Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Glad you can laugh....I should know better than to respond to you...nm

Posted By: ms on 2008-12-13
In Reply to: ROFL.....(sm) - Just the big bad




Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

Glad you at least got a laugh...... sm
Yes, we definitely agree on this subject and for so many reasons that I don't think there is room to go into it all on this forum.

However, I will state with brevity that the Bible does speak very clearly and very plainly on the subject of homosexuality. It is wrong in God's (or as you put it our creator's) eyes. Therefore, it is considered a sexually deviant behavior, just the same as pornography, beastiality, etc.

And I do believe you are wrong in stating that it does not affect my life or my home because when my children see this sort of thing on the evening news or prostestors on the street, it is brought into my life and home and I then must explain to my children why I believe this behavior is wrong. Just as I told my sons last night (about a completely separate and unrelated subject) what you do affects others. No man is an island.

I do agree with you in the sense that all gays are not as extreme as the ones we heard about a week or so ago bursting into a church and distributing their fliers and descecrating the altar, but that is true of any sector of society....Christians, Muslims, tree huggers, those save the whales folks, etc.

People are not born with a "lifestyle." Babies come into this world as a blank slate not having been exposed to the various world views that are out there, so your argument about whether or not God would "create everyone with different lifestyles." Being poor is a lifestyle and while one may be born into a poor family, one does not have to remain poor. One might be born into a Christian family but there is no guarantee that person would be a Christian when he or she is of age to determine their own path in life. Lifestyles are chosen, not created by God.

I agree with you in that times are changing, and they seem to be changing more rapidly today than ever before. However, intellegence and independent thinking should not become so open-minded that one can no longer distinguish between right and wrong. When it gets to that point, and it is rapidly doing just that, we are doomed as a society as lawlessness and immorality will prevail.
Glad you enjoyed them and glad to see you back!

I'm sorry, I just HAVE to respond here...

This is just bunk.  How arrogant can human beings be?  To think that we can manipulate this planet in such profound ways is ridiculous.  This is a dynamic planet.  These things have always happened, and always will.  The world has reinvented itself at least twice.  It will shake us all off like fleas off a dog, if it chooses to do so.  Not that we shouldn't be good custodians of the planet, but we don't even come CLOSE to having the kind of control that the environmental loons seem to believe.  Reminds me of that movie Armgageddon where Bruce Willis is standing out on that oil rig hitting golf balls at a Greenpeace boat screaming at them asking them how much diesel does that boat you've got there use?


And lastly, the United States cannot be single handedly blamed for a supposed case of global warming?  That people think that, specifically liberals, shows you just how political the whole thing is, and very little to do with science.  Last time I checked there was a great big huge INHABITED world beyond our shores, and they're also especially good at polluting this planet that we all share.


cant respond right now
Im sorry, first thing in my morning reading your post after watching thousands without anything and knowing they are going to DEMAND what they need..Geez, Im sorry, I cant post response right now..Im too upset..Later today, I will however respond, I promise. 
So why did ya respond?

If ignorance is bliss, the Obama-land is the happiest place on Earth!  Screw Disneyland!


Respond away.
You claimed I was the first to bring it up and I wasn't.
Dixie Dew: Please respond to this!
Okay.  Now you're back on the right.... er left.... er CORRECT board!  Please stay here, okay? 
Wow. I really don't know how to respond to your post. sm

But you support the troops...right?


Please do not respond observer
Please do not respond to my posts *Observer*.  This is the liberal board and my posts are to my fellow democrat/liberals not to a ring winger.  I have nothing in common with you or right wingers, in fact, I cannot stomach right wingers, their ideas, what they have done to this country under their president.  Do youself a favor, go back to the conservative board or just skip over my posts and dont even read them.
It is immaterial to me if you respond to me or not, LD...
still a free board, still a free country, still able to state an opinion. You do not have to waste your time or energy reading my responses. With all due respect of course.
Know you are not going to respond, don't mind....others might want to know...
any fire department employee is paid for by some branch of government...city, county, etc. They are all in essence government employees. Like any other city or county employee...like law enforcement. Los Angeles County FD, Orange County FD, they were the most heavily involved in fighting the Malibu fire, I believe. Generally volunteer firefighters are used where the municipalities cannot afford to pay firefighters, or for outlying areas that town firefighters do not cover. So I suppose that means firefighting is socialized anywhere the town, city or county government can afford it...not sure that qualifies as socialized firefighting. They are not universal firefighters all controlled from Washington, so really not similar to what socialized medicine would be. Control is at the local city or county level.
Would like to respond, but need more info....
I have been a bit out of touch the past week or so (looking for a job) and have not heard about Obama's latest remarks regarding sanctions, coalitions and the like. Could you please cite your sources for this information? It sounds like spin to me, but I like to keep open mind. You are right about much food for thought and I would like to enter this discussion once I know where this is coming from.

IMO, the sanctions against Iraq have very little to do with "punishing" Sadaam and more to do with serving US interests in destabilizing the region as a whole, thus facilitating US ambitions of securing and maintaining "oil"igarchy in the Middle East. We have been doing that ever since the late 1940s. Examples abound. Don't get me started.

The Iran sanctions discussion is a moot point. We have imposed sanctions against Iran ever since the Islamic revolution in 1979. Over the years, these have been extended and have become so harsh, there really is nothing left to sanction. This has succeeded in fueling the hatred Islamic extremists hold toward the West and emboldened their leaders, who have been quite resourcesful in bypassing US sanctions by forming alliances with other western and eastern countries.

With regard to "international coalitions" against Iran, I would be more worried about the Bush Administration covert operations as described recently by Seymour Hersh in the New Yorker (http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/04/17/060417fa_fact) than anything Obama may come up with.

Still, I would be interested in learning more about these remarks you find so troubling.
911 Widows Respond to Coulter
Statement of September 11th Advocates
Response to “Godless”
For Immediate Release -- June 6, 2006

We did not choose to become widowed on September 11, 2001. The attack, which tore our families apart and destroyed our former lives, caused us to ask some serious questions regarding the systems that our country has in place to protect its citizens. Through our constant research, we came to learn how the protocols were supposed to have worked. Thus, we asked for an independent commission to investigate the loopholes which obviously existed and allowed us to be so utterly vulnerable to terrorists. Our only motivation ever was to make our Nation safer. Could we learn from this tragedy so that it would not be repeated?

We are forced to respond to Ms. Coulter’s accusations to set the record straight because we have been slandered. Contrary to Ms. Coulter’s statements, there was no joy in watching men that we loved burn alive. There was no happiness in telling our children that their fathers were never coming home again. We adored these men and miss them every day.

It is in their honor and memory, that we will once again refocus the Nation’s attention to the real issues at hand: our lack of security, leadership and progress in the five years since 9/11.

We are continuously reminded that we are still a nation at risk. Therefore, the following is a partial list of areas still desperately in need of attention and public outcry. We should continuously be holding the feet of our elected officials to the fire to fix these shortcomings.

1. Homeland Security Funding based on risk. Inattention to this area causes police officers, firefighters and other emergency/first responder personnel to be ill equipped in emergencies. Fixing this will save lives on the day of the next attack.

2. Intelligence Community Oversight. Without proper oversight, there exists no one joint, bicameral intelligence panel with power to both authorize and appropriate funding for intelligence activities. Without such funding we are unable to capitalize on all intelligence community resources and abilities to thwart potential terrorist attacks. Fixing this will save lives on the day of the next attack.

3. Transportation Security. There has been no concerted effort to harden mass transportation security. Our planes, buses, subways, and railways remain underprotected and highly vulnerable. These are all identifiable soft targets of potential terrorist attack. The terror attacks in Spain and London attest to this fact. Fixing our transportation systems may save lives on the day of the next attack.

4. Information Sharing among Intelligence Agencies. Information sharing among intelligence agencies has not improved since 9/11. The attacks on 9/11 could have been prevented had information been shared among intelligence agencies. On the day of the next attack, more lives may be saved if our intelligence agencies work together.

5. Loose Nukes. A concerted effort has not been made to secure the thousands of loose nukes scattered around the world -- particularly in the former Soviet Union. Securing these loose nukes could make it less likely for a terrorist group to use this method in an attack, thereby saving lives.

6. Security at Chemical Plants, Nuclear Plants, Ports. We must, as a nation, secure these known and identifiable soft targets of Terrorism. Doing so will save many lives.

7. Border Security. We continue to have porous borders and INS and Customs systems in shambles. We need a concerted effort to integrate our border security into the larger national security apparatus.

8. Civil Liberties Oversight Board. Given the President’s NSA Surveillance Program and the reinstatement of the Patriot Act, this Nation is in dire need of a Civil Liberties Oversight Board to insure that a proper balance is found between national security versus the protection of our constitutional rights.

###

September 11th Advocates:
Kristen Breitweiser
Patty Casazza
Monica Gabrielle
Mindy Kleinberg
Lorie Van Auken
Stand down. If you respond, she will repeat herself
an over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again.
Kudo's to you. I was hoping you'd respond
to the tactics of those who try to silence others who don't agree with them.

Mom always told me you don't like the channel change it, you don't have to watch something you don't want to. Same with the posters. If they don't like what you have to say, ignore it and move on.

Life's too short.
I hesitate to respond to this because I'm an Independent and see good and bad

in both liberals and conservatives.


Believe it or not, liberal/independent people can be pro choice, believe in God, love America, would like to see all nations free, and most of all, supports our troops.


First of all, we love our country so much that we have respect for the Constitution. Being pro choice or pro life is a direct result of your religious/spiritual beliefs. The Constitution guarantees freedom of religion for ALL people, even those who don’t subscribe to the same religion as YOU. The concept of when life begins relies 100% on religious beliefs. If I believe that life begins at the moment of conception, then the best way I can honor my God my religion is to not ever have an abortion. What I DON’T believe is that I have the right to impose my religious beliefs on every American in this country via laws. If I do that, I’m infringing on THEIR religious beliefs. The same hold true for stem cell research. If you don’t believe in it, then don’t participate in it. But don’t prevent others who don’t agree with you from reaping the life-saving benefits it may offer. In fact, some of us might think those against this research are anti-life, rather than pro-life, since they don’t seem to care at all about saving the people who are already here. A reasonable person of any faith might ask why in the world God gave us the technology if he/she didn’t want us to use it.


We further believe in the Constitution’s promise that we have freedom of speech. There is no doubt in my mind that you were surrounded by pro Bush people at a pro Bush rally. Were you actually in the same room with President Bush, though? You may have been. I, on the other hand, would never be allowed to attend one of his "town hall" meetings because he prescreens people and doesn’t let anyone in who doesn’t agree with him or might challenge him. Some of us would definitely think this is a very anti-American practice.


As far as other moral values are concerned, I personally don’t believe in lying. My personal God doesn’t care for that very much, either. The entire world was lied to by President Bush concerning the war in Iraq. What’s much worse than that is that he used the tragedy of 9/11 to propagate a war against the leader of a country that wasn’t associated with 9/11 in any way. He used the vast support he received during the Afghanistan invasion after 9/11 to achieve the goal he had before he was even elected President: To declare war against Saddam Hussein. He did this on the blood and backs of every victim of the Twin Towers attack. My personal God really has contempt for that kind of behavior.


As far as getting rid of God "from the publics views," I have yet to hear of one church/synagogue/mosque or other public religious building being shut down by a liberal. Liberals have EQUAL respect for all religions and are against one particular religion receiving favor over another. To bring Jesus’ name into the political arena or an arena paid for by the tax dollars of everyone diminishes other religious beliefs. There are people whose religious beliefs don’t include Jesus, and some liberals see the "My God is better than your God" game to be very dangerous in a country that claims to provide freedom of religion for all.


Finally, regarding our troops: Nobody has more respect for our troops than I do. It’s the President who seems to have no respect. The difference between me and President Bush is that I place much more value on each of their lives. I would never be so reckless with the lives of our children as to send them into an unplanned war, refuse to provide them with adequate equipment to fight that war and protect themselves, and lie to them about their release dates in order to hold them hostage. For several months in a row now, the military has failed to reach their recruitment quotas, which is no surprise to me. I want our troops to come home, ALIVE AND WELL, and that is a direct result of the respect I have for him all. Their lives should not be sacrificed casually for a false reason. Their lives should only be on the line when we are protecting ourselves from a direct threat. Perhaps if Bush cared enough about this country 30-some years ago and served combat duty in Vietnam, he would have more respect for our troops. But his wealth and privilege came to his rescue, and he was able to wiggle out of it. He never had to know firsthand what it’s like to wake up every morning (if indeed you’re that lucky) to wonder if this day is going to be your last. Perhaps if he did, he’d have more respect for our troops today.


Everyone supported the President when he sent troops to Afghanistan after 9/11. Unfortunately, we can’t leave Iraq right now. Bush "broke it," and now WE are MORALLY obligated to fix it. God only knows when that will happen. It’s not, as he and his cronies promised in the beginning, going to be a quick war, and contrary to what he declared in his well-planned photo op, "Mission Accomplished" by a long shot. The terrorists must figure that the odds are pretty good in their favor if only ONE suicide bomber can kill multiple people, Americans and Iraqis, in a single hit. And they’re not going away. They’re only getting stronger all the time because Bush created a haven for them in Iraq. So much for respecting our troops. And how are we going to "fix" the mess he made in Iraq when we simply run out of troops because young people refuse to enlist because they’ve lost faith in him and don’t trust our government any more? He promised he wouldn’t impose a draft. If/when he ultimately DOES impose it, I think a GREAT photo op for him would be when he accompanies Jenna and Barbara as they enlist. I don’t think I’ll hold my breath for that one.


Did you know that part of the Iraq war budget includes a comprehensive health care plan for every Iraqi citizen?  I personally think it's very immoral for a President to take care of others in another country when his own Americans are in the midst of such a health care crisis.


He’s apparently too concerned about "spreading freedom" all over the world to guarantee that same freedom is safe from peril here at home. I recently heard that al Qaeda is now joining drug lords from Central America to cross our carelessly unprotected borders and enter the country. They figured out they can do this successfully because their complexions are similar, and they can easily pass as someone of Latin descent. There is a myriad of other things this President should have done to make this country safer. But he’s too busy obsessing on his personal vendetta against Saddam Hussein. If he had put 1/100th of the effort into finding Osama bin Laden, we would have captured him by now. If he had put 1/100th of the effort into taking precautions concerning nuclear plants and other entities in this country, we actually WOULD be safer today.


Just because someone has tolerance and respect for all religious beliefs; perhaps has his or her own style of respect and support for our troops by wanting to keep them alive and using their service carefully, thoughtfully, and judiciously; believes a person already born and living in this country is a citizen and that an embryo isn’t; believes that we should clean up our own country before trying to clone more like it all over the world; and believes that the Constitution should be the written document that is relied upon to form laws and that religious documents should be left to churches and other houses of worship, doesn’t mean he or she doesn’t love this country, doesn’t believe in God, doesn’t have morals, isn’t a good person and doesn’t have values, and, most importantly, doesn’t support our troops.


The fact that you seem to think it does and would even ask that question, though, makes me wonder somewhat about you.


Just a hint. Next time respond to a post,

read it first. 


This isn't about the ACLU, or an agency LIKE the ACLU.


I think you would be hard pressed to find a liberal who agrees with NAMBLA or any organization like them that is in favor of sexual exploitation of children.  I don't think prison is even good enough for them.  I think they should get the death penalty.


Maybe if you would have actually taken the time to READ the post, you would see it has nothing to do with your response.


Oh, before you call me a liar. I did respond to the flat tax,
but I brought my responses back here.
You didn't respond to Yepper's post.

I don't feel the need to make the choice. It's a child, not a choice. n/t


I am unable to respond to leaps in "logic" that
rasberries
I made a mistake and was trying to respond to the post below by *LOL* when I wrote that.

in the article you posted, nor did I see the word *impeach* anywhere in the article.


I agree with your comments and with the article you referred to, and I understood the comments of LOL to mean that the article was responding to some sort of "talking points" and using the word impeach often, when in fact, it can't be found once in that article.


As far as impeaching Bush, I believe time will tell.   I personally believe he's guilty of war crimes, and that his war will be judged to be illegal before the end of his "reign as King of the USA." (if we all manage to survive that long).


The mere fact that he led us into this war based on lies should be enough to impeach him.


If I offended you, then I truly apologize.  I agree with you and I'm glad you posted this article.  I surely wouldn't have referred you back to the very article you obviously read and posted and tell you to educate yourself, and in no way, shape or form do I believe you are ignorant; far from it.


If you posted the LOL statement below, then I apologize for misunderstanding what you meant by it.


I made a mistake when posting my post, and instead of winding up under the intended post, it wound up under yours instead.  Again, I'm sorry if I offended you.


LOL! Not bright enough to respond intelligently to a wonderfully written

If you know some good democratic blog sites, please respond to this post with the links. nm
Thanks.
I could laugh at that...
...if it wasn't so scary. Unfortunately though I think you are right.
That you can laugh at that

LOL! Thanks for the laugh. (nm)


Thanks so much for the laugh.
You dare to use the word truth in the context of the most untruthful president in American history.  He lied about why we went to war with Iraq.  Plain and simple.  He lied.  You are defending an unethical dishonest liar. 
Thanks for the laugh...
//
Thank you for the laugh. LOL
xx
LOL thanks for the laugh

Any idea how I got in the kitchen to paint vegetables in my old age?  No?  I didn't think so.  LOL


Thanks for the laugh! nm
x
HA HA HA - I have to laugh at
the ignor@ance of some people. I think I would have been standing with my mouth open and said "do you hear yourselves".

Here's something amusing. This was said by low and behold....Joe Biden. When talking about Obama he described him "clean and good looking". All I could think of was "you ignor@ant fool, we take showers too".

P.S. - I think people watch too much TV and get their ideas from there.

Thanks for the laugh though.
Don't know whether to laugh or cry
If people will believe "blogcaca," they will believe anything.

I'm still in shock.

Thank you for the laugh!
I wish Saturday Night Live would have been able to do this one!!!
I can laugh because.....(sm)

I think it is absolutely ridiculous to try and paint Fox News as a *middle of the road* news organization.  They are about as far right as you can get, just like MSNBC is about as far left as you can get. 


 


LOL is right on this one. A laugh is all
know who is more ignorantly childish Maddow or Olberman. However, Olberman is so big, he just looks like a big oaf. Besides, he is so consumed with jealousy of O'Reilly, he devotes most of his time to trying to poke fun at the man he despises the most because he can't get the ratings Bill does. The whole MSNBC crew can only see to the left, would get scared to death if they ever looked to the center, let alone to the right.
LOL is right on this one. A laugh is all
know who is more ignorantly childish Maddow or Olberman. However, Olberman is so big, he just looks like a big oaf. Besides, he is so consumed with jealousy of O'Reilly, he devotes most of his time trying to poke fun at the man he despises the most because he can't get the ratings Bill does. The whole MSNBC crew can only see to the left, would get scared to death if they ever looked to the center, let alone to the right.
LOL is right for this one. A laugh is all
know who is the most ignorantly childish Maddow or Olberman. She tries so hard to be witty and cute with her hate-filled opinions. Olberman just makes himself look like a big oaf. Besides, he is so eaten up with jealousy of O'Reilly that he devotes most of his time trying to make Bill look bad just because he hates him and can't get his ratings anywhere near Bill's ratings. The whole crew at MSNBC can only see to the left, so bad that if they even looked to the center a little it would scare them to death, let alone if they ever peeped to the right and saw a little real joy and happiness.
Laugh all you want and

by all means keep drinking the Kool-Aid.  Most Americans aren't laughing right now because whether you want to believe this or not....the dems in control are actually hurting us right now.  This constant spending is just insanity.  I couldn't care less if Bush handed this mess over to Obama.  Fine...we have castrated Bush already.  Now we have Obama spending like we have trillions of dollars to blow and all he can say is.....this is Bush's fault.  Look at the amount of money Bush spent in 8 year WITH a war.  Now compare that to the amount of money Obama has spent in 50-some days.  Laugh all you want but Fox has higher ratings than any other political channel.  So stay in your little bubble of denial and keep blaming pubs for everything while the majority of us open our eyes and realize that Bush is out of office and now we have to hold Obama's feet to the fire because he is in the White House now. 


So keep hoping for that change Obama promised because we don't even have change left and him and Pelosi want to spend MORE money!!!


And they wonder why I laugh at them...(sm)


Discussing anything with them is pointless.  I guess if Fixed Noise doesn't say it, it isn't true. 


PS:  Stick figures don't work either unless pitchforks and white robes are involved.


Sat. morning laugh
Anybody interested, watch the short animated video at:

http://www.batemania.com/bateman365/day009.html

It only takes a few seconds, it's really funny....until you think about it too long anyway.


Its me again - you all made me laugh
Just had to write back to let you all know I enjoyed reading all your posts to my "rant" this morning. It's nice that other people see her for what she really is, and sad that others do not. Sure we all want to just up and leave when things don't go our way and nothing seems fair, but as my mama used to say "who ever told you that life was fair", and no I'm not rich like the hollywood people who can leave country at the drop of a hat. So, just to let you know my feelings have not changed about how I feel for her. No, I don't hate her, but I do see her for what she is and I don't like it. Well yeah, maybe deep inside I do hate her. I just wish she would just go away and I wouldn't have to see her anymore, but somehow they always find their way out from under the rocks (Bush & Cheney is included). Anyway....I have calmed down since posting (not not with medication, but with a good dose of reality from all who commented) :-) I don't have anything to worry about anyways though because even if she pulls some of her "maneuvers" and knocks out Obama she will never win over McCain - just a fact. (if by chance she does, then in November I will come back and tell you all I'm eating crow. HA HA HA. I'm also not worried bout it anymore -after all I do have a "mute" and "channel changer" on my remote control. :-)
You make me laugh!!!
Who cares?
OMG! That is hilarious! Thanks for the laugh!
*
You made me laugh! Thanks! nm

Bright? Now that's a laugh
When a radio host went out on the streets of Harlem and asked the people questions about Obama, they were so ignorant to the facts they didn't even know who his running mate was, but yet they are allowed to vote. He asked them if they thought Palin was a good VP pick for Obama and they said YES! He asked if Obama wanting our troops to stay in Iraq was a good idea and they said, YES! My bet is more than half of those voting for him didn't even have a clue what/who they were voting for. Someone just told them free money and that's all they heard.


If I found something to laugh about...... sm

I would.  I just don't view the whole concept of abortion as funny in the least, and I find jokes about it, in any capacity, to be especially sick and demented. 


I know - sure needed a laugh here
Lifes too short to let things get to you. Of course people get mad (especially on this board), but after a few new posts it is forgotten. What really made me wonder was a post I read that said the OP was asking someone to be banned for what they wrote 3 or so pages back. Then when I read the witch hunt comment that's exactly what I thought too. Then when I saw both original post and reply I could not tell who was for what and who was mad about what, and it just got me laughing. I'm glad this is topic is turning humorous though. I'm reading all the funny posts and one thing I think all MTs have in common is a good sense of humor.
YOU LIAR, LAUGH YOU $$ OFF...s/m
What are you going to say when you appear in front of God?
With all your lies and being a hypocritical smarta$$???

We'll see who laughs last.
LIAR!
I loved this.....thanks for the laugh....sm
Do you suppose it would really work for any of us in this day and age????.........lolol.........
Thanks for the laugh. But, unfortunately, they are all too true. nm
nm