Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Hello. Early polls ARE the first phase of the election.

Posted By: Accountability. What are you talking about? sm on 2008-11-03
In Reply to: It absolutely should not count -- if she's gonna - help put this man in office, sm

These are Americans. They were alive when they voted. A vote is a vote is a vote is a vote. They evidently took their citizenship very seriously. They should be afforded at least the respect to be taken seriously and be counted along with the rest of us. You, on the other hand...would you say this about your own mother or daughter? What is wrong with you?


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

May see an erosion of Dem support as early as 2010 election cycle.
Rasmussen is already showing some evidence of this as a generic Republican is beating a generic Democrat now by 2 points, rather than losing by 6 points as his poll showed a few weeks ago.

The best evidence of this in 2010 will not necessarily be Republican victories, although it might happen. The evidence will be that Democrats in "stronghold" districts will have to fight for their lives to get reelected and will have much smaller margins than they're used to. Others might have opposition from their own party and have to deal with a primary fight they're not used to.

I'm rather glad that the media and the Democrats have treated the tea-party phenomenon with such scorn and contempt. I'd rather that they continue to underestimate the opposition to what they're doing, and overestimate their own popularity. They will discover that the support of the American voter has never been something you can take for granted.

The Democrats are now in the process of doing just what the Republicans did in allowing the extreme elements of the party to take over and, just as voters showed the Republicans the error of doing this, the voters will teach the Democrats the same lesson. Hence, the pendulum.
Polls mean nothing. Wait till election day, to see who wins.

and "the polls" said Kerry was winning on election night
but you probably still think those polls were correct, so I just wasted my breath.
dem stacked polls mean nothing...wait till the election and we'll see....nm

Typical of the honeymoon phase. nm
x
If you believe in polls good for you - The King of Polls said
So the polls only poll a few small areas with certain demographics. You trust that. Sure maybe they only poll Hollyweird and the other liberal cities. They also reflect all the phone voter registrations, so maybe to your cat and cartoon characters it matters that Obama is ahead. Me - I'll wait for election day to find out the truth about who is ahead in the race. I've said it before and I'll say it again (and glad to know Mr. Rassmusin backs me up on this one) - polls do not matter and do not reflect a real vision of who is ahead in the race.
The polls that supply that electoral map are just that....polls...sm
Polls mean less than nothing to me. Polls intimidate and mislead the voters, in my opinion. Thanks for asking.



I think it's too early to tell
He's only been in a couple weeks. Too early to tell. We hear stories here and there, but he needs more time. I voted for him, but I do not have a lot of confidence in him. I always remind myself that he is not the one making decisions, he just does what he is told to do. I don't think he's gotten a good start though.

I think Obama has the same "mesmerizing" type of quality that Bill Clinton did when he would give speeches. Someone who was invited to the white house once when Bill Clinton was president said that Mr. Clinton had the ability to mesmerize his audiences almost like in a hypnotizing or trance-like state. He said that he looked around the room at the people listening to the President and they were in a sort of trance. Mr. Clinton had a way of lying to the people but they didn't care and they smiles and said Thank god Mr. Clinton is our president. When asked about the lies he told, they answered with "so what, I don't care." That is the same road I'm seeing Mr. Obama take. He's able to hypnotize his audiences to a point that he lies to them and they don't care. They still will smile and say it's okay.

As for losing or gaining support I think it all depends on whether you support him or not. If you voted for him and are a die-hard Obama fan you will say he's gaining support and everyone else is just picking on him. But if you don't support Obama you will say he's losing support.

I don't think he's had a very good start to the office - just the stuff he's done like who he is picking for his cabinet, the stimulus bill he came out and approved and basically threatened congress and put out the fear that if they don't vote for it we will head into depression, etc, etc., but I do believe we really need to give the guy some more time. Maybe in 6 months lets come back and see how he's done over the first 6 months.
He was born too early ...
If you read through the articles, you'll see that he was actually born before the law went into effect stating that people born in the Panama Canal zone were natural born citizens. Thus, he is not.

I'm sure the RNC felt that it was just a technicality that would never be called out.

I fear if this Obama stuff continues, it will be. And we'll be left with no candidates to vote for.
Too early to ask this. Palin has not said SHE is
nm
This was in the late 70s early 80s
As far as I know, none of my friends slept with these students. One of the guys used to come up to our hometown and spend the night and never ever acted like he was interested in "conquering" my friend or I. We were all just friends. maybe the times were different?
Got a call early this morning, was
not truly awake when I answered the phone, and my stepson stationed in Japan gave me the dreadful news, news I NEVER wanted to hear...he is going to Iraq.  My husband was not here when I received this horrifying news, he was working the midnight shift.  My stepson said not to tell his dad, that he would tell him.  So here I am, with husband now sleeping, and he still does not know that his son is nearing the time of deployment to this God-awful, senseless, maniacal, perverted, ill-fated, unjustifiable war in Iraq where innocent Iraqis by one hundred thousand and American by the thousands are dying because WHY???? Someone please give me an unabashed truthful, reasonable answer as to WHY we are even there?!  You must know that when the Bush admin even started talking about invading Iraq, I was 100 percent against it. I knew our presence there would only enrage, create a hornet's nest of more terrorists and fanatics, and lead to devastation for WHAT!?  To get rid of Saddam, to get the oil, to enrich Halliburton?!  None are good enough reasons to kill people.  This murdering bunch of thugs who are *elitists* sitting on their money, getting richer on the lives and deaths of our American troops....It's all too much for me.  As I said, I have been against this war before troops were even deployed, and my son has to go....very very sad day for us.  I pray for all those have gone before my son, and pray to the dear Lord that this will all end soon.  God forgive this prez for all the killing and misery he has caused for nothing, NO THING!
Poll: Early in the game but.sm

Who will get the Democratic nomination, and who will that person pick for a running mate?


Who will get the Republican nomination, and who will that person pick as a running mate?


Winner gets a 22K gold-plated crystal ball, and the top position on Wall Street..!!!l


Too early to tell, but this looks like a good start! =)
nm
Wow. They let the loons out early this morning.
Either way, it is doubtful he is racist against his other half.
The paragraph about early retirement

That's where DH is. Forced to retire because of no work (road construction). The stimulus money went to 2 cities in my state. The rest of the state got nothing towards road construction or very little.


We didn't get last year's stimulus check because we owed taxes and they put the money towards that. Now he's getting screwed out of the $250 because he wasn't retired when this happened. Never fails.


Remember that cartoon of the guy always under the grey cloud? That's us.


Plan was made in early 1990's
The top neocons, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Perle were mulling invading the Middle East back in the early 1990's.  In the minutes of their meetings, they state they have to find a reason to invade, that Americans would not allow a war without a reason.  They got their reason with 9/11 and twisted the truth, lying and trying to convince the people, as they are still doing, that 9/11 and Iraq and Saddam are somehow connected.  These plans were set over 10 years ago.  It was and is for control of the Middle East and it's oil.  Funny thing happened, though, on the way to a war where the Iraqi's would meet our soldiers in the street with flowers, the Iraqi's didnt and the terrorists started multiplying and meeting our soldiers in the streets with bombs and guns..and with this war, what do we have to show for it?  An Iraqi constitution?  Oh please, based on Islamic law, not democracy.  Less rights for women than they had under Saddam.  Less rights for minorities.  An ancient country ravaged and destroyed by Bush's war.  People too afraid to venture outside, electricity, if you are lucky for an hour a few times a week, dirty water which they bathe in, drink, clean clothing and dishes in, tens of thousands dead, tens of thousands more maimed, no doubt psychological trauma for the Iraqi children for the rest of their lives..oil pipe lines being blown up..and that was supposed to pay for this war..All of this..FOR WHAT?  What the heck was this all for..Bush ought to be tried as a criminal..and he just might be in the future.
He peaked too early and is now unraveling. His downfall..

was not picking Hilliary and now I'm sure he regrets it.


Early "sex education" is not what some people are...sm
making it out to be.  It is actually teaching children of all ages, as early as kindergarten, to learn what is and is not acceptable behavior of adults toward them, that they should not hesitate to say no, yell, run away and tell, when anyone is inappropriate, especially in a sexual way, or makes them feel uncomfortable.  That is all.  Elizabeth Smart's father Ed Smart advocates the same thing.  Many, many children are traumatized every year because they are afraid to speak out when something like that happens.  I was one of them many years ago.  You might say that that is the parents' job.  I agree.  My mother did not warn me and I wish she had to say the least.  This criticism of Barak Obama is totally unwarranted, mostly made by republicans who jump the gun and do not get all the facts first. Shame on you!
She;s right, it is serious. There was one student from England who voted early...sm
in Ohio. I would definitely call that voter fraud, wouldn't you?

Heaven knows what they'll find out when they finally get down to it.


Acorn is really messing things up for everybody, both parties included. No matter who takes Ohio, obviously, there's going to be fraud going on. Not to mention all the other states with the same problem.



And before you go off on the fact that the link is from FoxNews below....try to remember the facts, that none of the other networks will cover this....because they're all in the tank for Obama.




http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/10-16-2008/0004905682&EDATE=
Brunner (dem)started this whole problem with early
nm
Early voting down here in the Lone Star and already
trying to mislead democratic voters.  Hmmmm.
Early studies show that regular smokers of pot, (don't know...sm
how regular regular is), seem to have less incidence of Alzheimer disease. If true, an interesting tidbit I thought.
Media in the tank for O,early voting in Ohio
nm
You're a tad early in your post. It's still 17 days today..
ho hum....boring....
Take a look at these polls.sm
Just to give you an idea, take Denver's Rocky Mountain News poll (the state is very conservative) below, and look at the results. Almost every poll I have seen shows large percentages of Americans think the same way as the theorists.

http://blogs.rockymountainnews.com/denver/rockytalklive/archives/2006/08/the_government_and_911_2.html#more

Here is another one from Ed Schultz at Air America with a 50/50 split.

http://www.wegoted.com/index.asp
Polls
Make that alter-ego. Changing names according to post content = literary license. I'm sure you've heard of it before, being so intimately acquainted with the literary world and all. Makes things a bit more intriguing. Enables one to dial back rabid mad-dog rhetoric.

Case in point. You don't launch into your "5-paragraph volleys" unless you think you are talking to GT. As BW, I enjoy the luxury of not having to drag out an entire arsenal of put-downs just to make myself understood, since you can’t quite figure out who you are talking to. Usually I am pretty good about revealing the aliases eventually, but not always. That is another prerogative of free speech.

BTW, when you lift content and ideas from somebody else's post, it's customary to use quotes. Disciple? Shades of the gospel according to Saint Hannity. Another suggestion would be that when you plagiarize thought or content, at least be careful not to put it into responses addressed to the original author.

Yes, Congress has a lower rating than Bush. He wields a powerful weapon that empowers him to obstruct, stall and reverse any sort of viable legislative initiatives. It's called the veto pen. In this last session, he has used it 8 times but Congress has managed to override him on 4 of those vetoes. They at have at least shown more ability than Bush to cross the aisle and engage themselves in effective bipartisan initiatives and convince them to vote against their fearless leader.

You and the pubs make no excuses for being too inept at reaching consensus (a decidedly American concept). Obstruction, stalling and reversals are akin to dodges, deceive and deflections. They are the strategies used by petty dictators and their parties in a setting of “might makes right,” that divide and conquer approach, rather than taking the high road and exerting the effort or harboring the desire to create a representative government body. Bipartisanship has never been his forte anyway. No surprise there.

Polls are interesting, but not terribly reliable, given the problems that arise when you start to consider the source, sift through bias, skewing and the like. More than likely, the polls offer the most reliable reflection of public opinion would be the approval ratings of the candidates, not that status quo that is destined to be decimated come November. Most dems are just about as frustrated with the whole mess as you are. On that we can agree. But my take on approval ratings, at least in terms the current state of affairs in Congress and the executive branch, is that the low numbers reflect a much more deep-seated frustration and anger toward being lied to about the war and the incalculable costs in terms of human life as well as tax dollars, the state of the economy and the perception that nobody anywhere is doing anything, typical of a lame duck in a campaign year. The nation as a whole is in a really bad mood, to be sure. They simply don't approve of anything, at the moment.

More than likely, this will play itself with a major overhaul on both sides of the aisle. Who comes out on top in Congress in terms of numbers is anybody’s guess.

Polls are even at 42%
per a CBS poll taken on Wednesday, so this does not include Palin's speech or McCain's acceptance speech. 
Polls & More

Remember, this is the party that prides itself on being "tolerant."  Yeah, sure.  How tolerant have they been of anything a conservative has to say?  This why they lie in wait here, so the few times I even bother to take the time (more like waste it) to post something, I try to make the subject line not stand out as a "right-winger" view.


This board is no better than DailyKos, HuffingtonPost, etc.  Go to those sites and see how well the libs behave. I look at this forum very seldom now after seeing what the bulk of my industry thinks and how totally nasty they behave.  They make having a cat fight look like a tea party.


While polls mean almost nothing to me, Rasmussen is a very reputable one.  Below is from Media Resarch Center (excellent; Bret Bozell, Libertarian).  Included in the article are links for a great deal of info for anyone interested.  Nasty posts, etc. mean nothing to me, so do as you please.  I've made my pitstop here for the day (or week), and see that each time I look here it's only gotten more nasty.


**********************************************************************************************
A new Rasmussen poll of 1,000 likely voters shows that by a
stunning five-to-one margin, Americans believe the media
are actively trying to help Barack Obama win the Presidential
Election.

The new poll comes on the heels of last week's survey that
discovered by a margin of 10 to 1, the public believes the
media are trying to hurt Republican Vice Presidential
nominee Sarah Palin.

Shockingly, Democrats and "unaffiliated" voters both believe
that journalists are attempting to help Obama.

For the complete CyberAlert report:

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10831&RID=16855646


Much has been made of Barack Obama's "lipstick on a pig" remark,
but few, if any worked harder to run cover for Democrat
Presidential hopeful more than MSNBC’s Chris Matthews, who
questioned if the comment "insults...everyone's intelligence?"

But did Matthews insult his viewers' intelligence on Monday,
when he accused Palin and Rudy Guiliani of using coded racist
language when they referred to Obama’s experience as a
"community organizer?"

For the full CyberAlert report:

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10832&RID=16855646

Is CNN the talking parrot on the shoulder of the Democrat Party?

A closer look reveals the "best political team on television"
parroting the Democrats dismal view of the economy by mimicking
the claim that the Republicans are shying away from the issue.
In fact, in true parrot form, CNN repeated the charge at least
12 times during its September 4 coverage.

For the complete Business & Media Institute report:

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10833&RID=16855646


Haven't yet signed up for The Business & Media Institute's Balance
Sheet? It’s a free, weekly e-mail newsletter auditing media coverage
of business and economic issues. Packed with analysis of the top
issues in the news from a free-market perspective, it is essential
reading for everyone who wants to know what the media aren't
telling you.

The Balance Sheet also delivers expert commentary and links to
valuable resources. Click here to sign up:

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10834&RID=16855646

P.S: MRC's exclusive, special report "Obama's Margin of Victory:
The Media" is shipping. If you haven't yet reserved your copy
of this 60 page booklet that shines the white-hot light on the
media's overt role in Obama's meteoric rise to prominence do so
now by clicking here:

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10835&CID=500&RID=16855646


********
MRC News Report
09/11/08
********

***Brent Bozell's Syndicated Columns

MSNBC's Doomed 'Experiment'

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10836&RID=16855646

Toxic Beverly Hills

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10837&RID=16855646


***CNSNews.com

Passage of Year Makes Petraeus Look Good, Congressional Critics Look Bad

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10838&RID=16855646

Moms Say Palin Is Role Model for All Women

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10839&RID=16855646

Chavez Hails End of ‘Yankee Hegemony’ As Russian Bombers Arrive

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10840&RID=16855646

Palin Stars at Virginia Rally, Then Heads Home

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10841&RID=16855646

Biden's Bishop Seeks Prayers to Help Biden Become Pro-Life

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10842&RID=16855646

Democrat Leader Raises Specter of Government Shutdown over Oil Drilling

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10843&RID=16855646


***MRC.org

By 5-to-1 Public Thinks Most Journalists Trying to Elect Obama

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10844&RID=16855646

Matthews: Obama's 'Pig' Not Sexist, 'Community Organizer' Racist

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10845&RID=16855646

CNN Labels Palin's Environmental Stances 'Outside the Mainstream'

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10846&RID=16855646

'Non-Partisan' Liberal Group's Critique of Palin Cited by CNN

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10847&RID=16855646

ABC's Brian Ross Highlights Angry Librarians Opposed to Palin

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10848&RID=16855646

MSNBC Hosts Mock and Distort Prayer Request by Sarah Palin

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10849&RID=16855646

CBS Highlights Dem's Anti-Palin Plea: 'We've Got to Go After Her'

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10850&RID=16855646

NYT's Herbert: "Arch-Conservative" Clarence Thomas' "Self-Hatred"

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10851&RID=16855646

Couric Uses sex Scandal to Show Bush Admin 'Close' to Big Oil

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10852&RID=16855646


***Culture and Media Institute

Newsweek's Female Columnists Pile on Palin

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10853&RID=16855646

The Cost of Killing Palinzilla

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10854&RID=16855646

Palin Heat Threatens Planet

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10855&RID=16855646

Crude MTV Award Host Mocks Palin, Purity

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10856&RID=16855646

Stop the Presses! Palin's Church Holds to Bible's Teaching on
Homosexuality!

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10857&RID=16855646


***TimesWatch.org

Public Editor Says Palin Coverage Fair, Parenting Angle "Legitimate"

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10858&RID=16855646

Obama's Terrorist Colleague Bill Ayers Makes Cameo in Story on Education

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10859&RID=16855646

Rev. Jeremiah Wright Compares Obama to Virgin Mary -- Times Doesn't Blink

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10860&RID=16855646

Seelye Shrugs Off Dem. Ed Rendell's "Big Lie" Smear of McCain

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10861&RID=16855646

Bob Herbert Unleashed: "Arch-Conservative" Clarence Thomas's "Self-Hatred"

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10862&RID=16855646


***Business and Media Institute - businessandmedia.org

CNN Parrots Dems on Republicans and Economy

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10863&RID=16855646

Greenspan: Recession Still ཮ Percent or More' Likely

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10864&RID=16855646

Media Error Causes Steep Loss for United Airlines

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10865&RID=16855646

ABC: Manmade Global Warming Causing Worse Allergies

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10866&RID=16855646

CEO: Fannie/Freddie Bailout Makes America 'More Communist than China'

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10867&RID=16855646


***NewsBusters.org

Covering for Dems: NYT Reporter Certain Obama's 'Pig' Wasn't Palin

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10868&RID=16855646

WaPo Religion Blogger Attacks Sarah Palin's Religion

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10869&RID=16855646

MRC's Bozell Discusses 'Lipstick' Smear, MSNBC Meltdown on 'Fox & Friends'

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10870&RID=16855646

Mitchell: Obama 'Clearly' Wasn't Talking About Palin

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10871&RID=16855646

Joe Klein: 'Obama is the precise opposite of Mountain Man Todd Palin'

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10872&RID=16855646

Former Time Columnist Unveils New Obama Spokesman: Buckwheat

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10873&RID=16855646


***Worst of The Week

The Trashing of Sarah Palin

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10874&RID=16855646

*** NewsBusted

For a Lighter Look at the News:  Watch the Latest Episode of NewsBusted!

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10875&RID=16855646

***Eyeblast.tv

For the best in video, check out Eyeblast.tv!

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10876&RID=16855646

+   +  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +  +  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +
(Note: Please do not reply directly to this e-mail message. This
e-mail address is not designed to receive your personal messages.
To contact the Media Research Center with comments, questions or
to change your status, see the link at the end of this e-mail.)
+   +  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +  +  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +

+ + Comments? Questions?

http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10877&RID=16855646

+ + + + +

The Media Research Center is a research and education organization
operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Contributions are tax-deductible for income tax purposes.


How much do you believe polls?
Yahoo had some info on the Rasumussen Polls and I went to their website to check it out: www.rasmussenreports.com

They have an electoral college page that shows the current "vote" at 248-163 in favor of Obama. I'm going to have to do some research and see how accurate polls were in previous presidential elections. They have it broken down by state and it is pretty interesting, if numbers are your thing!

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/election_2008_electoral_college_update
For all who believe in polls

I don't believe in polls but a lot of posters like to use them to try to make some sort of point....


Today's Gallup poll (one of the most trusted) - Obama 49, McCain 47 -


Like I say....way to close to predict a winner.  I also heard some students after last nights debate that said they were still undecided said if they had to vote right now they'd choose McCain.  Goes to show not every single person/young person voting Obama.


polls
Thanks, it is

49.5 for Obama
42.7 for McCain.

Obama is 6.8 points ahead.
Well, actually there are polls to confirm this
I don't believe the word "sick" was part of the poll but it comes pretty darn close to the majority of America's current view of this administration and this war.
These polls are so fickle.

Up and down, up and down. 


I just don't know if he can stand the heat.  I have so far not been impressed with Obama.  Right now it seems that people are using him against a Hillary vote and not necessarily for anything he says or stands for.  Is it just me, or does the man lack conviction or passion of any kind?  He doesn't ever really say anything of substance and not very good at defending what positions he has taken a stand on.  I'm not sure if I want someone of so little experience as President. 


This is how I would like to see it play out:  HIllary elected and breaks some of the ice by implanting some changes followed up by either Edwards or Obama at the next election to implement more changes.  I say this because I believe people inherently don't like change and they especially don't like fast change.  So if Obama or Edwards were to beat out Hillary and try to implement such sweeping changes, I don't think those changes could sustain themselves.  Obama doesn't strike me as being very forceful and may buckle, and Edwards comes across as too forceful and I think would have trouble during their administrations amongst their peers.


I don't put much stock in polls....
however, McCain is the first to break the 50% mark. And I trust Gallup and rasmussen more than I trust Fox polls, CNN polls or other media outlet polls. Although CBS did show McCain with a lead too. Still, it is encouraging, and a pretty big whoop...lol
If polls are samples of what is to come...
that is very good for McCain. Still ahead in the popular vote and making big gains in swing states. So...great. If polls are a sample of what is to come...it is good news for McCain.
Polls as of today....
Gallup:
Gallup Daily: McCain 47%, Obama 45%

McCain retains a three-point advantage for the third straight day, 50% to 47% (see recent daily results).

Real Clear Politics
RCP Average 09/05 - 09/13 -- McCain 47.5 Obama 45.2 McCain +2.3

McCain has also diminished Obama's lead in many of the "swing states" and is even within 2 points in Pennsylvania, which is unheard of. Pennsylvania nearly always goes democratic. McCain leads in Ohio. He has gone into the lead in New Mexico and Nevada. That has been steady for several days now.

All that being said...the polls said Kerry should have won many states handily...but he didn't. Polls can be very misleading. We won't know until election night...although this is the first time in how long that a Republican was leading in the polls at this point?

It is a very interesting campaign, that's for darned sure.
Polls are usually wrong. I don't put much
<>
latest polls

SP sinking . . . losing her "oh look at the shiny new object" diversionary value.  Obama on the upswing . . . and these were before the latest financial fiasco which McCain and Gramm had a hand in by deregulating financial institutions.


 


latest polls
Obama up in swing states FL and PA due to financial crisis. 
Polls don't mean didly
Unless you only keep track of them when your candidate is up. However, don't know where you got this poll, because the one I saw today said FL is very tight with McCain leading by 4%. They also added not to get to comfortable with that because polls change on an hourly basis. But in all the polls they put up there McCain was ahead by at least 4 points or more in most of the states. But like I say, polls are polls and they don't mean diddly.
If your going to go by polls then use more than just the ones that favors
As of today - Taken from polling websites and CNN

Gallup -
Obama 47, McCain 44

Rassmussen -
Obama 38, McCain 58

Battleground Tracking - Obama 46, McCain 48

American Research Group - Obama 41, McCain 53

In Ohio CNN poll gives McCain a 3 point lead (48-45)

In NC McCain has a 10-point lead

In Indiana McCain has a 6 point lead

Wisconsin has voted for dems in the last four elections, this time Obama only has a 3 point lead

My point is whether McCain or Obama is ahead it doesn't mean diddly and by posting only the polls which favor your candidate while ruling out the others is just another spread of propaganda and does not validate your claims.
Polls mean nothing. Don't trust them. - sm
Polls have always been used by the media to sway people to vote one way or the other. I have no idea how they can even count them as reputible. The real poll is when people vote and I have never heard anyone say that they are voting a certain way because of the polls. What we are hearing on the news is made up to fit whichever news station you ware watching and from what I see and read on the internet the polls change hourly.
I'll believe polls when
I see how many illegals are in them.
I too do not put much faith in polls.
Did these polls have John Kerry ahead at this time during the last election.  They also showed the Nixon was ahead of Kennedy.  We will find out when we find out.  Just go vote for who you think is best and hope for the best.
The polls are not accurate...
slanted for obama like everything else the liberal media tells you. People (myself included) tend to believe what they want to believe
Yeah? I saw polls where they were only

2 points away from each other. I've seen polls where they were 5 points away all in the same day.


Don't count on the polls for the decision and I don't think you should be so smug about it. He may still lose. Then what are you going to say?


does anyone know anything about registering at the polls?
I just got a call from my daughter who lives in Arizona. She went to vote this morning and was told she was not registered, even though she has voted there before! So they went and had her register on site but then told her she could fill out a "provisional ballot" but that her vote would not count! What??? Does anyone know anything about provisional ballots or the whole "registering at the polls situation? Please, reliable info only. No bashing! I would appreciate it. Thanks in advance.
Well, when you look at the national polls
and see that 37% of Americans are in favor of the bill, I guess you can say that *most* people don't want this stimulus!
i dont believe those polls
How do u know those polls, any of them can be trusted?  You don't. 
again, I really dont believe ANY of those polls.
It's kinda like how they were saying our economy is fine but we all could feel that it wasn't.