what a childish post, I think you were declared incompetent..nm
Posted By: .- on 2009-05-27
In Reply to: LOL, STRUCK A NERVE!!! - Anon2
nm
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
What is childish in her post?........nm
nm
Your post is very disrepectful and uncalled for - and childish
Okay so you don't like him. We get it, we get it, we get it.
No I don't like Bush, can't stand the guy - didn't vote for him.
Bobbin & weavin, yes so was Clinton for those dark long 8 years before him. In 16 years we have not had a decent person in the office (20 if you count the Sr.) and I'm expecting another 4 years of bullcrap. Nothing is going to change. The same people that own and run Bush and tell him how to think, now own and run the O.
Shocked he wasn't impeached? Pelosi and Reid should be impeached for not impeaching him. It was their constitutional duty to impeach him but they didn't. So...what dirt on them does Bush/Cheney hold. Also, Kucinich has been trying to get him impeached for a long time. So there's a lot going on behind the scenes we are not aware of.
But to call Bush a retard is very very uncalled for. It is disrespectful and insulting to the mentally impaired/special needs people. And it's just plain rude and low class.
That is about as classy as calling a black person the "n" word. But hey, maybe you do that too.
You know we get it. You don't like Bush, but enough with the insults. By next month he will not be in the white house and you don't have to think on him anymore. Yes I know you will be glad as I will too, but for Pete's sake stop with the childish name calling and insults.
One poster below wrote "too bad more folks don't think before they post". They must be talking about you.
Path to 9/11 declared to be
false and defamatory. Was supposed to be made in accordance with the 9/11 Commission's findings. However, it was not, and the WH is wanting to submit this heap of trash to schools and offer it to students as the truth. Where are we headed here!? WH just gets more ridiculous, more self-serving, more scandulous actions, and I just want them out of there!!! Out of my life!
nothing to do with incompetent however,
if you watched him talk about this (not just using internet sites) you would have heard him explain how he was so young and cocky, kept getting into trouble, etc, and WHAT caused him to be changed, and HOW. He is very intelligent and capable and proven in all respects, unless of course you prefer to stick your head in the sand and ignore the FACTS!!
SP declared war on "liberal" media at RNC
in view of the NeoCons pathologic inability to ever own up to a mistake, we are likely in for a long haul on this alleged zealous media vendetta against the poor victimized VP pick. In the absence of pub diplomatic offer of an olive branch, there are a number of strategies they could employ to appease the scoundrels. Attacking them for being biased is not one of them. For example, she could actually make the rounds of the talk show circuit, stop running on the lipstick platorm and focus on pub platform, policies and issues in a substantive and compelling manner, thus forcing thoat attack dogs to choke on their own bones of contention. won't hold my breath on that one.
What a bunch of whiners. Obama was been dogged and hounded by the media for over 18 months. This was "really bad" on Focks network where they launched feeding frenzies of attack reporting for weeks and even months at a time, cramming antiObama propaganda down the throats of anyone within earshot. Pubs can take comfort in the fact that ultimately these smear campaigns really did not succeed in bringing Obama down, who went on to seize the nomination of his party.
If you guys are on the right side of history and if you have selected the best among you with the strongest appeal, the most credible policies and can convince voters that they should trust your candidate over the opposition to deliver real CHANGE, you have nothing to fear. Before that can happen, though, JM and SP will have to step up to the podium and talk about the debt we are passing onto our children and their children in the form of costs of the Iraq war and the rising number of obscene corporate bailouts, the latest being FMFM, their special interests and corruption. JM and SP will also need to effectively address how they plan to unify a deeply divided nation, the war and foreign policy, the diminishing quality of life for the middle class, gas prices and alternative fuels, the mortgage industry collapse, jobs creation, outsourcing, health care, education, the environment, global warming…well, I could go on, but you get the drift.
33 states have declared sovereignty from the
XX
Yep! Either lied or is incompetent...sm
One fact that's left out is that the head UN inspector urged to allow the inspections to continue and that the WMD that had been reported in the 90's had been mostly destroyed. Why do you think there is none to be found?
So the things the American public was bamboozled about in Iraq (not me) are:
1) Iraq was an imminent threat to the US. It is now in the wake of the war than ever. More of a threat that it was under Saddam.
2) There were WMD. They should have listened to the UN inspectors. Clinton bombed a good deal of the sites in Iraq that had WMD in his term.
3) Connection to 9-11. I'm still waiting on a sound theory for this.
2)
Bush is incompetent
Well, you and the tiny 39% of Americans (some polls 37%) can continue to trust dumbo, LOL, we, the ones who can see the forest for the trees will strive on to get back on track in America..to become well respected once again and become the American our forefathers envisioned..You can continue to keep you head in the sand as we throw the bums out of office.
I'd like to know WHY these incompetent CEOs
still have JOBS!? Why aren't they in the unemployment lines? You know why...they had to put the US/world in financial crisis in order to facilitate their agenda.
Has Fox News Channel declared a War on Christmas?
Let's see.....
MSNBC stopped live broadcasting early, as did CNN. (They must want the majority of their employees to celebrate CHRISTMAS at HOME with their families.)
Fox News Channel, on the other hand, is broadcasting LIVE on Christmas Day and continuing to spread their Bush is wonderful and broke no laws gospel.
I wonder if Gibson and O'Liely will expose Fox's blatant war on Christmas!!
And people say Palin is incompetent...
maybe O needs to have a talk with Joe, he sure seems to open mouth, insert foot a lot.
Remember when they declared family private and off limits
It's a can of worms I don't think they really want to open. I am looking forward to seeing what kind of light Aunti Zeituni can shed on the REST OF THE STORY (that is if she ever gets the chance) after the election. seh obviously holds nothing but the highest regard for her nephew and sounds like a really interesting person.
What is amazing about the fallout is that no one seems to be questioning that "highly unusual" shrub directive to ICE to issue as many deportation orders as possible before Tuesday. To me it's sort of like calling for mass executions in the Texas gas chambers (hurry up, hurry up) before anybody finds out that a couple of the death row inmates are innocent. One has to wonder what he meant by "politically sensitive" deportation cases.
Hopefully, it is a moot point. An executive order from a lame duck president with approval ratings in the low 20s is likely to be ignored by the ICE anyway.
No, you're too busy defending an incompetent
AMEN! I hope we also survive his incompetent
nm
Air America declared bankruptcy in October 2006...google it...
//
Can you get any more childish? nm
childish, so childish
Are you self-appointed QA of the board? Stick to the subject instead of picking on my spelling.
This happens anytime people confront you with debate points. You meltdown and start insulting and calling people names. Sorry to invade your hate-filled haven. I can see you only tolerate miserable people like yourself.
Don't be so childish, you know the
stoop to child-like arguing with you. I have better ways to spend my time, thank goodness!
You are childish, childish, childish
.
Yes, it is pretty childish....
if you don't like the way I play, get out of my sandbox. Very Democratic and liberal of you, piglet.
Not much of social value from conservatives? Emancipation proclamation? Voting for women and African Americans? Nah, from YOUR point of view, I guess that is not much. I believe they have all been sustainable. But if course, doing one of those things involved fighting a war to bring it about. And we all know liberals (well except John Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson...uh...) RUN from wars, right??
Not willing to compromise one iota, and doing the piglet post of disdain for anyone who dares disagree with you.
Grab your hoe and torch and head for the castle. That is about the extent of your idea of a "social movement." And have the nerve to say you have the welfare of the common man in your heart. Pull the other leg, piglet.
Wicked... and so childish. and when it comes to
nm
You're being very childish
Maybe you shouldn't participate on this board if you can't read posts without resorting to 3rd grade tactics.
You are being childish, YOU said that blogging
gives wrong information (especially yours) and one should rather beleive the news, which side of the news?
Well, o.k. WHY ARE WE BLOGGING THEN, ESPECIALLY YOU?
You are a very childish poster..go play with the
aa
Democrats seem to be the most childish, juvenile
nm
You have absolutely worn this childish
pathetic party of poop! When you hear something you don't like, just pretend it is an *unanswer.*
I really wish you would quit this childish stuff.
nm
She is a depressed, childish, selfish,
media w$hore who should have all of her children taken away from her. What a loon; she lives with her parents in a filthy home and has her mother look after the children. She should be sterilized immediately.
I'm so sick and tired of the childish BS.
I acknowledge that Bush ran up one heck of a deficit. I understand that this omnibus bill includes pork with 60% of the pork being added by dems and 40% being added by pubs. I'm tired of the whole lot of them. Okay pubs....so dems have 60% of the pork....you still have 40%......TAKE IT OUT!!!! STOP THE SPENDING!!!! I hear Obama talking about cutting the deficit and then in the next sentence all I hear is spending spending spending. WTH is our government thinking. STOP THE SPENDING!!!!!!! We need to start letting these companies fail. We can't bail out everybody. As much as this will hurt my family in particulary, they need to let GM file bankruptcy. They need to stop giving money to these banks. Government needs to stop rewarding irresponsible people.
With the amount of money that we owe and the amount of money that is proposed to being spent here.......taxing the rich alone cannot pay this deficit down.
We need to STOP government spending. We need to give tax cuts. The reason Bush's tax cuts didn't do anything is because government was still spending money like it had just won the lottery. I'm tired of politicians being wasteful and spending money. I'm tired of big CEOs making millions while they can't afford to pay their workers.
Right now both parties are on my poop list!!! I'm tired of the back and forth cry baby whining. Bush screwed up. I get it. But Bush is out of the office now and now we have Obama. Just because Bush screwed up and spent like crazy doesn't give Obama the excuse to spend more because this deficit was wrapped and handed to him. STOP THE SPENDING GOVERNMENT!!!!!!!
When are people going to realize that this isn't pubs vs dems anymore. This is the American people vs our government. pubs and dems have both screwed up. It is time to take our country back!!!!!!
A *freebie*??? Ah, yes, another childish expression...LOL
It is truly sad to see what should be mature grownups acting like CHILDREN! Stop being SORE LOSERS!! YOU LOST. THE GOOD GUYS WON! Grow UP!
Calls for *maturity* from a childish SORE LOSER??
Pot meet kettle. SNORT. LOL!
P.S. Please scroll down after reading above post. Washington Post article included.
Reprinted in Boston Globe. Sorry!
I wrote: I second JTBB's post, 'watcher's post is misinformed crap...sm
pYou have also to read what's posted 'inside' the message.
Oops, meant to post this under the loose trolls post...
I'm going to keep ignoring these troll posts. It's kind of fun, actually, just pretend you don't see them.
Post the direct link. I don't see the post you're referring to.
t
The post I quoted was the entire post. It was not taken out of context. sm
I imagine there are as many emotions and thoughts going on with our troops as possible and each does not feel the same as the other, which is obvious by the posts here.
Sorry gourdpainter, my other post should have been under the wacky Pakistan post (nm)
xx
Why did you post this? Republicans have been asked NOT to post here..Bye Bye.
Why did you post this? Happy Thanksgiving is enough but to be so happy we have a republican president? Why did you post that? I would like to remind you, you are on the liberal board. Are you trying to start trouble? If so, let me know and I will report you immediately. No, Im not happy we have a republican president, a warmonger chickenhawk president. Does that answer your question? Now, go back to the republican board. We dont want you here and actually the moderator and administrator have asked republicans not to post here..Bye..bye..
Forgot to post a link in 1st post. Sorry.
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/money/tax/article1996735.ece
Please refer me to any post where I referred to either the post...
or the poster as ignorant. And I certainly never sunk to the levels you did at the top of the post, against a man who is ill in a wheelchair. Pot calling the kettle black...?
I re-read your post, and I stand by my post.
You are twisting his words by saying that he wants to make friends with terrorists. That is not what he said.
Ya gotta understand the rules. We have to post on this board only. They can post on any board they
The above post explains a lot about everything else you post!
Your revelation about being married to a career Army guy explains why your views are skewed so drastically to the far right! I thought it had to do with small-town Pennsylvania, but now I truly understand where you are coming from. Thank you for explaining that us. We will read your posts in a completely different light now that we know the truth.
If you want to post something on the subject, post
objective views. This is a one-sided publication that asks for donations to keep it going. Nothing I read in there posts anything against any democrats, just republicans. It is not a fair-minded reporting.
I like to read both sides of the aisle but this publication spews hatred for anything not democratic in order to sell books. To those who can't see both sides, this blog, or publication as they like to state, is just up their aisle. I shake my head at one-sided news. Taken from their web site:
"Indeed, a founding idea of the Consortium for Independent Journalism was that a major investment was needed in journalistic endeavors committed to honestly informing the American people about important events, no matter what the political and economic pressures.
While we are proud of the journalistic contribution that this Web site has made over the past decade – and while we are deeply grateful to our readers whose contributions have kept us afloat – we also must admit that we have not made the case well enough that this mission is a vital one.
Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His new book, Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at secrecyandprivilege.com. It's also available at Amazon.com, as is his 1999 book, Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & 'Project Truth.' "
I second your post and 'watcher's post
is misinformed crap.
My post was a direct answer to the direct post...
of Democrat. It was not a blank open-ended statement. And dial it back a notch...it is certainly your right to protest anything any time you want to. Just like it is my right to protest you protesting while men and women are still in harm's way, because you are in effect aiding the enemy. Apparently the Viet Nam experience taught you nothing. Americans protesting in the streets heartened the enemy and when they were about to surrender decided not to, based a lot upon what was happening in the American streets. I believe that the protesting in that war prolonged the war and cost more American lives. Hanoi Jane should have been tried for treason. That being said...lessons were not learned and the protestors are doing the exact same thing now. Exercising the very right bought for them by shedding of American military blood. And I still say common courtesy should keep people out of the streets and off the TV until the military are home safe. But it just proves the same thing to me over and over...the selfISHhness of the protestors vs. the selfLESSness of the military. They continue to put it all on the line for your right to protest anything you want to protest...it is up to YOU to decide where and when that is appropriate, and it is up to you to take the heat for same. It is up to me and others like me (in my opinion) to apply that heat. Go ahead and do whatever your conscience or lack thereof moves you to do. But do not expect those of a different mind not to protest the protest.
Thanks for the post. I think I will look up that
article.
And thanks for pointing out all the other "results" of his administration that, as you say, benefit nobody but the rich and/or the corporations or, as he himself once publicly bragged, "his base."
I know for a fact that when he ran for President in 2000, I told every single person I knew that if he becomes President, we're going to go to war with Iraq. (Nobody's gonna treat his daddy like Saddam did and get away with it.)
I didn't have a crystal ball. I had common sense and a good memory from the Gulf War when his father was President and how he didn't "finish the job." Seems a lot of other Americans forgot about that.
I really enjoyed reading your post and all the facts you raised that I failed to raise in mine. Thanks for the mention of the LA Times article. I'm going to try to look that up on the web. 
I know they don't. I said that in my post. NM
//
Actually, that post is right on. sm
You sound like a total lunatic, out of control and full of hatred. You sound like someone who could do just what "vs" says. You had best take a look at your behavior. YOUR posts are the ones who should be reported. You are one frightening person.
Re your post
From your post:
"Did you read Mein Kampf? Would that be good enough evidence for you, because he wrote about it in there."
Wrote about what? That the Jews were socialists?
This is an entirely different post.
Really wasn't directed to you anyhow.
|
