Who gives more to charity? Liberals or conservatives? sm

• Who gives more to charity? Liberals or conservatives? sm - ms
  • in the first web site you listed it states . . - interesting
    • I remember reading that Mississippi is a very giving - state, the poorest, and a red state. nm
      • yeah, those awful, rich, ungiving Republicans - -always been fiction. nm
        • seems to have more to do with religion than politics nm - Read the articles
          • The fact remains....sm - ms
            • Trying to figure this out. Religious dems....sm - oldtimer
              • We both must have read something different....sm - ms
                • Doesn't say anything about . . . - mt
                  • Yes it does. nm - ms
                    • Just ignore them, ms, obviously they refuse to read the whole thing....nm - not sam
                      • no we don't - nm
                    • No it doesn't - nm

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

I posted this on the comedy board too - its half political/half comedy.

1. The invention of beer, and

2. The invention of the wheel. The wheel was invented to get man to the beer, and the beer to the man.

These facts formed the foundation of modern civilization and together were the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct subgroups:

1. Liberals & 2. Conservatives.

Once beer was discovered, it required grain and that was the beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can were invented yet, so while our early humans were sitting around waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the brewery. That's how villages were formed.

Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to barbeque at night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what is known as the Conservative movement.

Other men who were weaker and less skilled at hunting learned to live off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly BBQ's and doing the sewing, fetching, and hair dressing. This was the beginning of the Liberal movement.

Some of these liberal men eventually evolved into women. The rest became known as girlie-men.

Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of cats, the invention of group therapy and group hugs, the evolution of the Hollywood actor, and the concept of Democratic voting to decide how to divide all the meat and beer that conservatives provided.

 Over the years, Conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest, most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are symbolized by the jack@ss.

Modern liberals like imported beer (with lime added), but most prefer white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish but like their beef well done. Sushi, tofu, and French food are standard liberal fare. Another interesting evolutionary side note: most of liberal women have higher testosterone levels than their men. Most are social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, dreamers in Hollywood, and group therapists are liberals. Liberals invented the designated hitter rule because it wasn't fair to make the pitcher also bat.

Conservatives drink domestic beer. They eat red meat and still provide for their women. Conservatives are big-game hunters, rodeo cowboys, lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical doctors, police officers, corporate executives, athletes, Marines, and generally anyone who works productively. Conservatives who own companies hire other conservatives who want to work for a living.

Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to govern the producers and decide what to do with the production. Liberals believe Europeans are more enlightened than Americans. That is why most of the liberals remained in Europe when conservatives were coming to America . They crept in after the Wild West was tamed and created a business of trying to get more for nothing.

Here ends today's lesson in world history.......

It should be noted that a liberal may have a momentary urge to angrily respond to the above before forwarding it.

A conservative will simply laugh and be so convinced of the absolute truth of this history that it will be forwarded immediately to other true believers, and to more liberals...just to yank their chain.

Have a great day!

http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/09/fearmongering-h.html

A quick look at some of the posts on this board would seem to corroborate the above.

donations are way down.

In this situation, people can't help other people if they can't help themselves.

Con means to deceive or mislead.  That's how they communicate, from Bush right on down to his peon worshippers.  They deceive, lie, mislead, twist, manipulate.  They do everything except speak the truth.  This is a perfect example.  You asked them above to see the post.  You didn't get a response, did you?

Now they'll just continue to troll this board with more outrageous fictional tales conceived in their tiny little minds, all for the purpose of demeaning and attacking liberals.

It's really sad, irritating and definitely bothersome, but they are their own worst enemy because they are getting more and more out of control every day.  In a way, I guess I will really be worried if it stops.  If I no longer see those angry hateful posts here, I will fear that they finally snapped in real life and either hurt someone else or got hurt themselves.

Kelsey Grammer

Gary Sinise

Stephen Baldwin

Patricia Heaton

Dennis Hopper

Craig T. Nelson

Ben Stein

Tom Sellek

Kurt Russell

Ted Nugent

Elizabeth Hasselbeck

Angie Harmon

John Ratzenberger

have afforded them the courtesy of not posting here, as has been said before.

NOT! America and the Poor...

Wednesday, September 14, 2005 By Bill O'Reilly PHOTOS VIDEO Click image to enlarge ARCHIVE SHOW INFO • America and the Poor... September 14, 2005 • Can President Bush Make A Comeback? September 13, 2005 • Feeling Sorry for O'Reilly September 09, 2005 • Government Cannot Protect Us: Part Two September 08, 2005 • What Really Happened in the Wake of Hurricane Katrina? September 07, 2005 • Keeping the Record Straight on the Katrina Story September 06, 2005 • The Politics of Katrina September 02, 2005 • The Straight Story About Katrina September 01, 2005 • Resisting Jessica's Law August 26, 2005 • Are You An Extremist? August 25, 2005 • The Bush Presidency At A Crossroads August 24, 2005 • The 'Swiftboating' of Cindy Sheehan August 23, 2005 • Demanding Justice For Jessica August 19, 2005 • How Is The USA Handling The Conflict In Iraq? August 17, 2005 • The Truth About the Cindy Sheehan Situation August 16, 2005 • The Saga of Cindy Sheehan Deepens August 11, 2005 • The Fascinating Saga Of Cindy Sheehan... August 10, 2005 • A Sad Day for America in Georgia August 09, 2005 • Is the ACLU Bin Laden's Best Ally? August 05, 2005 • Far-Left Crisis? August 04, 2005 • God vs. Science August 03, 2005 • A Tale of Two Terrorists August 02, 2005 • The Senate Slaps the ACLU July 28, 2005 • More Trouble On The Left.... July 27, 2005 • Those Who Help the Terrorists... July 26, 2005 • Let's Talk About Terror in Britain... July 25, 2005 • The Politics of Terror... July 22, 2005 • Why Judge Roberts Will Be Confirmed... July 21, 2005 • Why Do School Officials Hurt Poor Children? July 20, 2005 • Is Karl Rove a Hero? July 19, 2005 • Karl Rove vs. the Liberal Media... July 18, 2005 • It Just Can't Get Much Hotter In Aruba... July 15, 2005 • Memo to a Judge July 14, 2005 • Investigating Karl Rove July 13, 2005 • Anti-American Danger July 12, 2005 • Media Coverage of the London Bombings July 10, 2005 • Failure To Deal With The Deadly Enemy July 08, 2005 • Reaction to President Bush's Iraq Speech June 30, 2005 • On the Defensive June 28, 2005 • What you, the folks, think about Gitmo June 24, 2005 America and the poor, that is the subject of this evening's “Talking Points Memo.” The aftermath of Katrina has produced a debate over poor Americans. There are about 37 million people living below the poverty line right now. The issue was described this way by Newsweek (search) reporter Evan Thomas (search), a liberal guy but not alone, who writes, Liberals will say [the authorities] were indifferent to the plight of poor African-Americans. It is true that Katrina laid bare society's massive neglect of its least fortunate. Massive neglect? Let's take a look at that bit of overstatement. Halfway through President Clinton's tenure in office in 1996, the poverty rate was 13.7 percent. Halfway through President Bush's tenure, the rate is 12.7 percent, a full point lower. In 1996, the Clinton budget allotted $191 billion for poverty entitlements. That was 12.2 percent of the budget and a whopping amount of money. That's why Bill Clinton (search) was called the first black president by some. However, the Bush 2006 budget allots a record shattering $368 billion for poverty entitlements, 14.6 percent of the entire budget, a huge increase over Clinton's spending on poverty entitlements. ADVERTISEMENTS

Yep, they'll be back when all the Lebanese are dead, because all us conservatives are evil like that.    

Please tell me what personal knowledge you have about gt's drinking history, if any such history actually exists.

The administrator should ban you for this kind of personal slanderous assault on a poster.