=410738
I think that's a bit one-sided. Can't put my finger on it right
now 'cause it's late (for me), but I will read it again in the morning and do a little research myself..
This is so one-sided it isn't funny!
It still never ceases to amaze me that people blindly follow their political party no matter what that party does. When are you people going to realize that this isn't totally the pubs fault. This has been a long time coming and some of it started back in Clinton's presidency. So spare me the pubs are evil and how they ruined this country single handedly because I do believe more greedy hands than just the pubs were involved in this. If you want to point the finger and place blame, at least be willing to see that your own political party should carry part of the blame as well. Pubs and dems are both to blame for our current situation that we find ourselves in. We all want to say this is totally Bush's fault and yet we fail to recognize Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Nancy Pelosi, etc. We fail to recognize that it was Bill Clinton who forced banks to give loans to people who couldn't afford them. We can't blame every single thing on Bush and the pubs. The dems had their hand in this too.
Do you feel that the dems are completely blameless?
Those that sided with the dems...
are not real republicans, they are Republicans In Name Only - otherwise known as RINOs.
Contrastly, there are Democrats In Name Only - aka DINOs, and it should come as no surprise that they are not very popular within their party either.
And the monitor obviously has one-sided rules.
All you have done since you showed up here a few days ago is attack me personally. You don't even know me, and it wouldn't matter what I posted, you have already made your mind up that you hate me, and all you want to do is call names and insult.
It started when I posted a response to Democrat's post above. Since then, you've done nothing but attack me.
At least Carla was asking intelligent questions and trying to have a meaningful and informative dialogue on the CON board. Yet, she was reprimanded by the moderator.
All YOU have done is insult and be just generally nasty and rude. In none of your posts have you made an effort to have an intelligent dialogue. All you're about is attacking. Yet, YOUR actions go unreprimanded.
Says a lot about fairness on this board.
And now, knowing how much the truth is appreciated here, I suppose I will be banned, while you will be free to continue on with your rudeness and hateful attacks.
Will you leave? Sure. *RME* As soon as pigs fly or as soon as AG stops *accidentally* posting on this board. Choose one.
Your one-sided posts are so stereotypical of your
This is not a cartoon world.
your post was just as one-sided and attacking as
What a shame. When I first read it, I was expecting it to be unbiased, but all I read in your post was negativity against Obama and defense of McCain. You probably would be better off on the gab board.
FOX is completely one sided and is a tabloid
like you
Anyone who watches one-sided news
aren't too smart. I don't consider MSNBC and half the so-called news programs unbiased.
Can you get anymore tunnel vision and one-sided?
Sally is just Sam's left-sided alter ego.
What you are feeling is what Sam puts us through the 12 hours a day, 5 days a week. You guys already unanimously supported her recently and the O team will do the same for Sally. In case you haven't noticed, the dems are pretty energized now that the convention is over. Gloves are off and we'll be taking it to the mat until the final election returns are in. You have a choice. Give respect and get it back or sling your mountains of mud and wait for the avalanche. Dems were way outnumbered last earlier in the summer but the playing field is level now. This is the democratic process you claim to so staunchly defend, so quitcha btchin' and go blow your nose. It's gonna be a long haul until Nov 4.
gee, one-sided U.S. news coverage...go figure....it's how Obama
|
