No, 'militance' IS implied
Posted By: .- on 2009-05-26
In Reply to: The term 'fundamentalist' - Agreed
in the term 'radical fundamentalism', these are those who defend Islam using weapons and physically hurting people.
Sorry, the screen moved to the left and is covered, so I cannot see the typos I am making, sorry....
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
No, 'militance' IS implied
in the term 'radical fundamentalism', these are those who defend Islam using weapons and physically hurting people.
Sorry, the screen moved to the left and is covered, so I cannot see the typos I am making, sorry....
I never implied that everything was
the fault of smokers. Good grief. I'm just tired of the IN YOUR FACE aspect of the government freeloaders.
Less taxes would go a long way towards helping people like me. We don' t need new programs that will just make it easier for the freeloaders to continue on with their sweet, sweet deal.
I don't think you implied
I think you outright stated Republicans are not necessary to democracy:
the quicker their extinction. YEA 
are you implying that is what she implied?
i don't get your post, it kind of came from left field...
Gender is implied in the name
the females are peahens!
First of all, I never implied that there should be only one system s/m
this is just another example of you guys taking words and twisting them into something sinister. Obviously you didn't listen to the President's speech last night. He made it very clear he wants to get rid of the the banks' dependence on the government and allow them to run once again independently. YOU DON'T LISTEN! And did I say I did not want democracy? NO!! What I am talking about that the way the GOP is now is going down the toilet. They need to update their philosophies to correlate with the 21st century instead of the 19th century. A poster on here a couple of days ago made a statement about the Republicans allowing the Evangelicals run the party -- that is what is killing it and will continue a slow demise if that is allowed to continue to happen. You people are in total denial about what is really happening to your own party, except for the few people who don't have their heads up their behinds and are trying to distance themselves from that extremist faction, which unfortunately, seems to be very prevalent on this board..
No, but you implied I was lying and kept hammering....
so YOU could celebrate a victory. I gave you what you wanted, and the subject changed. Yes, McCain has a refundable tax credit for health insurance. Is it aimed at a specific income group? No. Does it eliminate anyone's tax liability? No it doesn't. It isn't welfare.
Obama's refundable tax cut says specifically it will eliminate federal taxes for 10 million low income workers. People who heretofore WERE paying taxes, you have assured me repeatedly. Taxing "the rich" more to make up for that loss of revenue is marxist redistribution of wealth. There is nothing remotely like that in McCain's tax plan. It is basically welfare...giving a tax credit to eliminate taxes and making up the lost revenue by taxing others who make more.
You explain to me how that is NOT redistribution of wealth. He said it himself. Spreading the wealth. At least he IS honest about it.
|
